What do you think?
Rate this book
259 pages, Kindle Edition
First published September 6, 2017
If he’d been their age, it would’ve been labeled innocent fun. Playing doctor. It wasn’t as if he’d forced himself on them. He hadn’t. They’d been the ones to touch first. I didn’t blame the girls, though. It wasn’t their fault. They had no idea what they were doing. None. Their touch and exploration was completely innocent. Nothing sexual about it, but it hadn’t been innocent for Noah, and he wasn’t their age, which made it a crime. I understood that, but their lives weren’t going to be ruined forever. They just weren’t. But, the world wouldn’t be satisfied until they’d annihilated him. He was more of a victim than those girls, but society would never see it that way. They saw it as him getting what he deserved.
All he did was touch the girls. There was no penetration or insertion of any kind ... He’d touched them, and they’d touched him. That’s all. It didn’t make it right. It was disgusting and wrong, but he didn’t physically hurt them. Not even close to how he’d been brutalized and stripped of his dignity.
I understood his shock and the horror. What Noah did was abhorrent, but he was our son. No matter what he’d done, he was still our son. I couldn’t sever my love for him any more than I could cut off my arm.
hhhhhhh. Oh, I have feelings about this one.
First off, it's very well written and researched (on both the psychological and the legal fronts). The author handles everything with tact and sympathy, and nothing is made gratuitous or used for shock factor. If you think you can stomach the heavy subject matter and feel intrigued by the premise, then by all means you should read it; in some matters, it was enlightening, and a heavy tale about the love of a mother for her children.
I wouldn't classify it as a thriller. Generally, I dislike thrillers, especially when they throw in some stupid twist at the end. This book did have a twist, but I didn't mind it so much because it was 1. Relevant (it changed the meaning behind quite a few chapters and relationships) 2. Well-written and foreshadowed (all the hints were there, and I noticed a few of them as I read them, such as ) and 3. Effective (I didn't see it coming; I was impressed, from a literary standpoint. Well done).
But I didn't get the point. Especially of that twist. What the hell??? Why does it matter that ? Was the author trying to imply that
And, oh... I wasn't okay with the end resolution, regarding Adrienne and Noah's choice. I think if it were any other kind of book, I'd be like, "Okay, this was the decision that was right for THEM; I can accept that." But since this is such a rare and taboo perspective, it almost has to speak for all such cases. Does the author believe that all As a mentally ill lesbian, that leaves a bad taste in my mouth. There are people who think that about people like me, too. What was the point of setting Noah up as such a sympathetic protagonist if you were just going to ? Surely there's better options than that for people like him.
Like some reviewers, I was also frustrated by Adrienne's mindset. She kept acting like literal child molestation was just "a mistake" that could be remedied. It may have been realistic... Plenty of parents have defended their children for worse crimes. What would I do if someone I loved was charged with something so heinous? I don't know! I hope I never have to find out!
But it was frustrating that she couldn't see how much risk she was putting people in. Leaving her seven-year-old daughter with a known, offending pedophile specifically attracted to girls in that age-range? Sending Noah back to school like everything will be fine, and then feeling shocked when people beat the shit out of him?!
Rape is never, ever, ever okay. Prison rape is not okay. Rape jokes are never funny. I'm speaking here as someone who has been sexually assaulted! I have dumped friends for making prison rape jokes. We as a society cannot turn our backs on sexual assault, even if it happens to the worst of criminals, or we're literally saying "Rape is sometimes an acceptable thing to do to other human beings, if we decide they deserve it." But it's still prevalent, because it's something that actually happens, and Adrienne knows this, and yet she's still shocked every time her son is assaulted!
There's a difference between being optimistic and being a blind idiot! If you love your damn kids so much, lady, protect them. (And the way she broke the news to the victim's parents was in really poor taste. Inviting them over to dinner to talk about it casually?! "Oh hi, Cheryl. Can you pass the salad? By the way, my son molested your daughter. Can you pass the dressing?" Lady. Please.)
I think I feel this frustrated because... It feels possible. I can imagine a loving parent behaving this way, thinking this way. The way she compares Noah to other teenage sex offenders and thinks he's "better" than them? That's a totally realistic mom-thing to do. And it's frustrating as hell! Stop it!
Noah, a teenage pedophile, is more aware of his situation than his mother. He reaches for help again and again, saying "I am a pedophile and I am not safe; if I have the opportunity to hurt children, I will do it. I need someone to stop me." How much clearer can he make it?! Why is nobody listening to him?! (I did appreciate the distinction the author made. Most instances of child sexual abuse are not the result of pedophilia. Pedophilia, the actual attraction to children, is quite rare. Most cases of CSA happen because children are vulnerable; not because predatory people are specifically attracted to them. Most people won't care to make that distinction, but it does matter in handling and preventing cases of CSA.)
Here's the thing about people, whether they're criminals or pimps or slavers or traffickers or rapists or pedophiles or terrorists or murderers or Nazis or anything else on the planet: they are human and they have human feelings and human families and favorite flavors of ice cream and favorite songs on the radio and they probably thought that baby panda video on Facebook was just as cute as you did. That does not justify or excuse what they do. But when we classify other humans as "incomprehensible monsters," we distance ourselves from them. And we can't do that, because it gives us a mental get-out-of-jail free card. It leaves us free to say, "well, sure, I did this horrible thing, but I'm not like THEM. I'm a person. They're barely even human." It's important to understand the "them" of this world, and to realize the capacity for good and evil each human, ourselves included, possesses. We are our actions.
I thought this book was well-written, and I'll probably read it again soon. It did bring tears to my eyes twice. I felt a lot of emotions reading this. This author is clearly very talented, and I want to read more of her work soon.