Aggiungi una trama nella tua linguaA young American man comes to believe that he can will himself back to London in the time of the American Revolution and meet his ancestors, who lived in the house he has just inherited.A young American man comes to believe that he can will himself back to London in the time of the American Revolution and meet his ancestors, who lived in the house he has just inherited.A young American man comes to believe that he can will himself back to London in the time of the American Revolution and meet his ancestors, who lived in the house he has just inherited.
- Candidato a 1 Oscar
- 1 vittoria e 2 candidature totali
- The American Ambassador
- (as Samuel Hinds)
- Innkeeper
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Town Crier
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
- Maid
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizS.T. Joshi points to this film as an inspiration for H.P. Lovecraft's novel "The Shadow Out of Time": "Lovecraft saw this film four times in late 1933; its portrayal of a man of the 20th century who somehow merges his personality with that of his 18th-century ancestor was clearly something that fired Lovecraft's imagination, since he had written a story on this very theme himself--the then unpublished "The Case of Charles Dexter Ward" (1927)." Lovecraft called the film "the most weirdly perfect embodiment of my own moods and pseudo-memories that I have ever seen--for all my life I have felt as if I might wake up out of this dream of an idiotic Victorian age and insane jazz age into the sane reality of 1760 or 1770 or 1780." Lovecraft noted some conceptual problems in this film's depiction of time travel, and felt that he had "eliminated these flaws in his masterful novella of mind-exchange over time."
- BlooperThe word Okay (OK) was not used in the 18th century.
- Citazioni
Peter Standish: A new Fire of London, that's what's needed here. Yes, and a new Plague too. Dirt, disease, cruelty, smells - Lord, how the eighteenth century stinks!
- ConnessioniReferenced in Don't Bet on Blondes (1935)
- Colonne sonoreEarly One Morning
(uncredited)
English folk song
'Berkeley Square', adapted from a stage play by John Balderston which also happened to be inspired by a Henry James story, had its really interesting premise going for it. Also wanted to see how the role and performance of Peter Standish Howard created on stage would fare on film, being too young to see him for myself. There was a slight worry with it being adapted from a stage play, and not all plays have translated well to film with traps of being too talky, stage bound and compact. Found 'Berkeley Square' a very good film and deserving of more credit despite it being fondly remembered, the same goes for its remake 'The House in the Square' (or 'I Will Never Forget You'). It deserves to be more wildly available, with it still not being the easiest film to find, and although what is available makes do it is in need of a restoration.
The film doesn't quite overcome the potential problem of being too talky and wordy. The dialogue is actually very intelligently written and maintains interest throughout, but there could have been a little less of it (some of it was also somewhat muffled), which would have tightened some of the pacing, which is mostly not a problem at all but occasionally creaks.
Do agree that the music, although beautifully lush music in its own right, is on the over-scored and somewhat intrusive side. That said, this is most likely due to the audio/sound which is not very balanced and can favour the music over the dialogue.
However, 'Berkeley Square' is a very handsome film on a visual level. It is immaculately photographed and the opulent period detail is also a delight, never does the setting feel compact. The music and dialogue quality by themselves, as said above, are fine, it's just the matter of them being better used and balanced. The story is charmingly quaint, always cohesive, with the time travel never suffering from choppy transitions (pretty smooth) and emotionally it can be quite moving. Especially at the end. Regarding how it translates on screen from the play, surprisingly it fares very well compared to a fair few stage to film adaptations around the same time. It is not static and the drama is opened up enough to not make it stage-bound.
Frank Lloyd's direction is suitably distinguished and he gets fine performances from the cast. In particular Howard in one of his best performances (deservedly Oscar-nominated), it is a very elegant and forceful performance that is equally poised and subtly nuanced in a way that is always riveting to watch. Angel is very charming and the two have a more than amiable chemistry together, likewise with Valerie Taylor. Mowbray and Beryl Mercer are strong support, as is an enjoyably arch Juliette Compton.
In conclusion, very good. 8/10
- TheLittleSongbird
- 12 mar 2019
- Permalink
I più visti
- How long is Berkeley Square?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 28 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 1.37 : 1