VALUTAZIONE IMDb
6,6/10
8564
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Un medico usa speciali colliri per darsi la visione a raggi X, ma il nuovo potere ha conseguenze disastrose.Un medico usa speciali colliri per darsi la visione a raggi X, ma il nuovo potere ha conseguenze disastrose.Un medico usa speciali colliri per darsi la visione a raggi X, ma il nuovo potere ha conseguenze disastrose.
- Premi
- 2 candidature
Diana Van der Vlis
- Dr. Diane Fairfax
- (as Diana van der Vlis)
Budd Albright
- Dance sequence
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Leon Alton
- Casino Patron
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Morris Ankrum
- Mr. Bowhead
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Benjie Bancroft
- Dealer
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
George DeNormand
- Medical Board Member
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
John Dierkes
- Preacher
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Bobby Gilbert
- Man Outside Office
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Stuart Hall
- Casino Patron
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Kathryn Hart
- Mrs. Mart
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Ed Haskett
- Casino Patron
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Jonathan Haze
- Heckler
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Harvey Jacobson
- Casino Boss
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Vicki Lee
- Young Girl Patient
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizTo create the effect of being able to see through a building, the director filmed the building while it was under construction.
- BlooperThe first X-ray that Dr. Xavier quizzes Dr. Fairfax with is a normal chest X-ray. There is no bullet on that film. Bullets show up very well on X-rays.
- Citazioni
Dr. Diane Fairfax: What do you see?
Dr. James Xavier: The city... as if it were unborn. Rising into the sky with fingers of metal, limbs without flesh, girders without stone. Signs hanging without support. Wires dipping and swaying without poles. A city unborn. Flesh dissolved in an acid of light. A city of the dead.
- Versioni alternativeThrough an apparent lab error, some of the 16mm U.S. television syndication prints had the ending credits in Spanish.
- ConnessioniEdited into Gli ultimi giorni dell'umanità (2022)
Recensione in evidenza
... in that a doctor makes a great discovery -in this case a formula that allows people to "see through" objects, starts out trying to do good, becomes his own guinea pig, becomes obsessed, becomes bitter because others do not see the importance of his discovery, and in the end just makes a bunch of stupid decisions. Oh, and the formula is cumulative and yet the doctor keeps taking it!
This film would be completely unmemorable without Ray Milland as the title character - Dr. Xavier. Like with his other horror films, independent producer/director Roger Corman smartly uses a lead from the golden age of Hollywood - in this case Milland - and builds a simple story that still strikes at the essence of fear in human beings.
There are a quite a few goofy and outright dumb things going on.When Xavier goes on the run because of a tragic accident, he ... decides to work as a "seer" in a carnival?? Isn't that one of the first places the police might come looking for him? In his quest for money to look for a "cure" for his situation, he decides to go to Vegas. And win a bunch of money in just one casino. And get a loud and obnoxious attitude about it. Maybe the most tragic thing about Xavier's situation is that he is inflicted with the company of Don Rickles during the mid part of the film.
The one fun and light hearted moment of the film is when Xavier is invited to a swinging 60s party and because of his unique condition sees naked people everywhere. Roger Corman will need to wait a few more years into the 60s before he can feature actual naked people. But I digress.
The special effects are laughable in the 21st century, but Milland's distinguished and empathetic presence makes this work. And it goes after the question - If you can see through EVERYTHING, what exactly DO you see?
This film would be completely unmemorable without Ray Milland as the title character - Dr. Xavier. Like with his other horror films, independent producer/director Roger Corman smartly uses a lead from the golden age of Hollywood - in this case Milland - and builds a simple story that still strikes at the essence of fear in human beings.
There are a quite a few goofy and outright dumb things going on.When Xavier goes on the run because of a tragic accident, he ... decides to work as a "seer" in a carnival?? Isn't that one of the first places the police might come looking for him? In his quest for money to look for a "cure" for his situation, he decides to go to Vegas. And win a bunch of money in just one casino. And get a loud and obnoxious attitude about it. Maybe the most tragic thing about Xavier's situation is that he is inflicted with the company of Don Rickles during the mid part of the film.
The one fun and light hearted moment of the film is when Xavier is invited to a swinging 60s party and because of his unique condition sees naked people everywhere. Roger Corman will need to wait a few more years into the 60s before he can feature actual naked people. But I digress.
The special effects are laughable in the 21st century, but Milland's distinguished and empathetic presence makes this work. And it goes after the question - If you can see through EVERYTHING, what exactly DO you see?
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is X: The Man with the X-Ray Eyes?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- X
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Queen of Angels Hospital - 2301 Bellevue Avenue, Los Angeles, California, Stati Uniti(Establishing shot of hospital.)
- Azienda produttrice
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 250.000 USD (previsto)
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 19 minuti
- Mix di suoni
- Proporzioni
- 1.85 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti
Divario superiore
By what name was L'uomo dagli occhi a raggi X (1963) officially released in India in English?
Rispondi