Una donna si trasferisce in un esclusivo condominio di New York City, dove ben presto scoprirà i segreti scioccanti degli altri inquilini.Una donna si trasferisce in un esclusivo condominio di New York City, dove ben presto scoprirà i segreti scioccanti degli altri inquilini.Una donna si trasferisce in un esclusivo condominio di New York City, dove ben presto scoprirà i segreti scioccanti degli altri inquilini.
- Premi
- 4 vittorie e 9 candidature
Melvyn Kinder
- Dr. Palme
- (as Dr. Melvyn Kinder)
José Rey
- Det. Corelli
- (as Jose Rey)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizWhile filming a kissing scene, Sharon Stone bit William Baldwin's tongue with such force that he couldn't talk properly for days afterwards.
- BlooperWhen Carly and Zeke are in the video room she takes his Walther PPKS 380 and fires a total of 14 shots, but the Walther PPKS only holds 7 bullets.
- Citazioni
Carly Norris: You've been spending too much time with your vibrator.
Judy Marks: I certainly have - I've been getting a plastic yeast infection!
- Versioni alternativeEuropean version features approx. four minutes of sex footage not present in R-rated US release (total running time 108 minutes) The longer version is available in the US as an unrated video.
- ConnessioniEdited into Sliver: Alternate Ending (1993)
Recensione in evidenza
I waited 18 years to see this movie because I had always heard how terrible it is. When it first came out, I seem to recall thinking it highly implausible that someone could have the kind of video and audio equipment you see in this movie. But the equipment and its use in the film is entirely plausible, even in 1993.
I found no problems with the plot. It's an interesting thriller with something that's hard to find--a unique story that hasn't been told a thousand times already. The acting is good. The characters and their actions are completely believable. I was never left thinking that a real person might not have done the things that the people in the movie did.
Having seen the movie, I really don't understand why so many people criticize it so harshly. In terms of telling a compelling, entertaining story, I would say it is far better than movies like Hereafter and on par with a movie like the Adjustment Bureau (just two recent movies I could think to compare it to).
If you haven't seen it, give it a chance.
I found no problems with the plot. It's an interesting thriller with something that's hard to find--a unique story that hasn't been told a thousand times already. The acting is good. The characters and their actions are completely believable. I was never left thinking that a real person might not have done the things that the people in the movie did.
Having seen the movie, I really don't understand why so many people criticize it so harshly. In terms of telling a compelling, entertaining story, I would say it is far better than movies like Hereafter and on par with a movie like the Adjustment Bureau (just two recent movies I could think to compare it to).
If you haven't seen it, give it a chance.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
Dettagli
- Data di uscita
- Paese di origine
- Lingua
- Celebre anche come
- Nhà Chọc Trời
- Luoghi delle riprese
- Aziende produttrici
- Vedi altri crediti dell’azienda su IMDbPro
Botteghino
- Budget
- 40.000.000 USD (previsto)
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 36.300.000 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 12.138.283 USD
- 23 mag 1993
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 116.300.000 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 47 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.35 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti