VALUTAZIONE IMDb
4,3/10
6319
LA TUA VALUTAZIONE
Una giovane donna scatena demoni terrificanti quando le forze soprannaturali alla base di una frattura decennale tra madre e figlia vengono spietatamente rivelate.Una giovane donna scatena demoni terrificanti quando le forze soprannaturali alla base di una frattura decennale tra madre e figlia vengono spietatamente rivelate.Una giovane donna scatena demoni terrificanti quando le forze soprannaturali alla base di una frattura decennale tra madre e figlia vengono spietatamente rivelate.
- Premi
- 2 candidature
Michael J Rogers
- Michael
- (as Michael J. Rogers)
Christopher Wardrop
- Detective
- (as Chris Froese)
Andrea Agur
- Cashier
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Nelson Conway
- Venatores soldier
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Emma Jonnz
- Dominique
- (non citato nei titoli originali)
Trama
Lo sapevi?
- QuizFilmed secretly in Canada over the course of the Covid-19 pandemic.
- BlooperWhen Carly is shown back home after the first interlink with her Mother she is in the kitchen with her back to the kitchen bench. You then hear the kettle whistling to tell you it's at its boil. Only when Carly turns round you see that the kettle is electric. To have a whistling kettle it would have to be on a gas stove. Edit: There are electric kettles that do whistle. You've just never seen one until now. Furthermore; It does not matter if a kettle is on a gas or electric stove. The water boiling is what produces the whistle. Not what causes the water to boil.
- ConnessioniFeatured in Half in the Bag: Demonic (2021)
- Colonne sonorePiano Sonata No. 14 in C sharp minor, Op. 27 No. 2 'Moonlight' I. Adagio sostenuto
Composed by Ludwig van Beethoven
Published by Flipper srl APM (ASCAP)
Appears courtesy of APM Production Music
Recensione in evidenza
Please excuse my attempts at humor. It's a defensive reaction.
I really, really wanted to like this film. It has been on my watchlist for like 3 years, and I was constantly checking on it. I hoped for Wan as a director, but when I saw Blomkamp, I was pleasantly surprised. I wouldn't say I liked Elysium, but I think Neill is a talented director.
With that being said, I give this film a lot of credit and a 6/10. It had its moments, but the negatives overcame the positives. As more people will watch it, I think it will drop down to ~5.5 or less.
There were three major problems for me:
1) the dialogue was unbearable most of the time;
2) the amounts of exposition thrown in these were overwhelming. The story comes to a halt for 10-15 minutes, and then BOOM, you get bombarded with information the characters share (the things they already know btw). And it's not that confusing to provide this much flashback.
3) the whole technology/occult combination was fresh, but when they tell you the point of all that, it just becomes a laughable excuse and an insane over-complication of what could have been done.
Throw in some heavy continuity, and the majority of the viewers will probably dislike this. The ending clearly shows that at least 10-15 minutes of it was missing, the main lead teleports way too much, and some scenes end abruptly.
I want to mention some positives as well, the film did look good, and I enjoyed the ending night scenes. I constantly felt like I'm giving this film much more creditworthiness than it's worth, but I saw some potential in it.
And yeah, while interesting in their looks, the simulation scenes lacked creativity, and the entity of which we got no information looks like Radament from Diablo 2.
Overall, this is not a horror film. And as much as I appreciate the effort, I didn't like it as much as I wanted to.
I really, really wanted to like this film. It has been on my watchlist for like 3 years, and I was constantly checking on it. I hoped for Wan as a director, but when I saw Blomkamp, I was pleasantly surprised. I wouldn't say I liked Elysium, but I think Neill is a talented director.
With that being said, I give this film a lot of credit and a 6/10. It had its moments, but the negatives overcame the positives. As more people will watch it, I think it will drop down to ~5.5 or less.
There were three major problems for me:
1) the dialogue was unbearable most of the time;
2) the amounts of exposition thrown in these were overwhelming. The story comes to a halt for 10-15 minutes, and then BOOM, you get bombarded with information the characters share (the things they already know btw). And it's not that confusing to provide this much flashback.
3) the whole technology/occult combination was fresh, but when they tell you the point of all that, it just becomes a laughable excuse and an insane over-complication of what could have been done.
Throw in some heavy continuity, and the majority of the viewers will probably dislike this. The ending clearly shows that at least 10-15 minutes of it was missing, the main lead teleports way too much, and some scenes end abruptly.
I want to mention some positives as well, the film did look good, and I enjoyed the ending night scenes. I constantly felt like I'm giving this film much more creditworthiness than it's worth, but I saw some potential in it.
And yeah, while interesting in their looks, the simulation scenes lacked creativity, and the entity of which we got no information looks like Radament from Diablo 2.
Overall, this is not a horror film. And as much as I appreciate the effort, I didn't like it as much as I wanted to.
I più visti
Accedi per valutare e creare un elenco di titoli salvati per ottenere consigli personalizzati
- How long is Demonic?Powered by Alexa
Dettagli
Botteghino
- Lordo Stati Uniti e Canada
- 71.334 USD
- Fine settimana di apertura Stati Uniti e Canada
- 40.683 USD
- 22 ago 2021
- Lordo in tutto il mondo
- 366.656 USD
- Tempo di esecuzione1 ora 44 minuti
- Colore
- Proporzioni
- 2.00 : 1
Contribuisci a questa pagina
Suggerisci una modifica o aggiungi i contenuti mancanti