7 reviews
It's a very good movie, not excellent but good. It reflects very well the 'media' trials. And how the media, and politics manipulate justice. It also, I think, mirrors the OJ trial. Very good movie but could have been better. P.S. I wonder why only 11 people have voted for this movie, and why IMDB users don't rate TV movies so much.
4 black kids attack a lone woman, at night and Smash in the window of her car so they can steal her car, bash in her head with a gun, kill her and their defense is they did it because of the way white people treat them? The movie forgot to let the prosecution mention these facts. Stupid waste of good actors.
If you enjoy intelligent political dramas as I do 'Color of Justice' is definitely not a movie to be missed.
Despite this being a movie made for TV it delivers in many ways where many movies for cinemas fail. It has a great story and all of the characters are well played and believable.
This movie has enough substance and raises questions for at least one more hour of playtime.
Who will benefit from the trail of 4 black juveniles accused of murdering a white woman? The New York D.A hoping to run for mayor? The rising star TV reporter and the network she is working for? Or maybe the black Reverend Walton (Gregory Hines) claiming the accused are victims of race?
Will justice be done? You will have to see for yourself. Enjoy.
9/10
Despite this being a movie made for TV it delivers in many ways where many movies for cinemas fail. It has a great story and all of the characters are well played and believable.
This movie has enough substance and raises questions for at least one more hour of playtime.
Who will benefit from the trail of 4 black juveniles accused of murdering a white woman? The New York D.A hoping to run for mayor? The rising star TV reporter and the network she is working for? Or maybe the black Reverend Walton (Gregory Hines) claiming the accused are victims of race?
Will justice be done? You will have to see for yourself. Enjoy.
9/10
It's incredible to me that people pass off this by-the-numbers TV movie slog as believable or well acted. Perhaps the plot just not aging well. The characters - four black youths accused of murder, the social justice minister who gets involved, the news media covering and exploiting the whole mess ....it's all very formulatic. The crime is beyond defense, the guilt is not in question, so the audience is really asked to spend too much time worrying about everything else.
This film explains itself to you every step of the way, but leads nowhere. Bruce Davidson valiently tries to keep the message on point, but in showing us the "circus" this trial became, the director makes it a muddle.
Pass on it.
This film explains itself to you every step of the way, but leads nowhere. Bruce Davidson valiently tries to keep the message on point, but in showing us the "circus" this trial became, the director makes it a muddle.
Pass on it.
When a group of young black men run out of gas on a quiet road across from New York they get out to ask the motorist behind for help. However the woman motorist suspects the worst and one of the men tries to drag her out of the car to steal it. However the car phone allows the police to catch the 4 men and they are charged with the women's murder. The case seems relatively straightforward until activist Rev. Walton begins to turn to the media and makes the whole trial into a race issue, leaving the woman's husband and his lawyer frustrated by the direction of the media spin. But as one character says `This is America, it's all about race'.
When I approached this I assumed it would be a court room thriller TVM sort of thing with a good (if solid) cast. However after 20 minutes I was pleasantly surprised. It has all the trapping so a courtroom TV drama but it allows itself to be a lot more than that. In fact the actual case is really only the setting for a bigger picture. The film instead looks at race, justice and the media in America. It makes some very obvious and simple points (eg a newscaster is given the job because she is `of colour' and hence the network cannot be accused of bias) however it makes deeper better points as well.
The film's strength to me was the way it didn't give many answers but mostly raised issues without providing a way out that was left for us to think about. We saw things on both sides of the arguments. This is best seen in the actual murder itself the prosecution say it was an attack and the defence saying it was a misunderstanding that got out of control we see it as an audience and it's difficult to tell who's right, it's a mix of both. This is the same throughout it's difficult to come down on either side of the fence.
The film does have weakness and it does use a bit too much character stereotyping to be great. The black men are a mix of the `gansgta type' and the `straight A student just trying to get outa da hood' type. Also the ending is, plain and simple, terrible. It is so bad and obvious that you can guess it now! It almost totally ruins the thoughtful debate that had gone before it's like the makers couldn't end on a thoughtful note and just needed a normal thriller ending.
The solid cast are all very good (despite some stereotype and cliché) Abraham, Hines et al may not be great leading men but they hold this film up well and the support cast is full of well know faces that add to the idea of depth and quality.
Overall this is excellent. It may not be the best film ever made but lets not forget this is a TVM. It is thoughtful and never gives us easy answers instead asking many questions. Only the occasional stereotype and a terrible, terrible ending spoil it by leaving a nasty taste in the mouth after a clever and well developed script had been well put on the screen.
When I approached this I assumed it would be a court room thriller TVM sort of thing with a good (if solid) cast. However after 20 minutes I was pleasantly surprised. It has all the trapping so a courtroom TV drama but it allows itself to be a lot more than that. In fact the actual case is really only the setting for a bigger picture. The film instead looks at race, justice and the media in America. It makes some very obvious and simple points (eg a newscaster is given the job because she is `of colour' and hence the network cannot be accused of bias) however it makes deeper better points as well.
The film's strength to me was the way it didn't give many answers but mostly raised issues without providing a way out that was left for us to think about. We saw things on both sides of the arguments. This is best seen in the actual murder itself the prosecution say it was an attack and the defence saying it was a misunderstanding that got out of control we see it as an audience and it's difficult to tell who's right, it's a mix of both. This is the same throughout it's difficult to come down on either side of the fence.
The film does have weakness and it does use a bit too much character stereotyping to be great. The black men are a mix of the `gansgta type' and the `straight A student just trying to get outa da hood' type. Also the ending is, plain and simple, terrible. It is so bad and obvious that you can guess it now! It almost totally ruins the thoughtful debate that had gone before it's like the makers couldn't end on a thoughtful note and just needed a normal thriller ending.
The solid cast are all very good (despite some stereotype and cliché) Abraham, Hines et al may not be great leading men but they hold this film up well and the support cast is full of well know faces that add to the idea of depth and quality.
Overall this is excellent. It may not be the best film ever made but lets not forget this is a TVM. It is thoughtful and never gives us easy answers instead asking many questions. Only the occasional stereotype and a terrible, terrible ending spoil it by leaving a nasty taste in the mouth after a clever and well developed script had been well put on the screen.
- bob the moo
- Aug 27, 2002
- Permalink
- Dr_Coulardeau
- Jul 18, 2007
- Permalink