48
Metascore
31 reviews · Provided by Metacritic.com
- 75USA TodaySusan WloszczynaUSA TodaySusan WloszczynaThere's much mumbo-jumbo about past lives and symbolic tattoos, but who cares when you can gaze at a sight as lovely as a dirigible floating in the night sky?
- 70Los Angeles TimesKenneth TuranLos Angeles TimesKenneth TuranBoth pleasantly old-fashioned and packed with up-to-date computer-generated special effects, the film's constant plot turns, cheeky sensibility and omnipresent action sequences have no trouble attracting our attention and holding on.
- 63Chicago TribuneMark CaroChicago TribuneMark CaroAction junkies may enjoy this non-stop barrage, which barely pauses for anything but the most rudimentary (albeit complicated) plot exposition.
- 60Film.comSean MeansFilm.comSean MeansMostly he's (Fraser) trapped in a sequel that's too wrapped up in a desire to top itself.
- 50SlateDavid EdelsteinSlateDavid EdelsteinA few billion 1s and 0s in search of a movie.
- 50Boston GlobeJay CarrBoston GlobeJay CarrIf you liked the earlier ''Mummy,'' you'll probably like this one. In fact, at many points you'll probably think you are watching the earlier one.
- 50The New York TimesA.O. ScottThe New York TimesA.O. ScottThe noisome action sequences of The Mummy Returns are preferable to the quiet times, when the cast is limited to spouting dialogue that is a banal combination of exposition and homily.
- 40L.A. WeeklyHazel-Dawn DumpertL.A. WeeklyHazel-Dawn DumpertYou can't see the movie for the footage, so thick is it with digital tricks and furious action.
- 40Wall Street JournalJoe MorgensternWall Street JournalJoe MorgensternThis frenzied sequel has all of the clank but none of the swank of the previous version.
- 38Charlotte ObserverLawrence ToppmanCharlotte ObserverLawrence ToppmanThis might all have been silly fun -- as it was in the 1999 version -- except for the carelessness of the whole picture.