User reviews

I've seen the movie just a month ago in a foreign film program in my city. I live in Juarez City, just in the border between Mexico and USA and let me tell you something that a good friend told me about it: "is the best movie I ever seen about Juarez city". Situations are the same and are truly reflected on the screen the reality on millions and millions of persons worldwide. It's very common to see persons trying to go to the other side of the river to get the "American dream" and in the mid time histories like the ones reflected on the movie took place every single day. The screenplay is very simple, and characters were well developed during the film. The most touching history was the "mattress guy". The actor transmits very deep emotions and exactly the same situation lived a good friend of mine here, miles away. Another strong history was the one related with the Ukrainian immigrants. Every year, hundreds of persons die in this city in their attempt to go to the other side, just miles away, were the lights are reflecting a different nation and in consequence different opportunities. The cast of actors were well selected and performances were simple, but convincing. This is the first film I saw from Schmid but I have to thank him for this extraordinary movie. As I think, there is no need to have a high budget to deliver a good film and this is another example that sometimes the simple is the best. Characters that could be identified with real people in real situations. At the end, the last scene defines and summarizes all the history: life is so strange and we can be touched by simple people forever. By films like this is why I like the movies.

This episode film draws quite a realistic picture on life on both sides of the German-Polish border. To the group of Ukrainian, stranded at the polish side of river Oder, the lights of the German town of Frankfurt/Oder promise a new life, wealth and freedom in the West. And nearly impossible to reach, as they cannot hope for asylum there. But life on the other side is also not as easy as it seems. We meet Ingo, who tries to make some money building up a mattress store and fails miserably; Katharina who has fled from the children's home and now makes her living of smuggling cigarettes over the border. On the other side of the river, there's the polish father who tries almost everything to get together the money for his daughter's communion dress; student Beata who works as a translator and also fulfills the more special wishes of her customers, as long as she gets paid. During the film, some of these people's ways cross, some don't, some try to help the others, some betray them, everyone struggles to make the best out of it for himself whether he or she is Polish, German or Ukrainian. One other thing struck my mind: In one scene of the film, Beata meets her German ex-boyfriend; when they start arguing, she shouts at him in Polish. He doesn't understand her and tells her to speak German and she answers: "If you had really loved me, you'd have learned Polish a long time ago!" He just says: "You can't be serious." I found this exemplary for many of the people, especially the Germans, that they don't understand the others, and they don't want to try. The people on the other side of the border, or those connected to it like German-Ukrainian translator Sonya, seem to help each other more, even though they also try to make their own profit by it, sometimes. Maybe this is the difference between the two worlds on the two sides of the river.

This movie reflects on the situation around the border between Poland and Germany. The fate of many single characters creates a picture of life in this region: Some Russians want to cross the border illegal to get into Germany, a company wants to build a new factory, a Polish taxi driver desperately needs money to buy his daughter a communion dress, and so on.

All this is very well written and directed. All the characters are true to life, and through the multiperspectivic reflection on the situation the movie works very well. Good acting performances do the rest. The one minor critical point I have is: The stories are standing on their own. I think the movie would have been better if they would have been connected in more points than just happening in one region. So the movie gets a 9 out of 10- but is still worth watching and very touchy.

In loosely interconnected episodes "Lichter" tells five stories of financial predicament, difficult relationships and dreams of a better future on both sides of the German-Polish border. A mattress salesman goes bust, an interpreter for the border police helps an illegal Ukrainian immigrant get to Berlin, a Polish taxi driver helps another couple of immigrants because he needs money for the Communion dress of his daughter, a group of juvenile cigarette smugglers go through a jealousy drama and a young German architect learns an unpleasant secret that his former Polish girlfriend has hidden from him.

Sounds depressing (and to many Americans it probably would be, as they seem to need an all-conquering hero as the protagonist - at least that's what Hollywood chucks out year after year), but we Old Europeans ;-) know better and want to see characters that we can identify with because they have the same problems we have or are even worse off. In other words we want realistic films (in addition to, not instead of(!) genre movies and escapist fairy tales), and "Lichter" is very realistic because it never betrays its characters for an unlikely plot twist or artificial humor just to please the audience. That doesn't mean there are no funny moments and I for one didn't leave the cinema depressed at all. The tagline "Willkommen in der Wirklichkeit" (Welcome to reality) really fits 100%.

All the actors are great (I liked David Striesow as pitiable entrepreneur Ingo, whom you wouldn't begrudge his "jungle bonus", and Maria Simon as sympathetic interpreter Sonya best) and their characters manage to stay likable although each episode has a moment of betrayal/lie/theft where their economic fears force them to display their most negative character traits. But this is balanced by a moment of hope in each episode where the characters behave more positive (more helpful, more unselfish, more friendly) than their situation would actually allow them to.

Finally, I have to say, that Hans-Christian Schmid is one of the best directors Germany has at the moment. Most German directors who come fresh from film school often have a very good debut-film, but can't keep up the same quality after that. Schmid however has made only good films so far ("Nach Fünf im Urwald", "23", "Crazy" and now "Lichter") and they even keep getting better IMO. As much as I love that some German films ("Run Lola run", "Nowhere in Africa" or "Good Bye Lenin") are successful abroad lately, they show Germany's past and I really hope that "Lichter" will have at least the same level of success, because it shows what life in Germany (for a particular social class at a particular place - Frankfurt an der Oder) is like TODAY, on the eve of the EU enlargement.

I'm not exactly sure why but this film just hit me right at the heart and hasn't left me since I left the cinema (which has been more than a year now). I completely disagree with the review that's on the title page at the moment in almost every point. He says the film was too busy... I say it was authentic and seeing the making of it makes you realize how the "busy" camera was mainly due to the fact that the actors had a lot of room for improvisation which you can tell when you see the film.

He also said that he thought that the mattress episode was pointless. I found it really really moving. And Devid Striesow just acts incredibly well (He doesn't act like an actor but like a real person which is something you have to get used to at first but then it's so rewarding to watch!)

I also think that the parallel way of storytelling worked really well and it wasn't hard to follow the plots at all. I'm actually proud that films like this one are made in Germany and this is just so much better than the average big-budget Hollywood film. The mood it creates is so tense, depressing and yet hopeful. It is definitely one of my favourite movies.

It is a slap in the face of all these rich, satisfied, egoistic, first world societies, who think that they are great, know better, and have more rights to live and spend than the poor on the other side of the fence.

We (some students, theatre people etc.) also tried recently to make a realistic feature, in our present times, shot on mini-DV, but this LICHTER is much, much better! I admire its realism, and how it could touch me within very few minutes, holding its tension for the whole time, and really caring for its characters. Believe me, I watch quite a lot of movies, but this does not happen very often.

It is a very sad observation of our economic situation, and the pressure which it forces on normal, small, everyday people. The need to make a living destroys their pride, their hopes, their humanity - and all this happens not far from the "Lights" ("Lichter") of the rich, promised land of wealth, where I live (I am blessed to live here) which is only a small distance away. Only a river to cross, but in fact the distance from poor to rich is nearly impossible to cross.

If you know "Lamerica" from Gianni Amelio or "Dekalog" aka "The Ten commandments" by Krzystof Kieslowski: "Lichter" has some similarities.

Simply amazing storytelling. Sad and true told. A mustsee! Author takes you into the time where everything changes, people cheating each other out of misery and therefore messing up their own lives...fear and hope, love and despair...look for it in this movie and you won't be disappointed. Very important serious cinema still in a light way!

Saw it first when I was about 19 - left me in daze for several days. Rewatched with my husband 5 years later - similar effect. This movie just came into my mind today - you bet I am going to watch it for the third time, 14 years later. Curious what it will do for me this time.

The acting was good, and the story kind of interesting.

I don´t think it is an important film, but it gives you something to think about. To think about human behaviour etc.

To be a really good film I missed a lot of explanations. For example why the family wanted to leave the Ukraine. Why they took a little baby with them? I wouldn`t make such a dangerous journey with a baby if it wouldn`t be really necessary. So the story about the Ukrainians didn`t work for me.

6/10.

Lichter is situated on both sides of the German-Polish border. It portrays several citizens of both the German and the Polish side of the border and some illegal immigrants hoping to cross the border to the Promised Land. Several story lines are set up, but only some meet. After all stories are set up, some characters act out of love for someone, even make a brave and important decision to help someone in need. All are betrayed, so this makes a pretty depressing picture with little hope and redemption. Even the building project as a sign of hope and cooperation turns out to have a negative angle.

From a cinema-point of view it would have been a better idea to connect all story lines and I found that a missed opportunity. But it succeeds in balancing the motives of all characters: Some act out of selfishness, some out of love, and others out of survival. At one moment in the movie immigrants are called fortune seekers, later they are called people in need.

Hans-Christian Schmid's direction is average. This is made for little money and it shows. It looks a bit like an upgraded TV-movie, with relative few interesting camera shots. But my guess is he wants us to focus on the theme of the movie and he succeeds in that, because after a few minutes you stop thinking about the movie's obvious technical limitations.

The tag line of the movie is Welcome to reality. But as cinema is all about manipulation this is a strange one. Every filmmaker has to start by making a choice where to place his or her movie in the movie universe, somewhere between the real world and the imagined world where a movie interacts with our imagination. So this is as manipulated as would be the reverse: Show a border town where everybody's happy. Show happy immigrants working happily on beautiful Berlin building projects. So here we still watch an imagined world being thoroughly manipulated by the director. And this certainly hasn't the realism of post-war Italian cinema.

As for the real world: With Poland now a member of the EU, the movie is already somewhat out of date and Poland will within a few years reach the wealth of say the Portuguese. Illegal immigration will always exist and has always existed: People seeking asylum, people wanting a better existence. The whole debate in Europe is about where to draw lines. This gives some reflection on that process.