Perseus braves the treacherous underworld to rescue his father, Zeus, captured by his son, Ares, and brother Hades who unleash the ancient Titans upon the world.Perseus braves the treacherous underworld to rescue his father, Zeus, captured by his son, Ares, and brother Hades who unleash the ancient Titans upon the world.Perseus braves the treacherous underworld to rescue his father, Zeus, captured by his son, Ares, and brother Hades who unleash the ancient Titans upon the world.
- Awards
- 2 wins & 3 nominations
Edgar Ramírez
- Ares
- (as Edgar Ramirez)
Birkett Turton
- Elite Guard No. 2
- (as Kett Turton)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaGemma Arterton was originally supposed to return, but scheduling conflicts with Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters (2013) prevented that. Her character was written out, rather than being re-cast, as Andromeda was.
- GoofsDuring various battles the archers are told to "fire" or "hold fire" also the artillery was told to "fire". The term "fire" didn't come around until the advent of gunpowder powered weapons. The correct command would have been "Loose".
- Crazy creditsThere are no opening credits for this movie
- ConnectionsFeatured in Maltin on Movies: Wrath of the Titans (2012)
- SoundtracksWrath of the Titans
Composed by Javier Navarrete
Featured review
I personally felt that the sequel to the remake of Clash of the Titans was much better movie than the remake itself. What made this film work more than the 2010 film was that it a better story, better performances and overall a bit more engaging action. The remake was a mess because the action was all over the place, and you simply lost interest after a while. With Wrath of Titans, they seemed to take a step back, and focus more on a writing a better story, with effective action that would please fantasy fans. The film is far from perfect, but overall it's a satisfying movie that might surprise viewers that hated the Clash of the Titans remake. The run time is shorter, thus it gets to the point fairly quickly and in the case of this film, it's a big plus because, the original just tried too hard at being grand, ambitious and epic, and in turn it turned out to be a tiresome mess of a film, one that wasn't worth investing your time in, and it showed plenty of weak points instead of strengths because it copied the 80's original, instead of trying to come up with a new angle to tell the story. The filmmakers have succeeded at crafting an entertaining movie with lots of action that is not boring or dull, and it's got a good story as well, maybe not the best, but far better than its predecessor. This is not great cinema, but it's a fun, entertaining popcorn action fantasy film if you're in the right frame of mind to watch. The film won't get any awards, but it's not bad either. I was very much entertained by this follow-up, and considering it follows-up a remake, they managed to make it better than its predecessor.
- How long is Wrath of the Titans?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Countries of origin
- Official sites
- Language
- Also known as
- Furia de Titanes 2
- Filming locations
- La Gomera, Canary Islands, Spain(Exterior)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
Box office
- Budget
- $150,000,000 (estimated)
- Gross US & Canada
- $83,670,083
- Opening weekend US & Canada
- $33,457,188
- Apr 1, 2012
- Gross worldwide
- $301,970,083
- Runtime1 hour 39 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content