IMDb RATING
5.8/10
4.8K
YOUR RATING
An office worker is trapped inside the building where a killer is on the loose.An office worker is trapped inside the building where a killer is on the loose.An office worker is trapped inside the building where a killer is on the loose.
Frankie J. Allison
- Barney the Security Guard
- (as Frankie Jay Allison)
Alejandro Patiño
- Fernando the Janitor
- (as Alejandro Patino)
Julie Elizabeth Abeyta
- Businesswoman
- (uncredited)
Christian Ijin Link
- Businessman
- (uncredited)
- Director
- Writers
- All cast & crew
- Production, box office & more at IMDbPro
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThis movie was originally supposed to be released in 2012.
- GoofsTom is unable to call 911 due to phone lock; however every phone has an option to dial 911 even if the phone is locked.
- Quotes
Thomas Miller: Gotcha!
Featured review
The plot: On the day that he is fired, an idealistic paralegal witnesses a professional killer murder one of his former coworkers at a legal firm.
I guess the setup isn't too original, but that's fine with me. I'm always up for a thriller in which a witness is hunted down by a hit-man. The plot is vaguely topical, and it should appeal to those who rail against "big pharma". The setting is law firm engaged in legal action against a giant pharmaceutical company, and there is occasional commentary about corruption in the pharmaceutical industry.
There are a number of minor problems with the film, but I don't think any of them make it unwatchable. If you're more interested in entertainment value than originality, and you're forgiving of plot holes, I think you could do worse than this. The ending has received a bit of criticism here, but I thought it was perfectly fine. However, if you're the kind of person who wants every single plot element fully resolved, I can see how that would annoy you.
There isn't any gore, nudity, or excessively harsh language, and the violence is fairly restrained. There isn't really all that much atmosphere, but Mindhella and Feild do a decent job. For a direct-to-video thriller, I'd say it's about what you might be expecting: flawed but watchable, unoriginal but entertaining.
I guess the setup isn't too original, but that's fine with me. I'm always up for a thriller in which a witness is hunted down by a hit-man. The plot is vaguely topical, and it should appeal to those who rail against "big pharma". The setting is law firm engaged in legal action against a giant pharmaceutical company, and there is occasional commentary about corruption in the pharmaceutical industry.
There are a number of minor problems with the film, but I don't think any of them make it unwatchable. If you're more interested in entertainment value than originality, and you're forgiving of plot holes, I think you could do worse than this. The ending has received a bit of criticism here, but I thought it was perfectly fine. However, if you're the kind of person who wants every single plot element fully resolved, I can see how that would annoy you.
There isn't any gore, nudity, or excessively harsh language, and the violence is fairly restrained. There isn't really all that much atmosphere, but Mindhella and Feild do a decent job. For a direct-to-video thriller, I'd say it's about what you might be expecting: flawed but watchable, unoriginal but entertaining.
- How long is Not Safe for Work?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Official site
- Language
- Also known as
- İşyeri için Uygun Değil
- Filming locations
- USA(usa)
- Production company
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 14 minutes
- Color
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content