32 reviews
Acceptable bangs for bucks.
- Mikelikesnotlikes
- Mar 21, 2017
- Permalink
With bigger Budget could have been better
The movie is about a technical engineer, who is sent to a nuclear power plant to repair a communication failure and the unexpected scenarios that follow.
This movie has a very good storyline that could have been much more but the low budget made it not reach its potential. It makes me sad that stories with potential like this gets destroyed due to bad actors and low budget.
It is a one time watch movie.
This movie has a very good storyline that could have been much more but the low budget made it not reach its potential. It makes me sad that stories with potential like this gets destroyed due to bad actors and low budget.
It is a one time watch movie.
- drronaldchacko
- Mar 20, 2018
- Permalink
Unconvincing
This film missed the mark as it was unconvincing. The acting and the writing/plot where really bad, however, the cinematography and directing was on point. The other fail in this was wardrobe... how is basically a motorcycle helmet part of a modern era space suit? Too bad the negative elements where so apparent, this film had potential. Sadly, it's only a 4/10 from me.
- Top_Dawg_Critic
- Sep 5, 2017
- Permalink
Honestly, there's no reason to watch this
I so rarely write reviews, despite watching an awful lot of movies. This one was poor enough that I was motivated to pop down a warning for any who might think 'Ah, I'll give it a go'
I don't mind a low budget approach to SciFi, I can look past less than perfect FX and CGI, I don't even consider bad science a deal-breaker.
Bad writing, bad acting, insanely obvious 'twist' and lack of satisfying dismount, however - that's enough to get me to put finger to keyboard and declare this a real dud. The actress playing Abby was awful, bless her. Though, to be fair, the script was pretty sub-par so she didn't have a lot to work with. Dominic did his best but the shot choices, off-pace editing and, again, poor source material meant his efforts simply came across as hammy. With better direction on all areas, he at least could have salvaged some dignity. Tom Sizemore was barely in it and had little to do.
The premise of the film is not the worst, and in more capable hands could have been at least an entertaining diversion. However, the actual final result looks like a rushed, b-grade (at best) made for TV gap filler for when the decent shows are on hiatus. SyFy has shown what they are capable of with The Expanse (among others). This was simply not a good movie on any level.
I don't mind a low budget approach to SciFi, I can look past less than perfect FX and CGI, I don't even consider bad science a deal-breaker.
Bad writing, bad acting, insanely obvious 'twist' and lack of satisfying dismount, however - that's enough to get me to put finger to keyboard and declare this a real dud. The actress playing Abby was awful, bless her. Though, to be fair, the script was pretty sub-par so she didn't have a lot to work with. Dominic did his best but the shot choices, off-pace editing and, again, poor source material meant his efforts simply came across as hammy. With better direction on all areas, he at least could have salvaged some dignity. Tom Sizemore was barely in it and had little to do.
The premise of the film is not the worst, and in more capable hands could have been at least an entertaining diversion. However, the actual final result looks like a rushed, b-grade (at best) made for TV gap filler for when the decent shows are on hiatus. SyFy has shown what they are capable of with The Expanse (among others). This was simply not a good movie on any level.
- al-mcdowall
- Oct 1, 2017
- Permalink
No, it doesn't work
I'm pretty generous when it comes to being low budget and not having the money for big special effects. I found the CGI actually quite good for the budget but what I cannot forgive is the heavily cliched story and bad acting. The story was too predictable and nonsensical. And that ending...Ugh.
- the_nephilim71
- Apr 15, 2019
- Permalink
Obviously written by men
- wingedheartart
- Aug 9, 2020
- Permalink
I like a good post apocalyptic story.
This is full on sci-if, but I like a good post apocalyptic story. It's a bit straight to DVD though, the acting is too forced, very wooden, generally a bit OTT and annoying. The CGI is heavy handed in places too. All that aside, fair play to the production for having a go and getting this out there, the story isn't too bad. I suspect the budget wasn't huge and aside the bloke from Lost (that was also a Hobbit or something), there's not any notable names. It's a bit crap if I'm honest, but I kinda liked it, a little bit.
- garethcrook
- May 17, 2018
- Permalink
Basic budget sci fi that works.....
Atomica is a basic budget sci fi, that works.....
The styling and design of this film, is what really stands out. Its futuristic elements are well rendered and stylish for a film that does not have a big dollar value associated with it.
The story line is alright too if not exceptional. Its a somewhat slow moving but it has enough going on, to keep your interest for the most part.
Lastly, the actors do hand in reasonable performances, that keep your interested enough to keep watching and try to unravel the mystery that's presented.
Not great but by no means awful either. Six out of ten from me.
The styling and design of this film, is what really stands out. Its futuristic elements are well rendered and stylish for a film that does not have a big dollar value associated with it.
The story line is alright too if not exceptional. Its a somewhat slow moving but it has enough going on, to keep your interest for the most part.
Lastly, the actors do hand in reasonable performances, that keep your interested enough to keep watching and try to unravel the mystery that's presented.
Not great but by no means awful either. Six out of ten from me.
Great potential |Terrible Flop
- tteenministries
- Mar 27, 2017
- Permalink
This... is a 4.1/10??
I had to create an account for Atomica. What we have here is an amazing 9/10 sci-fi movie rated 4.1 by users and 3.3 out of 10 by critics. At least I started watching this with low expectations, and they got completely blown away.
The plot is original and believable, the technology bits well exposed, the tension and mystery well built.
I feel terrible for the team, writer, director, actors who all did an awesome job. This is the most unfairly received movie I've ever had the chance to discover.
The plot is original and believable, the technology bits well exposed, the tension and mystery well built.
I feel terrible for the team, writer, director, actors who all did an awesome job. This is the most unfairly received movie I've ever had the chance to discover.
Low Ratings not due to quality of film but rather viewing preferences
No spoilers here. I added another point to my rating because I whole heartily disagree with the low reviews. Although those looking for high tech fancy sci-fi special affects, and action packed fight scenes, (this story is not about that),they will be disappointed. What it DOES have, is some very believable acting. And although a modest setting as most of the movie is shown in a debilitated run down power facility in the future, it is believable. Most of the movie has a lot of dialogue between two characters. That in itself may turn some viewers off. But the story/pace gives little bits at a time, to build suspense, yet gives enough that the characters aren't flat/one dimensional... It is a slow burn thriller, and for a lower budget film, I thought this was excellently done. The lower ratings are not fair. I believe it IS NOT due to the QUALITY of this movie, but rather, the viewing preferences, of the viewer.
- tdwillis-26273
- Apr 28, 2017
- Permalink
Smoking history or something
- nogodnomasters
- Jul 16, 2017
- Permalink
Laughable
I expected a good B to C Grade TV Movie, and i got.. Damn i dont find words for this piece of Junk.
A Motorcycle Helmet as Protection from Radiation? Are you guys kidding me?
How high was the Budget for this Movie? 200 Bucks? Effects are on par with TV Effects from the 90s. Acting was strange, but not in a good Way.
The Story is ok, but nothing more.
No just NOOO.. Please dont make more of this. I´m begging you. PLEASE!
How high was the Budget for this Movie? 200 Bucks? Effects are on par with TV Effects from the 90s. Acting was strange, but not in a good Way.
The Story is ok, but nothing more.
No just NOOO.. Please dont make more of this. I´m begging you. PLEASE!
- djhoschman
- Jul 12, 2019
- Permalink
Sexy Mary Sue
- draftdubya
- Apr 8, 2017
- Permalink
Good Story Line
Weak thriller.
A safety inspector was sent to a nuclear reactor in the desert to check why communication had been lost. Once there the crew are maybe not who they are.
- abovethelaw-95473
- Jul 15, 2021
- Permalink
Mediocre
An eco thriller with a barebone cast
People have tried to replicate the success of Moon with various other titles, like Air and Passengers, but they always seem to miss the point that a film with just a few characters needs something more, not less, than a movie with a lot of people in it.
Unfortunately, that is the case of Atomica/Deep Burial. There are three characters in total, with one of them secondary to the story. And before the big reveal, 20 minutes before the end, nothing much happens than two people talking to each other in a climate of rising suspicion.
The acting is good, the psychological aspect of the thriller is pretty good, but the story is completely empty, as is the message in the end. And the funny thing is that the science fiction part of the movie is completely superfluous. They could have easily done the same scenario in the real world, with more of an impact.
As such, with a future world that feels remote and with characters that have no backstory or much character development, the film is just slow and hard to endure, with no real payback in the end, since no one cared what happens in the first place.
Unfortunately, that is the case of Atomica/Deep Burial. There are three characters in total, with one of them secondary to the story. And before the big reveal, 20 minutes before the end, nothing much happens than two people talking to each other in a climate of rising suspicion.
The acting is good, the psychological aspect of the thriller is pretty good, but the story is completely empty, as is the message in the end. And the funny thing is that the science fiction part of the movie is completely superfluous. They could have easily done the same scenario in the real world, with more of an impact.
As such, with a future world that feels remote and with characters that have no backstory or much character development, the film is just slow and hard to endure, with no real payback in the end, since no one cared what happens in the first place.
Another example of sci-fi sexism
While some of the detail is beautifully achieved -- computers for one -- this film remains an homage to science fiction's "dude culture" of sexy women (not always convincingly capable) and male slobs like Sizemore.
It's tiring and boring to see women treated this way, and it's universal. Just watched a similar treatment for a TV pilot.
So disappointing and incredibly insulting to women astronauts and scientists.
It's tiring and boring to see women treated this way, and it's universal. Just watched a similar treatment for a TV pilot.
So disappointing and incredibly insulting to women astronauts and scientists.
- vicstevinson
- Mar 20, 2017
- Permalink
Character vs. Effects
- drhall-672-138129
- Mar 23, 2017
- Permalink
Super cheap Sci-Fi at it's best.
- subxerogravity
- Mar 17, 2017
- Permalink
Another good movie ruined by the ending
I don't need a fancy sci-fi big budget movie but at least have an ending that is worth a crap. I'm so sick and tired of these movies running out of budget before they can film a decent ending. Unbelievable.
- kidpokerfan
- Jan 17, 2020
- Permalink
Good Sci-fi without a blockbuster budget
This film was enjoyable Dominic Monaghan stole the show. The acting was above par and Tom Sizemore was in about 20% of it towards the end. It definitely could of been worse on this budget but the writing and storyline held up. Some of Ms.Habel's scenes were a little out of sorts at times I felt I was watching a soft porn flick... NOT THAT I'M COMPLAINING. But on a budget that was minimal this film held it's own and I can say it was a pretty good film.. Sci-fi fans who don't have sticks up their butt will enjoy.
Better than I expected
Wow. I'm surprised. I thought it was good despite the ratings. I passed up on it a few times while browsing for something to watch. The pace was a little slow at the beginning and maybe some dialogue could have been left out for more drama. The actors were great. I didn't prefer the way it had to end but I guess it needed closure instead of a sequel.
Enjoyable
Watched this after reading low imdb rating, great premise , good twists and turns, revenge terrorist, decent sets, decent acting, there are lots of rubbish science fiction, but this isn't one of them.