User reviews

I saw this at the Cleveland Film Festival yesterday and was disappointed with it. In the first scene you see a young woman, Jody Linder, in bed with a guy in the second floor bedroom of a nice old house when pickup trucks pull up outside the house. The men in the pickup trucks are her older male relatives who warn her that the man who was convicted of killing her parents has been released from prison. Why Jody is living in this house clearly decorated in a style a much older person would have chosen or what she does for a living are never revealed. The oldest of the men who arrive at the house is her grandfather and the owner of a ranch that employs most of the characters in the movie, including the guy Jody was sleeping with. Shortly thereafter, she is confronted by the son of the convicted killer who tells her he knew that his father never left the house during the time of the murder but that he lied to the police by telling them he wasn't sure because he wanted his father to go to prison. Though she isn't receptive to hearing what the son has to say, Jody begins to question the verdict and for the rest of the movie she pursues the truth about her parents' murder.

I wish there had been more exposition at the beginning to give the audience an idea of Jody's normal life and her relationship to her grandparents, relatives and ranch employees before she's given the news about the release of the convicted killer. I couldn't keep track of the characters, many of whom wore hats and had lots of facial hair. If there had been more scenes at the beginning showing their individual personalities it would have been easier to keep track of who's who.

Another problem I had with the film is the unnecessary sepia filter that gives the entire film a dreary look and hides some the distinguishing characteristics of some of the similar looking characters. The sepia look might have been OK for the events from the past if they were from a long time ago but they appear to be less than 10 years prior, maybe as few as 6 or 7 based on the appearance of some of the characters.

Towards the end of the movie someone is shot in a bedroom of a house and Jody arrives at the bed of this person who has just been shot and tells him/her to hang on but I didn't know who it was because the director wouldn't clearly show their face. I never figured out who that was (I don't think it mattered much) and that wasn't the only confusing scene. There were a number of scenes that caused me to ask the people beside me, "who's that?". Pay close attention to the physical characteristics of the men in the film if you decide to watch it and you may find the film more satisfying than I did.

I believe I know how Jody's parents actually were killed and by whom and it wasn't interesting or satisfying because the characters hadn't been developed well enough for me to care, which I believe is the main problem with the film.

Prior to the film, the director asked the audience how many people were seeing it for the second time. No one raised their hand. He then asked if anyone was at the screening who talked to someone who had seen a previous screening and a couple people raised their hand. This is NOT the kind of film that people are going to watch over and over to figure out what's going on. The director had the opportunity to make the storytelling more coherent and spend more time on character development but he chose not to and there's no payoff for the audience to justify that decision.

I kept waiting for Bonnie Bedelia to have a big scene but it never happened. Maika Monroe is bland in the lead role unfortunately.

Although I like the mystery genre this time I wasn't completely satisfied. There was just too much going on, back and forth from the present to the past, too many characters, that results in a too confused story to follow. The acting was good though, certainly nothing bad to say about that. The filming was good too. Just too bad it was all that confusing and a also bit slow at times. Why they put this movie in the western genre is also a mystery to me. It's not because it's in Texas and that people wear cowboy hats that it's a western. But the movie is worth a watch, you won't get bored. I won't watch it a second time though, once is enough.

The movie stinks. I can't stand the back and forth business with no explanation as to what is going on. There were constant flashbacks to the past like we are supposed to know who all the characters are. It started at the beginning and we hadn't even gotten to know the present characters so that makes it frustrating and confusing. The entire movie goes back and forth. The lead character's trying to figure out who murdered her parents years ago but she never comes to a conclusion; she seems to give up altogether towards the end. What was the point? We never find out 'who done it!" I can't stand movies that don't have a conclusion.

Another thing I didn't like is the filming technique "shaky-camera syndrome" and it was so random. Too bad no one on the movie making staff had the guts to tell the director he did a terrible job of trying to tell a story and that he omitted 99% of the answers.

After watching this garbage twice(once with subtitles) I am still in the dark as to "who dun it". What a convoluted bewildering story made all the more so by time shifting and similar looking suspects. 0 stars!! Waste of time.

A waste of time. It´s predictable and unoriginal. The ending is disappointing and it´s not enjoyable throughout.

Truly awful film.

Dull , dazed and confused I was just like the script and the acting. So slow and dull its not even worth spending an iota of time reviewing.

Maika Monroe cannot act and the lack of characterization made it worse. Give it a fancy name but you cannot polish a turd I am afraid!

I recently saw this movie at the Atlanta Film Festival. The acting was great, the colors used were amazing, and the story was interesting enough to keep the audience captivated.

Normally with those three items mentioned, this would be a perfect movie. Unfortunately, parts of the movie left the audience confused. You weren't sure exactly who was who at times, and the director admitted some viewers will be confused.

The beginning dragged on a bit, and it took much longer than needed to realize you were watching two different time lines. This type of movie is difficult to direct and besides the character confusion, I honestly believe the director did his best to portray the two time-lines in order to give the full story.

It's a movie worth watching, but make sure you don't lose your focus or else you may get lost.

When it ended. This movie had to set a record for the most flash-backs of any film regardless of running time. The director just had to add an irrelevant musical interlude for the "arsty-craftsy" crowd. It would have helped if all the "Billy Bobs" and there were a lot of them, wore rodeo numbers or at least name tags so we could tell them apart. By the time this thing ended I had lost all interest in who killed who and just wanted it to be over. What a waste.

The Scent of Rain and Lightning made some interesting decisions: a non-linear story line, understated colors, and a list of characters that you both related to and suspected of murder. By the time the main character unravels the story of her parents' deaths, she realizes that no one is all good or bad, that people make mistakes and that some of those choices lead to dire consequences. This is no old-time western where the bad guy rides in with his black hat so you know who "done" it. The story unravels, going back and forth from past to present, keeping you engaged and guessing. I think this choice by the director was brilliant, and it keeps the audience in a semi-state of uncertainty--as soon as you think you've figured it out, guess again. I saw this movie with my husband, who normally likes easy and entertaining, but he found it as intriguing as I did, and I prefer movies that leave me with something to chew on afterwards. The casting had depth and allowed for the whole movie to work instead of revolving around a few major characters; it definitely felt like an ensemble. If you liked Hell or High Water, you'll like this film.

With a stellar cast, I really did expect more from percent of rain and lightning. It just seems to drag on and on with only a few standout scenes, what could've been a compelling who done it turns out to be more than a bit of a drag! It seems to have been shot on a pretty tight budget, but even so a little bit of creative cinematography could've elevated it higher. The modern western setting is nothing we haven't seen 1000 times before, and sadly some of the drawnout shots are more style over substance. Again, the cast do nothing wrong, but aren't given much to work with in what is a truly forgettable movie.

Scent of Rain and Lightning (an adaptation of the novel by Nancy Pickard) upends expectations at every twisted turn. Anchored by a strong script from RUDDERLESS writers Casey Twenter and Jeff Robison, the film refuses to comply with the usual genre rules. Styled as a Western, flirting at the edges of a who-don-it, the film ultimately questions if we can truly know the truths of our personal histories...let alone understand them. Director Blake Robbins's extreme close-ups create a feeling of confusion and claustrophobia while a stellar cast hints at unseen histories. Watch for Maggie Grace's enigmatic portrayal of the headstrong, paradoxical Laurie.

This is a film for those audiences that actually take the time and have the patience to experience it, knowing that they will be rewarded. For those that don't, or want everything spoon-fed to them (like another review here), it will be confusing and unrewarding. I've seen it twice as of this writing (Oct 2017), and it was even better the second time around. Everything is spot on, the direction, cinematography, writing, sound, everything. Every role is superbly acted, especially by Maika Monore, Maggie Grace, and Mark Webber. I'm sure it's hard to adapt a novel covering 25 years with many characters' detailed lives into a 100 minute movie, and director Blake Robbins has done an awesome job. (Also, check out his first film "The Sublime and Beautiful".)

This is the kind of film that sticks with you, and makes you want to watch again. The story isn't told in a traditional way, which can make it feel unsettling and even disorienting at times, but in an interesting and engaging way.

I will not rate or review this movie. It may be brilliant. Just to say that I noticed it because it was classified on the Net as Western. It is not a Western.

Westerns can be a lot of things, but this ain't it.