A remake of the 1992 film about a pair of basketball hustlers who team up to earn extra cash.A remake of the 1992 film about a pair of basketball hustlers who team up to earn extra cash.A remake of the 1992 film about a pair of basketball hustlers who team up to earn extra cash.
- Awards
- 3 nominations
Tyler Herro
- Tyler Herro
- (as Tyler Christopher Herro)
Storyline
Did you know
- TriviaThis movie was dedicated to the late Lance Reddick.
- GoofsIn closing credits it states, "Based on the 1991 motion picture..." when in fact it was 1992.
- ConnectionsReferenced in Saturday Night Live: Jack Harlow (2022)
Featured review
If you've seen the original, seriously, don't waste your time. It doesn't come close!
The best thing about this was Andrew Schulz and a few of the jokes scattered throughout the film.
To be honest this misses the mark and is just an average film, I know they had to change it up compared to the original, modernise it etcetera and they did that well, although in an annoying way, in my opinion, but I'm old enough to remember the original lol...
Which is a classic and still stands up today, there was no reason for a remake. This is just an average streaming film about basketball.
I'm trying to be vague here to avoid spoilers, but it feels like there's none of the ICONIC moments from the original, a lot of content and story missed out. It doesn't even feel like it's about the 2 of them, one is an extra in the others story and now the title doesn't even make sense...
Some okay acting performances and some of the soundtrack was alright I have to admit, but other than that nothing stands out.
The original is streaming for free as well, personally I feel like I've wasted an hour and a half odd, when I could have just watched the original, but I had to find out for myself since I'm a huge Schulz fan and he's mentioned it on Flagrant.
5/10 bang average streaming film, the funny moments saved it from being lower than that!
The best thing about this was Andrew Schulz and a few of the jokes scattered throughout the film.
To be honest this misses the mark and is just an average film, I know they had to change it up compared to the original, modernise it etcetera and they did that well, although in an annoying way, in my opinion, but I'm old enough to remember the original lol...
Which is a classic and still stands up today, there was no reason for a remake. This is just an average streaming film about basketball.
I'm trying to be vague here to avoid spoilers, but it feels like there's none of the ICONIC moments from the original, a lot of content and story missed out. It doesn't even feel like it's about the 2 of them, one is an extra in the others story and now the title doesn't even make sense...
Some okay acting performances and some of the soundtrack was alright I have to admit, but other than that nothing stands out.
The original is streaming for free as well, personally I feel like I've wasted an hour and a half odd, when I could have just watched the original, but I had to find out for myself since I'm a huge Schulz fan and he's mentioned it on Flagrant.
5/10 bang average streaming film, the funny moments saved it from being lower than that!
- How long is White Men Can't Jump?Powered by Alexa
Details
- Release date
- Country of origin
- Language
- Also known as
- Los blancos no saben saltar
- Filming locations
- Venice, California, USA(VENICEBALL tournament scenes.)
- Production companies
- See more company credits at IMDbPro
- Runtime1 hour 41 minutes
- Color
- Sound mix
- Aspect ratio
- 1.85 : 1
Contribute to this page
Suggest an edit or add missing content