Tag Archives: philosophy

Why I’ve realised I’m a Socialist, and why Liberals and Socialists must work together

For a long time, I simply considered myself a liberal. I believed in personal freedom, a strong but fair economy, and the power of government to create opportunity. I wanted a system that worked for everyone, but I also thought markets, when properly regulated, could be a force for good. But over the years, I’ve come to realise that these values of equality, fairness, and a society that serves all its people are not just liberal values. They are socialist ones too.

This isn’t about abandoning liberalism. My liberal resolve has never been stronger. But, I have been forced to recognise that if you follow the principles of liberalism to their logical conclusion, you arrive at socialism. If you believe in fairness, then you have to acknowledge that an economy where billionaires accumulate wealth while millions struggle is inherently unfair. If you believe in democracy, then you have to ask why it stops at the ballot box. Why workers don’t have real power in their workplaces, or why people don’t have a say in the essential services they rely on.

For too long, liberals have sought to mitigate capitalism’s excesses rather than confront the system itself. They have pushed for fairer taxation, stronger public services, and better protections for workers. But these are reactive measures that attempt to manage inequality rather than prevent it. And the problem with inequality is that it isn’t just an unfortunate byproduct of capitalism. It’s a feature.

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , , and | 21 Comments

Is liberalism wrong – and how would we know?

A couple of hours on Twitter is more than enough to see the acolytes of political philosophy A assuring the world that everyone who believes in political philosophy B is stupid, immoral or more than likely both. The favour is typically returned in kind.

And yet anyone who’s acquainted with that slightly curious place known as the “real world” knows there are many highly intelligent, moral and clear-thinking people in pretty much every camp. Anyone who thinks Burke, Mill or even Marx had nothing worthwhile to say is a fool.

Who’s actually right? Are our political philosophies just religions in which we must

Posted in Op-eds | Also tagged , and | 22 Comments
Advert

Recent Comments

  • Denis Loretto
    I do not think it is fair to regard Ed's "Buy British" call as a permanent lurch into protectionism. It is directly related to a current absolute necessity - co...
  • Joseph Bourke
    The instability in the US bond market is the achilles heel for the entire Trump economic agenda and unfortunately for UK public finances. It appears that finan...
  • David Evans
    Indeed Chris, you are also completely right. LGR has been a game played by the big two at the expense of the Lib Dems and democracy itself. 1) Take a largely...
  • expats
    @Simon R 12th Apr '25 - 10:57am.. Simon, I don't think there ever was a 'Thatcher blue book'...I'm afraid I was using the term in an ironic comparison to 'Ma...
  • Simon R
    @expats: Margaret Thatcher's 'blue book'? What was that? The reference rings a bell somewhere in my mind but I don't recall anything specific, and a quick Go...