Open conversations and highlighting what rightfully belongs to whom at the beginning of starting the project. if someone is being unreasonable and demanding more than what is rightfully theirs, please do not engage in long run. Don;t bring in lawyers. Lawyers should only validate the argument of what rightfully belongs to whom.

Thank you for inviting me to answer this… and what an apt time as we’re currently discussing music rights for several projects… I swear one of these devices is bugged and listening in lol For music rights, I always clarify ownership and licensing right from the start at prepro then get all that into contracts. I know I always say this: “Hire the right people”, but it’s true — the right people have never given me any problems — they always ensure our projects have the sounds they deserve to truly resonate.

I prioritize working with licensed music libraries and collaborating with artists who understand the importance of proper licensing. Open communication with all stakeholders is crucial; I ensure everyone is on the same page regarding music usage to avoid misunderstandings. When disputes arise, I approach them with transparency and a willingness to find solutions. Whether it’s negotiating with rights holders or seeking alternative tracks, I focus on maintaining positive relationships while protecting the integrity of my projects. These experiences have reinforced the value of proactive planning and clear communication in navigating the complex landscape of music rights.

Using music with clear, secure licensing is essential. I select tracks only from libraries with transparent rights policies to ensure compliance. Occasionally, I need a specific song, and if it’s GEMA-registered (Germany's main performance rights org.), I use it. If not, I reach out to the label or avoid it. Last week, I needed a similar track for an archive snippet, but it wasn’t listed, so I made the safe call not to use it. While it’s disappointing to miss the ‘perfect’ song, there’s always another option. Sometimes, the alternative is even better.

My contribution to Linkedin’s AI… Blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa blaa. Ok..now I need a cup of Tea!

Most of the musicians are friends or with good professional relation, so never face any situation like music dispute or copyright claims etc.

Any conflict could be resolved in 5 steps: 1. State the facts clear (not your opinion about it) and share what exactly concerns you about it (state the problem) 2. Offer the other side to share their perspective (no judging). Accept their perspective (doesn’t mean you agree, means you open to see where they are coming from) 3. Offer to share your perspective and do it (ONLY) if the other side agrees to listen. 4. Find common ground, benefitting for all as much as possible 5. Make an agreement on future steps This is quite wide framework, different cases might contain some middle steps, but main part is the same - readiness to accept other point of view and focus on mutual agreement

Regardless of the relationship that resulted into the partnership between the artists or the artists and the firm, it is important to always document the rights of every artist within the company. It is notable that artists are brand ambassadors of the company and help to promote the vision and mission of the company. Relationships help build businesses. However, In order to avoid clashes of interest and to ensure safe environment to thrive in and work within the media space, it is imperative that the rights of every artist to their intellectual properties are known and legally bound from the onset of the partnership.