To foster a collaborative environment when opinions on coding styles differ, focus on project outcomes as the primary goal. Remind the team that the ultimate purpose of any coding style is to produce efficient, maintainable, and scalable code. Encourage developers to prioritize code quality and project requirements over personal preferences, and use code reviews as a way to align on what works best for the project, allowing everyone to focus on long-term success rather than individual styles.

𝗙𝗮𝗰𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝗮𝘁𝗲 𝗗𝗶𝘀𝗰𝘂𝘀𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 Encourage open dialogue to understand both perspectives. 𝗘𝘀𝘁𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗶𝘀𝗵 𝗦𝘁𝗮𝗻𝗱𝗮𝗿𝗱𝘀 Create a unified coding standard everyone follows. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝗺𝗼𝘁𝗲 𝗙𝗹𝗲𝘅𝗶𝗯𝗶𝗹𝗶𝘁𝘆 Allow reasonable flexibility within the agreed guidelines. 𝗣𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲 𝗠𝗲𝗻𝘁𝗼𝗿𝘀𝗵𝗶𝗽 Help senior developers guide juniors on best practices. 𝗙𝗼𝗰𝘂𝘀 𝗼𝗻 𝗥𝗲𝘀𝘂𝗹𝘁𝘀 Prioritize code quality and functionality over personal preferences.

I Believe this can be removed to a extend by 1. Proper Training, Like guiding the method that been using for the past ,Providing the code walkthroughs etc 2. The Code Review : Review their code and functionalities, Suggest the improvement 3. Proper Communications

Handle differences in coding styles between senior and junior developers, it helps to create a clear coding style guide for everyone to follow. Encourage open discussions where team members can share their views. Pair programming is a great way for seniors to teach juniors, and regular code reviews can help juniors learn and improve. Focus on making code easy to read and maintain, and be open to mixing styles to find what works best. Support ongoing learning for the whole team through workshops or shared resources. This way, everyone can work together better.

Everyone has a different way of logical thinking and code according to that. However establishing a "standard practice of coding" from experts helps the juniors to improve their coding skills better in terms of performance and other aspects. Conducting frequent sessions between juniors and seniors helps in juniors to have the knowledge of experts and the seniors to understand their logic ability and guide them how to do it better. It has to work as a team rather than splitting the team as Juniors and Seniors.

When seniority and innovation collide, balancing coding styles can be an art. Here's how to keep harmony while letting creativity flow: Set shared guidelines: A style guide that blends best practices with room for individual flair keeps everyone aligned without stifling innovation. Mentor, don’t dictate: Pair senior devs with juniors to build bridges, fostering mutual respect and knowledge-sharing. Open the floor: Regular discussions let everyone have a say, refining standards and bringing fresh ideas to the table.

It all depends on your position in the team 1 - if you are a junior developer you should listen from both and search on your own to decide which is better .. then you can discuss it with every one separately 2 - If you are senior then you should always listen to juniors .. many may have new fresh ideas that could be turned into added value. 3 - As a team leader, you MUST provide the whole team with guidelines to do any task not just leave them on their own every one write what he wants in his own matter ... Not only this, but also you must train the whole team on following these guidelines ... and every one must know why these guide lines are there and how do they benefit the productivity of the team.

Fostering collaboration amid differing coding styles requires openness and balance. I believe the key lies in creating a shared coding style guide that respects best practices while allowing flexibility. Encouraging mentorship between senior and junior developers helps bridge knowledge gaps, and regular open discussions ensure everyone can voice their ideas and align on standards. This approach builds mutual respect and keeps the team focused on writing clean, efficient code.

If there's an established style for the software then it shouldn't be malleable. Go with whatever is consistent even if it's not optimal. Consistency might add slight development time but save a ton of rework. If there's nothing established just make sure good practice is followed (documentation, consistency within their code, naming conventions) and agree to disagree. If it works and is logical then just go with the flow as styles evolve constantly anyways.

Allow them to communicate them over a Skype call. Inform them to submit their work on a common platform and integrate solutions accordingly. Bridging call to manage differences is key