Shmoop’s Post

View organization page for Shmoop, graphic

5,993 followers

“Standardized test scores are a much better predictor of academic success than high school grades,” Christina Paxson, the president of Brown University, recently wrote. Stuart Schmill — the dean of admissions at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, one of the few schools to have reinstated its test requirement — said, “Just getting straight A’s is not enough information for us to know whether the students are going to succeed or not.” -- Did your school drop the SAT/ACT? Have plans to bring it back? https://lnkd.in/gKwaG__y

The Misguided War on the SAT

The Misguided War on the SAT

news.yahoo.com

John Melville Ph.D.

Scientist - Biology, Neuroscience, Biomedical Applications, Educational Technology and Software

8mo

The SAT has always been predictive of how well a student will do in their first year of college. They have significant class, racial and yes gender biases. Even Forbes says “meh” - PS - think twice before posting Opinion pieces by DL from the NYT - https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2019/12/11/lawsuit-claims-sat-and-act-are-biased-heres-what-research-says/

Nicole Murawski, M. Ed.-Science

Life-long learner and advocate for equity and diversity in STEM

8mo

That's interesting. When I was studying to become a teacher, one of my education professors told us that ACT/SAT scores had zero correlation to success in university. I recall asking, 'then why do we still give them?' He replied, 'they don't have any other ideas.' 🤷♀️

See more comments

To view or add a comment, sign in

Explore topics