"Meanwhile, the University of California system found that standardized-test scores helped predict first-year grades for all students, and especially the grades and graduation rates for underrepresented minority, first-generation, and low-income students. A faculty panel that finished its work in January 2020, before Covid-19 was on most colleges’ radars, recommended that the system maintain its test requirement."
But it didn't. It is test-BLIND! They won't consider test scores. When CUNY did this in the 1970s, they found that admitted students could not do the work. Maybe UC will just lower the bar.
Building "a diverse community," regardless of likelihood to graduate should not be the overarching goal in college admissions. If we lower the standards and push everyone through to graduation, the diploma loses value. When there is an overproduction of degrees, it leads to relative deprivation (the feeling that one is entitled to better wages, status, etc.).
And when the promise of better wages and status fails to be realized, people lose faith in the social contract, relative deprivation ensues, and society is destabilized (see Weimar Republic, Arab Spring, Hong Kong, Occupy, BLM, etc.: Korotayev, 2020; Farooq, 2017; Kwok 2022; Zamęcki 2018; Snow et al. 1998; Van Dyke & Soule 2002).
Todays reading is from Francie Diep
Francie takes a measured look at the testing debate. Providing nice context and overview for the conversation and minimal hyperfocus on highly rejectives increasing their exclusion.
-[[ NCAT!!!! [if you dont know you better learn!] and Joseph Montgomery are mentioned and quoted! ]]]
Joe's quote reminds me of when I tweeted:
"Is it me or does it seem that highly rejective colleges only want to enroll students they'll have to teach and support the least in order to get them to graduate "prepared" for career?"
Tidbits:
- It’s well established that poorer students tend to do worse on standardized tests, and that Asian and white students outperform Black and Hispanic ones on average. So how could making all students turn in test scores help make campuses more diverse?
- For some observers, it all seems a bit hypocritical. The colleges in question are some of the world’s wealthiest institutions. They serve a relatively small share of the country’s low- and middle-income and minority students.
- Generally, studies find that high-school grades and test scores together go a quarter of the way in predicting a student’s grades at the end of their first year in college. Three-quarters of their GPA remains unrelated to those measures.
- “We know over time what our students need to be successful. We can take students far below the standards of MIT, far below the standards of Caltech, and yet make good and great engineers out of them,” Montgomery said. “I wish more of our institutions thought that way.”
https://lnkd.in/eJZ6dxbg
Does the SAT Really Help Colleges Find ‘Diamonds in the Rough’?
chronicle.com
Scientist - Biology, Neuroscience, Biomedical Applications, Educational Technology and Software
8moThe SAT has always been predictive of how well a student will do in their first year of college. They have significant class, racial and yes gender biases. Even Forbes says “meh” - PS - think twice before posting Opinion pieces by DL from the NYT - https://www.forbes.com/sites/kimelsesser/2019/12/11/lawsuit-claims-sat-and-act-are-biased-heres-what-research-says/