On 03/07/2016 03:13 PM, Cedric St-Jean wrote: > There is already Pandas.jl, Stan.jl, MATLAB.jl and Bokeh.jl following > that trend. That is interesting. Were they done by people associated with the original projects? MATLAB.jl ? And mathworks was fine with that?
> > Maybe... NotScikitLearn.jl? ScikitForget.jl? :) It's tongue-in-cheek, > but IMO it communicates the right idea (like IceWeasel did) > > > I worry like Andy of the overhead in support > > What are you referring to? Do you mean that people might mistakenly > file issues with scikit-learn when they have problems in ScikitLearn.jl? I believe that is what he means. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Transform Data into Opportunity. Accelerate data analysis in your applications with Intel Data Analytics Acceleration Library. Click to learn more. http://makebettercode.com/inteldaal-eval _______________________________________________ Scikit-learn-general mailing list Scikit-learn-general@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/scikit-learn-general
