I have been using UnitTest++ earlier version with a variety of Embedded systems (TI, Analog Devices, number of ARM variants)
I was planning to do an upgrade across the next summer. Can anybody tell me whether the new presence of this boost capability (of which I am not familiar) is going to totally stop my ability to upgrade UnitTest++? Zbigniew Zagórski wrote: > Not that i am Unittest maintainer, but for generic user like me it's a > showstopper. UnitTest++ (AFAIR) was designed to be "simple" and > simplicity among others is "don't bring big problematic dependencies". > I don't think that most of UT++ users like to have boost dependency. > > This applies to "main library content" ... > > However it would be fine to add thing like that to something like > examples/contrib folder that is only an addition and/or application > example for interested users. > > -- Michael Smith Ph. D., Professor, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering. Adjunct Professor, Department of Radiology, University of Calgary. Analog Devices University Ambassador. Electrical and Computer Engineering, Voice: (+1) 403-220-6142 University of Calgary, Calgary, Fax: (+1) 403-282-6855 Alberta, Canada T2N1N4 Email: mike.sm...@ucalgary.ca Experience can't be taught, experience can only be earned. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july _______________________________________________ unittest-cpp-devel mailing list unittest-cpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unittest-cpp-devel
