On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 11:45 AM, David Lind <davidkl...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sean,
>
> I don't understand the reason for forking the source. Is it so outside
> developers, such as myself, can our patches into the "official" source?
>
> --==--
> DKL
>
>
> I concur. There is nothing that I've needed feature-wise that I couldn't
either create in an additive fashion (i.e. not requiring changes to the UT++
code-base), or create with a simple patch and apply to the code base myself.
Note this is not in an individual role; I maintain the 'common' UT++
code-base for a group of developers in a corporate environment.
I would very much like to see the maintainers be more active, especially
when there are patches submitted that address open bugs / feature requests;
however, II don't believe that a fork is necessary yet.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Let Crystal Reports handle the reporting - Free Crystal Reports 2008 30-Day
trial. Simplify your report design, integration and deployment - and focus on
what you do best, core application coding. Discover what's new with
Crystal Reports now. http://p.sf.net/sfu/bobj-july
_______________________________________________
unittest-cpp-devel mailing list
unittest-cpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unittest-cpp-devel
