This is the Appellate Brief by the “State” of Florida in which it attempts to obtain a reversal of the Order dismissing the contempt charges brought against Mark A. Adams without any legal basis. Apparently, the boasts made by Timothy W. Weber and Anthony S. Battaglia of their ability to improperly influence members of Florida’s government extends to members of the Florida Attorney General’s office as well as judges, “law” enforcement, and the Florida Bar. Of course, these stupid, corrupt criminals didn’t realize that this action gave rise to criminal liability for each of them for violations of my rights under color of law, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 among other crimes.
This is the Appellate Brief by the “State” of Florida in which it attempts to obtain a reversal of the Order dismissing the contempt charges brought against Mark A. Adams without any legal basis. Apparently, the boasts made by Timothy W. Weber and Anthony S. Battaglia of their ability to improperly influence members of Florida’s government extends to members of the Florida Attorney General’s office as well as judges, “law” enforcement, and the Florida Bar. Of course, these stupid, corrupt criminals didn’t realize that this action gave rise to criminal liability for each of them for violations of my rights under color of law, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 among other crimes.
This is the Appellate Brief by the “State” of Florida in which it attempts to obtain a reversal of the Order dismissing the contempt charges brought against Mark A. Adams without any legal basis. Apparently, the boasts made by Timothy W. Weber and Anthony S. Battaglia of their ability to improperly influence members of Florida’s government extends to members of the Florida Attorney General’s office as well as judges, “law” enforcement, and the Florida Bar. Of course, these stupid, corrupt criminals didn’t realize that this action gave rise to criminal liability for each of them for violations of my rights under color of law, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 among other crimes.
This is the Appellate Brief by the “State” of Florida in which it attempts to obtain a reversal of the Order dismissing the contempt charges brought against Mark A. Adams without any legal basis. Apparently, the boasts made by Timothy W. Weber and Anthony S. Battaglia of their ability to improperly influence members of Florida’s government extends to members of the Florida Attorney General’s office as well as judges, “law” enforcement, and the Florida Bar. Of course, these stupid, corrupt criminals didn’t realize that this action gave rise to criminal liability for each of them for violations of my rights under color of law, 18 U.S.C. §§ 241 and 242 among other crimes.
Copyright:
Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf
You are on page 1of 25
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA
SECOND DISTRICT
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellanr,
v Case No. 2006
MARK A. ADAMS,
Appellee.
ON APPEAL FROM CIRCUIT COURT
AN AND FOX PINSLLAS CUUNIY
STATE OF FLORIDA
INITIAL BRIEF OF APPELLANT
CHARLES J. CRIST, JR.
ATTORNEY GENERAL.
DONNA S$. KOCH
Assistant Attorney General
Florida Bar No. 865974
concourse Center 4
3507 E. Frontage Road, Suite 200
Tampa, Florida 33607-7013
(813) 287-7900
Fax (813) 281-5500
COUNSEL FOR APPELLANTTABLE OF CONTENTS
ABLE OF CLUATLONS
STATEMENT OF THE CASE AND FACTS... ....
SUMMARY OF THR ARGUMENT Eye i
AROUMENT 2. . UTR alanie
eset et UU IMI LETTER
WHETHER THE SUCCESSOR JUDG2 ERRED IN REVERSING
A FINAL ORDER OF THE PREDECESSOR JUDGE
TSsiR TT : eras
WHETHER THE SUCCESSOR JUDCE ERRED IN RULING
‘TIME WEBER APFIDAVIT WAS LEGALLY INSUFFICIENT
CONULUSLUN Se
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE .....------
CRRTTFTCATR OF FONT COMPLIANCE . 1.7... ee e
iL
14
20
20TABLE OP CITATIONS
cases
Adams v. State,
2003-4844 (Fla. 2d November 24, 2003)
Adams v. State,
884 So. ad 287 (Fla. 2d DCA 2004)
Aceizaya v. Spices,
B41 So. zd 4y4 (ila. 2d DCA 2003) -
Barwick v. State,
660 So. 2d 685 (Fla. 1995) allele
Bryant v Stare,
363 So. 24 1141 (Fla. 1% DCA 1978)
Castro v. buce,
650 So. 24 1067 (Fla, 2d DCA 1995)
Decoro v. State,
771 Sc. 2d 627 (Fla. 3d DCA 2000) .
Riehert v. State,
199 So. 24 288 (Fla. 3d DCA 1967),
aff/d, 201 80. 24 726 (Fla. 1967)
5X parte Crews,
127 Hla. 381, 1/¥ So. 24> (Fla. 1947)
Folson v. Folson,
509 So. 2d 1330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
Hagerman v. Hagerman,
751 80. 24 152 (Pla. 24 DCA 2000)
Jacksuu v. Slate,
881 So. 24 666 (Fla. 5 DCA 2004).
Lowe v. State,
468 So. 2d 258 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985)
Mackenzie v. Super Kids Eargain Stare,
565 So. 24 1332 (Fla. 1990)
ii
10,
me,
or
a
15
17
13