What Is The ISPS Code?: Topic Status
What Is The ISPS Code?: Topic Status
What Is The ISPS Code?: Topic Status
ChapChapter XI-1, Special Measures to Enhance Maritime Safety, has been enhanced to include additional
requirements covering ship identification numbers and carriage of a Continuous Synopsis Record.
Chapter XI-2, Special Measures to Enhance Maritime Security, has been created and includes a requirement for
ships and companies to comply with the International Ship and Port Facility Security (ISPS) Code. The ISPS Code
contains two parts. Part A is mandatory, while Part B is recommendatory and contains guidance for implementation
of the Code. The USCG has decreed that sections of Part B of the Code will also be taken into consideration.
Chapter XI-2 also sets out requirements for ship security alert systems and control and compliance measures for
port states and contracting governments.
As well as the new Regulations in SOLAS Chapter XI-2, the Diplomatic Conference has adopted amendments to
extant SOLAS Regulations accelerating the implementation of the requirement to fit automatic identification
systems (AIS) (Chapter V). The Diplomatic Conference has also adopted a number of Conference Resolutions
including technical co-operation, and the co-operative work with the International Labour Organisation and World
Customs Organisation.
Review and amendment of certain of the new provisions regarding maritime security may be required on
completion of the work of these two organisations.
These requirements form a framework through which ships and port facilities can co-operate to detect and deter
acts which pose a threat to maritime security. The regulatory provisions do not extend to the actual response to
security incidents or to any necessary clear-up activities after such an incident.
enables the detection and deterrence of security threats within an international framework
establishes roles and responsibilities
enables collection and exchange of security information
provides a methodology for assessing security
ensures that adequate security measures are in place.
put in place vessel and port security plans; and ensure training and drills are conducted.
TOPIC STATUS
11 Mortgage Contract
15 Statutory Certificates
33 Death Inquiries
44 Medical Certificate
54 Certificate of Competency
74 License Applications
89 ITC 69
106 Amendments to MMC No. 104 GMDSS (Radio Replaced by MMC No.118
Qualified Personnel on board Panamanian Flag
Vessels Policy)
108 Publications and Records required on non-self Addition to MMC No. 107
propelled units certified under the Mobile
Offshore Drilling Units Code
ISPS CODE
ISPS CODE
MMC 132: ISPS Code Entry into Force (Cut-off date for submission of SSPs)
MMC 135: Procedures for issuance of CSR and full term ISSC
To view all those circulars, please click HERE
The Guidelines on ship security are part of an integrated approach to security and
safety without prejudice to what is contemplated in the ISPS Code.
Ship security guidelines, as far as possible and except for ease of reference, should not
replace, duplicate or create extraneous procedures or functions to those in the ISPS
Code. Where there is no ISPS terminology, definition or procedure that meets the
requirements of these guidelines alternative terminology, definitions and procedures
should be compatible with the ISPS Code.
Nothing in these guidelines is intended to prejudice the rights or obligations of the State
under international law. These guidelines should be interpreted in a manner that does
not undermine the ILO conventions on workers rights.
These security guidelines do not override or abrogate the Panama Maritime Authority, or
any authorized in their behalf, as well as any commercial and industrial corporation or
an individual’s responsibility to comply with the laws, regulations and rules applicable in
the respective port or the Country of Panama. The guidance is not a substitute for
applicable legal requirements nor is it regulation itself.
The scope of the guidelines is to promote recognized security roles, tasks and
measures to deter, detect and respond to unlawful acts against vessels serving on
international voyages and maritime operations.
These guidelines were developed to assist owners and operators to establish protective
measures that are appropriate to their specific vessel. Knowing that vessels are unique,
owners and/or operators may seek an alternative to the specific protective measures
recommended, demonstrating that such alternative to the protective measure provides
an acceptable level of protection.
The Department of Maritime Security of the Panama Maritime Authority has developed the
following Guidelines in compliance with the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code
(ISPS) concerning ship security.
PREFACE:
2. 2. The Guidelines on ship security is part of an integrated approach to security and safety
without prejudice to what is contemplated in the ISPS Code.
4. 4. Ship security guidelines, as far as possible and except for ease of reference, should not
replace, duplicate or create extraneous procedures or functions to those in the ISPS Code.
Where there is no ISPS terminology, definition or procedure that meets the requirements of
these guidelines alternative terminology, definitions and procedures should be compatible
with the ISPS Code.
5. 5. Nothing in these guidelines is intended to prejudice the rights or obligations of the State
under international law. These guidelines should be interpreted in a manner that does not
undermine the ILO conventions on workers rights.
6. 6. These security guidelines do not override or abrogate the Panama Maritime Authority, or
any authorized in their behalf, as well as any commercial and industrial corporation or an
individual’s responsibility to comply with the laws, regulations and rules applicable in the
respective port or the Country of Panama. The guidance is not a substitute for applicable
legal requirements nor is it regulation itself.
7. 7. The scope of the guidelines is to promote recognized security roles, tasks and
measures to deter, detect and respond to unlawful acts against vessels serving on
international voyages and maritime operations.
8. 8. These guidelines were developed to assist owners and operators to establish protective
measures that are appropriate to their specific vessel. Knowing that vessels are unique,
owners and/or operators may seek an alternative to the specific protective measures
recommended, demonstrating that such alternative to the protective measure provides an
acceptable level of protection.
September 2003
1. 1. Section 8 of Part A of the ISPS Code requires the Company Security Officer (CSO) to
ensure that, for each ship for which he has security responsibilities, a Security Assessment is
carried out by persons with appropriate skills to evaluate the security of a ship, in accordance
with ISPS Code.
2. 2. The Ship Security Assessment (SSA) is considered to be an essential and integral part of
the process of developing and updating the Ship Security Plan.
4. 4. The SSA must include an On Scene Security Survey and, at least, the following
elements:
5. 5. The SSA must be documented, reviewed, accepted and retained by the Company.
6. 6. Prior to commencing the SSA, the CSO should ensure that advantage is taken of
information available on the assessment of threat for the ports at which the ship will call or at
which passengers embark or disembark, and about the port facilities and their protective
measures. The CSO should study previous reports on similar security needs. Where
feasible, the CSO should meet with appropriate persons on the ship and in the port facilities
to discuss the purpose and methodology of the assessment. The CSO should follow and
specific guidance offered by the Contracting Governments.
1. 1. physical security;
2. 2. structural integrity;
4. 4. procedural policies;
5. 5. radio and telecommunication systems, including computer systems and networks; &
6. 6. other areas that may, if damaged or used for illicit observation, pose a risk to people,
property, or operations on board the ship or within a port facility.
8. 8. Those involved in a SSA should be able to draw upon expert in assistance regarding to:
7. 7. ship security;
11. 11. radio and telecommunications systems, including computer systems and networks;
2. 2. the location of areas which should have restricted access, such as the bridge, spaces
in which the main propulsion or generating machinery, navigation equipment, fire control
station, emergency power and communications are located.
3. 3. the location and function of each actual or potential access point to the ship;
4. 4. changes in the tide which may have an impact on the vulnerability or security of the
ship;
6. 6. locations where the ship’s stores and essential maintenance equipment is stores;
9. 9. number of ship’s personnel, any existing security duties and any existing training
practices of the Company;
10. 10. existing security and safety equipment for the protection of passengers and ship’s
personnel.
11. 11. escape and evacuation routes and assembly stations which have to be maintained to
ensure the orderly and safe emergency evacuation of the ship;
12. 12. existing agreements with private security companies providing ship/waterside
security services; and.
13. 13. existing security measures and procedures in effect, including inspection and control
procedures, identification systems, surveillance and monitoring equipment, personnel
identification documents and communications, alarms, lighting, access control and other
appropriate systems.
10. 10. The SSA should consider the continuing relevance of the existing security measures and
guidance, procedures and operations, under both routine and emergency conditions and
should determine security guidance relevant to:
1. 1. restricted areas;
11. 11. The SSA should consider the persons, activities, services and operations that it is
important to protect. This includes:
5. 5. ship’s stores;
12. 12. The SSA should consider the persons, activities, services and operations that it is
important to protect. This includes:
5. 5. ship’s stores;
13. 13. The SSA should consider all possible threats, which may include the following types of
security incidents:
1. 1. damage to, or destruction of, the ship or port facility, e.g. by explosive devices, arson,
sabotage or vandalism;
6. 6. use of the ship to carry those intending to cause a security incident and/or their
equipment;
14. 14. The SSA should take into account all possible vulnerabilities, which may include:
15. 15. The CSO and Ship Security Officer (SSO) should always have regard to the effect that
security measures may have on ship’s personnel who will remain on the ship for long
periods. When developing security measures, particular consideration should be given to the
convenience, comfort and personal privacy of the ship’s personnel and their ability to
maintain their effectiveness over long periods.
16. 16. Upon completion of the SSA, a report must be prepared, consisting of a summary of
how the assessment was conducted, a description of each vulnerability found during the
assessment, and a description of counter measures that could be used to address each
vulnerability. The report must be protected from unauthorized access or disclosure.
2. 2. monitoring restricted areas to ensure that only authorized persons have access;
6. 6. supervising the handling of cargo and the delivery of ship’s stores; and
7. 7. ensuring that ship security communication, information, and equipment are readily
available.
1. 1. According with the Part A 9, ISPS Code requires each ship to carry on board a Ship
Security Plan (SSP) approval by its flag state or by an organization recognized by it to carry
out such approvals, known as a Recognized Security Organization (RSO).
2. 2. The Company Security Officer (CSO) has the responsibility of ensuring that the plan is
prepared and submitted for approval. The content of each individual SSP will vary depending
on the particular ship it covers. The Ship Security Assessments (SSA) will have identified the
particular features of the ship and the potential threats and vulnerabilities. The preparation of
the SSP will require these features to be addressed in detail.
3. 3. All SSP have to make provision for the three, internationally adopted, Security Levels:
A- A- Security Level 1, normal; the level at which ships and port facilities will normally
operate;
B- B- Security Level 2, heightened; the level applying for as long as there is a heightened
risk of a security incident;
C- C- Security Level 3, exceptional; the level applying for the period of time when there is
a probable or imminent risk of a security incident.
4. 4. The Plan must be written in the working language or languages of the ship. If the
language or languages used are not English, French or Spanish, a translation into one of these
languages must be included, preferably English. The Plan must address, at least, the
following (Part A 9.4 ISPS Code):
2. 2. Identification of the restricted areas and measures for the prevention of unauthorized
access;
9. 9. Procedures for training, drills and exercises associated with the Plan;
10. 10. Procedures for interfacing with port facility security activities;
11. 11. Procedures for the periodic review and updating of the Plan ;
15. 15. Procedures to ensure the inspection, testing, calibration, and maintenance of security
equipment provided on board, if any;
16. 16. Frequency of testing or calibration of security equipment provided on board, if any;
17. 17. Identification of the locations where the ship security alert system activation points
are provided (this information should be kept elsewhere on board in a document know to
the master, the SSO and other shipboard personnel as decided by the Company);
18. 18. Procedures, instructions and guidance on the use of the ship security alert system,
including testing, activation, deactivation, resetting, and procedures to limit false alerts.
2. 2. Detail the ship’s relationships with the Company, port facilities, other ships and
relevant authorities with security responsibility;
4. 4. Detail basic security measures for Security Level 1, both operational and physical,
that will always be in place;
5. 5. Detail the additional security measures that will allow the ship to progress without
delay to Security Level 2 and, when necessary, to Security Level 3;
6. 6. Provide for regular review, or audit, of the SSP and for its amendment in response to
experience or changing circumstances;
6. 6. In addition, the SSP should establish the following, which relate to all Security Levels
(Part B 9.7 ISPS Code);
5. 5. The type and maintenance requirements of security and surveillance equipment and
systems, if any;
6. 6. Procedures to ensure the timely submission, and assessment, 0of reports relating to
possible breaches of security or security concerns;
7. 7. Procedures to establish, maintain and update an inventory of any dangerous goods or
hazardous substances carried on board, including their location.
7. 7. The Plan can be kept in an electronic format. In such case, it must be protected by
measures aimed at preventing unauthorized access, disclosure, deletion, destruction or
amendment (Part A 9.6 ISPS Code).
8. 8. The Plan should address the security measures to be taken at each Security Level
covering:
3. 3. Handling of cargo;
1. 1. Section 12 of Part A of the ISPS Code requires that companies designate a Ship Security
Officer (SSO) on each ship.
2. 2. The duties and responsibilities of the SSO include, but are not limited to (Part A 12.2
ISPS Code):
1. Undertaking regular security inspections of the ship to ensure that appropriate security
measures are maintained;
2. Maintaining and supervising the implementation of the Ship Security Plan (SSP),
monitoring the continuing relevance and effectiveness of the Plan, including the
undertaking of internal audits and any amendments to the Plan;
3. Co-ordinating the security aspects of the handling of cargo and ship’s stores with other
shipboard personnel and with the relevant Port Facility Security Officers (PFSO);
5. Reporting to the Company Security Officer (CSO) any deficiencies and non-conformities
identified during internal audits, periodic reviews, security inspections and verifications
of compliance, and implementing any corrective actions;
7. Ensuring that adequate training has been provided to shipboard personnel, as appropriate;
9. Co-ordinating implementation of the SSP with the CSO and the relevant PFSO;
10. Ensuring that any security equipment is properly operated, tested, calibrated and
maintained;
11. Reviewing and completing the Declaration of Security (DOS) on behalf of the ship.
3. 3. According with Part B 13.1 ISPS Code requires the SSO to have knowledge and receive
training in some or all of the following, as appropriate:
1. Security administration;
5. Methodology of SSA;
10. Instruction techniques for security training and education, including security measures
and procedures;
11. Handling sensitive security related information and security related communications;
19. Security drills and exercises, including drills and exercises with the port facilities;
4. 4. In addition the SSO should have adequate knowledge of, and receive training in, some or
all of the following ship specific areas, as appropriate (Part B 13.2 ISPS Code):
2. The SSP and related procedures (including scenario-based training on how to respond);
5. Testing, calibration and, whilst at sea, maintenance of security equipment and systems.
5. 5. Other shipboard personnel having specific security duties should have sufficient
knowledge and ability to perform their assigned duties, including, as appropriate (Part B 13.3
ISPS Code):
9. Testing, calibration and, whilst at sea, maintenance of security equipment and systems;
11. Methods of physical searches of persons, personal effects, baggage, cargo and ship’s
stores.
6. 6. All other shipboard personnel should have sufficient knowledge of and be familiar with
relevant provisions of the SSP, including (Part B 13.4 ISPS Code)
1. The meaning and the consequential requirements of the different Security Levels;
1. 1. Section 11 of Part A of the ISPS Code requires each shipping Company to designate a
person to act as the Company Security Officer (CSO) for one or more ships, depending on
the number or types of ships the Company operates, provided it is clearly identified for
which ships the person is responsible.
3. 3. In respect of such ships, the duties and responsibilities of the Company Security Officer
(CSO) include, but are not limited to (Part A 11.2 ISPS Code):
1. Advising the level of threats likely to be encountered by the ship, using appropriate
Security Assessments and other relevant information;
3. Ensuring the development, the submission for approval, and thereafter the
implementation and maintenance of the Ship Security Plan (SSP) and its placement on
board the appropriate ship;
4. Monitoring the continuing relevance and effectiveness of the plan, ensuring that the Ship
Security Plan (SSP) is modified, as appropriate, to correct deficiencies and satisfies the
security requirements of the individual ship;
6. Arranging for the initial and subsequent verifications of the ship by the Flag State or the
Recognized Security Organization (RSO);
7. Ensuring that deficiencies and non-conformities identified during internal audits, periodic
reviews, security inspections and verifications of compliance are promptly addressed and
dealt with;
9. Ensuring adequate training for personnel responsible for the security, of the ship;
10. Ensuring effective communication and co-operation between the Ship Security Officer
(SSO) and the relevant Port Facility Security Officers (PFSO);
12. Ensuring that, if sister-ship or fleet security plans are used, the plan for each ship
reflects relevant ship-specific information accurately;
13. Ensuring that any alternative or equivalent arrangements approved for a particular ship
or group of ships are implemented and maintained.
4. 4. According with Part B 13.1 ISPS Code requires the Company Security Officer (CSO),
and appropriate shore based Company personnel, to have knowledge of, and training in,
some or all the following, as appropriate:
1. 1. Security administration;
10. 10. Instruction techniques for security training and education, including security
measures and procedures;
11. 11. Handling sensitive security related information and security related communications;
13. 13. Recognition and detection of weapons, dangerous substances and devices;
16. 16. Security equipment and systems and their operational limitations;
19. 19. Security drills and exercises, including drills and exercise with port facilities; and
Measures which might be taken at each of the Security Levels outlined by the ISPS Code:
Security Level 1
For Access Control
1. 1. The Ship Security Plan should establish the security measures to control access to the
ship, where the following may be applied:
1. 1. checking the identify of all persons seeking to board the ship and confirming their
reasons for doing so by checking, for example, joining instructions, passenger tickets,
boarding passes, work orders etc:
2. 2. in liaison with the port facility, ensuring that designated secure areas are established
in which inspections and searching of people, baggage (including carry on items),
personal effects, vehicles and their contents can take place;
3. 3. in liaison with the port facility, ensuring that vehicles destined to be loaded on board
car carriers, ro-ro and other passenger ships are subjected to search prior to loading, in
accordance with the frequency required in the Ship Security Plan.
4. 4. segregating checked persons and their personal effects from unchecked persons
and their personal effects;
8. 8. providing security briefings to all ship personnel on possible threats, the procedures
for reporting suspicious persons, objects or activities and the need for vigilance.
Security Level 1
For Restricted Areas
2. 2. The Ship Security Plan should establish the security measures to be applied to restricted
areas, which may include:
3. 3. The Ship Security Plan should establish the security measures to be applied during cargo
handling, which may include.
1. 1. routine checking of cargo, cargo transport until and cargo spaces prior to, and during,
cargo handling operations;
2. 2. checks to ensure that cargo being loaded matches the cargo documentation;
3. 3. ensuring, in liaison with the port facility, that vehicles to be loaded on board car
carriers, ro-ro and passenger ships are subjected to search prior to loading, in accordance
with the frequency required in the Ship Security Plan, and
Security Level 1
For Delivery of Ship’s Stores
4. 4. The Ship Security Plan should establish the security measures to be applied during
delivery of ship’s stores, which may include.
1. 1. checking to ensure stores match the order prior to being loaded on board; and
Security Level 1
For Handling Unaccompanied Baggage
5. 5. The Ship Security Plan should establish the security measures to be applied when
handling unaccompanied baggage is screened or searched up to and including 100 percent,
which may include use of x-ray screening.
Security Level 1
For Monitoring the Security of the Ship
6. 6. The Ship Security Plan should establish the security measures to be applied which may
be a combination of lighting, watchkeepers, security guards or use of security and
surveillance equipment to allow ship’s security personnel to observe the ship in general, and
barriers and restricted areas in particular.
7. 7. The Ship’s deck and access points to the ship should be illuminated during hours of
darkness and periods of low visibility while conducting ship/port interface activities or at a
port facility or anchorage when necessary. While underway, when necessary, ships should
use the maximum lighting available consistent with safe navigation, having regard to the
provisions of the International Regulation for the Prevention of Collisions at Sea in force.
8. 8. The following should be considered when establishing the appropriate level and location
of lighting:
1. 1. whilst at anchor or alongside, the ship’s personnel should be able to detect activities
beyond the ship, on both the shoreside and the waterside;
Security Level 2
For Access Control
9. 9. The Ship Security Plan should establish the security measures to be applied to protect
against a heightened risk of a security incident to ensure higher vigilance and tighter control,
which may include:
1. 1. assigning additional personnel to patrol deck areas during silent hours to deter
unauthorized access;
2. 2. limiting the number of access points to the ship, identifying those to be closed and
the means of adequately securing them;
3. 3. deterring waterside access to the ship, including, for example, the provision of boat
patrols in liaison with the port facility;
4. 4. establishing a restricted area on the shoreside of the ship, in close co-operation with
the port facility;
5. 5. increasing the frequency and detail of searches of people, personal effects, and
vehicles being embarked or loaded onto the ship;
7. 7. providing additional specific security briefings to all ship personnel on any identified
threats, re-emphasizing the procedures for reporting suspicious persons,
Security Level 2
Restricted Areas
10. 10. The frequency and intensity of the monitoring of, and control of access to, restricted
areas should be increased to ensure that only authorized persons have access. The Ship
Security Plan should establish the additional security measures to be applied, which may
include:
Security Level 2
For Handling of Cargo
11. 11. The Ship Security Plan should establish the additional security measures to be applied
during cargo handling, which may include:
4. 4. increased frequency and detail in checking of seals or other methods used to prevent
tampering.
12. 12. Detailed checking of cargo may be accomplished by the following means;
Security Level 2
For Delivery of Ship’s Stores
13. 13. The Ship Security Plan should establish the additional security measures to be applied
during delivery of ship’s stores by exercising checks prior to receiving stores on board and
intensifying inspections.
Security Level 2
For Handling Unaccompanied Baggage
14. 14. The Ship Security Plan should establish the additional security measures to be applied
when handling unaccompanied baggage, which should include 100 percent x-ray screening
of all unaccompanied baggage.
Security Level 2
For Monitoring the Security of the Ship
15. 15. The Ship Security Plan should establish the additional security measures to be applied to
enhance the monitoring and surveillance capabilities, which may include:
2. 2. increasing the coverage and intensity of lighting or the use of security and
surveillance equipment;
4. 4. ensuring co-ordination with waterside boat patrols, and foot or vehicle patrols on the
shoreside, when provided.
Security Level 3
For Access Control
16. 16. The Ship should comply with the instructions issued by those responding to the security
incident or threat thereof. The Ship Security Plan should detail the security measures which
could be taken by the ship, in close co-operation with those responding and the port Facility,
which may include:
2. 2. granting access only to those responding to the security incident or threat thereof;
17. 17. The ship should comply with the instructions issued by those responding to the security
incident or threat thereof. The Ship Security Plan should detail the security measures which
could be taken by the ship, in close co-operation with those responding and the port facility,
which may include:
1. 1. establishing additional restricted areas on the ship in proximity to the security incident
or the believed location of the security threat, to which access is denied; and
Security Level 3
For Handling of Cargo
18. 18. The Ship should comply with the instructions issued by those responding to the security
Incident or threat thereof. The Ship Security Plan should detail the security measures which
could be taken by the ship, in close co-operation with those responding and the port facility,
which may include:
Security Level 3
For Delivery of Ship’s Stores
19. 19. The ship should comply with the instructions issued by those responding to the security
Incident or threat thereof. The Ship Security Plan should detail the security measures which
could be taken by the ship, in close co-operation with those responding and the port Facility,
which may include:
Security Level 3
For Handling Unaccompanied Baggage
20. 20. The ship should comply with the instructions issued by those responding to the security
incident or threat thereof. The Ship Security Plan should detail the security measures which
could be taken by the ship, in close co-operation with those responding and the port facility,
which may include:
1. 1. subjecting such baggage to more extensive screening, for example x-raying it from at
least two different angles;
Security Level 3
For Monitoring the Security of the Ship
21. 21. The Ship should comply with the instructions issued by those responding to the security
incident or threat thereof. The Ship Security Plan should detail the security measures which
could be taken by the ship, in close co-operation with those responding and the port facility,
which may include:
3. 3. maximizing the length of time such surveillance equipment can continue to record;
September 2003
1. Effective from September 15th 2003, pre-arrival notification for vessels approaching
Panamanian waters will be 96 (ninety six) hours and must include copy of crew list, and detail of
cargo if any. This requirement also applies to vessels bound for the Panama Canal with
scheduled transit and also to those with a voyage time less than 96 hours from their previous
port of call.
2. If the vessel is due for transit it should follow MR´s Advisory to Shipping No. A-17-2003
(Panama Canal Authority Advisory). If the vessel is going to enter a Panamanian port, please
submit information to:
September 2003
Merchant Marine Circular No. 130
1. 1. The purpose of this Merchant Marine Circular is to announce new regulations applicable
to Maritime Labor Inspections on board Panamanian flagged ships.
2. 2. According to Chapter Ten “Inspections” of Law Decree No. 8 of 1998 “whereby work at
sea and in navigable waterways is regulated” on board Panamanian-registered vessels, the
Panama Maritime Authority (PMA) through the Directorate General of Seafarers has
approved the regulations related to Maritime Labor Inspections by Resolution J. D 022 of
August 14, 2003.
4. 4. The owner(s)/operator(s), charterers and others responsible for the operation of one or
more vessels sailing under the Panamanian flag, as well as their agents or representatives,
and the Master of such vessels shall be under obligation to admit the Inspection personnel
on board, cooperate with them and allow them to carry out the inspection.
October 2003
Merchant Marine Circular No. 131 REVISED
To: Shipowners/Operators, Masters, Recognized Security
Organizations and Marine Inspectors of
Panamanian Registered Vessels
1. The purpose of this Merchant Marine Circular is to serve as guidance regarding the
amendments to the SOLAS Convention and to the new Chapters regarding Maritime
Security and the new ISPS Code.
2. The diplomatic Conference on Maritime Security held in London in December 2002 adopted
new provisions in the International Convention for the safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974
and the International Code for the Security of Ships and of Port Facilities (ISPS Code) to
enhance maritime security. The ISPS Code is entering into effect internationally on the 1st of
July 2004.
3. Having regard to the importance of the ISPS Code, the Panama Maritime Authority through
its Board of Directors created the Maritime Security Department. This department has the
responsibility to oversee the implementation of the ISPS Code and responds solely to the
Administrator.
4. The Panama Maritime Authority has outlined the implementation of the Code in a four-step
process:
5. Panama will incorporate the figure of Recognized Security Organizations (RSO) in the
implementation of the ISPS Code; and multiple Interim Guidelines have been issued on the
different aspects of the Code: Ships, Port Facilities, Companies and Recognized Security
Organizations. For further information regarding this subject, please write to
MSD@amp.gob.pa
6. The Panama Maritime Authority has recognized as the RSOs responsible for the evaluation
of Ship Security Plans (SSP):
Shipowners must submit their SSP for plan approval following instructions by the
different authorized RSOs.
7. Upon evaluation of the plan by P.V.S, U.S.G, or S.T.E.T., shipowners shall be notified of
the approval so they can contact an RSO (Verifier) to carry out the verification on board.
The following list of RSOs has been authorized for the verification process:
8. The RSO carrying out the verification will then submit a report to the Panama Maritime
Authority detailing the inspection carried out and determining that the vessel is found in
compliance with the approved ship security plan. The Panama Maritime Authority will then
issue an International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC) to the vessel.
9. The validity of the ISSC will be of five (5) years with interim inspections between the second
and third year and a second one six months prior to expiration. Interim ISSC could be issued
by the RSO carrying out the verification or by the Panama Maritime Authority and the validity
of the same should not exceed six (6) months.
10. Ships under bareboat charter - For the effects of this Maritime Administration, the
responsibility of the elaboration, evaluation and implementation of the Ship Security Plan on
board of bareboat charter vessels will be subject to requirements of the Flag the vessel is
flying.
11. ITC 69: This Administration will consider the application of the ISPS Code to those
passenger vessels, cargo vessels and high-speed crafts based only on their ITC-69
tonnage, this provision does not include MODU units. National tonnage provisions (interim
scheme) will not be taken into consideration.
December 2003
Revised April 2004 (inclusion of 5 additional RSOs)
Revised June 2004 (inclusion of 2 additional RSOs)
Merchant Marine Circular No. 132
To: Shipowners/Operators, Charterers, Masters, Recognized Security
Organizations and Marine Inspectors of Panamanian flagged Vessels
The amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974
and the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS Code) adopted by the
Conference of SOLAS Contracting Governments on December 12, 2002, are due to enter into
force on July 1st, 2004.
In this regard, shipowners and all those involved in the ISPS implementation process are
strongly urged to redouble their efforts to ensure compliance with the new maritime security
measures, whose dispositions become mandatory on July 1st of this year.
In order to avoid any repercussions to Ships, shipping companies, port facilities and
international shipborne trade, all parties involved must play an active role in the ISPS Code
implementation.
The Panama Maritime Authority reiterates all information contained in Merchant Marine Circular
No.131 (revised), which details the procedures to follow by all parties concerned in the
implementation process and strongly urges all those involved to comply at the earliest possible
date.
The Maritime Security Department, has established a cut-off date as of May 1st, 2004 for the
submission of ship security plans (SSP) in order to guarantee a proper implementation of the
ISPS. This measure is being taken to avoid last minute bottlenecks and to assure proper
compliance with the ISPS Code, by allowing enough time for verification of the SSPs.
We would also like to encourage all companies to provide to the Maritime Security Department
(csr@amp.gob.pa) the information of all designated Company Security Officers (CSO) and
their contact details by May 1st 2004.
Attention is also drawn to the compliance of Merchant Marine Circular No.129, with regards to
“Pre-arrival Notification”.
February 2004
In this regard, shipowners and all those involved in the ISPS implementation process are
strongly urged to redouble their efforts to ensure compliance with the new maritime security
measures, whose dispositions become mandatory on July 1st of this year.
In order to avoid any repercussions to Ships, shipping companies, port facilities and
international shipborne trade, all parties involved must play an active role in the ISPS Code
implementation.
The Panama Maritime Authority reiterates all information contained in Merchant Marine Circular
No.131 (revised), which details the procedures to follow by all parties concerned in the
implementation process and strongly urges all those involved to comply at the earliest possible
date.
The Maritime Security Department, has established a cut-off date as of May 1st, 2004 for the
submission of ship security plans (SSP) in order to guarantee a proper implementation of the
ISPS. This measure is being taken to avoid last minute bottlenecks and to assure proper
compliance with the ISPS Code, by allowing enough time for verification of the SSPs.
We would also like to encourage all companies to provide to the Maritime Security Department
(csr@amp.gob.pa) the information of all designated Company Security Officers (CSO) and
their contact details by May 1st 2004.
Attention is also drawn to the compliance of Merchant Marine Circular No.129, with regards to
“Pre-arrival Notification”.
February 2004
The amendments to the International Convention for the Safety of Life at Sea (SOLAS), 1974
and the International Ship and Port Facility Security Code (ISPS Code) adopted by the
Conference of SOLAS Contracting Governments on 12 December 2002, are due to enter into
force on 1 July 2004.
In accordance with Regulation XI/6, all Panamanian registered vessels, to which this regulation
applies, shall be fitted with a Ship Security Alert System (SSAS) that complies with the
performance standards specified in the International Maritime Organization (IMO) Resolution
MSC.136 (76), as revised by MSC.147 (77).
The Panama Maritime Authority has designated the Company (according to the ISM Code
definition) as the competent authority to receive alerts.
Upon receipt of an alert, the Company Security Officer (CSO) shall notify the Panama Maritime
Authority, on behalf of the Company. The notification shall include the name and the location of
the vessel whose SSAS has been activated, in order to inform the relevant Coastal State(s).
The communication between the Company and the Panama Maritime Authority will be
maintained until verification that the situation has returned to normal.
The Company shall notify the Maritime Security Department of the tracking system that will be
used to comply with Regulation 6.
Chemical tankers
Gas carriers
In order to comply with Regulation I/6 and Section A-I/6 of the STCW78 convention, in its
amended form, with regards to the training and assessment of all seafarers working aboard
Panamanian flagged vessels and related, the Panama Maritime Authority hereby notifies:
DEFINITIONS
1. Course Certificate: document issued by the training center under which the seafarer has
received specialized maritime training, which is submitted with the application for licensing
and/or course endorsement.
2. Course Endorsement: document issued by a recognized maritime administration certifying
the validity of the course certificate being presented, and confirming that the bearer has
shown the proficiency necessary to carry out specific duties, in accordance with STCW95
regulations.
APPLICATION:
1. For purposes of license applications and course endorsements, all course certificates issued
by Training Centers recognized by this Administration are valid until their expiration date. In
the absence of an expiration date, their validity is limited to five years from the date of issue.
2. Expired course certificates and course endorsements submitted for the purposes of
licensing or course endorsement must be validated with an STCW95 revalidation stamp or
accompanied by an STCW95 revalidation certificate. Alternatively, a statement from the
regulating Maritime Administration may be submitted to claim an extended validity in
accordance with STCW95 regulations.
3. 3. All course endorsements issued by the Panama Maritime Authority have a validity of 5
years. The administrative format for course endorsements has varied throughout the years.
The following information is provided to help determine the validity of the endorsements,
according to their date of issuance:
Format # 1: Course Endorsements issued up to the year 2002: These documents only mention
the course being endorsed and the date of issue (stated in the lower left corner) of the course
endorsement. As such, they will remain valid up to 5 years from the date of the endorsement.
Format # 2: Course Endorsements issued between 2002 and 2004: These documents are
similar to Format # 1, but have a new line located beneath the name of the course being
endorsed, stating the date of issue of the course certificate (e.g. **ISSUED ON 17/06/2003).
These endorsements will remain valid for a period of 5 years from the date of issue of the
course certificate. This date is not to be confused with the date of issue of the course
endorsement, located in the lower left corner of the course endorsement, and which has no
relevance to its time validity.
Format # 3: Course Endorsements issued starting 2004: These course endorsements are
similar to Format # 2, but the line stating the date of issue of the course certificate has been
changed to state the date of expiration of the course endorsement (e.g. **ISSUED ON
17/06/2003 changes to **EXPIRES ON 17/06/2008).
CLARIFICATION:
Course endorsements are not subject to the expiration date of the license under which they
were issued (license number is stated in the upper right hand corner of the course
endorsement), and will continue to be valid up to their allotted time, as explained in Application
Point 3.
April 2004
Subject: Procedures for the issuance of the Continuous Synopsis Record (CSR)
and the Full Term International Ship Security Certificate (ISSC).
For the issuance of the Continuous Synopsis Record Certificate (CSR) and the International
Ship Security Certificate (ISSC), the Maritime Security Department of the Panama Maritime
Authority (MSD) has developed the following guidelines and procedures:
1- Completed CSR applications in the attached format (click here), must be mailed or
faxed to:
Maritime Security Department
Panama Maritime Authority
Diablo Heights, Bldg. 534
P.O. Box 592, Balboa, Ancon – Panama, Republic of Panama
4- The CSR Document may be withdrawn directly in the MSD central office by the
applicant, or by the Ship’s legal representative, or by a designated person carrying a
formal letter of authorization on company’s letterhead. Alternatively, the CSR Document
may be sent by courier at the applicant’s expense. Such preference must be clearly
stated and the courier account number to be charged (recipient) must be indicated.
3- Panama Maritime Authority will issue the full term certificates within one week, previous
payment of US $ 250.00 Dollars.
Copy of the payment receipt must be sent to MSD in order to process the ISSC.
a) Copy of Plan approval certificate issued by one of the RSOs authorized by the
Panama Maritime Authority to perform SSP evaluation (PVS, STET or USG).
(REVISED)
b) Copy of the audit report issued by one of the RSOs authorized by the Panama
Maritime Authority to carry out plan verification on board (Merchant Marine
Circular No. 131 Revised).
c) Document issued by the RSO certifying that the ship security plan has been
implemented correctly on board (interim certificate or statement of compliance).
5- 5- The full term ISSC may be withdrawn directly in the MSD central office by the
applicant, or by the Ship’s legal representative, or by a designated person carrying a
formal letter of authorization on company’s letterhead. Alternatively, the full term ISSC
may be sent by courier at the applicant’s expense. Such preference must be clearly
stated and the courier account number to be charged (recipient) must be indicated.
May 2004