Gear Lubrication 3
Gear Lubrication 3
Gear Lubrication 3
antenna drives. bridge drives. cranes, etc. 'Gears in the e applications run slowly, and they are
therefore boundary lubricated, mu t bond strongly to resi
t
The lubricant
gear teeth. However. the queezing and liding action of gearleeLh tends
10 push
onthe type
of gearing and enclo ure, operating speed and load. ambient temperature, and method oflubricant application. Most gears are lubricated with one of the following types: oil. grease, adhesive open-gear lubricant, Dr solid lubricant. The optimum lubricant for any application is the least expensive, considering both initial cost and maintenance co ts, thai meet the requirements. Oil is ihe rna
'I widely
the root of the gear teeth where it is relatively ineffective. These iubricants are applied by hand brushing or by automatic systems which d sliver
quick-evaporating
olvent/
diluent to make them easier to apply, Open-gear lubricants share the disadvantages of grease lubrication, and they are especially costly (and messy) to maintain. For these reasons. the 'trend i away from open gear toward enclo ed, oillubricated gearboxes whenever possible, Solid Ilubricants, usua\Jy in the form ofbonded, dry films. are
1I
it is readily distributed to gears and bearings and has both good lubricating and cooling propertie . Also. contamination may be readily removed by filtering or draining and replacing the oil. However, it requires an oil-tight enclosure provided with adequate haft eals. lowbecause il. does not circulate Grea e is suitable only for low-speed, 'load applications
too
high ortoo [ow for an oil orgrea e: where leak age cannot be tolerated; or where the gears must operate in a vacuum. These lubricantsare usually molybdenum disulfide (MoS teeth and cured
10 2 )
well, and it is a relatively poor coolant. Grease lubricated gears are generally boundary lubricared becausethe grease is either pushed aside or thrown from the gear teeth, Contamination from wear particles or other debris is u ually trapped in the grea eend require
COSIly
form a dry film coating. (PTFE) and tungsten are also used. Solid
lubricants are expensive to apply and have limited wear lives. However. in many applications, such as spacec raft, they are the only alie mati ve and can provideexcelleut service.
maintenance on-light.
to-eliminate.
sidered, it is usually found that an oil lubricant is more economical for gear lubrication. Open-gear lubricants are viscous, adhesive semi-fluids used on large. low-speed, open gears.
1,4
GEAR
TECHNOLOGY
requirements
of pur. hell-
ture. Ester and bydrocarbon synthetic lubricants have high viscosity indices. giving them good fluidity or low vi cosities at very low temperaat high temperathat tures and acceptable viscositie
and spiral-bevel
gearsare
essentially the same. For thi clas of gears, the magnitudes of the loads and .Iiding peeds are
tures. The volatility of e ters is lewerthno ing oil loss at high temperature. long service life. the extra co
t
oils,
R&O oils.
lubricants generally cannot be ju tified for oilbath ystems unless there are extreme temperatures involved. becau e the oil mu l be changed frequently to remove contamination. Selecting Gear Lubricant The recommendations ~hould be followed when Vi co it.y
commonly called turbine ,oils, are used in many high- peed gear unit, where the gear [Oath loads are relatively low. Mlneral oll without anti- cuff additives are uitable forhigh-speed, hghtly loaded gear oil films. property In these where the high entraining developsthick i vi co ity, EHD AntiCOl
for enclosed gear drives that operate at pitch line velocities up to 5,000 fpm. AGMA 421.063 should be consulted 5,000 fpm). In our discussion of gear failure' modes, we found that viscosity is one of the most important lubricant properties. and the higher the viscosity. the greaterthe protection against the various for high-peed drives (>
metal contact and the cuffing mode of failure. Slower speed gears, especially carbu rized gears, tendto be more heavily loaded. require higher viscosity The e gears lubricants generally
with anti-scuff additives. Hypoid gear. such as those used for autoprone to scuffing For these reasons, motive axles, are especially high sliding velocities,
because they are heavily loaded and they have hypoid gear oils have the higher concentrations of anti-scuff additive. For critical applications ..the contact temperatore hould be calculated with Blok' lubricant. resistanc e. Worm gears which generates Fortunately. have high hdingvel.ocity losses. are relatively lubricated with with lubrics.ignificant frictional
I
equation
and compared to the scuffing temperature of the Thi quantitative method is effective cuffing for selecting a lubricant with adequate
gain in operating
Gear drives operating ill cold climates must 11 ave a lubricant that circulate s freely and does not cause high starting torques. lubricant A candidate gear
mineral oil. that are compounded fany oil or low acid tallow, of the additive form
Robed ErricheUo
is lire principo; ;11
These oils eontain 3% to 10% The polar molurface films by with the soap which
(9f) lower than the expected minimum ambient start-up temperature, mineral gear oils are lOaF while synthetic gear lubricantshave significantly lower pour point of about -40QF, Pour point depre ants are u ed
110
phy ical ad orption or by reaction surface oxide to form a metallic "lubricity" Synthetic or friction-reducing lubricants
acts as a [ow hear strength film. improving the properly. are u ed for appJ ica-
ta.ilor pour points of mineral lubricants for auto:motive hypoid gears to. be as low as -40F. The pitch line speed of the gear index of the required viscosity. is a good An empirical.
tions, such as aircraft gas turbines, where the oil must operate over a wide temperature range and have good oxidation stability at high tempera-
15
,,1)
7000
V40:::-----
fhi's applicationgi ve
(2)
(V) O.S v
where v 40
::: 40
7000
:::
128 cSt
,(3000) 0.5
= lubricant =
kinematic viscosity at 40C, cSt This indicates that the viscosity per AGMA 42 L06 (68 cSt) is much too low, and the visco ity per AGMA 250.04 050 cSt) is appropriate. Hence, definitions of high- peed ver us abetter low-
V := operatingphch line velocity, ft/min v= 0.262 d n d operating pitch diameter of pinion, in. n= pinion speed, rpm
Caution must. be 'u ed when using AGMA recommendation forviscosity. Theauthorknows The pinion speed of an application where two gear drives were considered to be high-speed. was 3.625 rpm, qualifying the gear units as highspeed gear drivesper AGMA 421.06. The gear drives were supplied with oil having the recommended viscosity per AGMA 421.06 of ISO 68. However, because the plnion was relatively small, its pitch line velocity was only 3,000 fpm. This qualifies the geardrives as slow-speed per AGMA 250.04, which recommends a viscosity of ISO 150. Both gear dri ves failed within weeks of start-
new gearsets and the ISO VG 68 oil was replaced with ISO VG 150. The gear drives now operate without overheating. eliminated. For critical applicatinns, Higginson's" equation. the specific film
011
and
3 . '0
2.'0
, , I ,
,I:
I
II: '1
II ___
I
1.0
i
I
II'
,
II,
, ,
II
I
, ,
5%
40% II
J
I
,.
,
.,
100'
. aD%.
I
:z: 10.5 ~
I
,
,I
l,.......
ht'Tttt __
I I
-tI~"""1lli-li! JIll' ~,
.I'
i=
:::li: ....., 1::.
"~+I ~..f.",,7ot==-f"' __
~
I'
Ii
'1
,
,:RELA.TeD'
!ClSTRESS
0..2
0.11
1
w
1..1.. 1..0.1 n,
w
U'l
vv
I /
~~I
,I
I I
i'
I
' II
I
'
J' ,
II
11
,
10.05
./1
V'
1/
I
I
I ,
I I
I[
""
0.02 0.01
'I
, I
I
I
I'
I I
1 :
I ,
III;
50 100
I I I I I, ,I I
500,
1000
5000
FPM
10000
50000
1988.)
16
GEAFI
TECH",OlOa'f
Fig, 1 i
Holloway,S which were obtained from several hundred laboratory tests and field applications of gear drives.
Applying, 'Gear Lubricants The method of applying the lubricant to the gear teeth depends for the mo. t pari. primarily on
the pitch line velocity, Splash lubrication y tern are tile
gear mesh.
flow should be supplied of the mesh for cooling. directed at the incoming The placement At tion.
irn-
plest, but Ihey are limited to a pitch line velocity ofabout 3.000 fpm. T,IIe gears should dip into the oil bath for about twice the tooth depth
to provide
crucial factor when pitch line velocitiesexceed 20.000 fpm. periment number and location peeds this high. exto find the optimum for the oil jets. ensure adequate are required
adequate
bearings and to reduce losses due to churning. The gear hou ing should have troughs to capture the oil flowing down the housing walls. channeling it to the bearings. can be exThe range of splash lubrication
In pressure-fed
lubrication and cooling of the gear mesh: Quanlity offlow.jet size. feed pressure, and number-of jets. There are general guidelines, based on experience and experimentation, for specifying these
t
tended to about 5,000 fpm by using baffles and oil pans te reduce churning. However. above 3.000 fprn, providing auxiliary cooling with fans and improving beat transfer by adding housing is usually necessary. Above 5.000 fpm, most gears are lubricated by a pressure-fed syslem.
Ifill.
be evalu-
ated independently ba ed on it particularoperatAll, empirical equation used to calculate the quantity of oil flow in gallons per minute is q;;;;; PIc where c is taken from Table t p= transmitted power. hp q ling 2
to the
bearings is permis ible up to a pitch line velocity Above this speed, and
:for gear drives with journal bearings, both the gears and bearings should be pre ure-fed. Tile oil.jet should be placed on the incoming side of thegear mesh for pitch line velocities up to 8,000 fpm. Above 8.000 rpm. more oil is for lubricating. and the oil neededforceolingthan
For a typical indu trial application transmitde igner might choose the constant c = 200hpl gpm, resulting in a copious flow of ] gpm. On the other hand, for a high efficiency aviation application transmitting 200hp. where weight ls critical, c
= 800 might
be chosen. re ulting in a
flow removes heat best by being directed at. the outgoing ide of the gear me h where the oil jets can trike the hoI, drive-side of the gear teeth,
lean flow of 0'.25 gpm, Some applications may require different flow rate than tho e given by _able I.. For instance, wide-face. high-speed
Table 1 ..Typical. c
(hp/gpmj
'Gear Mesh
Comment General indu trial
Flow
Conditions
200
400
800
1000
JULY/AUGUST
I &g,
1'1
gearing may require a higher flow rate toensure uniform cooling and full-face coverage. The proper jet size, feed pressure ..and number of jets must. be determined to maintain the proper flow rate.jetvelociry, and full-facecoverage. The diameter of a jet can be calculated for a. given flow rate and pressure ba ed on the viscosity of the oil' at the operating temperature. mum recommended size is 0.03". U ajet it. Typicaljetdiarneters
7
of tile face
width. More than. one jet for each gear me h is advisable because of the possibility of clogging .. The upper limit IOn the number of jets is determined by the flow rate and jet diameter; too many
There
Case History
Ill. an lndustrialapplieation,
creaser gearboxes 24 speed-in10
horsepower and increase speed from 55 rpm 375 rpm. The gears were parallel-shaft,
which in tum determines the amount of oil thai penetrates the gear mesh. Typical feed range from 20.-WO psig.
helical, carbunzed, and ground. The splasb lubrication system used a mineral oil without antiscuff additives with ISO H>Oviscosity. about 250. hours of operation. After two gearboxes the primary
pressures
lndustrialapplicaticn
feed pressures are typically 3D psig, and highspeed aerospace applications. are typically 100
failed by bending fatigue .. The gear tooth profiles were so badly wom determining failure mode was impossible .. Three other gearboxes with less service were elected for in pee-
psig.
greater the cooling.,8 but the higher the pressure, the smaller the jet diameter. Therefore, pressure :is limited by the minimum recommended diameter of 01.0.3". The number of jets should be sufficient to jet
lion. One had logged] 5 hours, while the other IWO had operated for 65 hourseach. Upon disas. embly, no broken teeth were found, but all three
30
40
so
100
110
120,
SO
30 20 10 8
6
4
40 ~ ..... s,
:f
~,
0
E
,..:
I~
Ui
0
Ul.
u.
s
~
...J
:l
!7!
!i
11.0
o.a
0.6
,6
"'
t--... ~
i'....
"i"', ~
"
................
11
<;
Fig. 2 - Absolute vi cosily versus temperature for mineral gear lubricants with a viscosity index of 95. (from AGMA 200 1-888, 1988.)
18:
ClEAII
TECHNO~OClV
7080
90
100
I
no
I
120
130140
1501 1:60
170
I
:
-----~ ---
I
I
250 (OF)
300
350
coefficient versus temperature for mineral gear lubricants ..(From AGMA 200I-B88.
1988.)
gearboxe . had scuffed gear teeth. The primary failure mode was scuffing, and the earlier bending fatigue failures were caused by dynamic load generated by the worn gear teeth. Subsequent in pection of the remaining gearboxes revealed that ali had scuffing damage, which probably had occurred immediately upon start-up because the loads were not reduced during run-in, Fortunately. a prototype gearbox had been run at 1/2 load for about 50 hours. When these gears were in peered, no signs of distress were seen on any of the gear teeth. The tool.h profiles were smooth, with surface roughness estimated to be 20 j.J:in rrns, and the contact pattern indicated 100% face contact. This gearbox was reassembled and run under 1/2 load until. its oil sump-temperalure reached equilibrium at 200F. For this application, the ambient temperature was in the range of 50F to 125F. The center distance of the gears was 16 inches and the pitch line velocity was 400' fpm .. Referring to AGMA 250..04, the recommended viscosity for these conditions is ISO 1.50. or ISO 220..
(3)
7000
V 40 ""
:::::350
cSt
(400)
0.5
Hence, the empirical equation recommends a viscosity close to ISO 320.. It is apparent that the viscosity that was originally supplied (ISO VG 1(0) was too low. The EHD film thickness was calculated with a special computer program. 9 The gear bulk temperature was assumed to be 230F (30 degrees hotter than the measured oil sump temperature), The following data for the ISO YO 1.'00 lubricant was obtained from Figs. 2 and 3: lJi. = 6,6 cP(O.96 x 10 -6 Reyns) o (J. =1.02 x 1O-4in21b Fig ..4 shews a plot of the film thickness versus position on the pinion tooth. The minimum film thickness OCClUS low on the pini.on
JULY/AUGUST 1 gg I
19
>95%
5.5
4.5
:g
S
t'I:I;
,tIS
l ,.125
",,'"
"
..r.,1
3.5'
,.J,
LPSTC
HPSTC
2.5
fig. 4 - Film thicknes versus pinion roll angle for gear tooth geometry of cuffed gearset,
450
35'0
25'0
l.PSTC
15'0
HPSTC
1"'"
Max FIDash'Iernp
= 439
e
Scoring Probability
63% I
50.
I
Pinion
II
ron angle
in degrees
Fig, 5 - Flash temperature versus pinion mil angle for gear tooth geometry of scuffed gearset,
20
GE"R
T!ECHNOlOG'I'
tomb near the lowest point of single tooth contact (LPSTC) where h . = 2.1 micro inches. The mID specific film thickness, based on 20 uin rms surface roughness for both profiles, is A. '" 0.073. Fig. I. shows that the gears operate in the boundary lubrication regime. The program predicts that the probability of wear is greater than 95%. The contact temperature was also calculated with the program. The scuffing temperature for the ISO BO 100 lubricant was calculated wkh the equation for non-anti- cuff mineral oils: Ts'" 146 + 59In(100);;;;; 418F Fig. 5 shows a plot of the comact temperature versus position on the pinion tooth, The maximum contact temperature occurs high on the pinion tooth near the highest point of single tooth contact. (HPSTC) where Tc = 439F. The program predicts that the probability of cuffing is
63q(. This is considered to be at high risk of
scuffing. The relatively high temperature peak: near the tip of the pinion tooth wa caused by the geometr-y of the gears. TIle designer selected a long addendum tooth for the pinion. Long addendum pinions perform well in speed reducers. where they increase the amount of recess action an d decrease the am Oll ru of approach action of the
gear mesh. Since recess action :ismuch smoother than approach action, long addendum pinions give speed reducers smooth meshing characteristics. When operated as a speed increaser, however, the approach and recess portions ofthe gear mesh reverse, making a long addend lim pinion rough running and vulnerable to scuffing. To explore the possibilities for reducing the scuffing risk. new gear tooth geometry was proposed with the pinion and gear addenda designed to minimize the flash temperature rise. The new gearset.analyzed with the program, assumed the lubricant was a mineral oil with anti-scuff additives, with a viscosity of ISO 220, and with the following properties: 110::: 10 cP( 1.45 x 10-6 R eyns) 4 a = 1.09 x 10- in2/lb Ts = 245 + 59In(220) '" 563"F Fig, 6 shows that the film thickness increases to h _ = 2.7 !lin, and the pecific film thickness mm increases to A. = 0.097 ..Fig. I showsthat the gears still operate in the boundary lubrication regime, however, the probability of wear is reduced to 94%, Fig. 7 shows that the optimized gear geometry reduced the maximum contact temperature to Tc = 302F. The combination of reduced contact
..275
.225 6
//
LPSTC
..125
=r'
3
("')
s
:3 ..... 4
0 ::I
"'I
HPSTC
-----------~~----~--.....--I:
....,,,. .
.,.,....--
//
.075
20 30 Pinion roll angle in degrees
40
Fig. 6 - Film thickness versus pinion roll angle for geartooth geometry optimized for maximum scuffing resistance.
JULY,AUGUST
1991
21
350
250
LPSTC
HPSTC
= 302
30
Fig. 7 - Flash temperature versus pinion roll angle for gear tooth geometry optimized for maximum scuffing temperature and the increased scuffing resistance provided by thehigher viscosity mineral oil with anti-scuff additives reduces (he scuffing probability to < 5%. Typical of many gear failures, this case history shows that several factors contributed to the
References;
1. .BLOK, H. "Les Temperatures
resistance.
Z. AGMA 250.04. "AGMA Standard Specification - Lubrication of Industrial Enclosed Gear Drives." 3. AGMA 421.06. Herringbone 4. DOWSON. "Practice Sept., 198 l,
failures:
.The lubricant viscosity was too low. -No anti-scuff additives were used.
5. WELLAUER,EJ.&HOLLQWAY,G,A EHD Oil, Film Theory to Industrial AMSEJ. Eng. Ind., Vol. 98, 626-634. 6. A_KAZAWA,M.,TEJ'IMA,T.& Test of High
Series B. No.2,
NARlTA, T. "FuIlSca!e
Speed, High
8. AKIN, L.. & TOWNSEND, D. "Study of'Lubricant Jetflow Phenomena in Spur Gears." NASA TMX-7IS72, OcL, 1974.
9. SCORING+. Computer Program. GEARTECH Inc., 1985-1989. Software,
22
GE ....R TECHNOLOGY