PSV
PSV
PSV
RELIEF SYSTEM SAFETY INTERLOCK SYSTEM ALARM SYSTEM BASIC PROCESS CONTROL SYSTEM
RELIEF SYSTEMS IN PROCESS PLANTS $ Increase in pressure can lead to rupture of vessel or pipe and release of toxic or flammable material
- may have exit path that should not be closed but could be - hand valve, control valve (even fail open), blockage of line
$ Remember, this is the last resort, when all other safety systems have not been adequate and a fast response is required!
Copyrights by CCPS/American Institute of Chemical Engineers and copied with the permission of AIChE
STANDARD RELIEF METHODS $ BASIC PRINCIPLE: No external power required self acting RUPTURE DISKS OR BURST DIAPHRAGMS must be replaced after opening
$ .
Copyrights by CCPS/American Institute of Chemical Engineers and copied with the permission of AIChE
SOME INFORMATION ON RELIEF VALVES Two types of designs determine influence of pressure immediately after the valve
- Conventional Valve -pressure after the valve affects the valve lift and opening - Balanced Valve - pressure after the valve does not affect the valve lift and opening
Conventional Balanced
Copyrights by CCPS/American Institute of Chemical Engineers and copied with the permission of AIChE
ADVANTAGES - simple, low cost and many commercial designs available - regain normal process operation rapidly because the valve closes when pressure decreases below set value
DISADVANTAGES - can leak after once being open (O-ring reduces) - not for very high pressures (20,000 psi) - if oversized, can Achatter@, leading to damage and failure (do not be too conservative; the very large valve is not the safest!)
To effluent handling
F1
F1
The positive displacement pump will be damaged if the flow is stopped; we need to provide relief. We would like to recover without shutdown; we select a relief valve.
IN SOME CASES, RELIEF VALVE AND DIAPHRAGM ARE USED IN SERIES - WHY?
What is the advantage of two in series? Why not have two relief valves (diaphragms) in series?
Copyrights by CCPS/American Institute of Chemical Engineers and copied with the permission of AIChE
IN SOME CASES, RELIEF VALVE AND DIAPHRAGM ARE USED IN SERIES - WHY?
Why is the pressure indicator provided? If the pressure increases, the disk has a leak and should be replaced. Is it local or remotely displayed? Why? What is the advantage of two in series? The display is local to reduce cost, because we do not have to respond immediately to a failed disk - the situation is not hazardous.
The disc protects the valve from corrosive or sticky material. The valve closes when the pressure returns below the set value. Copyrights by CCPS/American Institute of Chemical Engineers and copied with the permission of AIChE
underpressure
Copyrights by CCPS/American Institute of Chemical Engineers and copied with the permission of AIChE
Structure
vent closed
Structure explosion
Recycle to process
Immediate neutralization
Copyrights by CCPS/American Institute of Chemical Engineers and copied with the permission of AIChE
SIZING RELIEF SYSTEMS $ $ DETERMINE THE RELIEF FLOW (maximum possible) DETERMINE THE SET PRESSURE - based on process needs and equipment materials and construction $ $ $ SELECT THE RELIEF TYPE - based on advantages/disadvantages of both CALCULATE THE NEEDED AREA FOR FLOW SELECT THE COMMERCIAL DEVICE FROM VENDOR=S SPECIFICATIONS
Fin
Tsource
Fout = ?
Relief Flow
Fin
Fin Fout = ?
Fout = ? Q(Vg-Vl)/Hvap
Filled Liquid system with no phase change and with heat transfer
Tsource
Fout = ? Q/Cp
Relief
LC
F Z q
R
D
A
XD
V
LC
B
A
XB
Relief
The maximum vapor occurs when
LC
F Z
R D
A
XD
1. Maximum feed vapor. 2. Maximum reboiler duty. 3. Complete loss of condensation (loss of cooling water).
q V
LC
B
A
XB
DETERMINING THE AREA FOR VALVES IN LIQUID SERVICE $ Basic equation for flow through an orifice
2 gc P F = C0 A
2 g c ( P s - Pb )
Ps = set pressure ; Pb = back pressure Kv = viscosity correction ( 6 1.0 as Re 6 large, 30,000) Kp = overpressure correction, depends on the overpressure from relief device (lower overpressure gives a smaller Kp and larger area) Kb = back pressure correction, # 1.0 for balanced valve = 1.0 for conventional valve
DETERMINING THE AREA FOR DIAPHRAGMS IN VAPOR SERVICE Basic equation for flow through an orifice venting to atmosphere
2 gc P F = C0 A
DETERMINING THE AREAS FOR VALVES AND DIAPHRAGMS IN VAPOR OR GAS SERVICE
$ Often, the flow is sonic or Achoked@ - in this situation, the flow depends on the upstream pressure but not the downstream pressure. This occurs when Ps > 0.5Pb ; this is rough estimate, see references.
F choked = K A P
With K* depending on T, heat capacity ratio, mol. weight, back pressure, and compressibility
Question: How do we know if the flow is choked? Does this mean that an increase in back pressure has no effect on flow?
DETERMINING THE AREAS FOR VALVES AND DIAPHRAGMS FOR EXOTHERMIC REACTORS
CAUTION!
$ Two-phase venting has proved difficult to model reliably
- DIERS, (Design Inst. for Emergency Relief Systems) formed by companies and AIChE- goals are to determine sizing methods, verify experimentally, and prepare program
$ Experience has shown that - Two-phase flow occurs often- Two-phase flow during runaway reactions requires a much larger area than predicted by one-phase methods
DETERMINING THE AREAS FOR VALVES AND DIAPHRAGMS FOR EXOTHERMIC REACTORS
CAUTION!
$ A standard experimental apparatus is used to collect adiabatic data on runaway reactions - small scale so little hazard - gives results for sizing relief devices (T and P vs time; flow regime - foamy or non-foamy; and viscosity - laminar or turbulent regime)
We are now ready to gain experience in designing and evaluating safety relief systems.
REFERENCES
Andrew, W. and H. Williams, Applied Instrumentation in the Process Industries, Volume I: A Survey, Gulf Publishing, Houston, 1979 Andrew, W. and H. Williams, Applied Instrumentation in the Process Industries, Volume II: Practical Guidelines, Gulf Publishing, Houston, 1980 Crowl, D. And J. Louvar, , Chemical Process Safety: Fundamentals with Applications, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, 1990 Driskell, L., Control Valve Selection and Sizing, Instrument Society of America, 1983 Fauske, H. And J. Leung, New Experimental Technique for Characterizing Runaway Chemical Reactions, CEP, p. 39-46, August 1985 Fisher, H., DIERS Research Program on Emergency Relief Systems, CEP, p. 33-36, August 1985 Issaca, M., Pressure-Relief Systems, Chem Engr., p.113-124, February 22, 1971 Jenett, E., Design Considerations for Pressure-Relieving Systems, Chem. Engr., Part I, p. 125-130, July 1963; Part II, p. 151-158, August 19, 1963 Kern, R., Pressure-Relief Valves for Process Plants, Chem.. Engr., p. 187-194, February 28, 1977 King, R., Safety in The Process Industries, Butterworth Hieneman, Oxford, 1990
3.