Jean-Baptiste Caire Claim
Jean-Baptiste Caire Claim
Jean-Baptiste Caire Claim
Indemnity awarded
A comparison with vicarious liability in municipal law
In Jean-Baptiste Caire Claim (above), the unlawful conduct of the army officers who killed M Caire was
imputed or attributed to Mexico for the purposes of state responsibility. An analogy in municipal law is the
vicarious liability in tort of an employer for the conduct of an employee in the course of employment. In the
latter context, provided that there is a sufficient connection between the employees conduct and the course of
employment, an employer may be held vicariously liable in tort for the criminal act of an employee, such as the
sexual assault of resident children committed by the warden of a boarding school (Lister v. Hesley Hall Ltd
[2002] 1 AC 215).
The reasoning in Caire may be compared with the decision of the Privy Council (on appeal from the Court of
Appeal of Jamaica) in Bernard v. Attorney General of Jamaica [2004] UKPC 47. In this case, a police officer
purporting to act in that capacity, unlawfully shot Mr Clinton Bernard in the head at point-blank range when Mr
Bernard refused to comply with the police officers demand that the police officer be given the use of a public
telephone before Mr Bernard had completed the call he was making. In a judgment delivered by Lord Steyn,
the Privy Council held that the Crown, as the police officers employer, was vicariously liable in tort for the
police officers unlawful, and almost certainly criminal, conduct. In this regard, the Privy Council emphasised
that, although the police officer was off-duty at the time of the incident, the police officer had purported to act in
an official capacity and had used the service revolver which off-duty police officers routinely were permitted to
carry. Adapting the language of Presiding Commissioner Verzijl in Caire, the police officer in Bernard engaged
the vicarious liability of the Crown in view of the fact that he had purported to act in his capacity as a police
officer and had used the means placed at his disposition by virtue of that capacity.
__________________________________