1677 PDFGVFGVVGHG, GHJGGHGHG
1677 PDFGVFGVVGHG, GHJGGHGHG
1677 PDFGVFGVVGHG, GHJGGHGHG
2013, 4 (3)
www.irjponline.com
Research Article
INTRODUCTION
The Ayurvedic system of treatment approaches the whole
problem of disease in a holistic fashion. It advocates
correcting the imbalance through a combination of diet,
exercise, regimen and herbal medicines to accelerate the
process of healing and bringing the body-mind-sense
complex to a normal natural state. According to WHO,
traditional medicine has established and proved itself to
possess promotive, preventive, curative and rehabilitative
roles. The Traditional Herbal Medicinal Products Directive is
changing the face of the botanicals extracts and supplements
sector in the world for prevention and curing of diseases on
the basis of scientific evaluation of evidence based Ayurvedic
drugs. The test drug has been selected from the renowned
Ayurvedic text Charak Samhita which is having the
combination of three ingredients in equal amounts - stems of
Guduchi (Tinospora cordifolia Willd), fruits of Amlaki
(Emblica officinalis Gaertn) and rhizomes of Mustak
(Cyperus rotundus Linn) 1, 2. It has been traditionally used
for the treatment of fever, pain and inflammation in clinical
practice but its aqueous extract has not yet been subject to
scientific pharmacological evaluation.
Emblica officinalis Gaertn (family Euphorbiaceae), locally
known as Amlaki or Amla is a medium sized deciduous
tree found throughout India. Dried fruit of the plant is brown
to blackish brown in colour with characteristic odour and
sour and astringent taste. Its fruits are a rich source of
Vitamin C, besides it also contains tannin, ellagic acid and
gallic acid, phyllembins. They are also used in diabetes,
anaemia, peptic ulcer, inflammation, skin diseases and
cardiac problems. The fruit juice has been reported to possess
lipid lowering and anti-atherosclerotic effect 3, 4.
Tinospora cordifolia belonging to the family of
Menispermaceae locally known as Guduchi is a glabrous
climbing plant mostly found in India, typically growing in
Elemental analysis
Elemental analysis was performed to detect the presence of
nitrogen, sulfur and halogens using routine chemical analysis
techniques. A piece of metallic sodium was taken in a test
tube, melted by slow heating and about 0.5 g of research drug
powder was added which was strongly heated for about
2 min. Twenty ml of distilled water was taken in a mortar and
pastel, the red-hot test tube was broken and ground in mortar
distilled water. The aqueous solution was filtered through
Watman-40 filter paper and the filtrate was subjected to test
for these elements
Physiochemical Analysis
Physiochemical parameters such as extractive value, moisture
content, acid insoluble ash, water soluble ash and total ash
content of the powdered test drug were evaluated according
to standard steps described in the Ayurvedic Pharmacopoeia,
Government of India.
Phytochemical screening
Preliminary phytochemical screening for assessing the
presence of different active constituents like alkaloids,
flavonoids, tannins, carbohydrates, glycosides, saponins, fats
and oils, protein and amino acids was performed following
the standard procedures.
Estimation of total polyphenol content
Total polyphenol content was estimated using the Folin
Ciocalteu method calibrated on Gallic acid 20. Sample
extracts of 500 l were added to 500 l of water, 5 ml of
0.2 N FolinCiocalteu reagent and 4 ml of 75 g/l saturated
sodium carbonate solution and mixed in a cyclomixer. The
absorbance was measured in the spectrophotometer at
765 nm after incubation for 2 h at room temperature.
Quantification of total polyphenol content was done on the
basis of a standard curve generated with 100, 200, 300, 400
and 500 mg/l of Gallic acid 10, 12, 13.
Thin Layer Chromatography (TLC) analysis
The extract of the research drug (2.5 mg/ml) and standard
phenolic compound Gallic acid (0.6 mg/ml) were analysed
using a glass plate coated with a thin layer of 60 F254 silica
gel (194015 G, Batch No. HX024736, SISCO Research
laboratories Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) using different solvent
mixtures. The development was stopped when the solvent
front had advanced about 7.5 cm. The different spots
developed were visualized on coloration (like Iodine vapour
exposure) and their Rf values were calculated. Rf values of
components are indicative of specific character of molecule
in the given environment of mobile and stationary phase. The
best results were obtained with the solvent system: Toluene:
Ethyl acetate: Formic acid: MeOH (3: 3: 0.8: 0.2 v/v/v/v).
Gallic acid was purchased from M/s Nice Chemicals Pvt. Ltd.
Experimental study
Acute toxicity study
Acute oral toxicity study was carried out according to OECD
guideline 423. Animals of both sexes were selected by
random sampling technique for the study and divided into 5
groups of 3 animals each. A single oral dose of the extract
starting at 200 mg/kg and progressively moving from 400,
600, 800 mg/kg up to 1000 mg/kg was administered. The
animal groups were observed for appearance of toxic
symptoms including behavioural changes, locomotion,
muscle spasm, loss of righting reflex, tremor, convulsions
Page 114
Page 115
Day light
light brown
Light brown
Light brown
Light greenish brown
Reddish black
Light green
Light brown
Creamish yellow
Light brown
Yellow
Yellow
Observation of colours
UV 254
Dark brown
Light brown
Greenish brown
Dark greenish brown
Dark brown
Dark green
Green
Green
Green
Dark green
Light green
UV 365
Blackish brown
Blackish brown
Blackish brown
Blackish red
Blackish red
Dark brown
Pesta
Black
Black
Black
Dark green
0 hour
Control (10ml/kg)
Indomethacin (5mg/kg)
Aqueous extract (400mg/kg)
Aqueous extract (600mg/kg)
1hour
2 hour
3 hour
4hour
0.43 0.05
1.24 0.07
2.33 0.06
2.79 0.09
0.49 0.08
0.88 0.06
0.80 0.05
0.75 0.07
0.45 0.04
1.07 0.05
1.02 0.04
0.99 0.07
0.47 0.08
0.99 0.04
0.93 0.07
0.88 0.05
Results are presented as Mean SEM. p < 0.05 compared to control n=6
2.81 0.05
0.60 0.04
0.90 0.08
0.81 0.06
% inhibition
after 4hr
78.65
67.97
71.17
36.40 0.04
Standard
36.82 0.06
Aqueous Extract
(400mg/kg)
Aqueous extract
(600mg/kg)
36.51 0.02
36.63 0.03
5 hr
37.26
0.04
37.02
0.03
36.81
0.03
36.68
0.02
Reduction in
temperature after 4 hr
- 0.24%
2.69%
2.41%
3.09%
0 min
30 min
60 min
90 min
% increase in reaction time after 60 min
3.67 0.049
3.55 0.043
3.48 0.054
3.62 0.060
-5.18%
3.55 0.043
7.07 0.076
7.38 0.060
7.12 0.021
107.89%
3.35 0.022
5.45 0.060
5.66 0.048
5.94 0.033
68.96%
3.36 0.033
6.06 0.026
6.36 0.054
6.84 0.031
89.29%
Results are presented as Mean SEM. p < 0.05 compared to control n=6
Table 5: Average reaction time during Tail immersion method
Group
Control
Standard Aspirin
Aqueous Extract 400 mg/kg
Aqueous Extract 600 mg/kg
0 min
30 min
60 min
90 min
% increase in reaction time after 60 min
3.07 0.056
3.25 0.056
3.23 0.042
3.35 0.043
5.21%
3.27 0.049
6.68 0.130
6.75 0.056
6.27 0.080
106.42%
3.07 0.059
5.63 0.040
5.67 0.031
5.19 0.037
84.69%
3.05 0.043
5.82 0.021
5.92 0.033
5.40 0.043
94.09%
Results are presented as Mean+ SEM. p < 0.05 compared to control n=6
Table 6: Analgesic effect during Writhing method
Control
Standard (Aspirin)
Aqueous Extract 400 mg/kg
Aqueous Extract 600 mg/kg
% Inhibition
0.0
59.78
44.53
50.89
Page 116
Figure 1: TLC plate obtained using the solvent system: Toluene: Ethyl
acetate: Formic acid: MeOH (3: 3: 0.8: 0.2)
Figure 2: Inhibition of acute inflammation in rat paws during carrageeninduced paw oedema test
Elemental analysis
Only sulphur was found present in the research drug, while
nitrogen and halogens were found to be absent.
Experimental Methods
Acute Toxicity study
The animals tested in acute toxicity study showed no
significant toxic symptoms up to the dose of 600 mg/kg such
as sedation, convulsion, diarrhoea, irritation, etc. At dosage
level of 1000 mg/kg, some animals showed mild symptoms
of irritation and minor behavioural changes but returned to
normal condition during a few hours. Even at this high dose,
no further toxic symptoms or mortality was observed for next
24 hrs and subsequently up to 14 days.
Page 117
Page 119
25. Kim HP, Son KH, Chang HW, Kang SS. Anti-inflammatory Plant
Flavonoids and Cellular Action Mechanisms. Journal of
245.
Pharmacological
Sciences
2004;
96:
229http://dx.doi.org/10.1254/jphs.CRJ04003XPMid:15539763
26. Gupta M, Shaw BP, Mukherjee A. Studies on antipyretic-analgesic and
ulcerogenic activity of polyherbal preparation in rats and mice.
International Journal of Pharmacology 2008: 4 (2): 88 94. http://
dx.doi.org/10.3923/ijp.2008.88.94
27. Gupta M, Sasmal S, Majumdar S, Mukherjee A. 2012. HPLC profiles of
standard Phenolic Compounds present in medicinal plants. International
Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemical Research 2012; 4 (3):
162-167.
28. Spacer CB, Breder CD. 1994. The neurological basis of fever. New
England Journal of Medicine 1994; 330: 1880-1886.
http://
dx.doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199406303302609 PMid:7832832
29. Owoyele BV, Oguntoye SO, Darel K, Alice B. 2008. Analgesic, antiinflammatory and antipyretic activities from flavonoid fractions of
Chromolaena odorata. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 2008; 2
(9): 219-225.
30. Gonzlez-Gallego J, Snchez-Campos S, Tun MJ. Anti-inflammatory
properties of dietary flavonoids. Nutricin Hospitalaria 2007; 22 (3):
287-293.
31. Rathee P, Chaudhary H, Rathee S, Rathee D, Kumar V, Kohli K. 2009.
Mechanism of action of flavonoids as anti-inflammatory age nts: a
review. Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2009; 8 (3): 229-235. http:/
/dx.doi.org/10.2174/187152809788681029
Cite this article as:
Gupta Mradu, Banerjee Dalia, Mukherjee Arup. Studies of anti
inflammatory, antipyretic and analgesic effects of aqueous extract of
traditional herbal drug on rodents. Int. Res. J. Pharm. 2013; 4(3):113-120
Page 120