0% found this document useful (0 votes)
122 views7 pages

1004gir - Final

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1/ 7

1004GIR Government-Business

Relations

Australia is a lucky
country that has the
ability to sufficiently
overcome economic
challenges

Michaela Hardwick s2895058


Word count: 1427

Michaela Hardwick s2895058

Page |

Australia is a vulnerable rather than a lucky country. Do you agree?


Give examples to support your argument.
Australia has been perceived as both lucky and vulnerable by Australians
and other countries. There is the increased perception that Australia is
vulnerable due to the changes occurring in the economic market. The
global environment is facing increased pressures and becoming more
volatile due to environmental uncertainty, recessions and other financial
crises. Globalisation has added to this volatility in recent times as events
in one country are more likely to have a domino effect and impact other
countries

as

well

(Conley,

2013).

It

is

therefore

essential

that

Governments and businesses work together to find solutions to these


vulnerabilities or at least try to be minimally affected by them. This has
been a strategy present between Australian businesses and the
Government; even during times when the rest of the world has had
trouble. They have overcome many of these pressures and continue to
manage and deal with any that arise which shows that Australia is a
strong country. This essay will demonstrate that Australia is a lucky
country rather than a vulnerable one through an analysis of Australias
mining boom, the Australian Government-business relation and how they
intervene appropriately and how there has been a shift of focus from
spending to reducing debt.

Many countries believed that Australia made a negligent decision by not


taking advantage of the technology boom, however; when that ended
negatively, Australia was benefited by focusing on other aspects, most
notable is the mining boom (Conley, 2013).

Countries are becoming

increasingly reliant on minerals and metals which means there is a higher


demand for them to be extracted and exported globally (Prior, Giurco,
Mudd, Mason & Behrisch, 2011). Australias recent mining boom has seen
output tripled since the 1970s and in the process there has been an
increased number of job opportunities which has caused a low
unemployment

rate

(Schandl,

Poldy,

Turner,

Measham,

Walker

&

Eisenmenger, 2008). However, some perceive this current boom to be


unsustainable over a long period of time using the current methods.

Michaela Hardwick s2895058

Page |

According to the Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trading


(DFAT), in 2011, Australia exported $158.7 billion in minerals and fuels
which contributed to 50.6% of the total exports. The next highest export
being

services

which

contributed

just

16%

(DFAT,

2012).

This

considerably large figure indicates that Australia is heavily reliant on


exporting minerals and fuels in order to create substantial revenue from
exports and is neglecting other industries such as manufacturing. This is
significant as it could suggest that Australia is becoming a banana
republic because all the focus is being placed on a single export that is
not sustainable over a long period of time (Moberg, 1996). At this present
moment in time, Australia is lucky because of the mining boom and all it
has done for the country (low unemployment rates, lessened impact of
the GFC). However; if Australia does not begin to diversify away from just
exporting minerals and fuels then it may create economic problems in the
future. While Australia continues to excel in the mining industry, the
Government in Australia has also been seen to adapt the different models
of Government-business relations effectively throughout different stages
of the economy and business cycle.

The Australian Government continuously changes its approach to


government-business relations in order to cope with various issues that
the country has and will face. Prior to the 1980s, the Australian
Government had a Keynesian approach and there was an extensive
amount of protectionism (tariffs and trade barriers) which protected
businesses. There was also colonial socialism which focussed on the
Government spending money to build up the countrys infrastructure
(Conley, 2013). This Keynesian approach was seen as co-operative
(providing assistance) because the government was working with the
businesses to achieve goals. Australia began reducing and abolishing
these trade barriers and tariffs during the Great Depression which created
more of a developmental (working together) approach (Eichengreen &
Irwin, 2010). This shift is noteworthy as it demonstrates that the
Government realised the unsustainability of the developmental approach
in the market that was present. Australia shifted further away from the
developmental approach and more into the regulatory (adversarial) as

Michaela Hardwick s2895058

Page |

globalisation occurred and it was no longer a viable option if Australia


wanted to maintain a competitive advantage on a global scale (Conley,
2013). This is an important example because it highlights that the
Australian Government was somewhat willing to reduce the amount of
control over businesses in order to allow the markets to expand. The most
recent case of Australia appropriately adapting methods to manage
situation is the Global Financial Crisis (GFC) in 2007-2009. The Australian
Government appropriately intervened in order to mitigate the countrys
losses. One of the major reasons that Australia was less affected by the
GFC was due to having more regulations over the financial sector than
the USA and UK did (Pais & Stork, 2011). This increased regulation is
significant as the GFC was a result of lack of regulation. It indicates that
Australia adapted the developmental (proactive) government-business
relations model when it came to the financial sector. This is important as
it shows that the impact of the GFC was also likely lessened due to
Australia shifting from Keynesianism to Neo-Liberalism in the 1980s and
accumulating a surplus by the 1990s that strengthened the economy
(Conley 2013). Australia is a lucky country because the government has
so far been able to appropriately adapt the most suited Governmentbusiness approach for situations that have occurred. While Government
intervention has been appropriately implemented when necessary, the
Government has become focussed on reducing debt that accrued during
the GFC and creating a more sustainable environment.

Both Australian citizens and the Government have become very


conscious of reducing Government debt and creating an environment that
is sustainable in the distant future. This has been the focus since the
1990s when John Howard became Prime Minister and took the Neo-liberal
approach to creating a surplus (Conley, 2013).

With Australias public

debt being 29.3% of the GDP (gross domestic product) at 2012 (The
World Factbook, 2012), Australians want to focus on reducing that debt as
soon as possible regardless of how it is done. However; many experts
have suggested that cutting back on Government spending is not an
effective way to reduce debt in the long-term. The Liberal Party of
Australia has recently outlined what they will be doing to reduce the

Michaela Hardwick s2895058

Page |

budget deficit, claiming budget cuts of $31 billion (Liberal Party of


Australia, 2013). Diane Elson (2010) suggests that reducing spending
often results in more recession in the long-term as well as increased
unemployment and inequality. This is significant as it highlights that
Australias current plan to reduce debt could actually have a negative
impact and degrade Australias current economic position in the future.
The considerably large budget cuts have the potential to cause Australia
to become a more vulnerable, unstable country. Australias deficit is not
actually that large considering other countries, such as Japan, have debt
that is 200% of their GDP (Organisation for Economic Co-operation and
Development 2013). When comparing Japans debt to Australias, it can
be inferred that Australia is actually in a reasonably sound position when
it comes to the level of public debt. Therefore, although Australia
currently has more debt than earlier years they are still in a better
economic position than other countries at this current point in time.
However; if the Government continues with their plans to reduce
spending then it could see Australia becoming a vulnerable country.
Despite a few concerning factors, Australia is a lucky country and is
relatively capable of overcoming economic challenges that it faces. The
most significant factors that have the potential to negatively affect
Australias economy are relying on one export (minerals and fuels) which
could lead to a repeat of the banana republic and an increasing amount of
debt that the current Government is planning to reduce in a way that
could result in more debt and higher unemployment. With the exception
of these factors, Australia has benefited considerably from the mining
boom which has seen record low unemployment rates and an increased
GDP and the Government has intervened to successfully avoid impacts of
the GFC (2007-2009) and the Great Depression (1930). Australias ability
to only have a small amount of debt compared to many other countries in
the current state of the global economy is another reason why Australia is
a lucky country. Australia is a lucky country that knows how to deal with
environmental changes and uncertainty, and has the potential to
continue being lucky if they continue making the appropriate decisions for
the country under the circumstances present.

Michaela Hardwick s2895058

Page |

References
Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trading, Trade at a Glance
2012, viewed 10 September 2013.
http://www.dfat.gov.au/publications/trade/trade-at-a-glance2012.html#p10
Conley, T 2013, The Great Transformation? The Political Economy and
Structural Change in Australia, in E van Acker & G Curran (eds),
Government and Business in Volatile Times, Pearson Australia, Frenchs
Forrest, NSW, pp. 129-162.
Eichengreen, B & Irwin, D 2010, The Slide to Protectionism in the Great
Depression: Who Succumbed and Why?, The Journal of Economic History,
vol. 70, no. 4, pp. 871-897, viewed 18 September 2013.
Elson, D 2012, Austerity Policies Increase Unemployment and Inequality but dont reduce budget deficits and government borrowing, Journal Of
Australian Political Economy, no. 71, pp. 130-133, viewed September 16
2013.
Liberal Party of Australia 2013, Our Plan to get the Budget under control,
viewed September 16 2013, http://www.liberal.org.au/latestnews/2013/08/28/update-coalitions-responsible-savings
Moberg, M 1996, Crown Colony as Banana Republic: The United Fruit
Company in British Honduras, 1900-1920, Journal of Latin American
Studies, vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 357-381, viewed 16 September 2013.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development 2013,
Economic Survey of Japan 2013, viewed 17 September 2013,
http://www.oecd.org/eco/surveys/japan-2013.htm
Pais, A & Stork, P.A 2011, Contagion risk in the Australian banking and
property sectors, Journal of Banking and Finance, vol. 35, pp. 681-697,
viewed 18 September 2013, Elsevier Ltd, doi:
10.1016/j.jbankfin.2010.05.012
Prior, T, Giurco, D, Mudd, G, Mason, L & Behrisch, J 2012, Resource
depletion, peak minerals and the implications for sustainable resource
management, Global Environmental Change, vol. 22, pp. 557-587,
viewed 18 September 2013, Elsevier Ltd, DOI:
10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.08.009
Schandl, H, Poldy, F, Turner, G.M, Measham, T.G, Walker, D.H &
Eisenmenger, N 2008, Australias Resource Use Trajectories, Journal of

Michaela Hardwick s2895058

Page |

Industrial Ecology, vol. 12, no. 5/6, pp. 669-685, viewed 10 September
2013, DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2008.00075.x
The World Factbook: Australia, viewed 16 September 2013,
https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/as.html

Michaela Hardwick s2895058

Page |

You might also like