Piatek v. Baker - Document No. 3
Piatek v. Baker - Document No. 3
Piatek v. Baker - Document No. 3
3
Case 2:05-cv-01258-TJC Filed 12/08/2005 Page 1 of 2 Document 3
v.
JESS BAKER,
Defendant.
U.S.C. § 1983 from a sheriff’s deputy from California. Piatek claims that the deputy
defamed him. Seventeen years ago the deputy was the victim of a crime committed
by Piatek who claims that the deputy sent a letter defaming him to a judge in Walworth
County, Wisconsin. The letter was introduced into the record of Piatek’s sentencing on
criminal charges arising out of incidents occurring in Wisconsin in 2002. Piatek claims
that he “lost business” due to the defamatory letter. Following the sentencing, Piatek
Although Piatek has paid the filing fee in full, the court must still screen
his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. See also Rowe v. Shake, 1916 F.3d 778, 781
(7th Cir. 1999). Having examined the record, the court concludes that the Plaintiff has
not stated a constitutional claim for injury to his reputation under the standards set forth
in Paul v. Davis, 424 U.S. 693 (1976) and its progeny. Therefore, the court ORDERS
Dockets.Justia.com
Case 2:05-cv-01258-TJC Filed 12/08/2005 Page 2 of 2 Document 3
that this action is dismissed with prejudice for failure to state a claim upon which relief
judgment as a separate document. See Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. This
s/ Thomas J. Curran
Thomas J. Curran
United States District Judge