Nealson and Hastings
Nealson and Hastings
Nealson and Hastings
496-518
0146-0749/79/04-0496/23$02.00/0
Significance
K. H. NEALSON'* AND J. W. HASTINGS2
Marine Biology Department, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, La Jolla, California 92093' and The
Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138'
INTRODUCTION
... 496
BIOCH EMI STRY
497
TAXONOMIC RELATIONSHPS OF LUMINOUS BACTERIA
................. 499
Marine Forms ............................................................. 499
Terrestrial and Freshwater Forms
.......................................... 501
CONTROL OF THE SYNTHESIS AND ACTIVITY OF THE LUMINESCENT
SYSTEM
50 1
Autoinduction
...... 501
Catabolite Repression
...................................................... 503
......................................... 503
Composition of the Growth Medium
Oxygen
.......... 504
Pyruvate and Excretion Products
....................
................. 504
Dark (K) Variants of Luminous Bacteria ........ 504
HABITATS AND DISTRIBUTION OF LUMINOUS BACTERIA
............... 505
Free Living ................................................................. 505
................................... 507
Saprophytic Forms: Natural Enrichments
Commensal Forms
.......................................................... 508
508
Parasites
Marine
508
508
..
Nonmarine .
..................................................... 509
Light Organ Symbionts
Teleost fishes ............................................................. 509
Squid
5 10
............................ ..................... 510
Nonculturable symbionts
512
Endosymbionts
.............................. ......... 512
FUNCTIONS OF BIOLUMINESCENCE
...................................... 512
Vestigial or Nonfunctional Hypotheses
513
Biochemical Functions
........................................................ 513
Biological Functions
................................................ 513
light organ luminescence
.................................
...... 513
Dispersion and propagation
............ 514
PERSPECTIVES: LUMINOUS AND NONLUMINOUS BACTERIA
......................................................... 515
LITERATURE CMD
496
These perspectives and other specific postulates presented here concerning the nature and
functions of bacterial bioluminescence provide
new approaches for data collection and experimental work.
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
497
BIOCHEMISTRY
The biochemistry of bacterial bioluminescence has been reviewed recently (40); the short
summary below serves to introduce the subject
and to provide a perspective for the subsequent
sections.
The light-emitting reaction of luminous bacteria involves a luciferase-catalyzed oxidation of
reduced flavin mononucleotide (FMNH2) by
molecular oxygen, with the concomitant oxidation of a long-chain aliphatic aldehyde, probably
tetradecanal (93). Although the biochemical system is unique to bacteria, it is nevertheless found
in higher organisms by virtue of the occurrence
of luminous bacteria in mutualisms of several
types (see below). Recent work has also shown
that bacterial luciferase is in fact not confined to
100
the bioluminescent species of bacteria; many
FMNH2+ 02+ RCHO LUCIFERASE
closely related nonluminous species contain luFMN + H20 + RCOOH + 2hvu50
ciferase in low but readily detectable amounts
(K. H. Nealson and D. S. Walton, Abstr. Annu.
Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1978, 1131, p. 102).
Luciferase can be viewed as a mixed-function
20
oxidase, involving the oxidations of FMNH2 and
a long-chain aliphatic aldehyde in a reaction
that is analogous to the reactions of certain
B\\dhorveyi k=0.12 sec'
\
flavoprotein hydroxylases (37). An unusual feaS splendido k= 0.11 sec'1
ture of the reaction is its inherent slowness; at czI5
room temperature the time required for a single
luciferase cycle to occur is on the order of 10 s
(38), making it one of the slowest enzymes
- '0
P phosphoreum k= 0 78 secc
known. A practical consequence of this is that
there are intermediates in the reaction with long
lifetimes. Indeed, by using low temperatures, z 10
P /elognothi k= 0 64 sec'
these have been isolated, purified, and charac- J
terized (2, 9, 37a); the initial chemical species is
P. logel k 0.94 sec
5
postulated to be a luciferase-bound 4a-peroxy
P fischeri k= 0 sec1
adduct of FMNH2 (23).
Luciferases from several different luminous
t
bacteria have been isolated, purified, and stud3U
25
C
20
10
15
3
T ME (seconds)
ied; these bacteria include five marine species
(Beneckea [Vibrio] harveyi, Beneckea splenFIG. 1. Luciferase kinetics in the nonturnover asdida, Photobacterium fischeri, Photobacterium say. The kinetics of the decay of luminescence for the
phosphoreum, and Photobacterium leiognathi) luciferase reaction in vitro (the reaction sequence is
and two terrestrial-freshwater species (Vibrio shown in the upper right) when initiated with FMNH2
cholerae biotype albensis and Xenorhabdus lu- in the presence of dodecanal are shown for luciferases
from several species of marine bacteria. The
minescencens) (See below). Although there are isolated
apparent first-order rate constants (k) for the decay
significant differences, all bacterial luciferases of
luminescence are indicated for two species not
possess a heterodimeric structure and have mo- graphed. All Beneckea species display slow kinetics,
lecular weights in the range 76,000 + 4,000 (40; whereas all Photobacterium species show fast kinetE. G. Ruby and J. W. Hastings, unpublished ics. RCHO, Long-chain aliphatic aldehyde; FMN,
data; K. Kopecky and K. H. Nealson, unpub- flavin mononucleotide.
x
ll.x
498
MICROBIOL. REV.
dJbstrcte
educed
A TP
NV
--
JADH
NAD
K-
cytochromees
I7
FMN-
----FMN
+
(I)
H20
H20
[FH
FMNH
aTP
/l02
FH2
NV
NA
PRODUCTS
-- RCOOH
(It)
2
2
rnf46 >^+
2
2)PCFH4O'
-
tF1:
(VI*)
,le
noX
Ideyly
L + FMN + H 202
-_
C 2 2
RCHC -
(IM)
22,
lq-)
FIG. 2. Pathway of bacterial bioluminescence. The
pathway of reactants and proposed intermediates is
shown in relation to cellular metabolism and electron
flow. For each cycle of light production, one reduced
flavin (FMNH?) and one reduced pyridine nucleotide (reduced nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
[NADH2i, used for aldehyde regeneration) are presumably required. NAD, Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide; ATP, adenosine triphosphate; FMN,
flavin mononucleotide; RCHO, long-chain aliphaic
aldehyde.
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
499
Genus
DNA guanine
plus cytosine
Luminous
content
species
Ability to
(mol %)
Name
of bacterial
luciferaseb
harveyia
Marine
Nonmarine
Photobacterium
39-44
P. fischeri, P. logei, P.
phosphoreum, P.
P. angustum
Beneckea (Vibrio)Y
45-48
B. harveyi, B. splendida
B. alginolytica
B. parahaemolytica
B. anguillara
B. natriegens
B. campbelli
B. vulnifica
B. nigrapulchrituda
B. pelagia
B. nereida
V. cholerae
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
+
NTd
NT
NT
NT
leiognathi
Vibrio
47-49
Xenorhabdus'
43-44
(Achromobacter)
500
reference 78.)
MICROBIOL. REV.
P. phosphoreum from seawater samples echibited some growth requirement, most commonly
methionine. Of 500 P. phosphoreum strains isolated from the Atlantic Ocean at depths between
200 and 1,000 m Ruby et al. (E. G. Ruby, E. P.
Greenberg, and J. W. Hastings, Appl. Environ.
Microbiol., in press) found that 117 would not
grow on minimal medium. Of these, 52 were
chosen at random and tested; 51 grew on minimal medium supplemented with methionine.
However, Ruby and Nealson (88) found no
strains that required growth factors among approximately 2,300 fresh isolates from coastal waters at San Diego, Calif. Only 16 of these were
P. phosphoreum; 651 were B. harveyi, and 1,601
were P. fischeri.
As mentioned above, a useful distinction between the two genera relates to the kinetics of
the reaction of the luciferase when assayed in
vitro. Although the luciferases from all species
require the same components, the decay kinetics
(enzyme turnover time) for the reaction in vitro
using dodecanal are slow for luciferases from
Beneckea and fast for those from Photobacterium (Fig. 3). Thus, the luciferase assay can be
used for rapid screening at the generic level.
Since this enzymatic pathway is apparently
unique to bacteria, the existence of bacterial
luciferase can be used as evidence for the presence of luminescent bacteria, even when they
cannot be cultured (D. Cohn, G. Leisman, and
K. H. Nealson, Abstr., Annu. Meet. Am. Soc.
Photobiol. 1979). The reaction has also provided
evidence for the presence of a functional luciferase gene even when luminescence in vivo is
not detectable (Nealson and Walton, Abstr.
Annu. Meet. Am. Soc. Microbiol. 1978).
Terrestrial and Freshwater Forms
The existence of nonmarine luminous bacteria, in particular the occurrence of a freshwater
strain of Vibrio albensis (now called Vibrio
cholerae, sometimes called V. cholerae biotype
albensis), is indicated from the earlier literature
(32). This strain has a low (50 mM) requirement
for sodium ion and a DNA guanine plus cytosine
content of 47.8 mol%; DNA-DNA hybridization
studies indicate that it hybridizes 100% with the
type strain of V. cholerae, whereas Beneckea
strains hybridize poorly with V. cholerae (80).
However, luciferase from this strain exhibits Beneckea-type (slow) kinetics (Kopecky and Nealson, unpublished data). Neither the distribution
nor the physiology of luminous members of this
species has been studied.
Recently, luminescence has been reported to
occur in some members of a group of bacteria
which are symbiotic with soil nematodes and
collaborate with the nematodes in the parasiti-
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
501
zation of insects (52, 76; see below). The biochemistry of light emission is similar to that of
the marine forms, and the reaction exhibits slow
(Beneckea-like) kinetics (75). A new genus (Xenorhabdus) with luminous (X. luminescens) and
nonluminous (X. nematophilus) members has
been created to accomodate these bacteria (Table 1) (92). Members of this genus have a DNA
guanine plus cytosine content of 43 to 44 mol%
and share many properties with other members
of the Enterobacteriaceae, in which group the
genus is placed. The cells are unusually large for
luminous bacteria (length, 5 to 10 ,um), pigmented, and chitinase and oxidase negative, and
they prefer low salt concentrations; growth is
inhibited at 3% NaCl. Both luminous and nonluminous species produce antibiotic-like substances that presumably are responsible for the
fact that infected dead insects do not putrefy
(52). Several of these inhibitory compounds have
been isolated and purified from the growth medium (B. Fenical, personal communication).
Knowledge of control mechanisms is important to the understanding of the selective advantage of luminescence and the ecology of the
bacteria. Most of the effects elucidated involve
control of synthesis, and up to now there is no
case known in which luciferase synthesis is affected without a concomitant effect on the synthesis of aldehyde (e.g., the biosynthesis of luciferase and the enzymes involved in aldehyde
production are controlled in parallel). Thus, if
luciferase synthesis is low, its ability to act in
vivo is also lowered by virtue of substrate (al-
dehyde) limitation.
Autoinduction
The most obvious and perhaps the most significant physiological control of light emission
involves control of the synthesis of the luminescent system by the bacteria themselves. This
has been referred to as autoinduction. It was
first described by Nealson et al. (69) and was
postulated to involve a substance (autoinducer)
that accumulates in the growth medium and
induces the synthesis of the components of the
luminescence system. This hypothesis is supported by the demonstration that both P. fischeri and B. harveyi cells produce a substance
which induces bioluminescence at low cell density and which may be isolated and concentrated
from the culture medium (20, 25, 63). Although
the autoinducer is apparently a different compound in Photobacterium and Beneckea species
502
MICROBIOL. REV.
(the substances do not cross-react), many nonluminous Beneckea species produce autoinducer
activity in large amounts (some more than B.
harveyi) which induces the luminescent system
in B. harveyi (25). Several strains of P. fischeri
have been found to differ in the amount of
autoinducer produced (63); the amount of luminescence in vivo is correlated with autoinducer
levels.
In a previous review (40) there was a report
based on unpublished data that autoinducer
from P. fischeri had a molecular weight of about
159 and properties similar to those of indole
acetaldehyde. This is now believed to have been
in error; the autoinducer was a minor contaminant in the fraction under study (A. Eberhard,
personal communication). Separation of the active fraction has now been achieved, and its
structure determination is under way (Eberhard,
personal communication).
Support for the autoinduction hypothesis has
been obtained recently from two types of studies.
In the first, P. fischeri cells were grown in a
chemostat in which the cell density was regulated by carbon (glycerol) limitation (R. A. Rossen and K. H. Nealson, Abstr. Annu. Meet. Am.
Soc. Photobiol. 1979, p. 150-151). At steadystate cell densities of 108 ml-' or greater, the
cells remained brightly luminous at an intensity
cells/ml
fischer,
light/cell
o4
109
o
u-t
is
a':iV
ax
41~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~i
~.i
Time (days)
i0s
Time
doays)
1i
12
FIG. 4. Loss of luminescence in cells growing at low cell densities. (A) Chemostat experiment with P.
fischeri. Each day the carbon (glycerol) concentration was lowered by a factor of two, and the cells of P.
fischeri were allowed to grow at that concentration. When the cell density dropped below about 108 cells per
ml, the luminescence per cell decreased; at a cell density of 3 x 106 cells per ml, light emission was
undetectable, i.e., less than 10 quanta/s per cell. Addition of purified autoinducer (arrow) restored bioluminescence in the culture at this density. (B) Cells of B. harveyi were maintained at low density by repetitive
subculturing rather than in a chemostat; no nutrient limitation was used. When the culture reached a density
of about 107 cells per ml, it was diluted to approximately 102 cells per ml in the same medium. After the first
dilution, luminescence per cell fell to and remained at a low level through all subsequent dilutions. Either the
addition of inducer (arrow A) or allowing the cells to continue growth (arrow B) resulted in the induction of
bioluminescence.
Catabolite Repression
Inducible enzymes are synthesized and have
a function under some conditions but not under
others (56). For many such enzymes induction is
mediated by some specific nutrient for which
catabolic enzymes are not produced constitutively. Moreover, the induced synthesis of the
relevant enzyme is often repressed by glucose,
even in the presence of inducer, and this repression can be overcome by exogenous cyclic adenosine monophosphate (cAMP); glucose repression and reversal by cAMP are referred to as
catabolite repression. The synthesis of the luminescence system in B. harveyi is subject to
catabolite repression (66). Furthermore, cAMP
binding protein occurs in large amounts in B.
harveyi, and it is immunologically homologous
with the cAMP binding proteins of Escherichia
coli and several other enteric bacteria (73). By
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
503
504
MICROBIOL. REV.
may lead to significant advances in the understanding of the ecology of these bacteria.
Oxygen
When P. fischeri is grown in a medium containing glucose or one of several other sugars as
the carbon source, pyruvate accumulates in the
growth medium (87; Ruby, Ph.D. thesis). Unless
the medium is strongly buffered, the pH drops
and luminescence ceases. P. fischeri grows with
pyruvate as the sole source of carbon, so its
excretion during growth on other substrates is
unusual. It may simply be a case of unbalanced
growth, but the mechanism has yet to be elucidated. Pyruvate excretion has also been observed in Beneckea species (both luminous and
nonluminous) and P. phosphoreum, but not in
P. leiognathi. Whether pyruvate excretion is
ecologically important to the luminous bacteria
under any conditions or is an artifact of the
laboratory studies awaits the demonstration of
pyruvate excretion under in situ conditions.
However, nutrient exchange is a common feature of many symbioses, and pyruvate may represent such a nutrient, as proposed for one model
of symbiosis of luminous bacteria with luminous
fish (65, 86).
When stab cultures of different species of luminous bacteria are examined, two different patterns of growth and luminescence are seen. In
some (B. harveyi and P. leiognathi), luminescence is maximal at the surface of the agar,
where oxygen concentration is high. In others
(P. fischeri and P. phosphoreum), maximal luminescence occurs deep in the stab, where
growth is inhibited and oxygen concentration is
low (67). Analysis of this phenomenon has
shown that oxygen is important as a controlling
element in the synthesis of the luminescence
system. For P. fischeri and P. phosphoreum, at
low concentrations where growth is limited, luciferase synthesis is not halted, resulting in cells
with high luciferase content. Quite a different
response occurs in B. harveyi and P. leiognathi,
in which there is a tight coupling between
growth and luciferase systhesis. Both properties
are simultaneously limited, so that cells grown
under oxygen-limiting conditions develop the
same amount of luciferase as do well-aerated
cells at the same cell density.
These differences may have clear ecological
implications and suggest that the different species occupy niches that are different with regard
to oxygen concentration or the necessity for the
presence of the luminescence system or both.
For instance, the light organ may represent a
niche where the oxygen concentration under
which the bacteria are maintained could be controlled by the host fish. Experiments in this area
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
505
nes1-uv*kaAtjo
506
MICROBIOL. REV.
Saprophytic
Nonspecific symbionts
Commensal
Parasitic
Species
Habitat or host
Mode
Nonsymbionts
Free living
Seawater
Soil (?), freshwater (?)
Marine animals, fish, salt meat(?)
Wounds, meat
identified
Specific symbionts
Symbiotic/parasitic
Light organ exosymbionts
Nematode/caterpillar
Teleost fishes (11 families)
Squid
(Euprymna scalopes)
(Heteroteuthis hawaiiensis)
endosym- Tunicates, squid(?)
X. luminescens
P. fischeri, P. phosphoreum, P. leiognathi; some isolates not identified, some
not cultured
P. fischerib
Not cultured
Not cultured or identified
Light organ
biontsc
a B. splendida and P. leiognathi have not been rigorously demonstrated in such habitats, but their presence
seems certain.
b The older literature (12, 32) contains reports that isolates cultured from squids exhibit characteristics that
are very different from "ordinary" marine luminous bacteria. Several different names were assigned, including
Vibrio pierantonii, which was later identified as P. fischeri (78). This has been confirmed with recent isolates
from Euprymna scalopes (G. Leisman, unpublished data).
'The occurrence of luminous endosymbionts has not been firmly established.
6
5
Cells
ml
4
3
2
rz/
/~
1975
s,
J
1976
1977
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
507
U,
4-
E
r-C
T
0
40.
500
E
600
700
800
900
Temperature, OC
1,000
2,000
6,000
10,000
2 3 4 5 6
0
Luminous CFU/lOOml Sea Water
FIG. 6. Bacterial colony counts and water temperatures in the water column over the Puerto Rico Trench.
(A) Abundance of planktonic bacteria as a function of depth. Symbols: x, total colony-forming units (CFU);
A, P. phosphoreum; O1 P. leiognathi; 0, P. fischeri; 0, Beneckea spp. Data are from three hydrocasts made
over a period of 4 days at two stations. (B) Temperature profile of the water at the time of the hydrocasts.
508
MICROBIOL. REV.
Parasites
Marine. Although there are few recent studies on the subject, it is well known from the
older literature that luminous bacteria can infect
the tissues of a variety of marine crustaceans
(24, 32, 46). It has usually been possible to isolate
and grow the infecting organism in pure culture,
and the infections are apparently not species
specific. Different species of luminous bacteria
occur as parasites, and the same host may be
parasitized by different bacterial species (both
Photobacterium and Beneckea); the parasitism
is apparently correlated with season, corresponding to the abundance of free-living isolates
(Nealson, unpublished data). Moreover, parasitic bacteria apparently have a wide host range
and are capable of infecting many different crustaceans (32). Luminous bacteria grow in the
hemolymph of the infected animals, often making them easily visible. Whether an intermediate
host, such as is found in the nematode-caterpillar case (see below), is involved is not known.
There are current studies concerned with necrotic lesions in the Tanner crab exoskeleton
infected specifically with P. phosphoreum. The
extracellular bacterial chitinase may provide a
mechanism for the bacteria to inhabit this niche
(J. Baross, personal communication).
Nonmarine. There are many reports in the
older literature of parasitic infections of terrestrial organisms by luminous bacteria; the welldocumented hosts include mole crickets, mayflies, ants, wood lice, and millipedes (32). As
mentioned above, recent studies link the parasitism of caterpillars by luminous bacteria (X.
luminescens) with a mutualistic symbiosis between the bacteria and a specific genus of nematode (52, 76). The luminous bacteria are carried
symbiotically in the gut of a nematode and occur
there in small numbers, estimated to be less
than 100 cells per animal (G. Thomas, personal
communication); the nematode stage is not visibly luminous. In its juvenile stage the nematode
is ingested by the caterpillar and bores through
the gut wall, inoculating the hemolymph with
the bacteria, which then grow there and are
pathogenic for the caterpillar. As mentioned
above, the bacteria produce an antibiotic that
presumably prevents putrefaction. The life cycle
of the nematode is completed in the hemocoel,
and luminous bacteria are incorporated into the
progeny. Poinar (personal communication) has
proposed that the function of the luminescence
is to aid in the success of the nematode progeny
by attraction of additional potential hosts (other
caterpillars). It seems equally likely that the
light could aid in the dispersion of the nematode
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
P. phosphoreum
Macrourid
Merlucciid
P fischeri
Monocentrid
509
P. Ieiognothi
Leiognathid
Apogonid
Non -culturoble
Ceratioid
Not identified
Acropomatid
Anomolopid
Morid
Opisthoproctid
Trachichthyid
FIG. 7. The "ichthylicht". A diagrammatic fish is used to indicate the approximate locations, sizes, and
openings of the light organs of the several different families of luminous fishes that culture symbiotic luminous
bacteria as a source of light for the organ. The taxa of bacteria known to be specifically associated with each
fish group are listed at the bottom of the figure.
510
MICROBIOL. REV.
.m
FIG. 8. Structural features of the luminous organ of the luminous fish M. japonicus. (A) Line drawing of
fish and ventral view of lower jaw, showing the location of the light organs (solid black area). Bar = 1.0 cm.
(B) Scanning electron micrograph of the dorsal surface of the light organ. Numerous dermal papillae can be
seen. The emissary ducts from the light organ emerge at the tips of the four large papillae (arrows). Bar = 0.2
mm. (C) Light micrograph of a sagittal section of the lower jaw. m, Melanocytes; t, tubules with bacteria; b,
mandibular bone; d, dermal layer; p, dermal papillae. The arrow points to an emissary duct. Bar = 50 pm.
(D) Light micrograph showing the tubules of the light organ filled with bacteria. Tubules are lined with a
single layer of cuboidal epithelial cells that display loose nuclear chromatin and prominent nucleoli supported
by connective tissue cells. Blood capillaries are sparse and not readily visible. Bar = 15 /im. (E) Electron
micrograph showing the major features of the tubule epithelium. Epithelial cells that make up the lining of
the tubules have light-staining mitochondra (lm) with fine cristae. Epithelial cells that are further away from
the tubule lumen next to the blood capillaries have dark-staining mitochondria (dm) with thick cristae. t,
tubule with luminous bacteria; e, erythrocyte visible in capillary; n, nuclei of tubule epithelial cells. Bar = 1
,um.
511
512
MICROBIOL. REV.
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
Biological Functions
Most authors favor the idea that it is the
emitted light that is of functional importance
and that its perception by some other organism(s) initiates phenomena which ultimately
serve to the advantage of the light-emitting bacteria. It seems unlikely that intraspecific effects
513
514
MICROBIOL. REV.
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
luminescent bacteria.
There are other relevant questions. What is
the cellular energetic commitment to bacterial
light emission? Are some of the luminous bacteria low-nutrient forms? Can they grow as freeliving forms in the ocean? What is the relationship between the various symbiotic partnerships
and the population densities of luminous bacteria? Have luminous bacteria established themselves in true endosymbiotic relationships in addition to the well-known extracellular ones?
What is the abundance, distribution, and significance of luminous bacteria in the gut tracts of
marine organisms? What are the physiological
mechanisms involved in the establishment,
maintenance, and control of the various symbioses?
Although the questions are many and the
firmly supported models are few, information
concerning the biochemistry, physiology, and
distribution of the luminous bacteria continues
to accumulate. As the data appear, many of the
questions posed above will be answered, and an
understanding of the ecology of these abundant,
widespread, and spectacular bacteria will be possible.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
Although we are responsible for the ideas and interpretations presented in this review, we were greatly
aided in their formulation and alteration by discussions with J. Morn, M. Shilo, P. Baumann, J. Reichelt,
R. Rosenblatt, and S. Ulitzur. In addition, unpublished
data and preprints were supplied by A. Eberhard, M.
Shilo, E. G. Ruby, E. P. Greenberg, G. Leisman, D.
Cohn, B. Tebo, G. Poinar, S. Ulitzur, D. Karl, K.
Kopecky, P. Dunlap, J. Morn, and J. Baross. Without
this assistance, it would have been impossible to do a
complete job on the review, and we are most grateful.
We acknowledge the support of National Science
Foundation grants PCM74-14788 (to K.H.N.) and
PCM77-19917 (to J.W.H.).
ADDENDUM IN PROOF
The compound responsible for the autoinducer activity from P. fischeri has now been purified and
identified as N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-3-aminodihydro2(3H)-furanone (N-fl-ketohexanoyl-homoserine lactone) (A. Eberhard, personal communication).
LITIERATURE CITED
1. Baldwin, T. O., M. M. Ziegler, and D. A.
Powers. 1979. Covalent structure of bacterial
luciferase: NH2 terminal sequence demonstrates subunit homology. Proc. Natl. Acad.
Sci. U.S.A. (in press).
2. Balny, C., and J. W. Hastings. 1975. Fluorescence and bioluminescence of bacterial luciferase intermediates. Biochemistry 14:47194723.
515
516
MICROBIOL. REV.
mediates in the bioluminescent oxidation of
flavin mononucleotide. J. Biol. Chem. 238:
2537-2554.
39. Hastings, J. W., and G. Mitchell. 1971. Endosymbiotic bioluminescent bacteria from the
light organ of pony fish. Biol. Bull. (Woods
Hole, Mass.) 141:261-268.
40. Hastings, J. W., and K. H. Nealson. 1977.
Bacterial bioluminescence. Annu. Rev. Microbiol. 31:549-595.
40a.Hastings, J. W., W. H. Riley, and J. Massa.
1965. The purification, properties, and chemiluminescent quantum yield of bacterial luciferase. J. Biol. Chem. 240:1473-1481.
41. Hastings, J. W., J. Spudich, and G. Malnic.
1963. The influence of aldehyde chain length
upon the relative quantum yield of the bioluminescent reaction of Achromobacter fischeri.
J. Biol. Chem. 238:3100-3105.
42. Henry, J. P., and A. M. Michelson. 1970. Physiologie bacterienne-etudes de bioluminescence. Regulation de la biolum. bacterienne. C.
R. Acad. Sci. 270:1947-1949.
43. Herring, P. J. 1977. Luminescence in cephalopods and fish. Symp. Zool. Soc. London 38:
127-159.
44. Herring, P. J. 1978. Bioluminescence of invertebrates other than insects, p. 199-240. In P. J.
Herring (ed.), Bioluminescence in action. Academic Press Inc., London.
45. Herring, P. J., and J. G. Morin. 1978. Bioluminescence in fishes, p. 272-329. In P. J. Herring (ed.), Bioluminescence in action. Academic Press Inc., London.
46. Inman, 0. L. 1927. A pathogenic luminous bacterium. Biol. Bull. (Woods Hole, Mass.) 53:
197-200.
47. Karl, D. H., and K. H. Nealson. 1979. Regulation of cellular metabolism during synthesis
and expression of the luminous system in Beneckea and Photobacterium. J. Gen. Microbiol. (in press).
48. Katznelson, R., and S. UWitzur. 1977. Control
of luciferase in a newly isolated strain of Photobacterium leiognathi. Arch. Microbiol. 115:
347-351.
49. Kelly, M. G., and P. Tett. 1978. Bioluminescence in the ocean, p. 399417. In P. J. Herring
50.
51.
52.
53.
BACTERIAL BIOLUMINESCENCE
517
25:161-167.
85. Ruby, E. G., and J. G. Morin. 1979. Luminous
enteric bacteria of marine fishes: a study of
their distribution, densities and dispersion.
518
MICROBIOL. REV.
Biochim. Biophys. Acta 404:321-328.
95. Warner, J. A., M. I. Latz, and J. F. Case. 1979.
Cryptic bioluminescence in a midwater shrimp.
Science 203:1109-1110.
96. Watanabe, T., N. Mimara, A. Takimoto, and
T. Nakamura. 1975. Luminescence and respiratory activities of Photobacteriumphosphoreum. J. Biochem. 77:1147-1155.
97. Watanabe, T., and T. Nakamura. 1972. Studies on luciferase from Photobacterium phosphoreum. II. Substrate specificity and stoichiometry of the reaction in vitro. J. Biochem.
72:647-653.
98. Waters, C. A., and J. W. Hastings. 1977. Mutants of luminous bacteria with an altered control of luciferase synthesis. J. Bacteriol. 131:
519-525.
99. Yasaki, Y. 1928. On the nature of the luminescence of the knight fish, Monocentris japonicus. J. Exp. Zool. 50:495-505.
100. Yetinson, T., and M. Shilo. 1979. Seasonal and
geographic distribution of luminous bacteria in
the eastern Mediterranean Sea and the Gulf of
Elat. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 37:1230-1238.
101. Young, R. E., and C. R. F. Roper. 1976. Bioluminescent countershading in midwater animals: evidence from living squid. Science 191:
1046-1048.
102. Zobell, C. E. 1946. Marine microbiology. Chronica Botanica, Waltham, Mass.
103. Zobeli, C. E., and S. C. Rittenberg. 1938. The
occurrence and characteristics of chitinoclastic
bacteria in the sea. J. Bacteriol. 35:275-287.
ADDENDUM IN PROOF
The compound responsible for the autoinducer activity from P. Fischeri has now been purified and
identified as N-(3-oxohexanoyl)-3-aminodihydro2(3H)-furanone (N-/3-ketohexanoyl-homoserine lac-