Philosphy 2016
Philosphy 2016
Philosphy 2016
What is leadership? What defines a leader? Well, for many these two questions are
awfully complicated. Coming into Virginia Tech in the residential leadership community, my
past three and a half years have been centered around leadership-focused classes and I have been
using what I learned in those classes to gain real leadership experience in my extra curricular
activities. All leadership classes I have taken are very similar, where they all center on the many
different facets of leadership. The answer to the two questions above becomes more about ones
experiences in a leadership environment and situations where ones personal leadership style
comes to practice. I believe the type of leader one becomes is focused around the characteristics
necessary to be a successful leader.
Leadership can take on many different definitions and every textbook will describe
leadership just a little differently than the last. Being a leader comes with great responsibility and
power. However, when the power is abused, the term leadership vanishes. People often confuse a
leader with a manager, however while a leader can be a manager, not all managers are leaders.
The main difference is a manager, who is not a true leader, delegates tasks and gets things done
without being personal and interacting together with his/her followers. A leader on the other
hand, builds relationships with their followers and with those relationships delegates and along
with their followers succeeds in the tasks set in front of them.
In my opinion, there are mainly two general types of leaders, professional leaders, and
personal leaders, which I will touch of each type later in my paper. Both of these types of leaders
contain certain characteristics that drive their way of leading a person or group. One class that
has helped me clearly define my perspective on leadership was Leadership Effective for
Professionals in the Agricultural Industry. Being a Public Relations major I had nothing in
common with agricultural industries, however I ended up taking the most from this class because
I finally felt that I had fully developed my personal definition. That definition pairs with a
contemporary definition from Elements of Leadership, leadership is a relational process based
on mutual goals toward some action,(Komives, Lucas, McMahon p.51). This definition only
skims the surface of leadership, but lays a foundation.
I believe proper leadership requires values, beliefs and ethics. These characteristics pair
with both professional and personal leaders. Leadership is more about the leader than it is about
the action of acquiring followers. My philosophy behind leadership lies on the grounds that some
persons, but not all persons, have the potential to be a leader.
Many people when asked who a leader is would probably say, the president of the United
States, a CEO of a company, or maybe someone famous such as Martin Luther King Jr. or even
Hitler. You may be thinking, well, those ARE examples of leaders. You are right. These in my
opinion are examples of professional leaders. However, a leader stretches far beyond ones title.
My ideal definition of a leader is a personal leader. This is how i classify my personal
type of leadership and what shaped me to want to lead others rather than follow. When I think of
a leader I think of God, my family and my teachers, the three people that have been through
everything with me. While this is a drastic change from the previous list of professional leaders,
this only shows how a wide range of people can be classified under the term leader. A true leader
is not only someone who can lead you to success, but also someone who can lead you to become