Five options were generated for sinking a well at the KMRC site between December 2014 and March 2016. The first option sent in December 2014 proposed using an RCC well sunk with a kentledge load. Additional schemes provided details for sinking with jack anchors, sheet pile walls in both circular and square designs, and a contiguous pile scheme. In March 2016, the site proposed a slurry wall technique.
Five options were generated for sinking a well at the KMRC site between December 2014 and March 2016. The first option sent in December 2014 proposed using an RCC well sunk with a kentledge load. Additional schemes provided details for sinking with jack anchors, sheet pile walls in both circular and square designs, and a contiguous pile scheme. In March 2016, the site proposed a slurry wall technique.
Original Description:
Different techniques prepared for well sinking for one of the prestigious project.
Five options were generated for sinking a well at the KMRC site between December 2014 and March 2016. The first option sent in December 2014 proposed using an RCC well sunk with a kentledge load. Additional schemes provided details for sinking with jack anchors, sheet pile walls in both circular and square designs, and a contiguous pile scheme. In March 2016, the site proposed a slurry wall technique.
Five options were generated for sinking a well at the KMRC site between December 2014 and March 2016. The first option sent in December 2014 proposed using an RCC well sunk with a kentledge load. Additional schemes provided details for sinking with jack anchors, sheet pile walls in both circular and square designs, and a contiguous pile scheme. In March 2016, the site proposed a slurry wall technique.