Scribd
Upload
57 views1 page

United States v. Rich, 1st Cir. (2015)

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an errata sheet for an opinion published on January 12, 2015. The errata sheet noted a typo on page 3, line 11 where the word "no" should be substituted for the word "know" in the sentence: "Appellate courts should not write at length to no other end than to hear their own words resonate."

Copyright:

Public Domain
Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf

United States v. Rich, 1st Cir. (2015)

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
57 views1 page
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an errata sheet for an opinion published on January 12, 2015. The errata sheet noted a typo on page 3, line 11 where the word "no" should be substituted for the word "know" in the sentence: "Appellate courts should not write at length to no other end than to hear their own words resonate."

Original Description:

Filed: 2015-02-02 Precedential Status: Errata Docket: 13-1995

Copyright

© Public Domain

Available Formats

PDF or read online from Scribd

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an errata sheet for an opinion published on January 12, 2015. The errata sheet noted a typo on page 3, line 11 where the word "no" should be substituted for the word "know" in the sentence: "Appellate courts should not write at length to no other end than to hear their own words resonate."

Copyright:

Public Domain
Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf
57 views1 page

United States v. Rich, 1st Cir. (2015)

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
The United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit issued an errata sheet for an opinion published on January 12, 2015. The errata sheet noted a typo on page 3, line 11 where the word "no" should be substituted for the word "know" in the sentence: "Appellate courts should not write at length to no other end than to hear their own words resonate."

Copyright:

Public Domain
Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
Download as pdf
You are on page 1/ 1

United States Court of Appeals

For the First Circuit


No. 13-1995
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Appellee,
v.
GERALD T. RICH, JR.,
Defendant, Appellant.

ERRATA SHEET
The opinion of this Court issued on January 12, 2015 is
corrected as follows:
On p.3, l.11, the word "no" should be substituted for the word
"know". The sentence, therefore, reads as follows:
"Appellate courts should not write at length to no other end
than to hear their own words resonate."

You might also like