Winnie Yamfwa Book Essay: Children of My Heart Course ED6821 Instructor: Dr. Evie Plaice Faculty of Education, University of New Brunswick
Winnie Yamfwa Book Essay: Children of My Heart Course ED6821 Instructor: Dr. Evie Plaice Faculty of Education, University of New Brunswick
Winnie Yamfwa Book Essay: Children of My Heart Course ED6821 Instructor: Dr. Evie Plaice Faculty of Education, University of New Brunswick
Winnie Yamfwa
Book Essay: Children of My Heart
Course ED6821
Instructor: Dr. Evie Plaice
Faculty of Education, University of New Brunswick
BOOK ESSAY
BOOK ESSAY
I am quick to mention that even though I have elected to focus on narrative inquiry,
there are some other qualitative approaches or methodologies that researchers can
use when looking at the novel and indeed educational research. Autoethnography
is an excellent example which in fact was the subject of one of my journals. A
mixed method is another possibility. Throughout my study of Roy and materials in
this course I have gravitated towards narrative inquiry because it seems to be an
acceptable approach to try and understand and interpret Roys work.
As a result, I have traced a thematic development of my work in terms of
lived experiences and stories in qualitative research. Also from my readings I
learnt that Deweys conceptual framework of experience and life as an act of
education that advocates for analyzing human experiences in groups or
individually makes sense. Clandinin (2006) also offers a methodology of lived
experience using a metaphorical point of view which is a three dimensional inquiry
space.
For the purposes of this essay, the terms narrative inquiry and narrative
research will be used interchangeably. Qualitative research has given much
prominence to the study and interpretation of literature because of its strong ability
to deal with various matters in a society or community which may be historical,
psychological, sociological or political. Needless to say, these are things that also
touch education. On the other hand, Literature is a source of sensory details,
BOOK ESSAY
figurative (Given, 2008, pp. 487) and ethically it offers other viable options of
studying the complexities of human life and relationships in qualitative research.
Furthermore, it is much easier to deal with confidentiality issues in literature than
in a report and one can have a wider audience in literature.
Reading Roys story, she touches on her senses and emotions - happiness,
sadness, melancholy and even freedom. Talking about her mother who had a
broken hip she wrote, The horror I had felt one day at the thought of being
chained for a lifetime to my teachers desk gave me a glimpse of her feeling at the
prospect of never leaving her prisoners lookout at the window (Roy, pp. 44) As
well, there are lots of conversations in the story which help create meaning,
Dialogue is continuous for the characters. Narrative inquiry is interested in
interpreting this dialogue perhaps as social phenomena.
Narratives or stories have been told for a very long time both in writing and
orally. Story telling is important as it tells of human experiences which are often
multilayered and complex. Narratives include human culture and experience and
there is always a great desire to make sense of experience and the world around us.
(Bruner, 1986). Nowadays, according to Given (2008), Methods of inquiry into
lived experiences appear under labels like autobiography, biography,
autoethnography, life history and oral history. (pp. 484) Similarly Chase (2007)
gives us has five approaches for analyzing told stories and these can take any of the
BOOK ESSAY
487).
It is against this background that I look at Roys work which is basically a
work of fiction which however is representative of human experiences in teaching.
She uses her past knowledge and experiences and her style is descriptive.
Throughout the book she uses the first person I for she is narrating the various
activities she was engaged in at school and out of school. Roy gives very vivid
pictures of her interactions with her students as well as their families. Additionally,
in the book she describes many things like the geography and the weather. She
writes: It was early May. It had rained for several days and the fields across
BOOK ESSAY
which Nil was leading me were a sea of mud, with occasional clumps of low,
thorny bushes that caught on my clothing. (pp. 51)
On the other hand, there is on-going discussion and debate as to whether
fiction can actually study critical issues related to teaching. If anything, this should
be the essence of looking at Roys work. What values does she bring to education
through her story? Is there a message for educators in her novel? For instance,
Sconiers and Rosiek (2000) in Barone (2007) looked at a case study about some of
Sconiers teaching experiences using a fictional character. Apparently the goal was
to investigate matters relating to teaching science to non-white students. We can
draw parallels here when we look at Roys story which is about teaching poverty
stricken immigrant children in the 1930s. I also know that many of our immigrant
children struggle with poverty as well as achievement in our schools today.
This brings me to the subject of voice (or voices) in Roys work. Meon (2006)
discusses at length the significance of voice. She is not the only one, other scholars
have said that:
In qualitative research there are voices. This is because they
recognize that the narratives are in part personal stories shaped by
the knowledge of experience, values and the feelings of the person
feeling them. At the same time, they are also collective stories that are
BOOK ESSAY
BOOK ESSAY
Among the many things that stand out in Roys novel is that like other fictional
writing, the book is a personal exploration of self and others as well as identity and
power relations. Roy explores community relations at one level and at another
level power relations especially within families and in her school. How does the
male principal relate to the staff? Furthermore, one can examine the various
relationships that she had with her students.
Writers do not write solely for themselves which therefore brings us to
audience. Clandinin argues that, Audience also shapes autobiographical narrative
inquiry. Who the characters are in peoples stories, the plotlines people choose to
tell and the audiences to whom they tell, all influence autobiographical narrative
inquiry (pp.7).
If we talk about the traditional process of narrative inquiry where a
researcher negotiates entry in the field, we see that this is not really applicable to
Roys work, as the work is in another field or if you will; genre. She has a
completely different style. For example, it is not evident if she uses field texts and
in fact the resulting work is a novel and not a research report as would be the case
in traditional qualitative research.
Essentially, because the novel is a literary text, it is rather difficult to
thoroughly apply qualitative research criteria such as validity, generalizability and
validity. It is in view of these criteria that one can say that Roys book is not
BOOK ESSAY
qualitative data in the strict sense of the term or methodology. Atkinson and
Delamont (2006) argue for more analytic rigour saying that Narrative should be
analyzed as a social phenomenonon, not as the vehicle for personal or private
experience (pp. 607).
Furthermore, When one engages in narrative inquiry the process becomes even
more complex, for, as researchers, we become part of the process. The two
narratives of participant and researcher become, in part, a shared narrative
construction and reconstruction through the inquiry (Connelly and Clandinin,
1990, pp. 5). This is not the way the book is constructed. On the contrary, Roy
writes in a genre that allows for subjectivity which can be problematic especially in
view of authenticity but also allows one to look at her characters holistically. Let us
not forget that Roys text is an art form or literature which is being examined
through the narrative inquiry conceptual framework or lens and obviously there are
limitations.
Clearly there is no evidence of researcher and participant in Roys work for as a
matter of fact she was a writer who in real life was more interested in the arts and
writing.
Etherington looks at narrative inquiry as an umbrella rerm that captures
personal and human experience over time, takes account of the relationship
between experience and cultural context. These approaches are underpinned by
BOOK ESSAY
10
BOOK ESSAY
11
fresh from Normal School as I was then the most delicate, the newest,
and the easiest thing to break in this whole world. (pp. 81).
Narrative unity is also vital. As Meon (2006) states, classrooms capture both the
complexity and multivoicedness of teaching narratives retain all the
characteristics of the whole and they occur in an integrated and living part of the
whole (pp. 9). In essence, narratives are created within familiar social contexts
and can therefore be understood or related to by people especially with similar
experiences. This brings together theory and practice in education.
Finally despite some limitations we learn that the advantage of studying
literature in qualitative research, is the assertion that Givens (2008) gives. This is,
it offers researchers a variety of approaches for explaining what and how
participants understand and for representing their insights. The three main areas
where literature is used as qualitative research are representation of data,
participant response and data. (pp. 486).
Narrative research or inquiry is therefore a powerful framework that provides
us as educators to investigate or explore human experiences of the world through
what is provided in stories. It helps us study teaching and learning. Roy wrote an
interesting book which deals with her everyday teaching experiences. Using the
narrative inquiry or narrative research approach to study Roys work leaves me
with an impression that indeed our lived experiences play a vital role in both our
BOOK ESSAY
12
professional and personal lives. At the same time, I am fully aware that from the
time I started studying the book, I have been inclined to think that it does not
completely fall under narrative inquiry but can still give some insights to
researchers. One thing Roy does well is to share her lived experiences and as this
paper has strived to show; those experiences turned into stories matter a lot.
BOOK ESSAY
13
References
Atkinson, P., & Delamont, S. (2006). Rescuing narrative from qualitative research, Narrative
Inquiry, 15(1), 164-172
Barone, T. (2007). A return to the good standard? Questioning the future of narrative
construction as educational research
Bruner, J. S., & Austin, G. A. (1986). A study of thinking. Transaction Publishers.
Chase, S. E. (2007). Multiple lenses, approaches, voices. Collecting and interpreting qualitative
materials, 57(3), 651-679.
Clandinin, D. J. (2006). Narrative inquiry: A methodology for studying lived
experience. Research studies in music education, 27(1), 44-54.
Clandinin, D. J., & Huber, J. (in press). Narrative inquiry. In B. McGaw, E. Baker, & P.
P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education (3rd ed.). New York: Elsevier
Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, D. J. (1990). Stories of experience and narrative
inquiry. Educational researcher, 19(5), 2-14.
Etherington, K. (2013). Narrative approaches to case studies. Last accessed, 30.
Given, L. M. (Ed.). (2008). The Sage encyclopedia of qualitative research methods. Sage
Publications.
Roy, G. (1977). Children of My Heart. Toronto: McClelland & Stewart Inc.
The Canadian Encyclopedia,
http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/gabrielle-roy/
Van Oort, R. (2004). The critic as ethnographer. New Literary History, 35(4), 621-661.
BOOK ESSAY
14