Nota Terkini Company Law
Nota Terkini Company Law
Nota Terkini Company Law
represents a company?
A Farmasi Ibrahim
B Melor Enterprise
C Zali Sdn Bhd
D Perniagaan Itikmas & Adik Beradik
E Bank Islam Malaysia Berhad
F Klinik Rahim, Said dan Wong
Companies
• The dominant form of business
organisation
• Over half a million companies in Malaysia
• Created through a process of registration
under statute – an “artificial legal person”
• Have special legal characteristics
(discussed in Lecture 3)
What is the purpose of
companies?
• Traditionally, a means by which a large
group of people with capital and
management resources could come
together to conduct an enterprise on an
ongoing basis
• Now also widely used for small business
and by individuals
Small and large companies
• Most companies are small businesses
• In 2001, there were 809 companies listed
on the Kuala Lumpur Stock Exchange
(KLSE). (Listed companies are
companies in which you can buy or sell
shares through the KLSE.)
The architecture of companies
• Capital structure
– equity capital (shares)
– debt capital
• Management structure
– board of directors and other officers
– members (shareholders)
• Choice of form of business association
• Types of companies
• Registration of companies
• Listing on the KLSE
• Corporate groups
Choice of form
• Distinguish between:
– incorporated entities; and
– unincorporated entities.
• Incorporated entities (corporations) are
separate legal persons
• Unincorporated entities have no legal
personality separate from their participants
Incorporated entities
• “Corporation” is the general term.
Definition in sec 4 of the Companies Act
• May be formed:
– by special Act of Parliament
– under an Act of Parliament conferring power
on some person to create corporations, eg.
the Companies Act 1965
Unincorporated entities
• sole trader
• general partnership
• limited partnership
• non-profit associations and clubs
• trusts
• syndicates and joint ventures
• Some distinction between company,
partnership and sole proprietorship
shoe business
Salomon
cash, debenture Pty Ltd
company
20,001 shares
family 6 shares
Salomon (cont)
• Issue – was Mr Salomon entitled to priority
under the debenture over other,
unsecured creditors of the company?
• Depends on whether the company and its
controller are separate legal entities, and
not agents or trustees for each other
• Court said yes
Characteristics of companies
• Important features of companies arising
from their separate legal personality
– can incur obligations and hold rights, and sue
and be sued, in their own name
– can contract with their controllers
– have perpetual succession
– are separate taxpayers
– participants (may) have limited liability
Companies are separate from
their controllers
• Lee v Lee’s Air Farming Ltd: issue –
could Mr Lee be both the controller of a
company and its employee?
• Macaura v Northern Assurance: issue –
was Mr Macaura the “owner” of property
that belonged to a company controlled by
him?
Companies can enforce rights
• Vu Siew Chin v Wong Fah Yoon
– issue : can incur liabilities and be sued
• Foss v Harbottle
– issue : enforce rights in its own name
• Lifting the veil/ exceptions
• Some time the above principle can produce unsatisfactory results-
thus there are exceptions:
• Number of members below 2-the person is personally liable
• Responsibility for fraudulent trading-the person who knew the fraud
is personally liable
• Publication of a name-when the name of the co is not published-the
person would be personally liable
• Taxation-nationality of members may affect the national status of the
co
• Holding and subsidiary co-the 2 co are separate legal entities,
however decisions show that they may also be treated as a single
entity
• Evasion of legal obligation
• To do justice-eg the director making secret profit
Exceptions – piercing the
corporate veil
• At common law (rare)
– just and equitable ground – Tan Guan Eng &
Anor v Ng Kwong Hee
– corporate form used to avoid an existing legal
duty – Gilford
– company is the agent or partner of the
controller – Smith, Stone & Knight
– principles underlying a particular law require
the veil to be pierced – Re Darby
Exceptions (cont)
– position of group of companies – People
Insurance Co Sdn Bhd v People Insurance Co
Ltd
• Under the Companies Act, in the insolvent
trading provisions in sec 304 and sec 36
• Other statutory exceptions:
– sec 67(5) – financial assistance
– sec 167 – profit and loss account
Exceptions (cont)
– sec 121 – publication of name
– sec 140(1) – Income Tax Act 1967
Constitution of company
Company Law – Lecture 5
• “Internal governance rules”/constitution
comprising :
(a) memorandum of association; and
(b) articles of association
• Legal effect of the memorandum and
articles of association.
Constitution of company
• Sample memorandum
• Sample Article
What are “internal governance
rules” ?
• Rules agreed between the members to govern
the internal workings of the company
• Typically deal with appointment, powers and
removal of officers, meetings, classes of shares,
dividends, transfer of shares, inspection of
books
• Where can we find the internal governance rules
for a company?
– in the company’s memorandum and articles of
association
Constitution
• A company can adopt a constitution
• Constitution contains customised internal
governance rules for that particular
company called:
(a) The Memorandum of Association; and
(b) The Articles of Association.
Adopting a constitution
• Memorandum must be lodged at the time
of incorporation.
• Articles of Association can be lodged
when the company is registered, or not.
• Adopting, amending or repealing the
articles requires a special resolution.
• Memorandum may be altered by special
resolution unless provisions therein state
otherwise
Model Articles of Association
• Table A, Fourth schedule of the
Companies Act 1965
• Sec 30 of the Companies Act 1965
• Listed companies must have an articles of
association that is consistent with the
Kuala Lumpur Listing Requirements,
Chapter 7
Legal effect of the
memorandum and articles of
association
• Section 33 – statutory contract
– interpretation
– rights of members and officers to enforce
– consequences of non-compliance
Legal effect of the
memorandum and articles of
association (Cont)
• Not a contract with outsiders
• Unenforceable by outsiders
• Raffles Hotel
Company Law – Lecture 10
• Types of directors
• Board composition
• Appointment, resignation, removal &
disqualification of directors
• How boards operate in practice
Types of directors
• Every company must have at least two
directors, resident in Malaysia.
• Executive directors
– CEO / managing director
– Others (eg finance director)
• Non-executive directors
– may or may not be “independent”
Types of directors (cont)
• Chairperson
• Governing director
• Nominee director
• Alternate director
• “De facto” and “shadow” directors
– sec 4
– Standard Chartered Bank v Antico
Malaysian Boards for listed
companies
90% with
2 or more
Independent NED
Board composition in Australia’s
largest companies
Appointment of directors
• Who can be appointed ?
– someone who consents
– human, not company
– minimum 18 years old
– not disqualified
– if 70 years or older in a public company,
special rules apply
Appointment of directors (cont)
• New companies
– directors named in application
• Existing companies
– check company’s articles of association
(see Lecture 7)
Resignation / removal of
directors
• Resignation
– director needs to notify the company
• Removal
– by other directors
• maybe in private companies (check articles)
– by members
• private companies – check articles : Art 69
• public companies – sec 128
Disqualification of directors
• Grounds (reasons) :
– automatically due to certain offences
where the person must obtain leave of
court
– where court orders disqualification of
directors of insolvent companies
– where the Securities Commission
disqualifies under the SIA.
How boards operate
• Delegation of powers to :
– Board committees :
• eg audit, remuneration, nomination
– CEO / managing director
– Director, employee or other person
• Directors’ access to information :
– common law (“information” – broader)
– company’s books, in relation to legal
proceedings.
How boards operate (cont)
• Meetings of directors
– usually called “board meetings”
– all directors must be told (“receive notice”)
– a quorum requirement: articles of association
– use of technology (e.g. video conf.,
telephone)
– “paper meetings”
• Art 90
Company Law – Lecture 11
• Duties of directors and other officers
– Summary of the duties
– Who owes the duties?
– To whom are the duties owed?
– Who enforces the duties?
– Consequences of breaching a duty
– The duty of care
Summary of the duties
Who owes the duties?
• General law duties
– Directors
– Senior executive officers
– Why? Because they are “fiduciaries”
• Statutory duties
– All statutory duties apply to directors
– This includes “de facto” and “shadow”
directors (see Lecture 10)
– Most statutory duties apply to “officers”
(sec 9) but not sec 132(1)
To whom are the duties owed?
• Answer = the company
• In exceptional circumstances, a duty will
be owed to an individual shareholder
– Brunninghausen v Glavanics
Who enforces the duties?
• Statutory duties – Suruhanjaya Syarikat
Malaysia (Companies Commission of
Malaysia)
• Common law duties – the company (or
liquidator if company is being wound up)
What are the consequences of
breaching a duty?
• Discussed in Lecture 13
• Breach of statutory duties may result in :
– a disqualification order
– an order to pay a penalty
–an order to pay compensation to the
company = 132D(7)
– an injunction = 132C, 132E
– imprisonment
What are the consequences of
breaching a duty? (cont)
• Breach of a common law duty may result
in the person paying compensation to the
company, damages for breach of duty or
giving an account of profit.
Duty of care, skill & diligence
• Sources of the duty :
– section 132(1)
– common law
– contract of employment – for executive
directors and other executive officers
• A director or other officer breaches this
duty if he or she is “negligent”
Duty of care (cont)
A Ltd
B Ltd C Ltd
• Can the directors of B cause B to enter a transaction
that benefits A or C, but does not directly benefit B ?
Duty to act in the best
interests of the company
(cont)
• What are the company’s interests?
(cont)
– Corporate groups (cont)
. Walker v Wimborne
- High Court : directors must put their
company’s interests before the group’s
interests
Duty to act in the best
interests of the company
(cont)
– Corporate groups (cont)
. Test
– Whether a person in the position of the director
could have reasonably believed the decision would
benefit the company: Charterbridge
. Equiticorp Finance v BNZ
– Directors can approve a transaction that benefits the
group (or another group company) if their company
will benefit indirectly
Duty to act in best interests of
the company (cont)
• Share capital
• Membership
Shares
• What are shares? (sec 4(1))
• Classes of shares
– generally
– preference shares
• Conversion of shares into stocks – Table
A (Art 36 - 39)
What are shares?
• Claims against a company to which
particular rights attach, in particular:
– distribution rights (interim and final)
– control rights (eg information, voting)
• A “chose in action” – a form of personal
property – sec 98
• Not an interest in the company’s assets
(compare with a trust)
What are shares? (cont)
• Borland’s Trustee v Steel Bros & Co Ltd
(nature of shares)
Classes of shares
• Shares can be created with different rights
attaching : sec 18(1)(c)
• Power to issue shares in the hands of the
directors, but the issue of shares in a new
class may require shareholder approval if:
– amendment to the constitution is required
– the issue varies existing class rights
– Table A, Art 2
Classes of shares (cont)
• Typically classes of shares have differing:
– entitlement to dividends
– priority in relation to payment of dividends
– voting rights
– priority in repayment of capital on a winding up
– right to share in surplus assets on a winding up
• Contrast “preference shares” and “ordinary
shares”
Preference shares
• Usually carry:
– fixed dividend
– priority for repayment of capital
– limited voting rights
– no right to share in surplus
Membership
• A person can become a member by
subscribing for new shares, or acquiring
already issued shares from another
person
• A person ceases to be a member by
transferring their shares, or having them
cancelled
Shareholder rights
• Voting rights
• Distribution rights
• Information rights
• Class rights
Variation of class rights (cont)
• Certain actions taken to vary class rights
• Section 65(1): rights of dissenting
members where the variation, cancellation
or modification does not have unanimous
consent. Members holding at least 10% of
the class can apply to the Court for
change to be set aside & the change is
effective with confirmation by the Court.
When is sec 65 applicable?
• Section 65(1) requires that :
– The company has different classes of shares
– The articles (eg. Art 4) or memorandum
provides for a method to vary the class rights
– The proposal is a variation
What is variation?
• Change /alteration of the rights: sec 65(1)
• Deletion /abrogation of the rights: sec
65(1)
• See Greenhalgh v Arderne Cinemas
• Issue of new preference shares ranking
equally or pari passu with existing
preference shares: sec 65(6)
• Alteration of the ‘modification of rights’
clause: sec 65(7)
Method of variation under sec
65
• Company must call separate class
meeting only of shareholders whose rights
are being affected by the variation
proposal
• At least 75% of these shareholders must
approve
What if sec 65 not applicable?
• Variation procedure depends on where the
rights are stated
• If the rights are given in the articles of
association: sec 31
• If rights given in memorandum: sec 21(1B)
Introduction to members’
remedies
• Members’ remedies may be available
where officers have breached their duties
• But sometimes members can also obtain a
remedy even though there has been no
breach of officers’ duty
• Members have statutory and common law
remedies
Introduction to members’
remedies (cont)
• Why do minority members need
remedies?
– Directors and majority shareholders can use
their power to harm minority shareholders
– Not always possible for a shareholder to sell
their shares
• This explains why the oppression remedy is most
commonly sought by shareholders in private
companies rather than public companies
Members’ statutory remedies
• Oppression remedy
• Court-ordered winding up
• Statutory injunction
• Statutory right to inspect company books
• Other protection :
– Variation of class rights (Lecture 7)
– Transactions affecting share capital
(Lecture 17)
Oppression remedy – sec 181
• Court can give a member a remedy where :
– the conduct of the company’s affairs or,
– the directors’ powers are being exercised,
– in an oppressive manner, or
– in disregard of members interests including himself
(181(1)(a))
OR
– an actual or proposed act or omission by or on behalf of
the company, or
– a resolution, or a proposed resolution, of members or a
class of members is either
– unfairly prejudicial to, or
– unfairly discriminatory against members (181(1)(b))
Oppression remedy (cont)
• What types of companies can the remedy
apply to ?
– In theory, any company
– But in practice, most oppression actions are
brought by members of private companies
• which have only a few participants, and
• in which members are also involved in
management
Oppression remedy (cont)
• What are the tests ?
– Was directors’ decision one that no board of
directors acting reasonably would have made?
– Not necessary for directors / majority
shareholders to have acted dishonestly or
intended to harm the minority – it is a question
of impact – is the conduct oppressive in effect ?
– “Reasonable expectations”
Oppression remedy (cont)
• Examples of oppressive conduct
– Diversion of business opportunities
– Improper exclusion from management
• Does member have a “reasonable expectation”?
– Unfairly restricting dividends
– Oppressive conduct of board meetings
– Share issue for improper purpose
– Breaches of directors’ duties
Oppression remedy (cont)
• What orders can the court make ?
– Any order “it thinks appropriate”
– e.g.
• winding up
• regulating the company’s affairs
• purchase of oppressed member’s shares
• appointment of a receiver
• restraining someone from doing something, or
requiring someone to do something
Statutory injunction
• Court order to stop someone breaching
the Companies Act
• Specific provisions : sec 132C , sec 132E
or sec 28.
• Who can apply ?
– Any member of the company
Statutory right to inspect books
• Section 157 – Member can apply to court
for authorisation to inspect company
books
– Court can authorise either the member or their
representative
– Member must be acting in good faith and for a
proper purpose
Foss v Harbottle
• Also known as the “proper plaintiff” rule
• The person who can enforce a wrong
against the company is the company itself
and not any individual shareholder
Exceptions
• Where members’ personal rights are
infringed
• Where the proposal requires special
resolution but passed by simple resolution
• Ultra vires transaction: objects clause
• Where there is fraud on the minority
• Where the justice of the case so requires
Fraud on the minority
• There must be “wrongdoer control”
– Control may be because of majority
shareholding
• The wrongdoer obtained benefit/
advantage at the company’s expense
• The wrongdoer prevents the company
from suing or enforcing the company’s
rights
Company Law – Lecture 8
• Member meetings
– types of meeting
– calling meetings
– conducting meetings
– voting
• Decision-making without a meeting
• Procedural irregularities
Annual and extraordinary
general meetings
• All companies must hold an annual
general meeting: sec 143
• All public companies must hold its
statutory meeting: sec 142(1)
• Other meetings are called “extraordinary
general meetings”
• Rules governing meetings are set out in
the Companies Act and the articles of
association
Calling a meeting
• Usually, meetings are called by the board.
Art 44 authorises a single director or board
collectively to call meetings.
• The Court may order a meeting on
application of a director or member if it is
impractical to call otherwise: sec 150
Calling a meeting (cont)
• Directors must call a meeting when requested to
do so by members holding not less than 10% of
paid up capital: sec 144. If the directors fail to
call the meeting within 21 days, the members
can do so and the company must pay their
reasonable expenses
• Two or more members with at least 10% of
issued share capital or 5% in number of
members may call a meeting, at their expense:
sec 145
Agenda
• Only matters that have been included in the
notice of meeting can be considered at the
meeting – other than matters stated in Art 46 of
Table A
• Usually, where the directors are calling a
meeting, they will determine the agenda
• Members can request the inclusion of
resolutions for consideration by the meeting:
sec 151
Member resolutions
• Section 151 allows members with at least 5% of
the votes, or numbering at least 100, to give
notice to the company of a resolution they
propose to move at the next general meeting
held more than two months after the notice is
received
• Copies of the resolution and a members’
statement are distributed, usually with the notice
of meeting
Notice of meeting
• General rule – 14 days. Consent to short
notice is possible: sec 145(3)
• For passing special resolution: sec 152
(21 days)
• Notice must be given to members,
directors and auditor
• Contents of notice: sec 152 and Art 46.
Notice of meeting (cont)
• Notice must contain sufficient information to
enable members to decide whether or not to
attend the meeting and how to vote
• Must not be misleading, and must “fully and
fairly inform and instruct the shareholder
about the matter on which he or she will
have to vote”: Devereaux Holdings
• Need to balance information presented:
Fraser v NRMA
Conduct of meetings
• Quorum
• Use of technology
• Proxies and corporate representatives
• Conduct (role of the chair)
Voting
• Members’ entitlement to vote
– Section 148(1)
– Section 148(2): preference shareholders
• Voting by proxies
• Voting (show of hands and poll)
• Demanding voting by poll
• Ordinary and special resolutions
Disqualification from voting
• Companies Act, articles of association and
KLSE Listing Requirements prevent
interested parties from voting their shares
in certain circumstances, including:
– related party transactions
– Interested director in relation to sec 131
Decision-making without a
meeting
• Private companies may use “shareholders
written resolution”, in which all members
entitled to vote must sign a document
agreeing to the resolution: sec 152A
• Formality may be waived by all members
under ratification
• Section 145(3)
Procedural irregularities
• Section 355 – decision may be valid
despite irregularity – but there must be no
“substantial injustice”
DEBENTURES