#10BELGRADE19
#10BELGRADE19
#10BELGRADE19
SIPDIS
AMEMBASSY ANKARA PASS TO AMCONSUL ADANA
AMEMBASSY ASTANA PASS TO AMCONSUL ALMATY
AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL DUSSELDORF
AMEMBASSY BERLIN PASS TO AMCONSUL LEIPZIG
AMEMBASSY BELGRADE PASS TO AMEMBASSY PODGORICA
AMEMBASSY HELSINKI PASS TO AMCONSUL ST PETERSBURG
AMEMBASSY ATHENS PASS TO AMCONSUL THESSALONIKI
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL VLADIVOSTOK
AMEMBASSY MOSCOW PASS TO AMCONSUL YEKATERINBURG
Summary
-------
Bilateral
---------
¶3. (C) The Ambassador told Tadic that she was eager to work with
him to build on the strong foundation created by her predecessors,
noting that Vice President Biden's May 2009 visit to Belgrade had
opened a new chapter in our bilateral relations. She said that the
military-to-military relationship was strong, but it was time to
take it to the next level through increased joint training and
exchanges, Serbian contributions to peacekeeping missions, and
participation in NATO Partnership for Peace (PfP) activities. The
Ambassador also told Tadic that she would focus on expanding
economic and business ties, including new investments, and
supporting the completion of Serbia's WTO accession. She also
emphasized her commitment to seek opportunities for additional
high-level contacts between our governments. She noted President
Tadic's visit to UNGA last fall, the recent visits of Defense
Minister Sutanovac and Foreign Minister Jeremic to Washington, and
Interior Minister Dacic's meetings this week. The Ambassador
pointed to two upcoming congressional delegations to Serbia and the
February 10 groundbreaking for the New Embassy Compound (NEC) in
Belgrade as early opportunities to continue our engagement and
further highlight the relationship publicly.
¶4. (C) Tadic said he was pleasantly surprised to hear about the
scheduled groundbreaking event, as he had worked with four
different U.S. ambassadors going back to his tenure as Minister of
Defense to identify a suitable location for the new U.S. Embassy
BELGRADE 00000019 002 OF 005
-----------------------------------------
¶7. (S) Tadic expressed appreciation for U.S. help with the EU
accession process. On ICTY cooperation, he explained that Serbia
was working intensively to capture Ratko Mladic "for our own
reasons," not due to pressure from the international community or
the ICTY, but to demonstrate its own resolve to capture war
criminals. He emphasized Serbia's commitment to reconciliation in
the region, pointing to its responsibilities as a guarantor of
Dayton. He also underscored Serbia's commitment to cooperation
with the U.S. on a range of threats, including organized crime,
corruption, terrorism, and narcotics, pointing to the success of
several recent joint counternarcotics operations. Tadic stated
that undertaking such sensitive operations was politically risky
and Serbia would continue to do the right thing; in return,
however, Serbia hoped for similarly strong bilateral engagement in
other areas and expected support from the U.S. on these efforts
with other countries in the region. The Ambassador expressed U.S.
appreciation for Serbia's strong cooperation in these important
areas and said she would be glad to discuss any areas of specific
concern.
Regional Cooperation
--------------------
¶8. (C) The Ambassador noted the important role that Serbia can and
needs to play on regional relations and stability, particularly
with regard to Bosnia-Herzegovina and Croatia. She conveyed
appreciation for the Serbian government's constructive support of
the Butmir process and urged Tadic to remain engaged with the
parties, including RS leader Milorad Dodik, in particular. She
expressed USG concern about the prospect of any referendum moving
forward in the Republika Srpska. Tadic said that Serbia believed
the preservation of BiH's territorial integrity was paramount; as a
guarantor of the Dayton Accords, Serbia sought a peaceful solution
on constitutional reform that would be consistent with Dayton
principles and preserve the model of two entities, three
constituent peoples. Tadic noted that he was seeking a
parliamentary resolution on Srebrenica to recognize the gravity of
the crimes committed there.
¶9. (C) With regard to Croatia, Tadic said that he had known
President-elect Ivo Josipovic for a long time and wanted to work
with him to address the many different open issues such as the
"huge problem" of refugees and property rights. He said he
expected the U.S. to support Serbian efforts to improve that
relationship and address the outstanding issues. Tadic told the
Ambassador that he would soon visit Albania and commented on the
enormous organized crime problem facing Montenegro, where he also
requested U.S. support. He emphasized that Serbia supported the
independence and territorial integrity of its neighbors in the
region, but many issues needed to be addressed.
¶10. (C) Turning to Kosovo, Tadic told the Ambassador "I must be as
clear as possible with you - Serbia will not change its views on
its territorial integrity. I want to be direct with you, as I have
with your other colleagues. After the International Court of
Justice (ICJ) issues its advisory opinion, we want to pursue
dialogue and find a way to address the issues related to Kosovo, as
the current situation is untenable." The Ambassador responded that
despite our clear differences, the U.S. and Serbia needed to keep
the channels of communication on Kosovo open. While the Vice
President had conveyed our agreement to disagree on Kosovo, it was
important for Serbia to focus on practical ways to improve the
lives of Serbs in Kosovo and on resolving outstanding issues. She
emphasized the need for Serbia to take a responsible and forward
looking approach after the ICJ opinion, consistent with President
Tadic's own forward looking approach toward European integration,
that would not do harm to stability in the region nor to the other
important work on our bilateral agenda. She recommended both sides
begin a dialogue now about how to manage the way forward and said
she hoped to continue discussions with Tadic's foreign policy
advisor, Jovan Ratkovic, on this subject as early as next week.
Comment
-------
¶11. (S) Comment: President Tadic made clear during the meeting
and in his public statement that he does not intend to back down on
Kosovo. At the same time, he demonstrated that he is open to
dialogue and told us what he wants: a warm reception in Washington
and continued high level engagement across the U.S. interagency,
cooperation on sensitive security issues, public support for
Serbia's efforts to improve regional relations, and sensitivity to
the domestic political constraints he faces on Kosovo policy. Now
is the opportune moment to lay out for Tadic and his key foreign
policy advisors what we expect of him, namely a constructive and
coordinated response to the ICJ's upcoming advisory opinion
accompanied by increased pragmatism in establishing a modus vivendi
Excellency,
Excellency,
Madam Ambassador,
Madam Ambassador,
At the same time, Serbia is very much concerned about the plans of
Pristina to forcefully establish its rule over the majority-Serb
northern Kosovo. If this strategy were to be implemented it would
have unforeseen consequences for the stability of the region.
Excellency,
Serbia is strongly committed to strengthening the regional
cooperation and good-neighbourly relations. Without a stable,
democratic Serbia it is not possible to imagine the stable and
prosperous Western Balkans. Serbia respects the sovereignty and
territorial integrity of Bosnia and Herzegovina, its internal
arrangements defined by the Dayton Accords as well as the European
and Euro-Atlantic integration of Bosnia and Herzegovina.
Excellency,
You begin your mission at the very important time for the Republic
of Serbia but also for the further development of the relations
between our two countries. I wish you every success in the
discharge of your responsible duties. l am convinced that with your
knowledge and experience you will make an important contribution to
the development of the overall cooperation between our two
countries.
WARLICK