Comparison Between Procter and Gamble and Unilever
Comparison Between Procter and Gamble and Unilever
Comparison Between Procter and Gamble and Unilever
and Unilever
Introduction
•
Formed in 1930 By the merger of Margarine
Unie (Dutch Company) & Lever Brothers
(British Soap Company)
•
Main Focus on it’s Foods, Personal care &
Home Care Business.
•
Second largest Consumer goods Company
(After P&G)
•
Third largest Food Firm after Nestle & Kraft
Foods in the world.
Introduction
•
The Group operates through seven segments:
a) Soaps and Detergents
b) Personal Products
c) Exports
d) Beverages
e) Foods
f) Ice Creams and Other
•
Significant Business in US, Europe, Asia & Latin
America.
Introduction
• Clarity of goals
• Trust
• Leadership
• Innovation & diversity
• High aims & goal oriented approach
Shared principles
• respect for all individuals
• Inseparable interests
• Strategically focused
• Innovation- cornerstone of success
• Externally focused
• value personal mastery
• Seek to be the best
• Mutual interdependency
Competitor Comparison
Board Of Directors
Management
• CEO USA
Management
Board Of Directors
Management
• Mr. Ehsan A Malik CEO
Pakistan
Product Line
Product Line
Product of Focus
Product of Focus
Marketing strategy
Marketing strategy
direct contact
Establish stalls in markets and malls
They go schools and colleges
free demos
satisfy costumers on the spot
policy that their commercials not executed right
before & after the commercial of competitors
--
Strengths Weaknesses
•Largest producing company •High rates of skin care products
•Enjoying economies of scale •Ratio of success of new product is low
•Good will in the market •Huge inventory stocks of raw material and
•Strong financial position finished goods
•Market leader in tea industry with Lipton & •Few new products are introduce in the market
Brook Bond
•Capture 70 percent market share of ice cream
industry
•Highly sales brands in skin care i.e. Ponds and
Fair & Lovely
•Have Strong distribution channel in Pakistan
•Wide product line in home wash
Opportunities Threats
•Capturing food industry by acquiring Raffan Best •Facing tough competition in Ghee and Cooking
Foods Oil
•Wide scope of confectionery business for LBPL •Facing tough competition in ice cream.
•LBPL is looking to acquire Tapal tea •LBPL is facing a very tough competition in
personal care and detergents by P&G
•There is very tough competition in detergents
and soap markets
•High inflation rate is increasing the cost of
imported raw material day by day
Strengths Weaknesses
•Social corporate image. •Unwilling to serve the low income
Swot analysis
•Strong financial position.
•Concerned about the total quality
market.
•Limited manufacturing facilities.
management.
•Direct contact with their costumers.
•Good relation with suppliers.
•Targets wives and children.
•Enthusiastic sales team.
•World wide research and
manufacturing.
•Well established and renowned
distributors.
•Has a larger share in the soap
industry.
Opportunities Threats
•Promoting health care products. •Increasing market share of local
•Introducing newer product lines. Producers.
•Increase in awareness. •Threat of new entrants .
•Increasing inflation in the country
Financial analysis
Net Income
3500
Revenue
54,000
3000
52,000
2500
50,000
48,000 2000
46,000 1500
44,000 1000
42,000
500
40,000
2000 2001 2002 2003 0
2000 2001 2002 2003
Financial Analysis (cont.)
280000
0
270000
0
260000
0
250000
0
Net Profit 240000 Employees
0 Margin
230000
0
0 220000
0 210000
2000 2001 2002 2003 2000 2001 2002 2003
Revenues: Product Segmentation
43%
57%
Foods Division
Home and Personal Care
Financial analysis
Net sales Operating Cash Flow
($billions) ($billions)
Net sales
By business segment By geographic region
P&G and Unilever
•
Unilever entered the u.s market in late 19th
cent. & Competed with the market leader P&G.
•
P&G dominated the U.S household & personal
care market while Unilever dominated the
European market.
•
Equal Dominance of P&G & Unilever in Asia.
•
Both Competed in every aspect of their
operations.
P&G and Unilever
•
Fiercest Competition in Soaps (Body care &
Fabric Care) & Shampoo (Hair care) segments.
•
Both among the Heaviest users of CI.
•
Many instances since 1940 proving their
involvements in Corporate espionage.
Thank You