Chapter 07 IMSM
Chapter 07 IMSM
Chapter 07 IMSM
IV.
A.
B.
C.
1.
2.
3.
A.
B.
A.
B.
C.
A.
1. The cost paid to acquire the parent's stock is reclassified within the consolidation
process to a treasury stock account and no income is accrued.
2. The treasury stock approach is popular in practice because of its simplicity and is now
required by SFAS 160.
Income tax accounting for a business combinationconsolidated tax returns
A consolidated tax return can be prepared for all companies comprising an affiliated
group. Any other companies within the business combination file separate tax returns.
A domestic corporation may be included in an affiliated group if the parent company
(either directly or indirectly) owns at least 80 percent of the voting stock of the subsidiary
as well as 80 percent of each class of its nonvoting stock.
The filing of a consolidated tax return provides several potential advantages to the
members of an affiliated group.
Intercompany profits are not taxed until realized.
Intercompany dividends are not taxed (although these distributions are nontaxable for all
members of an affiliated group whether a consolidated return or a separate return is
filed).
Losses of one affiliate can be used to reduce the taxable income earned by other
members of the group.
D. Income tax expenseeffect on noncontrolling interest valuation
1.
If a consolidated tax return is filed, an allocation of the total expense must be made to
each of the component companies to arrive at the realized income
figures that serve as a basis for noncontrolling interest computations.
2.
Income tax expense is frequently assigned to each subsidiary based on the amounts
that would have been paid on separate returns.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 2
B.
C.
If one company in a newly created combination has a tax carryforward, the future tax
benefits are recognized as a deferred income tax asset.
However, a valuation allowance must also be recorded to reduce the deferred tax asset
to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.
Learning Objectives
Having completed Chapter 7, "Ownership Patterns and Income TaxesConsolidated Financial
Statements," students should be able to fulfill each of the following learning objectives:
1. Differentiate between a father-son-grandson ownership configuration and a connecting
affiliation.
2. Calculate realized income figures for all companies in a business combination when either a
father-son-grandson or connecting affiliation is in existence.
3. Prepare a consolidation worksheet for both a father-son-grandson ownership pattern and a
connecting affiliation.
4. Eliminate a subsidiary's ownership interest in its parent using the treasury stock approach.
5. Explain the rationale underlying the treasury stock approach to a mutual ownership.
6. List the criteria for being a member of an affiliated group for income tax filing purposes.
7. Discuss the advantages to a business combination of filing a consolidated tax return.
8. Allocate the income tax expense computed on a consolidated tax return to the various
members of a business combination according to their separate taxable incomes.
9. Compute taxable income for an affiliated group based on information presented in a
consolidated set of financial statements.
10. Compute the deferred income tax expense to be recognized when separate tax returns are
filed by any of the members of a business combination.
11. Determine the deferred tax liability that is created when the tax bases of a subsidiary's
assets and liabilities are below consolidated values.
12. Explain the impact that a net operating loss of an acquired affiliate has on consolidated
figures.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
Answers to Questions
1.
2.
3.
Able100% of income accrues to the consolidated entity (as parent company).
Baker70% (percentage of stock owned by Able).
Carter56% (80% of stock owned by Baker multiplied by the 70% of Baker controlled by
Able).
Dexter33.6% (60% of stock owned by Carter multiplied by the 80% of Carter controlled by
Baker multiplied by the 70% of Baker owned by Able).
4. When an indirect ownership is present, the quantity of consolidation entries will increase,
perhaps significantly. An additional set of entries is included on the worksheet
for each separate investment. Furthermore, the determination of realized
income figures for each subsidiary must be computed in a precise manner. For
any company in both a parent and a subsidiary position, equity income accruals
are recognized prior to the calculation of that company's realized income. This
realized income total is significant because it serves as the basis for
noncontrolling interest calculations as well as the equity accruals to be
recognized by that company's parent.
5. In a connecting affiliation, two (or more) companies within a business combination own
shares in a third member. A mutual ownership, in contrast, exists whenever a
subsidiary possesses an equity interest in its own parent.
6.
In accounting for a mutual ownership, SFAS 160 requires the treasury stock approach.
The treasury stock approach presumes that the cost of the parent shares
should be reclassified as treasury stock within the consolidation process. The
subsidiary is being viewed, under this method, as an agent of the parent. Thus,
the shares are accounted for as if the parent had actually made the acquisition.
7. According to present tax laws, an affiliated group can be comprised of all domestic
corporations in which a parent holds 80 percent ownership. More
specifically, the parent must own (directly or indirectly) 80 percent of the
voting stock of the corporation as well as at least 80 percent of each class
of nonvoting stock.
8. Several basic advantages are available to combinations that file a consolidated tax
return. First, intercompany profits are not taxed until realized. For
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 4
If the consolidated value of a subsidiarys assets exceeds their tax basis, depreciation
expense in the future will be less on the tax return than is shown for external
reporting purposes. The reduced expense creates higher taxable income and,
thus, increases taxes. Therefore, the difference in values dictates an anticipated
increase in future tax payments. This deferred liability is recognized at the time the
combination is created. Subsequently, when actual tax payments do arise, the
deferred liability is written off rather than recognizing expense based solely on the
current liability. In this manner, the expense is shown at a lower figure, one that is
matched with reported income (which is also a lower balance because of the extra
depreciation).
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
Recognition of this deferred liability at date of acquisition also reduces the net amount
attributed to the subsidiary's assets and liabilities in the initial allocation process. Therefore,
the residual asset (goodwill) is increased by the amount of any liability that must be
recognized.
12.
A net operating loss carryforward allows the company to reduce taxable income for
up to 20 years into the future. Thus, a benefit may possibly be derived from the
carryforward but that benefit is based on Wilson (the subsidiary) being able to
generate taxable income to be decreased by the carryforward. To reflect the
potential tax reduction, a deferred income tax asset is recorded for the total
amount of anticipated benefit. However, because of the uncertainty, unless the
receipt of this benefit is more likely than not to be received, a valuation allowance
must also be recorded as a contra account to the asset. The valuation allowance
may be for the entire amount or just for a portion of the asset.
13. At the date of acquisition, the valuation allowance was $150,000. As a contra asset
account, recognition of this amount reduced the net assets attributed to the
subsidiary and, hence, increased the recording of goodwill (assuming that the
price did not indicate a bargain purchase). If the valuation allowance is
subsequently reduced to $110,000, the net assets have increased by $40,000.
This change is reflected by a decrease in income tax expense.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 6
Answers to Problems
1. D
2. B
3. D
4. C
5. C
6. C
7. A Damson's accrual-based income:
Operational income ....................................................................
Defer unrealized gain .................................................................
Damson's accrual-based income ........................................
$200,000
(40,000)
$160,000
$200,000
144,000
$344,000
$300,000
275,200
$575,200
$220,000
(60,000)
$160,000
20%
$32,000
$300,000
(30,000)
128,000
$398,000
20%
$79,600
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
$50,000
14,000
$64,000
10%
$6,400
$120,000
24,000
$96,000
(76,800)
$19,200
30%
$5,760
$30,000
20%
$6,000
25%
$1,500
$420,000
$400,000
(30,000)
370,000
$50,000
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 8
$252,000
108,000
360,000
(300,000)
$60,000
30 years
$2,000
14. (continued)
Consideration transferred for Leaf (by Limb) ..............
Noncontrolling interest fair value ..................................
Leafs business fair value ...............................................
Book value
.................................................................
Trade name........................................................................
Life ....................................................................................
Annual amortization ........................................................
a. Investment in Limb
Limb's reported income-2009
Amortization expense
Accrual-based income
Limbs percentage ownership
Equity accrual-2009
Dividends received 2009
Limb's reported income-2010
Amortization expense
Income from Leaf
Accrual-based income
Limbs percentage ownership
Equity accrual-2010
Dividends received 2010
Investment in Limb 12-31-10
$91,000
39,000
$130,000
(100,000)
$30,000
30 years
$1,000
$252,000
$40,000
(2,000)
$38,000
70%
$26,600
(7,000)
$60,000
(2,000)
6,300
$64,300
70%
$45,010
(14,000)
$302,610
$10,000
(1,000)
$9,000
70%
$6,300
(1,400)
$4,900
$40,000
60,000
(4,000)
6,300
102,300
70%
71,610
(21,000)
$50,610
14. (continued)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
$1,260,000
(1,025,000)
(3,000)
$232,000
$30,000
(1,000)
$29,000
30%
$8,700
$24,990
$33,690
$64,300
10,000
(16,000)
$58,300
$83,300
16,000
(25,000)
$74,300
f.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 10
15.
$500,000
125,000
$625,000
600,000
$25,000
10 years
$2,500
$50,000
(2,500)
47,500
80%
$38,000
b. To the outside owners, the $6,000 intercompany dividends ($20,000 30%) paid
by Uncle are viewed as income because the book value of Nephew is
increasing. Thus, the noncontrolling interest's share of income is $10,700 or
20% of [$47,500 income ($50,000 operational income less $2,500 excess
amortization) plus the $6,000 in dividends].
16.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
$250,000
98,000
140,000
(22,500)
(8,000)
$457,500
$59,400
$29,620
$89,020
16. (Continued)
Mesas operating income
$250,000
Mesas share of Buttes operating income (80% $98,000)
78,400
Mesas share of Valleys operating income (80% 55% $140,000)
61,600
Mesas share of Buttes excess amortization (80% $22,500)
(18,000)
Mesas share of Valleys excess amortization (80% 55% $8,000)
(3,520)
Controlling interest in consolidated net income
$368,480
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated net income
89,020
Consolidated net income
$457,500
17. (30 Minutes) (Consolidated income figures for a connecting affiliation)
UNREALIZED GAINS:
Cleveland ($12,000 remaining inventory 25% markup) = $3,000
Wisconsin ($40,000 remaining inventory 30% markup) = $12,000
NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS:
CLEVELAND:
Operational income (sales minus cost of goods sold and
expenses) ....................................................................
$60,000
Defer unrealized gain (above) ........................................
(3,000)
Realized incomeCleveland ....................................
$57,000
Outside ownership ..........................................................
20%
Noncontrolling interest in Cleveland's income ......
$11,400
WISCONSIN:
Operational income (sales minus cost of goods sold and
expenses) ....................................................................
$110,000
Defer unrealized gain (above) ........................................
(12,000)
Investment income (60% of Cleveland's realized income of
$57,000) ......................................................................
34,200
Realized incomeWisconsin ...................................
$132,200
Outside ownership ..........................................................
10%
Noncontrolling interest in Wisconsin's income .....
$13,220
TOTAL NONCONTROLLING INTERESTS: $24,620 ($11,400 + $13,220)
CONSOLIDATION TOTALS
Sales = $1,590,000 (add the three book values and eliminate
intercompany transfers of $40,000 and $100,000)
Cost of Goods Sold = $1,015,000 (add the three book values, eliminate
intercompany transfers of $40,000 and $100,000, and defer [add]
unrealized gains of $3,000 and $12,000)
17. (continued)
Expenses
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 12
(25 Minutes) (Tax expense with separate tax returns for a combination.)
a. CONSOLIDATED TOTALS
Sales = $790,000 (add the two book values and eliminate the $110,000
intercompany transfer)
Cost of Goods Sold = $340,000 (add the book values, eliminate
intercompany transfers of $110,000, recognize [subtract]
$30,000 deferred gain from 2010, and defer [add] $40,000
intercompany gain deferred into 2011)
Operating expenses = $234,000 (add the two book values)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
$126,000
30%
$37,800
DOWN:
Reported income .............................................................
Tax rate ............................................................................
Currently payable to government ............................
$100,000
30%
$30,000
$198,000
+18,000
$216,000
30%
$64,800
The $3,000 difference between the liability and the expense is an increase in the
Deferred Income Tax Asset account. It is created by the tax effect (30%) on the
net unrealized gain for the period ($10,000 or $40,000 $30,000).
20. (45 Minutes) (Series of questions requires computation of income tax expense
and the related payable balance)
a. $260,000 ($650,000 40%)
The affiliated group would be taxed on its operating income of $650,000 (the
net unrealized gain is deferred on a consolidated return). The intercompany
income and dividends are not relevant since a consolidated return is filed.
b. $260,000 ($650,000 40%)
The affiliated group would be taxed on its operating income of $650,000 (the
net unrealized gain is deferred on a consolidated return). The intercompany
income and dividends are not relevant because a consolidated return is filed.
The percentage ownership does not affect the figures on a consolidated
return.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 14
20.(continued)
c. $296,000 ($96,000 + $200,000)
Rogers would pay $96,000 or 40% of its $240,000 operating income. Clarke
would pay $200,000 or 40% of its $500,000 operating income. The unrealized
gain is not deferred when separate returns are filed. Intercompany dividends
are not taxable because the parties qualify as an affiliated group even though
separate returns are being filed. Answer (c.) differs from (a.) and (b.) because
tax on the $90,000 unrealized gain (40% or $36,000) is paid immediately.
d. $268,064
Rogers would record income tax expense of $96,000 or 40% of its $240,000
operating income.
Clarke must record its expense based on the revenue recognized during the
period. Thus, the tax expense is based on operating income of $410,000 (the
net unrealized gain is not being recognized in this period) plus equity income
accruing from Rogers of $100,800 (70% of that company's after-tax income).
Clarke will record an income tax expense of $164,000 in connection with the
operating income ($410,000 40%). The expense recognized in connection with
the equity accrual is affected by the dividends-received deduction:
Equity income of subsidiary...........................................
Dividends-received deduction (when received) (80%).
Income subject to taxation .............................................
Tax rate ............................................................................
Income tax expenseequity income (Clarke) .............
Income tax expenseoperating income (Clarke)
(above) .........................................................................
Income tax expenseoperating income (Rogers)
(above) .........................................................................
Income tax expense ........................................................
$100,800
80,640
$20,160
40%
$8,064
164,000
$172,064
96,000
$268,064
e. $204,480
Clarke will pay $200,000 in connection with its operating income ($500,000
40%) because the unrealized gain cannot be deferred. Clarke also receives
$56,000 in dividends from Rogers ($80,000 70%). Tax payment on these
dividends is $4,480 ($56,000 20% 40%). The difference between the payment
by Clarke ($204,480) and the company's expense in (d.) ($172,064) is created by
the premature payment of the tax (a deferred tax asset) on the unrealized gain
($90,000) less the deferred tax liability on the parent's equity accrual ($100,800)
in excess of dividends received ($56,000).
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
21. (20 Minutes) (Comparison of income tax expense and payable on separate and
consolidated tax returns.)
a. Consolidated Return2010
Piranto income 2010 (sales less expenses) .......................................
Slinton income 2010 (sales less expenses) .......................................
2009 gain realized in 2010.....................................................................
2010 deferred gain..................................................................................
Taxable income ................................................................................
Tax rate ..................................................................................................
Income tax payablecurrent ..........................................................
$300,000
100,000
120,000
(150,000)
$370,000
40%
$148,000
$300,000
120,000
(150,000)
$270,000
40%
$108,000
The $12,000 difference between the expense and the payable is the tax effect
on the net unrealized gain ($30,000 40%).
Slinton will have an expense and payable of $40,000 ($100,000 40%).
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 16
22. (45 Minutes) (Comparison of income tax expense and payable on separate and
consolidated tax returns. Includes question on mutual ownership and the
conventional approach.)
a. Total income tax expense is $156,877. Because of the level of ownership,
separate returns must be filed. Unrealized gains are taxed immediately as are
intercompany dividends.
Because the unrealized gains are deferred on the consolidated financial
statements, Boxwood's expense would be $34,400 or 40% of $86,000 in realized
income ($100,000 + $18,000 $32,000).
Lake's income subject to taxation includes its $300,000 in operating income
plus $30,960 in income accruing from its investment in Boxwood (60% of the
after-tax Income of $51,600 [$86,000 $34,400]). Income tax expense for Lake is
computed as follows:
Operating income ............................................................
Equity income ..................................................................
Taxable portion ................................................................
Income eventually subject to taxation ..........................
Tax rate..............................................................................
Income tax expense Lake (rounded)..............................
Income tax expense Boxwood (above)..........................
Total income tax expense ...............................................
$300,000
$30,960
20%
6,192
$306,192
40%
$122,477
34,400
$156,877
b. Boxwood will pay $40,000 ($100,000 40%) because separate returns are filed.
Lake, however, will pay its taxes based on dividends received rather than on
the equity accrual. A deferred income tax liability would be established for the
difference. Lake's payment for the current year is computed as follows:
Operating income.............................................................
Dividend income (60% $10,000) ..................................
Taxable portion ................................................................
Income currently taxable ................................................
Tax rate ............................................................................
Income tax payableLake .............................................
Income tax payableBoxwood (above) .......................
Total Income tax payable current ..................................
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
$300,000
$6,000
20%
1,200
$301,200
40%
$120,480
40,000
$160,480
22.(continued)
The $3,603 difference between the expense in a. and the payable in b. is created
by the following two effects:
Deferred income tax liability on equity income accrual not yet taxed
($30,960 $6,000 = $24,960 20% 40%)...................................
Deferred income tax asset on net unrealized gain
($32,000 $18,000 = $14,000 40%)............................................
Net decrease in expense.....................................................................
$1,997
5,600
$3,603
c. Because a consolidated tax return is filed, unrealized gains are deferred in the
same manner as for external reporting purposes. Dividend income is not
taxable.
Lake's operating income ................................................
Boxwood's operating income ........................................
Prior year unrealized gain ...............................................
Current year unrealized gain ..........................................
Income subject to taxation (and currently taxable)......
Tax rate .............................................................................
Income tax expense ........................................................
$300,000
$100,000
18,000
(32,000)
86,000
$386,000
40%
$154,400
23. (30 Minutes) (Computation of income tax expense and income tax payable on
consolidated and separate tax returns.)
a. Operating Income ............................................................
Tax rate .............................................................................
Taxes to be paid ..............................................................
$450,000
40%
$180,000
The affiliated group would be taxed on its operating income of $450,000 (the
$50,000 unrealized gain is deferred). Intercompany income and dividends are
not relevant because a consolidated return is filed.
b. Total taxes to be paid are $200,000. Robertson would have to pay $80,000 or
40% of its $200,000 operating income. Garrison would pay $120,000 or 40% of
its $300,000 operating income. The unrealized gain is not deferred because
separate returns are being filed. Intercompany dividends are not taxable
because the parties still qualify as an affiliated group even though separate
returns are being filed.
c. Robertson must report an income tax expense of $80,000 or 40% of its $200,000
operating income.
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 18
23. (continued)
Garrison records its expense based on the revenue recognized during the
period. Thus, the expense is computed on an operating income of $250,000 (the
net unrealized gain is not recognized in this period) along with equity income
from Robertson of $84,000 (70% of that company's $120,000 after-tax income).
Garrison will record an income tax expense of $100,000 in connection with the
operating income ($250,000 40%) and $6,720 resulting from its equity income
($84,000 20% 40%). Total expense to be reported amounts to $186,720 for
Garrison and Robertson ($80,000 + $100,000 + $6,720).
d. Garrison will pay $120,000 in connection with its operating income ($300,000
40%) and $2,400 because of the dividends received from Robertson. Garrison
will receive $30,000 in dividends based on its 60% ownership. Of this total, only
$6,000 (20%) is taxable. Thus, at a 40% rate, the tax on the dividends would
amount to $2,400 ($6,000 40%). The total income taxes payable by Garrison is
$122,400 ($120,000 + $2,400).
24. (10 Minutes) (Impact on goodwill of assets with a different tax vs. book value.)
The assets and liabilities of Kew (the subsidiary) will be consolidated at their
individual fair values (netting to $500,000). However, both the buildings and
equipment have a tax basis that is lower than fair value. Thus, for tax purposes,
future depreciation expense will be lower on the tax return so that taxable
income will exceed book income. The higher taxable income (anticipated in the
future) creates a deferred tax liability at the time the combination is created.
Buildings ..........................................
Equipment ........................................
Total temporary difference .......
Tax rate .......................................
Deferred tax liability ..................
Tax
Basis
$140,000
150,000
Fair
Value
$180,000
200,000
Temporary
Difference
$40,000
50,000
$90,000
30%
$27,000
$110,000
130,000
100,000
180,000
200,000
24. (continued)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
Liabilities...........................................................................
Deferred tax liability ........................................................
Assigned to specific accounts ......................................
Purchase price .................................................................
Excess assigned to goodwill .........................................
(220,000)
(27,000)
473,000
650,000
$177,000
CONSOLIDATION ENTRIES
Entry *G
Retained Earnings, 1/1/11 (Wilson) ..........................
12,000
Cost of Goods Sold ..............................................
12,000
(To recognize income on intercompany inventory transfers made in previous
year but not resold until current year as per above computation.)
Entry *C
Retained Earnings, 1/1/11 (House) ................................
11,200
Investment in Wilson Company ..........................
11,200
(To convert investment account from partial equity method to equity method.
Unrealized gain shown in Entry *G is not properly reflected by parent under
partial equity method [12,000 70% = $8,400 income decrease] nor would the
$2,800 in amortization expense for 20092010. Thus, a reduction of $11,200 is
required. Because Cuddy is a current year acquisition, no prior conversion to
equity method is required for the investment.)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 20
25.(continued)
Entry S1
Common Stock (Cuddy) ..................................................
150,000
Retained Earnings, 1/1/11 (Cuddy) ................................
150,000
Investment in Cuddy Company (80%)......................
240,000
Noncontrolling Interest in Cuddy Common Stock (20%)
60,000
(To eliminate Cuddy's stockholders' equity against the corresponding
investment balance and to recognize noncontrolling interest on common
stock.)
Entry S2
Common Stock (Wilson) .................................................
310,000
Retained Earnings, 1/1/11 (Wilson)
(adjusted by Entry *G) ...............................................
578,000
Investment in Wilson Company (70%) ...............
621,600
Noncontrolling Interest in Wilson (30%) ............
266,400
(To eliminate Wilson's stockholders' equity against corresponding investment
balance and to recognize noncontrolling interest.)
Entry A
Buildings............................................................................
54,000
Franchise Contracts ........................................................
32,000
Goodwill.............................................................................
140,000
Equipment ...................................................................
10,000
Investment in Wilson Company ...............................
151,200
Noncontrolling interest in Wilson Company...........
64,800
(To allocate excess payment made in connection with purchase of Wilson
shown above. Amortization for 2009 and 2010 has been taken into account in
determining the January 1, 2011 value for each account.)
Entry I1
Income of Cuddy Company ......................................
56,000
Investment in Cuddy Company ...........................
56,000
(To eliminate intercompany income accrued by both House and Wilson
during the year.)
Entry I2
Income of Wilson Company ......................................
91,000
Investment in Wilson Company ..........................
91,000
(To eliminate intercompany income accrued by House during the year.)
Entry D1
Investment in Cuddy Company ................................
40,000
Dividends Paid (80%) (Cuddy) ............................
(To eliminate effects of intercompany dividend payments.)
40,000
25. (continued)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
Entry D2
Investment in Wilson Company ...............................
67,200
Dividends Paid (70%) (Wilson) ............................
(To eliminate effects of intercompany dividend payments.)
67,200
Entry E
Operating Expenses ..................................................
2,000
Equipment .................................................................
5,000
Franchise Contracts .............................................
4,000
Buildings.................................................................
3,000
(To record 2011 amortization on excess payment made in connection with
acquisition of Wilson Company.)
Entry TI
Sales and Other Revenues ........................................
200,000
Cost of Goods Sold ..............................................
200,000
(To eliminate intercompany inventory sales for the current year.)
Entry G
Cost of Goods Sold ....................................................
Inventory.................................................................
18,000
(To defer unrealized gain in ending inventory.)
18,000
$70,000
20%
$14,000
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 22
$130,000
28,000
(2,000)
12,000
(18,000)
$150,000
30%
$45,000
25. (continued)
HOUSE CORPORATION AND CONSOLIDATED SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidation Worksheet
December 31, 2011
Accounts
Sales and other revenue
Cost of goods sold
Operating expenses
Income of Wilson Company
Income of Cuddy Company
Net Income
Consolidated net income
Noncontrolling interest in
Wilson net income
Noncontrolling interest in
Cuddy net income
To House Corporation
Retained earnings, 1/1/11:
House Corporation
Wilson Company
Cuddy Company
Net Income
Dividends paid
House Corporation
Wilson Company
Cuddy Company
Retained earnings, 12/31/11
House
Corp.
Wilson
Company
Cuddy
Company
Consolidation EntriesNoncontrollingConsolidated
Debit
Credit
Interest
Balance
(900,000)
(700,000)
551,000
300,000
219,000
(91,000)
(28,000)
(249,000)
270,000
90,000 (E)
2,000
(I2) 91,000
(I1) 56,000
(70,000)
(28,000)
(158,000)
(1,700,000)
(*G) 12,000
(TI) 200,000
797,000
581,000
-0-0(322,000)
(820,000)
(590,000)
(249,000)
(158,000)
(45,000)
45,000
(14,000)
14,000
(263,000)
(*C) 11,200
(*G) 12,000
(S2)578,000
(150,000) (S1)150,000
(70,000)
(808,800)
-0-0(263,000)
100,000
96,000
(969,000)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
(652,000)
50,000
(170,000)
(D2) 67,200
(D1) 40,000
28,800
10,000
100,000
-0-0(971,800)
25. (continued)
Accounts
House
Corp.
Wilson
Company
Cuddy
Company
Consolidation EntriesNoncontrollingConsolidated
Debit
Credit
Interest
Balance
220,000
390,200
807,800
334,000
320,000
128,000
128,000
(D1) 40,000
Buildings
Equipment
Land
Goodwill
Franchise Contracts
Total assets
385,000
310,000
180,000
320,000
130,000
300,000
2,421,000
1,532,000
Liabilities
Noncontrolling interest in Cuddy
Noncontrolling interest in Wilson
Noncontrolling interest in
subsidiary companies
Common stock
Retained earnings (above)
Total liabilities and equities
(632,000)
67,000
103,000
(D2) 67,200
(570,000)
(E)
(310,000)
(969,000)
(2,421,000)
(652,000)
(1,532,000)
-0900,000
523,000
496,000
140,000
28,000
3,503,200
4,000
(1,300,000)
(S1) 60,000
(S2) 266,400
(A) 64,800
(820,000)
621,000
795,200
-0-
18,000
11,200
621,600
91,000
151,200
240,000
56,000
3,000
10,000
(98,000)
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 24
(G)
(*C)
(S2)
(I2)
(A)
(S1)
(I1)
(E)
(A)
1,916,400
(60,000)
(331,200)
411,400
(411,400)
(820,000)
(971,800)
(3,503,200)
26.
(20 Minutes)
combination)
(Consolidation
entries
for
mutual
holding
business
240,000
Entry A
Trademarks .................................................................
95,000
Investment in Lowly .............................................
57,000
Noncontrolling Interest in Lowly 1/1/10 (40%) . .
38,000
(To recognize unamortized portion of acquisition-date excess fair value.)
Entry E
Amortization Expense ...............................................
Trademarks ............................................................
(To record trademarks amortization expense for 2010.)
5,000
5,000
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 26
$344,000
86,000
$430,000
(380,000)
$50,000
10 Years
$5,000
$720,000
80,000
$800,000
740,000
$60,000
15 Years
$4,000
CONSOLIDATION ENTRIES
Entry *G
Retained Earnings, 1/1/10 (Stookey) ........................
7,680
Cost of Goods Sold ..............................................
7,680
(To give effect to unrealized gain from 2009. Amount is calculated based on
normal 48% markup [found from Income Statement] multiplied by $16,000
retained inventory [20% of $80,000])
Entry *C1
Investment in Stookey ...............................................
85,856
Retained Earnings, 1/1/10 (Yarrow) ....................
85,856
(To recognize equity income accruing from Yarrow's investment in Stookey
during 2009. Because the initial value method is applied and no dividends
paid, no income has been recognized in connection with the 2009 ownership
of Stookey. Reported income of $120,000 [2009] less unrealized gain of
$7,680 deferred above indicates income of $112,320. Based on 80%
ownership, an $89,856 accrual is needed, which is reduced by the $4,000
amortization (80% $5,000) for that year.
27.(continued)
Entry *C2
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
45,000
36,000
9,000
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
7- 28
27. (continued)
Entry A2
Copyright .....................................................................
56,000
Investment in Yarrow ...........................................
50,400
Noncontrolling interest in Yarrow.......................
5,600
(To recognize January 1, 2010 unamortized portion of acquisition price
assigned to copyright.)
Entry E
Operating Expenses ...................................................
9,000
Customer List.........................................................
5,000
Copyright................................................................
4,000
(To recognize amortization expense for 2010$5,000 in connection with
Travers' investment and $3,000 in connection with Yarrow's investment.)
Entry Tl
Sales ............................................................................
100,000
Cost of Goods Sold ..............................................
100,000
(To eliminate intercompany inventory transfers made during 2010.)
Entry G
Cost of Goods Sold ....................................................
9,600
Inventory (current assets) ...................................
9,600
(To defer unrealized gain on ending inventory$20,000 48% markup.)
Noncontrolling Interest in Stookey's Net Income
2010 Reported net income ..............................................
Customer list amortization .............................................
Realization of 2009 deferred income (*G) .....................
Deferral of 2010 unrealized gain (G) ..............................
Realized income 2010 .....................................................
Outside ownership ..........................................................
Noncontrolling interest in Stookey's net income ........
Noncontrolling Interest in Yarrow's Net Income
2010 Reported net income ..............................................
Copyright amortization ...................................................
Accrual of Stookey's income (80% of $93,080
realized income [computed above]) ........................
Realized Income2010 ...................................................
Outside ownership ..........................................................
Noncontrolling interest in Yarrow's net income ..........
McGraw-Hill/Irwin
Hoyle, Schaefer, Doupnik, Advanced Accounting, 9/e
$100,000
(5,000)
7,680
(9,600)
$93,080
20%
$18,616
$200,000
(4,000)
74,464
$270,464
10%
$27,046
.
27. (continued)
Accounts
(900,000)
480,000
(600,000)
320,000
(500,000)
260,000
(Tl)
(G)
100,000
9,600
Operating expenses
Separate company net income
Consolidated net income
NCI in Yarrow's net income
NCI in Stookey's net income
To controlling interest
Retained earnings, 1/1/10:
Travers Company
Yarrow Company
Stookey Company
100,000
(320,000)
80,000
(200,000)
140,000
(100,000)
(E)
9,000
(700,000)
(600,000)
(300,000)
(320,000)
128,000
(892,000)
(200,000)
329,000
444,000
720,000
380,000
(800,000)
2,113,000
(*C2) 217,670
836,000
1,560,000
(*C1)
(917,670)
-0-0-
85,856
(G)
(S2)
(A2)
(S1)
(A1)
9,600
887,270
50,400
393,856
36,000
1,094,400
-0-0-
520,000
(A2)
800,000
(460,000)
(300,000)
(200,000)
(200,000)
(892,000)
(800,000)
(400,000)
(1,560,000)
(*C2) 217,670
(*C1) 85,856
(800,000)
(609,080)
27,046
18,616
(563,418)
(563,418)
128,000
(1,353,088)
280,000
(721,000)
(500,000)
(2,113,000)
685,856
7,680
292,320
(400,000)
344,000
949,000
(S2)
(*G)
(S1)
(100,000)
Liabilities
Common stock
(1,900,000)
961,920
7,680
100,000
(27,046)
(18,616)
(*G)
(TI)
(A1)
45,000
56,000
(E)
(E)
4,000
2,305,000
40,000
5,000
52,000
3,491,400
(1,381,000)
(S1)
(S2)
200,000
300,000
(S1)
(A1)
(S2)
(A2)
2,008,982
98,464
9,000
98,586
5,600
2,008,982
(500,000)
(1,353,088)
(107,464)
(104,186)
(257,312)
(257,312)
(3,491,400)
27.(continued)
b. Travers' reported income .....................................................................
Yarrow's reported income ....................................................................
Dividend income (none collected) ......................................................
Intercompany gains (no transfers) ......................................................
Amortization expense ...........................................................................
Taxable income ......................................................................................
Tax rate ...................................................................................................
Income tax payable ...............................................................................
$320,000
200,000
-0-0(9,000)
$511,000
45%
$229,950
$100,000
45%
$45,000
$9,600
(7,680)
$1,920
45%
$864
$229,950
45,000
$274,950
(864)
$274,086
27. d. (continued)
Because a single rate is used, income tax expense can also be computed by
taking consolidated net income (prior to noncontrolling interest reduction) of
$609,080 (part a.) and multiplying by the 45% tax rate to obtain $274,086.
Income Tax ExpenseCurrent ......................................
Deferred Income TaxAsset .........................................
Income Tax Payable ...................................................
274,086
864
274,950
28. (40 Minutes) (Series of questions about a business combination and its income
tax reporting)
a. Partial equity method. "Income of Soludan" is 80% of Soludan's reported total.
b. $12,000. Reduction is evidenced by a $338,000 figure reported for consolidated
inventory rather than the $350,000 total for the two companies.
c. $37,500. Consolidated operating expenses have increased by $2,500, evidently
the annual amortization. Because a 15-year life is assumed by the combination,
the amount originally allocated to trademarks must have been $37,500.
d. $120,000. Decrease shown in consolidated sales account.
e. Upstream. "Noncontrolling interest in Soludan Company's income" is $18,700.
Because this amount is not equal to 20% of Soludan's reported income less
excess amortization ($100,000 $2,500), realized income must have been
adjusted for unrealized gains. Subsidiary income is only adjusted to show the
effects of upstream transfers.
f. $20,000. For both receivables and liabilities, the consolidated total is $20,000
less than the sum of the two companies.
g. $8,000. Consolidated cost of goods sold is decreased by $120,000 (to $780,000)
in eliminating intercompany sales. The increase of $12,000 created by the
ending unrealized gain (see part b.) would then leave a $792,000 balance.
Because $784,000 is the ending balance reported for consolidated cost of
goods sold, an $8,000 unrealized gain must have been deferred from the
previous year.
28.(continued)
h. Because the trademarks balance now stands at $32,500, amortization expense
of $2,500 has been recognized, $2,500 in the previous year. In addition, an
$8,000 unrealized gain from the prior year (see part g.) is recognized.
Amortization expenseprior years 80%....................
Unrealized gainupstream effect on
parent's retained earnings is $8,000 80%.............
Adjustment to parents beginning retained earnings. .
i. This figure is computed as follows:
Book value of subsidiary1/1 .......................................
Unrealized gain in beginning inventory (see above) . .
Realized book value ......................................................
Excess allocation
......................................................
Total to noncontrolling interest .....................................
Outside ownership ..........................................................
Noncontrolling interest in Soludan's income
(as reported) ...............................................................
Noncontrolling interest in Soludan's dividends
($20,000 20%) ...........................................................
Ending noncontrolling interest ......................................
$2,000
6,400
$8,400
$370,000
(8,000)
$362,000
35,000
397,000
20%
$79,400
18,700
(4,000)
$94,100
117,400
117,400
80,000
80,000
28. k. (continued)
On a separate return, Soludan would report $100,000 operating income for a
payable of $40,000. The unrealized gains are accounted for in different time
periods in the financial statements, thus, a temporary difference is created. The
beginning gain of $8,000 was taxed in the previous year rather than currently.
The current gain of $12,000 is taxed now rather than next year; the tax paid this
year on the net $4,000 ($1,600) is a prepayment.
Income Tax Expense .......................................................
Deferred Income Tax - Asset ..........................................
Income Tax Payable ...................................................
38,400
1,600
40,000
$100,000
8,000
(12,000)
$96,000
40%
$38,400
40,000
$1,600
29. (45 Minutes) Develop worksheet entries that were used to consolidate the
financial statements of a father-son-grandson combination.
Entry *G
Retained Earnings, 1/1/11 (Delta) .............................
15,000
Cost of Goods Sold ..............................................
15,000
(To recognize gain that was unrealized in 2010 [amount provided].)
Entry *C1
Retained Earnings, 1/1/11 (Delta) .............................
7,000
Investment in Omega Company ..........................
7,000
(To recognize amortization expense from Deltas acquisition for 2010.)
29. (continued)
Entry *C2
Retained Earnings, 1/1/11 (Alpha) ............................
27,600
Investment in Delta Company .............................
27,600
To recognize accrual adjustments for excess amortization
and inventory deferral as follows:
Excess amortization from Delta acquisition
(80% $6,250 2 years).........................................
$10,000
Deltas share of excess amortization from Omega acquisition
(80% [70% $10,000] 1 year)...........................
5,600
Inventory profit deferral at 1/1/11 (80% $15,000)..
(12,000)
*C2 adjustment............................................................
$27,600
Entry S1
Common Stock (Omega) ...........................................
100,000
Retained Earnings, 1/1/11 (Omega) ..........................
100,000
Investment in Omega (70%) .................................
140,000
Noncontrolling Interest in Omega (30%) ............
60,000
(To eliminate stockholders' equity accounts of Omega against parent's
Investment account and to recognize outside ownership.)
Entry S2
Common Stock (Delta) ...............................................
120,000
Retained Earnings, 1/1/11 (Delta, as adjusted) .......
378,000
Investment in Delta (80%) ....................................
398,400
Noncontrolling Interest in Delta (20%) ...............
99,600
(To eliminate stockholders' equity accounts of Delta [as adjusted as Entry
*G and Entry *C1] against corresponding balance in Investment account and
to recognize outside ownership.)
Entry A
Copyrights ..................................................................
222,500
Investment in Delta ...............................................
90,000
Investment in Omega ...........................................
77,000
Noncontrolling interest in Delta...........................
22,500
Noncontrolling interest in Omega.......................
33,000
(To recognize January 1, 2011 unamortized copyrights, 2 years amortization
recorded on first investment but only one year for second.)
Entry I1
Income of Subsidiary .................................................
144,000
Investment in Delta ...............................................
144,000
(To eliminate intercompany income accrual found on Alpha's records.)
29. (continued)
Entry I2
Income of Subsidiary .................................................
49,000
Investment in Omega ...........................................
49,000
(To eliminate intercompany income accrual found on Delta's records.)
Entry D1
Investment in Delta ....................................................
32,000
Dividends Paid (Delta) ..........................................
32,000
(To eliminate intercompany dividend payments, 80% of Delta's payment.)
Entry D2
Investment in Omega .................................................
35,000
Dividends Paid (Omega) ......................................
35,000
(To eliminate intercompany dividend payments, 70% of Omega's payment.)
Entry E
Operating Expenses ..................................................
16,250
Copyrights .............................................................
16,250
(Current year amortization, $6,250 on first acquisition and $10,000 on
second.)
Entry Tl
Sales ............................................................................
Cost of Goods Sold ..............................................
(To eliminate intercompany inventory transfer.)
200,000
200,000
Entry G
Cost of Goods Sold ....................................................
22,000
Inventory.................................................................
22,000
(To defer ending unrealized gain on intercompany transfers.)
Noncontrolling Interest in Omega's Income:
Reported income .............................................................
Excess fair value amortization .......................................
Accrual-based income.....................................................
Outside ownership ..........................................................
Noncontrolling interest in Omegas income ................
$70,000
(10,000)
60,000
30%
$18,000
29. (continued)
Noncontrolling Interest in Delta's Income:
Reported operating income ............................................
Equity income investment in Omega (70% $60,000)
Amortization expense .....................................................
2010 Unrealized income realized in 2011.......................
2011 Unrealized income realized in 2011 ......................
Accrual-based incomeDelta (2011) ............................
Outside ownership ..........................................................
Noncontrolling interest in Delta's income (2011) ........
Noncontrolling interest in Delta Company....................
Noncontrolling interest, 1/01/11 (Entry S2)..............
Noncontrolling interest, 1/01/11 (Entry A)................
Noncontrolling interest in Deltas income (above).
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest
($40,000 20%).........................................................
Noncontrolling interest in Delta, 12/31/11..........
Noncontrolling interest in Omega Company.................
Noncontrolling interest, 1/01/11 (Entry S1)..............
Noncontrolling interest in Omegas income (above)
Noncontrolling interest, 1/01/11 (Entry A)................
Dividends paid to noncontrolling interest ($50,000 30%)
Noncontrolling interest in Omega, 12/31/11.......
$131,000
42,000
(6,250)
15,000
(22,000)
$159,750
20%
$31,950
$99,600
22,500
31,950
(8,000)
$146,050
$60,000
18,000
33,000
(15,000)
$96,000
Summit
Treeline
Basecamp
Operating
income
$345,000
$280,000
$175,000
Ownership percentages
Summit-->Treeline
Treeline-->Basecamp
Dividends
paid
$150,000
$100,000
$40,000
Excess
amortizations
$20,000
$25,000
90%
70%
$175,000
(25,000)
$150,000
70%
$105,000
$280,000
105,000
(20,000)
$365,000
90%
$328,500
$345,000
328,500
$673,500
Comparison
Consolidated net income (operating incomes less
amortizations)
Noncontrolling interest in consolidated net income
(30% $150,000 plus 10% $365,000)
Controlling interest in consolidated net income
$755,000
$81,500
$673,500