Remedial Law (Jurisdiction and Preliminaries) Memory Aid A C B O 2001
Remedial Law (Jurisdiction and Preliminaries) Memory Aid A C B O 2001
Remedial Law (Jurisdiction and Preliminaries) Memory Aid A C B O 2001
e. All cases in which only an error or question of law is involved. JURISDICTION OF THE COURT OF APPEALS 1. ORIGINAL jurisdiction to issue writs of mandamus, prohibition, certiorari, habeas corpus, and quo warranto, and auxiliary writs or processes, whether or not in aid of its appellate jurisdiction (concurrent with SC and RTCs) 2. EXCLUSIVE original jurisdiction over actions for annulment of judgments of RTCs. 3. EXCLUSIVE appellate jurisdiction over all final judgments, decisions, resolutions, orders or awards of RTCs and quasi-judicial agencies, bodies, or commissions, EXCEPT those which fall within the appellate jurisdiction of the SC, namely: a. COMELEC; b. Commission on Audit; c. Sandiganbayan. JURISDICTION OF THE REGIONAL TRIAL COURTS I. ORIGINAL A. CIVIL CASES 1. Cases where the subject of the litigation is incapable of pecuniary estimation;
2. Involving the title to, or possession of, real property, or any interest therein,
where the assessed value of the property involved exceeds P20,000/ P50,000, EXCEPT actions for forcible entry and unlawful detainer: 3. All actions in admiralty and maritime jurisdiction where the demand or claim exceeds P200,000/P400,000; 4. Probate proceedings, both testate and intestate, where the gross value of the estate P200,000/P400,000; 5. In all actions involving the contract of marriage and marital relations; 6. In all cases not within the exclusive jurisdiction of any court, tribunal, person or body exercising jurisdiction; 7. In all civil actions and special proceedings falling within the exclusive original jurisdiction of a Juvenile and Domestic Relations Court and of the Court of Agrarian Relations as now provided by law; and 8. In all other cases in which the demand, exclusive of interest, damages of whatever kind, attorney's fees, litigation expenses, and costs or the value of the property in controversy exceeds P200,000/P400,000;
MUNICIPAL
of provisional remedies where the demand, exclusive of interest, damages, attorneys fees and costs, does not exceed P100,000/200,000.
2. Exclusive original jurisdiction over cases of forcible entry and unlawful detainer;
issue of ownership resolved only to determine issue of possession. After lapse of 1 year, MTC loses jurisdiction, and case becomes one for recovery of possession de jure (accion publicicana), although MTC may still have jurisdiction if value of property does not exceed P20,000/50,000.
3. Actions involving personal property valued at not more than P100,000/200,000. 4. Actions involving title or possession of real property where the assessed value
B. CRIMINAL JURISDICTION
1. Violations of city or municipal ordinances. 2. All offenses punishable with not more than 6 years imprisonment, irrespective of
fine, or a fine of not more than P6,000, regardless of civil liabilities and accessory penalties.
1. Motion to dismiss or quash EXCEPT for lack of jurisdiction over subject matter or
failure to comply with Katarungang Pambarangay (LGC) requirements 2. Motion for bill of particulars 3. Motions for new trial, reconsideration, re-opening 4. Petition for relief from judgment 5. Motion for extension of time to file pleadings, affidavits 6. Memoranda 7. Petition for certiorari, mandamus, and prohibition against any interlocutory order issued by the court 8. Motion to declare defendant in default 9. Dilatory motion for postponement 10. Reply 11. Third-party complaints 12. Motion for intervention JURISDICTION OF THE HOUSING AND LAND USE REGULATORY BOARD (HLURB) EXCLUSIVE jurisdiction over
1. Unsound real estate business practices 2. Claims involving refund and any other claims filed by subdivision lot or condominium
unit buyer against the project owner, developer, dealer, broker, or salesman
3. Cases involving specific performance of contractual and statutory obligations filed by
buyers of subdivision lots or condominium units against the owner, developer, dealer, broker, or salesman JURISDICTION OF THE KATARUNGANG PAMBARANGAY (UNDER THE LOCAL GOVERNMENT CODE OF 1991) 1. No complaint, petition, action or proceeding involving any matter within the authority of the lupon shall be filed or instituted directly in court or any other government office for adjudication, unless:
a. There has been a confrontation between the parties before the lupon chairman or
pangkat, AND
R E M E D I A L L AW ( J U R I S D I C T I O N A N D P R E L I M I N A R I E S ) MEMORY AID ATENEO CENTRAL BAR OPERATIONS 2001 b. That no conciliation or settlement has been reached as certified by the
lupon/pangkat secretary as attested to by lupon chairman or pangkat chairman, or unless such settlement has been repudiated by the parties thereto 2. Disputes subject to Conciliation Requirement: All disputes between parties actually residing in the same city or municipality HOWEVER, the court in which non-criminal cases not falling within the authority of the Lupon may, at any time before trial, refer the case to the lupon for amicable settlement. 3. EXCEPTIONS TO CONCILIATION REQUIREMENT (SC Circular 14-93) a. Where one party is the government, or any subdivision or instrumentality thereof; b. Where one party is a public officer or employee, and the dispute relates to the performance of his official functions;
c. Where the dispute involves real properties located in different cities and
municipalities, unless the parties thereto agree to submit their difference to amicable settlement by an appropriate Lupon;
g. Offenses where there is no private offended party; h. Disputes where urgent legal action is necessary to prevent injustice from being committed or further continued, specifically the following: i. Criminal cases where accused is under police custody or detention; ii. Petitions for habeas corpus by a person illegally deprived of his rightful custody over another or a person illegally deprived of his liberty or one acting in his behalf; iii. Actions coupled with provisional remedies such as preliminary injunction, attachment, delivery of personal property and support during the pendency of the action; AND iv. Actions which may be barred by the Statute of Limitations. i. j. Any class of disputes which the President may determine in the interest of justice or upon the recommendation of the Secretary of Justice; Where the dispute arises from the Comprehensive Agrarian Reform Law (CARL) (Sections. 46 & 47, R.A. 6657); (Montoya vs. Escayo, et al., 171 SCRA 442; Art. 226, Labor Code, as amended, which grants original and exclusive jurisdiction over conciliation and mediation of disputes, grievances or problems to certain offices of the Department of Labor and Employment); l. Actions to annul judgment upon a compromise, which may be filed directly in court.
Disputes involving real property or interest Barangay where property is situated therein Disputes arising at the workplace where Barangay where such the contending parties are employed, or at institution is located the institution where such parties are enrolled for study workplace or
Objections to venue shall be raised in the mediation proceedings before the punong barangay; otherwise, they are deemed waived. Legal questions confronting the punong barangay which might arise in resolving such objections are to be submitted to the Secretary of the DOJ, whose ruling shall be binding. 5. EFFECT OF NON-COMPLIANCE: a. Dismissal upon motion of defendants for failure to state cause of action or prematurity; OR
b. Lupon chairman shall make attempts at mediation; if he fails within 15 days from
date of first meeting, he shall set a date for the constitution of a pangkat ng tagapagsundo (3 members; chosen by the parties from the list of the members of the lupon)
c. Pangkat shall have power to issue summons, and shall hear both parties and
their witnesses, and attempt to arrive at an amicable settlement. It shall arrive at said settlement or resolution of the dispute within 15 days from the day it convenes. During the period while the dispute is under mediation, the prescriptive periods for offenses, and for causes of action shall be interrupted upon filing of the complaint with the punong barangay. Said interruption shall not exceed 60 days from said filing. In all proceedings, parties must appear in person without the assistance of counsel or representatives, EXCEPT for minors and incompetents who may be assisted by their next-of-kin who are not lawyers. 7. Amicable settlement shall have the force and effect of a final judgment upon the expiration of 10 days from its date, unless: a. It is repudiated, or Repudiation must be done within 10 days, by filing a sworn statement with the lupon chairman; The grounds for repudiation are vitiation of consent by fraud, violence or intimidation; Such repudiation is a sufficient basis for the issuance of a certification for filing a complaint with the court. b. A petition to nullify the settlement is filed in the proper city or municipal court The above does not apply to cases not within jurisdiction of the lupon but submitted to it. In this case, the compromise agreed upon by the parties
c. Issued by the Punong Barangay, as requested by the proper party, on the ground
of failure of settlement, where the dispute involves members of the same indigenous cultural community, which shall be settled in accordance with the customs and traditions of that particular cultural community, or where one or more of the parties to the aforesaid dispute belong to the minority and the parties mutually agreed to submit their dispute to the indigenous system of amicable settlement, and there has been no settlement as certified by the datu or tribal leader or elder, to the Punong Barangay of the place of settlement If mediation or conciliation proved unsuccessful before punong barangay there having been no agreement to conciliate, OR respondent failed to appear before punong barangay, Punong Barangay shall not issue the certification (because now mandatory for him to constitute the Pangkat before whom mediation, conciliation, or arbitration proceedings shall be held.) JURISDICTION OF THE SANDIGANBAYAN A. ORIGINAL 1. Violations of: a. Anti-Graft and Corrupt Practices Act; b. R.A. 1379 (An Act Declaring Forfeiture in Favor of the State of Any Property Found to Have Been Unlawfully Acquired By Any Public Officer or Employee and Providing for the Proceedings Therefor); or c. Title VII, Chapter II, 2 of the RPC (i.e., Articles 210-212 of RPC) Where one or more of the principal accused are officials occupying the following positions in the government, whether in a permanent, acting or interim capacity, at the time of the commission of the offense: i. Officials of executive branch occupying positions classified as Grade 27 or higher
ii. Members of Congress and officials thereof classified as Grade 27 or higher iii. Members of the Judiciary, without prejudice to the provisions of the Constitution (on impeachment) iv. Chairmen and members of the Constitutional Commissions, without prejudice to the provisions of the Constitution v. All other national and local officials classified as Grade 27 or higher; or 2. Other offenses or felonies, committed by public officials and employees mentioned in #1, in relation to their office, whether simple or complexed with other crimes
Establishes a relation between the court Establishes a relation between plaintiff and and subject matter defendant, or petitioner and respondent CLASSIFICATIONS OF JURISDICTION 1. General vs. Specific/Limited: General - power to adjudicate all controversies EXCEPT those expressly withheld from the plenary powers of the court Specific/Limited - restricted to particular cases and subject to such limitations as may be provided by the governing law 2. Original vs. Appellate Original power of the court to take judicial cognizance of a case instituted for judicial action for the first time Appellate authority of a court higher in rank to reexamine the final order or judgment of a lower court which tried the case now elevated for judicial review
4. 5. 6.
CLASSIFICATION OF ACTIONS 1. Real, personal and mixed Real brought for the protection of real rights, land, tenements, or one founded on privity of estate only Personal not founded upon the privity of real rights or real property Mixed brought for protection or recovery of real property and also for an award for damages sustained 2. In rem, in personam, and quasi in rem In rem not directed against particular persons but against the thing itself; object is to bar indifferently all who might be minded to make objection against the right sought to be enforced; hence, judgment is binding upon the whole world (e.g., land registration; special proceedings) In personam directed against particular persons on the basis of their personal liability to establish a claim against them; judgment is binding only upon the parties impleaded and their successors in interest (e.g., action for breach of contract) Quasi in rem directed against particular persons, but the purpose of which is to bar and bind not only said persons but any other person who claims any interest in the property or right subject of the suit (e.g. action for judicial foreclosure of mortgage) 3. Transitory vs. local Transitory one the venue of which depends generally upon the residence of the parties, regardless of where the cause of action arose (e.g., personal actions) Local one required by the Rules to be instituted in a particular place in the absence of an agreement to the contrary (e.g., real actions) KINDS OF PARTIES 1. Real party in interest person having an interest in the subject of the action and in obtaining the relief demanded.
10
a. Negative Defense specific denial of a fact alleged. b. Affirmative Defense an allegation of new matter which, though admits the
material allegations of the complaint, nevertheless prevents recovery. 3. COUNTERCLAIM any claim for money or other relief which a party may have against an opposing party.
b. Permissive Counterclaim does not arise or is not connected with the subject
matter of the claim (e.g., set-off). 4. CROSS CLAIM claim by one party against a co-party arising out of a transaction or occurrence which is the subject matter of the action or counterclaim.
5. REPLY a pleading that denies or alleges facts in denial of new matters alleged by way of defense in the answer with the purpose of joining the issues as to such new matters. 6. THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT a claim which a defending party may file against a person not a party to the action for contribution, indemnity, subrogation or any other relief.
OTHER DEFINITIONS Specific Denial specific allegation of the fact the truth of which he does not admit and setting forth the substance of the matter relied upon to support the denial OR allegation of lack of knowledge or information sufficient to form a belief as the truth of the averment. Negative Pregnant a form of denial where only the qualification or modification of the fact alleged is denied while the fact itself is admitted. Summons an order directed to a defendant in the name of the court and under its seal directing that the defendant answer the complaint upon failure of which judgment will be taken. Motion application for an order not included in the judgment. Subpoena process directed to a person requiring him to attend and to testify at a hearing or the trial or to bring with him any book or thing under his control.
11