Attacking Manual 2

By
Jacob Aagaard
Quality Chess
www.qualitychess.co.uk
First English edition 2010 by Quality Chess UK LLP,
Copyright 2010 Jacob Aagaard
Attacking Manual 2
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored
in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic,
electrostatic, magnetic tape, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior
permission of the publisher.
ISBN 978-9197600-41-5
All sales or enquiries should be directed to Quality Chess UK LLP,
20 Balvie Road, Milngavie, Glasgow G62 7TA, United Kingdom
Ofce phone: (+44) 141 227 6771
e-mail: info@qualitychess.co.uk
website: www.qualitychess.co.uk
Distributed in US and Canada by SCB Distributors, Gardena, California, US
www.scbdistributors.com
Distributed in Rest of the World by Quality Chess UK LLP through
Sunrise Handicrafts, Smyczkowa 4/98, 20-844 Lublin, Poland
Typeset by Andrew Greet and Jacob Aagaard
Proofreading: Colin McNab and Alan Beardsworth
Edited by Andrew Greet
Cover design by Carole Dunlop
Printed in Estonia by Tallinna Raamatutrkikoja LLC
Acknowledgements
Te author would like to thank the following people for their contribution
to this book in big and small ways: Jonny Hector, Krishnan Sasikiran,
Anne Madsen, Herman Herbolt, Mihail Marin, Artur Yusupov, Allan
Beardsworth, Colin McNab, and most of all Andrew Greet and John Shaw.
Thank you!
Contents
Key to Symbols used 4
Preface to the second edition 7
Bring it on - an introduction 9
Chapter 1 Understanding Mating Attacks 9
Typical Mates & Focal Points 11
Tree Piece Attacks 25
Insurance Policies 30
Transformations 31
Exercises 40
Solutions 43
Chapter 2 Typical Piece Play 53
Te Assault Ratio 57
Defection 67
Overloading 76
Tempo-gainers 81
Piece Sacrifces for time 84
Transition squares 89
Lines of Communication 101
Vacating Squares 118
Outposts 127
Launching 135
Te pin 148
Improving the Circumstances 165
Prophylaxis 170
Te f5/f4-squares 178
Chapter 3 Typical Pawn Play 181
Pawn breaks 183
Pawns as valuable as pieces 193
Pawn storms 208
Pawn sacrifces 237
Provoking weaknesses 243
Chapter 4 King Safety 251
Destroying the defensive structure 253
Line clearance 264
Cutting of the defences 275
Weak kings 281
Drawing the king into the open 293
Kings on the run 300
Cutting of the escape route 311
Te king stuck in the centre 315
Breakthrough in the centre 321
Two thematic sacrifces 346
Chapter 5 Intuitive Sacrifces and Enduring Initiative 353
Creative play 355
A sudden chance 358
Aggressive opening play 377
Intuitive sacrifces 391
Enduring initiative 399
Chapter 6 Exercises 413
Solutions 423
Index of games and game fragments 457
Key to symbols used
? a weak move
?? a blunder
! a good move
!! an excellent move
!? a move worth considering
?! a move of doubtful value
# mate
(n) n
th
match game
Bibliography
Jacob Aagaard: Te Panov-Botvinnik Attack
Christian Bauer: Play 1...b6!
Sabino Brunello: Attacking the Spanish
Larry Christiansen: Rocking the Ramparts & Storming the Barricades
Colin Crouch: Attacking Technique
Iakov Damsky & Mikhail Tal: Attack with Mikhail Tal
Ftacnik, Kopec & Browne: Champions of the New Millennium
Tibor Karolyi with Nick Aplin: Genius in the Background
Hans Kmoch: Pawn Power in Chess
Vladimir Vukovic: Art of Attack in Chess
Simon Webb: Chess for Tigers
Periodicals
Chess Informant, Chess Today, New In Chess, Chess Monthly, Schach 64, ChessVibes.com,
ChessBase.com, Mega Database 2009
Foreword by the author
When I decided to write this double-volume book on attack back in 2002, I had very clear ideas
for Volume One, such as specifc phrases, positions, structures, while all I had for Volume Two
was a clear notion of what it should cover, in abstract. Where Volume One was about the laws of
dynamics, the font of all attacks, and to some limited extent an original work, Volume Two was
always meant to be a perfection of existing work on the attack.
Over the years I have read dozens of books on attacking chess, and they were all about knocking
the kings position open, once the attack had been established. Some authors even disguised
their puzzle books as books on attack or was it their publishers? Although some books on the
middlegame would mention parts of the positional basis for the attack, I was unable to refer my
students to any book as the work on attacking chess. Simply put, none of them explained well
how the attack came to be, but concerned themselves mainly with the sacrifce. Tis is what I
tried to do in Volume One, and with some success, I think.
Tis volume is intended to cover all of attacking technique, by which I mean what to do once the
attack is up and running. Obviously this cannot be done in 464 pages, but a decent attempt can
be made, and I think I have managed to do so. In this book I will discuss such concrete items as
Destroying the defensive structure (page 253), Te pin (page 148), Overloading (page 78), as well
as more abstract concepts such as Creative play (page 355) and Intuitive sacrifces (page 391).
Hopefully what I have found worthwhile to say about these concepts will be useful for the reader.
Although I am a writer by nature, and place a high value on aesthetics, I am deeply aware that
most readers will have picked up this book with the hope of improving their chess. My experiences
and conversations with some of the best players in the World have strengthened my belief that it
is very useful to solve exercises regularly if you want to improve your play. Although a well-written
book can afect your play positively, it will do so much more if you are involved, rather than just
reading it. For this reason I have included a diagram preview in this book. I invite you to use up
to 10 minutes on each position before reading the subsequent chapter. For Chapters 1, 3, 4 & 5
I have selected 8 positions I fnd interesting, while Chapter 2 has 26 positions, as it is a rather big
chapter. I know that not everyone will want to spend this amount of time on these exercises, but
for those who have the discipline, the option is there. It is for the same reason that I have included
50 exercises towards the end of this book and 24 exercises at the end of Chapter 1.
Tis double-volume work has been seven years in the making; with the publication of the revised
and expanded Volume One and this volume, I have fulflled a major personal ambition. Quality
Chess was founded to support the publication of Te Berlin Wall, Questions of Modern Chess
Teory and this work. Seven years after the frst thoughts and conversations about these works, I
am proud to say that it was all worth it, and that all four books were worth fghting for.
Jacob Aagaard
Glasgow, 22nd December 2009
Chapter 1
Understanding Mating Attacks
This is the three piece rule in practice. The bishop has sacrificed itself,
the knight is assisting the queen, in this case by defending her, and big
momma creates general devastation.
Diagram preview
On this page you fnd 8
diagrams with critical moments
from the coming chapter. I
recommend that you take up
to 10 minutes to think about
each of them. Te solutions are
found on the following pages in
the annotations to the games.
Positions with a circled P can
be played against a computer.

'

' N
=

~=



Win in the face of disaster
(see page 15)

'

'


=
~
=

Black to win in one move

(see page 17)

'

'= =

White wins, but how?

(see page 22)

'

' 9==


~

White to win
(see page 25)

'
9
'9
=

~
=

White to calculate very well

(see page 26-27)


'

' =




=

White to play and win

(see page 29)

' = N
9
'


~

=

Calculate all the way

(see page 33)

'
=
'



=

Accurate attack
(see page 36)

P
P

Covered in this chapter

Typical Mates & Focal Points
Tree Piece Attacks
Insurance Policies
Transformations
In this chapter we will discuss the basic
mechanics of mating attacks. We will do so
by looking at some basic themes and then
elaborating on them, to see how they work
in practice. A good place to start is with the
ordinary.
Typical Mates & Focal Points
I am not sure if the notion of focal points has
been used before in chess literature, but the
place where I frst encountered it and where it
continues to meet new readers, was in Vladimir
Vukovics famous book Art of Attack in Chess,
which is considered by many to be the best
book ever written about attacking chess. Te
book is an impressive looking brick, written in
1965, which alternates between giving bloated
theoretical descriptions in the tradition of
Kmochs Pawn Power in Chess (a book which
by itself has decreased the numbers of chess
players in the world!) and some sophisticated
description of actual positions.
Vukovics defnition of a focal point goes as
follows:
If the attacker threatens mate or actually
mates on these squares, they are mating focal-
points, but if he only harries the king from
them or uses them as points from which
to break into the castled position, they are
called strategic or auxiliary focal-points. It
may be that there is more than one mating
focal-point, and in that case we speak of
compound focal-points. If there are many
focal-points (both mating and strategic) on
squares of the same colour, we speak of a
network of weak squares.
I personally fnd this paragraph of defnitions
rather amusing, as it is complex and not
particularly helpful for the practical player, if
anyone at all. Te reason why I am starting
with this quote is that I had written a few
pages that were going down the road of trying
to defne what attacking chess is, rather than
showing it, before I realised that I was stuck
and not able to deliver my ideas in a format
that satisfed me.
Despite the fact that the theoretical basis for
the idea of focal points stands on this rather
shaky foundation, which despite being
technically correct is of very little use, it has
had a great impact on how people talk about
chess even today, more than forty years after
the book was written. I think this is mainly
because Vukovic manages to elucidate various
aspects of attacking chess with great vitality
and care, and leaves the reader with real
insights. But we do not need to know a lot
of defnitions to understand that, though it
is usually easier to attack the opponent at h7
than g7 (mainly because of the easy access from
the starting position for the kings bishop and
knight), an attack on g7 is in general stronger,
because the king will have a greater chance of
escaping if it is attacked on h7 than on g7. We
do not need to know a complex terminology
to understand such insights, and luckily you
do not need to do so to follow Vukovics
book.
Another chapter in Vukovics book gives
some generic mating positions that may
seem more suitable for a beginners book
than a sophisticated book on middlegame
strategy, but they do have the purpose to build
a foundation for the rest of the book. An
example is the following confguration:
12 Attacking Manual 2

'

'
=

Only two chapters after presenting this

simple position, Vukovic goes deep into the
Greek gift sacrifce with xh7, g5 and
h5, in scenarios that are far from clear. He
has his own points to make about this and I
strongly recommend that you read his book to
fnd out what they are, as it is always useful
to see a topic discussed from various points of
view.
Not surprisingly it is my intention in this
book to present my understanding of the
various techniques and aspects of attacking
chess. I am a strong believer that thinking in
concepts can improve your chess and that to
consider certain patterns or standard reactions
can greatly improve your playing strength. If
you are familiar with a lot of thematic ideas,
you will defnitely fnd them more easily at the
board. For instance, if you know that an attack
on the fank is best met by a strike in the centre,
you will investigate this option with a good
deal more confdence than if you had never
encountered the concept.
In the frst volume of this book I presented
my seven global ideas, of which I am certain
that we should have an intimate knowledge,
if we want to be good attackers. Tey were
deliberately made so simple as to make them
seem almost comical, and for this reason I gave
examples of very strong players violating them
again and again. Obviously those strong players
had other ideas and somehow they did not
work out, but we should also not overestimate
the human ability or underestimate just how
difcult chess is. We need all the help we can
get to play this game just on a decent level.
Developing a strong intuition for the attack by
learning and mastering those seven principles
will defnitely do this.
It is with this foundation that we progress
to this, the second volume. Here we will
look at some of the typical scenarios that we
encounter again and again when conducting a
direct attack on the opponents king. Te frst
discussion will be of a typical mating pattern,
one also found in Vukovics book. However,
just like Vukovic, I am not simply wishing to
give a mate in one exercise, but to take this
typical pattern and study it thoroughly, from
the perspective of both the attacker and the
defender.
Te frst pattern is defned by a pawn on f6
teaming up with a queen on h6 to attack the
enemy king:

'

'=

Tis is the archetypal position. Let us

now familiarise ourselves with some typical
variations on the position, which we will be
discussing in more detail over the next few
pages (for ease of reading I will always take
White as the attacking side, but the principles
will of course be just as relevant on the opposite
side of the pitch).

'=

'=

13 Chapter 1 - Understanding Mating Attacks

White has just played the knight to g5 and
Black will have to give up his rook in order to
avoid mate.

'=

' =
~

White has the chance to decide the game

with 1.g7, winning a rook due to the
hanging queen on d8.

'

' =

Black cannot defend f7 in this position, but

even if he was able to do so, White would have
the deciding tactic 1.e8!, diverting/pinning
the rook on g8 and thus taking control over
the g7-square.

'

'=

Black has managed to control the vital

g7-square, but if White is to move, he would
have 1.xh7! xh7 2.h4 mate. However,
Black to play would be able to defend with
1g5! followed by 2g6!, repulsing the
queen.

'
=
'=

~

Te fnal position shows a combination that

arises rather infrequently. Here White can
decide the game with 1.xh7! xh7 2.hxg6
mate.
In what follows I will give thirteen relevant
practical examples from games played by
good players. During my research, I found it
striking that serious mistakes were committed
more often than not. If I had to guess, I
would attribute the mistakes to the players
insufcient familiarity with the relevant
patterns, not forgetting the simple fact that
chess is just difcult!
David Berczes Simon Widmer
Biel 2005

'

' =
N =~

Te frst example starts at a point where the

player leading the black pieces is on the way
to inficting a big upset against an opponent
rated more than 300 points higher, when the
following accident happens:
14 Attacking Manual 2
25...xf5?
If Black had taken with the pawn on f5 he
would not only have prevented anything bad
from happening, but would also have been able
to use the open g-fle for aggressive measures.
26.h3! h5
Black must have believed that he had
everything under control at this point. Great
must his disappointment have been, upon
seeing Whites next move.
27.g5!
Tere is no good way for Black to defend f7.
Taking the queen allows a smothered mate:

'

'=

10
Tis pattern is more often seen in positions
where Black gets his queen to f8 to expel the
white queen from h6, as we saw above, and as
is the case in the following example.
Hansjuerg Kaenel Meinrad Schauwecker
Swiss Championship 2001

'
=
' N

~


~ =

Objectively, White is probably doing rather

well in this position. Black has no easy targets
to attack around the white king, even if it
does look rather vulnerable. Te best way
to continue would probably be to get the
bishop to c6 and start undermining the black
queenside with the idea of eventually attacking
his kingside from the fank.
In the game White chose another strategy,
which can at best be called suicidal. He decided
to exchange probably his best piece, the knight
on d4, for what is surely an inefective piece
of wood on f3, albeit theoretically of higher
value, and in the process promote the pawn
on g4 from being in the way of the knight to
being a cold-hearted killer on f3.
You can argue that this was the basis of a
miscalculation, but Kaenel is not a weak player
and would not have made this type of error if
he had possessed a deep understanding of the
relevant themes.
28.xf3? gxf3 29.h1
White seems to be under the illusion that
his king can be defended. But even if he had
not been losing to the trick played in the
game, it would still be an error of judgement
to enter such a volatile position willingly,
considering that his position was so promising
beforehand.
29e6?
Black commits an inaccuracy. Instead
29...h5! 30.g1 h3 would transpose to
the game, without allowing the possibility
mentioned in the following note.
30.g1?
Tis loses in the way we have already seen
in the previous example, this time with the
queen on the more typical f1-square. Instead
it was possible for White to defend his king
15 Chapter 1 - Understanding Mating Attacks
by advancing the g-pawn, something that we
will see is a quite common defensive possibility
from this generic position.
Te line I have analysed includes a few nice
tactics and eventually leads to a draw: 30.g4!
xg4 31.g1 g6 32.d2 xh2 33.d7
xg1 34.xg4 h6 35.xg1 g6 36.h2
d6 37.h3 h6 38.g3 d6 with an
odd repetition of moves.
30...h3 31.f1 g4!

'

'

~ 9
=

~ =

White must have been horrifed to see this

move. Tough he had probably seen a similar
theme before, somehow it had slipped his
mind. He tried to give up a rook, but the
material defcit was much too great for him to
obtain any hope of survival.

32.g2 fxg2 33.xg2 xg2 34.xg2
xa1 35.xa1 xf2 36.h3 c8 37.h4
xh2 38.g5 g7
01
At times a knight jump to g4 can seem so
convincing that it disarms us of our confdence,
which I imagine is one of the ingredients in
the following disaster, the other being possibly
time trouble.
Ketevan Arakhamia-Grant Stephen Peters
Port Erin 2000

'

' N
=

~=

White is faced with the strong threat of

g4 and did not fnd an adequate reply. It
was necessary to disturb the black coordination
for long enough to turn the d-pawn from
a mere player into a match winner. A bit of
positive thinking was required, as White
is surprisingly winning after 36.f5!!. Te
relevant line goes: 36xf5 37.d7! and
with the threat of xf5 it seems that Black
has nothing better than 37h6. But here
White has time for 38.e8 or 38.d6, both of
which decide the game in Whites favour as the
d-pawn is unstoppable.
In what I suspect was time trouble White
followed a less convincing strategy.
36.e6?? g4 37.xg4 xg4
01
One thing that surprised me when I was
researching our archetypal position was that
the number of positions featuring the above
pattern, involving a knight moving to g5 (or
g4), is very low. In the vast majority of games,
rooks were the main helpers in the attack,
either against h7 or by pinning the g8-rook.