Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 10K views

    How To Write A Good Abstract

    Uploaded by

    Nithin Mohan
    The document provides tips for writing an abstract that will be accepted by the ERS Annual Congress. It discusses including an introduction that summarizes current knowledge, aims and objectives that state the study's hypothesis, concise methods, important results presented with data, and conclusions that explain the implications. The abstract should follow submission guidelines, use simple sentences without jargon, and be reviewed by colleagues to catch any issues before submitting. Over 8000 abstracts are submitted each year but many are rejected for not being clearly written or scoring high enough in peer review. Writing an effective abstract is important for communicating research findings.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd

    How To Write A Good Abstract

    Uploaded by

    Nithin Mohan
    10K views3 pages
    The document provides tips for writing an abstract that will be accepted by the ERS Annual Congress. It discusses including an introduction that summarizes current knowledge, aims and objectives that state the study's hypothesis, concise methods, important results presented with data, and conclusions that explain the implications. The abstract should follow submission guidelines, use simple sentences without jargon, and be reviewed by colleagues to catch any issues before submitting. Over 8000 abstracts are submitted each year but many are rejected for not being clearly written or scoring high enough in peer review. Writing an effective abstract is important for communicating research findings.

    Original Description:

    For all those people who still wonder what abstract is al about and How to Write a Good Abstract.

    Original Title

    How to Write a Good Abstract

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    The document provides tips for writing an abstract that will be accepted by the ERS Annual Congress. It discusses including an introduction that summarizes current knowledge, aims and objectives that state the study's hypothesis, concise methods, important results presented with data, and conclusions that explain the implications. The abstract should follow submission guidelines, use simple sentences without jargon, and be reviewed by colleagues to catch any issues before submitting. Over 8000 abstracts are submitted each year but many are rejected for not being clearly written or scoring high enough in peer review. Writing an effective abstract is important for communicating research findings.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    10K views3 pages

    How To Write A Good Abstract

    Uploaded by

    Nithin Mohan
    The document provides tips for writing an abstract that will be accepted by the ERS Annual Congress. It discusses including an introduction that summarizes current knowledge, aims and objectives that state the study's hypothesis, concise methods, important results presented with data, and conclusions that explain the implications. The abstract should follow submission guidelines, use simple sentences without jargon, and be reviewed by colleagues to catch any issues before submitting. Over 8000 abstracts are submitted each year but many are rejected for not being clearly written or scoring high enough in peer review. Writing an effective abstract is important for communicating research findings.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF or read online from Scribd
    Download as pdf
    of 3

    How to write a good abstract

    Some useful tips that will help get your abstract accepted by the ERS

    The aim of the ERS Annual Congress is to support exchange of knowledge among the
    international respiratory community. Writing an abstract for the ERS Congress is an important
    way for you to communicate your scientific research or clinical practice with your peers and
    colleagues.

    The ERS receives several thousands of abstracts every year for presentation at the Congress.
    Each of these abstracts is evaluated by three independent reviewers and scored (1-6) on its
    content and scientific merit. Abstracts above a mean score of 3.0 are accepted. Last year
    alone, the Programme Committee had to reject 828 abstracts because they did not score highly
    enough.

    The scientific work behind rejected abstracts is often well conceived and carried out, but the
    text is written in such a manner that it cannot be accepted. This may mean that your good
    work is not communicated to your colleagues as it deserves.

    In order to try and prevent this from happening, the following information will give you some
    practical advice about writing an abstract, which will then have the best possible chance of
    being rated highly by the reviewers and selected by the Programme Committee for the next
    ERS Annual Congress.

    Why write an abstract?


    An abstract is a shortened version of the first draft of a paper. It is important for several
    reasons:
    • it provides the first chance for you to announce and cite the preliminary findings of
    your study;
    • it allows you to communicate your findings to your colleagues and get their feedback;
    • it is the starting point for achieving the ultimate aim of a research project, the writing
    and publishing of a full paper in peer-reviewed literature.

    The optimal structure of an abstract


    Title
    The title should be an accurate promise of the abstract's contents. It should explain as much as
    possible about the context and the aims of the study. Ideally, the title should be about 10–12
    words long, and should include the scope of the investigation, the study design and the goal.
    In general, it is preferable to make the title a description of what was investigated rather than
    a statement of the results or conclusions. The abstract's title should be easy for the reader to
    understand and should not include jargon or unfamiliar acronyms or abbreviations.
    Authors
    The list of authors should be restricted to those individuals who actually carried out the study,
    conceived it, designed it, gathered the data, analysed the numbers and wrote the abstract. The
    author who will present the abstract should be listed first. Every listed author should read and
    approve the abstract before it is submitted.

    Main text
    A good abstract should address the five following questions in the relevant sections:

    1. "Why did you start?" – Introduction or background


    You should summarise, preferably in one sentence, the current knowledge, or state-of-the-art,
    specifically in relation to the work you are presenting.

    2. "What did you try to do?" – Aims and objectives


    Here, you should state the aim of the study, and ideally include a short statement of the
    study's hypothesis. A legitimate scientific study is not done "to prove that something is true"
    but rather "to find out whether it is true." The difference may seem small, but it makes a huge
    difference. A formal hypothesis shows that you were objective.

    3. "What did you do?" – Methods


    In an abstract, the description of the methods has to be concise, and much of the details of
    what was done must be omitted. However, in a few short sentences, you can give the reader a
    good idea of the design of the study, the context in which it was done, and the types of
    patients or measurements that were included.

    4. "What did you find?" – Results


    It is important to give the main results of the study, not just in subjective terms ("We found
    device X to be superior to device Y") but also in the form of some real data. You will need to
    choose which findings to report here: it should be the most important data in your study, and
    the findings on which your conclusions will be based. Do not include a table or figure unless
    you need it to show your results.

    5. "What does it mean?" – Conclusions


    Here, space limitations generally limit you to a single sentence of why you think your
    findings are important, and their potential implications. Keep your conclusions reasonable and
    supportable by the findings of your study. Remember that if your study was restricted to
    certain patients, or a particular therapy, or a specific device, its results may not extend beyond
    these restrictions.

    Some general advice for writing abstracts

    Follow the instructions


    However good your study was, it deserves the best possible chance for review and
    presentation. This means that you should follow the published guidelines for submission to
    the ERS Congress.
    Use simple sentences
    Unless they are basic, universally accepted abbreviations, like ARDS or FEV1, acronyms and
    abbreviations should be spelled out the first time they are used in the abstract. Similarly, local
    expressions and jargon should be kept out of the abstract. Keep in mind that healthcare
    practice varies from country to country.

    Ask your colleagues


    Before the abstract is submitted, it should be double-checked for accuracy, not only of the
    data reported but of the description of the methods and all other details.
    Tables and figures should be checked especially carefully.
    Having one or more colleagues (who were not involved in the study) read the abstract and
    offer constructive criticism can be extremely helpful.

    You might also like