Directions: The New Ada/Aba
Directions: The New Ada/Aba
Directions: The New Ada/Aba
ADADirections
At long last, a new direction for the ADA Guidelines
The Function
. . .or maybe its functionality. This is a much more functional document than ADAAG. You can go easily from scoping for signs to the technical requirements for signs. An Occasional Newsletter Fall 2010
The Form
Yes, form should follow function, but in the new ADA/ABA, the form almost becomes the function.
Lots of added detail about typestyles and spacing add quality to raised text.
Communications Subcommittee of the George W Bush, there were few ADAAG Advisory Committee appointed substantive suggestions for revisions to the signage section. The new appointees to the Access Board did trigger changes to the document, but they came, in terms of signage, in the form of condensation. A very long signage section that dealt with each aspect of accessible signage in step-by-step detail, became much shorter. Although the intent remained the same, a significant amount of clarity was lost, in my opinion. during the Clinton administration to make the first major revision of ADAAG, which went into effect in 1992, added scoping to the Standard, but other requirements suggested by some of the Working Groups were shot down before they ever reached the full Committee, or were eliminated by the Committee itself in the final version. During the two public hearings that took place prior to the presidential election that ushered in the regime of
Access Communications 2386 East Artesia Blvd Long Beach CA 90805 accesscomm@earthlink.net http://www.4adasigns.com
FROM
THE
EDITOR
I can remember very well the enthusiasm and hope with which I began the series of newsletters I called ADA Directions back in the early days of the ADA. The intervening eighteen years has shown me how naive I was. I saw accessible signage as an easy and inexpensive way for businesses and public agencies to demonstrate, in the most visible way, that they believed in access for all and were starting out immediately on the path to barrier removal. I was ready to show owners how they could communicate that they had plans to remove barriers as time, money and architectural realities allowed, and that, in the meantime, they were ready to provide as much access as possible. They could get that message not only to those with vision impairments who needed to find destinations in their facilities, but with people who had all kinds of disabilities Alas, I found that many others did not see it that way. However, there are plenty of unsung heros out there who have kept the faith and now, we have a new chance to convince the public that the ADA rules are not as impenetrable as they think. Perhaps this new format will be easier for everyone to understand. Thats certainly what everyone who worked so hard on it over a period of more than 10 years had in mind! In the meantime, let me explain some of my pet peeves from ADAAG and Title 24 to you, and lets get this new show on the road.
concise, simple and consistent directional signs to help those who cannot easily ask for directions or understand or hear the answers? How about a consistent use of pictograms for restrooms, vertical access and information desks for those with limited reading skills. As you specify signs, think about the last large facility you visited for the first time. Could you have found your way unassisted if you could not speak or hear?
Sharon Toji
Staff alone on a tactile sign doesnt really tell us anything, because we have staff workrooms, staff lounges and lunchrooms, and even staff entrances. The same goes for Faculty. And we only gum up the works when we lengthen the sign out to say Womens Restroom, and so on. Its all too easy for a blind person to quickly just read restroom and mistake the facility for a single user room. Even sighted people in a hurry have been known to rush into the So how about taking just a little bit of wrong facility when the word restroom is added. Lets keep it that money we spend on hundreds of simple and consistent and make life unnecessary wheelchair symbols easier for everyone to take that and tactile text on directionals and throw in a few really well thought out, bathroom break. (Oops -- is there really a bathtub in there?)
Access Communications 2386 East Artesia Blvd Long Beach CA 90805 accesscomm@earthlink.net http://www.4adasigns.com
(continued from page one) braille is domed or rounded, and they dont add unnecessary uppercase indicators to braille. They already make tactile exit signs available. For these companies, where tactile signs are concerned, most of the changes will be in installation. The emphasis is no longer on placing signs exactly 60 inches on center, but on placing them so that the tactile information is reachable by the majority of blind readers. Good practice will mean that some facilities may have signs placed lower than others, since those sign readers may be shorter in stature, or use wheelchairs or walkers. Another long-awaited installation exception will allow some tactile signs to be placed on doors. This exception will chiefly benefit hotels and apartment buildings, and it may also solve some problems in older buildings with limited room for sign installation.
distance is for reading the signs. The distance is based on barriers. Although its not stated, and therefore is not per code, designers would be wise to consider the possibility of movable barriers and not just those that are fixed. The point is to consider how close sign readers can realistically get to signs in order to read them.
that easier, since everything follows in a logical order. Unfortunately, many state building codes are not so well organized. Californias seems to be an impenetrable tangle, because it is organized on the basis of occupancies, so scoping is scattered.
The original ADAAG gave short shrift to visual signs, with only a vague indicator of character size based on a requirement for 3 inch high characters well, particularly in parking garages. for signs 80 inches or more above the If you are interested in other finish floor or ground. elements to aid those who are blind and visually impaired in their use of That left everyone free to ignore architectural facilities, you will have appropriate sign text for other visual signs. In the new document, there is a to search other places as well, for items such as ATM requirements and table that lays out appropriate sizes detectable warning surfaces. Howfor signs based on on high they are ever, the new format makes all of placed on walls, and what the
If jobs are still in the design stage, you might see if there is any interest in installing the signs according to the new code, and if the inspectors will You may be surprised to see just how allow that. Better placement alone few signs are scoped out in Section will provide more accessibility for 200, especially if you are in California, many users. where schools are loaded with Access Board: http://www.accessSymbols of Accessibility every few board.gov/ feet. There are new exceptions as DOJ: http://www.ada.gov/
Access Communications 2386 East Artesia Blvd Long Beach CA 90805 accesscomm@earthlink.net http://www.4adasigns.com
benefit from more information, so other terms were added after the initial word Exit. The International Code Council (ICC) has now also added tactile exit signs to the building code, and the new ADA/ABA Guidelines has them as well, although its just Exit, with nothing more. Their main function is to accompany illuminated or other large exit signs that identify exit doors. These can be final exit discharge doors, doors leading to exit corridors, or doors leading into exit stairwells. The idea behind the signs is to give equal access to those who cannot see the large visual signs, especially during emergencies.
Exit Route, that should accompany signs above doors leading from interior rooms to the final exit discharge or exit stair, or To Exit, for rare horizontal exits. Architects try to use these as directional signs, with tactile arrows, and place them along corridors. Of course there is usually a door nearby, and often it is not a door that leads to an exit. The sign appears to identify a door, when it really doesnt give any meaningful location, and could lead a person to seek fruitlessly in a large office or storage room for an exit door that does not exist. The tactile arrow does little good. One study showed that only 20 percent of blind people tested knew what a tactile arrow meant. Anyway, it only points to the next door. The arrow doesnt tell you how far to go to the actual exit. So, my last word is, use tactile exit signs only where they belong -- to identify marked exit doors.
Unfortunately, the California code requirements have created confusion Of course California seldom does anything by half, so the Committee at about the signs that could actually the State Fire Marshals that worked slow things down for people who are on the code was not content with the functionally blind, and endanger them during an emergency. Most of simple term Exit. It was decided the confusion comes from the terms that people who were blind would