Lean in Services
Lean in Services
Lean in Services
to 10 different operators in a call centre for technical support. We were surprised by the huge variation in processing times among the operators: the quickest one was about six times faster than the slowest. Further analysis revealed that some operators used simple computer shortcuts such as hot keys and macros to increase their speed. But the company had no training to improve performance, and no incentives to encourage operators to work more quickly.
satisfaction is costly as it may prompt customers to take their business elsewhere. Many service functions lack the ability to analyse and manage the factors that affect workforce productivity, such as exceptions and rework. In a manufacturing plant, targets for output and capacity utilisation are set and tracked, but most service organisations are unable to measure performance in these areas. Intermittent cost reduction efforts tend to use highlevel benchmarks, not process improvement, and sharing of best practices within companies is usually quite limited.
customer satisfaction is rarely seen in corporate service processes, but it can sharply improve overall productivity levels.
OLAF REHSE
PARTNER & MANAGING DIRECTOR, BCG, DUSSELDORF
DEVESH RAJ
PARTNER AND MANAGING DIRECTOR, BCG, NEW YORK
THINKSTOCK
Another typical observation with service processes is a variation of the 80-20 rule: a small percentage of work typically eats up a disproportionate amount of time. In one internal-support function, 75 per cent of the transactions took less than five minutes to process. But the remaining 25 per cent, the more complex transactions, accounted for 60 percent of the total time expended every day. Exceptions such as these can be a huge drain on productivity and are typical for many service processes. In healthcare, banking, travel, and other service industries, the customer is the product moving through the process and experiencing first-hand the frustrations of inefficiency. Satisfaction is critical, whether the customer is internal or external. And a lack of
as significant opportunities to improve performance. Look for hand-offs and steps that waste time or add no value, and analyse information flows to identify silos and roadblocks. Reduce complexity: Eliminate any variations, disruptions, rework or exceptions that slow the workflow. Remove any exceptions from the general process and have specialists handle them. This allows employees to work more quickly and productively, with fewer interruptions. Standardise discrete work modules: Break each process into discrete, repeatable pieces with distinct inputs and outputs. Each piece should be big enough to involve a meaningful amount
of labour and transaction volume but small enough to address the core complexity of the process. Then standardise these repeatable steps. Set and track performance metrics: Once process work has been broken down into discrete pieces, those pieces can be measured and set performance benchmarks. Then, managers can track the actual time spent on specific tasks, understand the drivers of productivity, and fine tune their operations for far greater efficiency and cost savings. Detailed data on how much time employees spend each day working and how productive they are at their tasks provide managers with a true measure of work force pro-
ductivity and utilisation. Harness the power of big data: Advances in computing power and processing speed allow companies to gather vast amounts of data and perform complex analytics. The resulting insights can minimise waste, lower costs, and sharply improve process performance. Cross-train to increase productivity: In some service functions, employees have uneven workloads at different times of the day, leading to periods of frenetic activity mixed with periods of downtime. Workers in the fastfood industry often share the workload by wearing different hats: taking customer orders, serving food, and so on. This sharing of duties to increase productivity and