Assignment Submission and Assessment
Assignment Submission and Assessment
Assignment Submission and Assessment
Your assignment should be prepared individually. You should not copy another persons assignment. You should also not plagiarise another persons work as your own. PENILAIAN / EVALUATION Tugasan ini menyumbang sehingga 40% daripada jumlah markah kursus berkenaan dan akan dinilai berdasarkan kepada Rubrik yang dilampirkan. / This assignment accounts for 40% of the total marks for the course and shall be assessed based on the Rubrics attached . Anda akan diberikan maklum balas tentang tugasan ini sebelum Peperiksaan Akhir Semester bermula. / You would be given feedback on the assignment before the Final Semester Examination commences. PLAGIARISME: POTONGAN MARKAH / PLAGIARISM: MARKS DEDUCTION Amaran: Tugasan yang diserahkan, secara automatik, akan disemak untuk menentukan kadar pertindihan. Jika plagiarisme dikesan, markah akan dipotong seperti berikut: / Warning: The submitted assignment will automatically undergo a similarity check. If plagiarism is detected, marks would be deducted as follows: Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 10 - 30%: potongan 20% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan antara 31 - 50%: potongan 40% daripada jumlah markah yang diperoleh. Tugasan dengan pertindihan kandungan lebih daripada 50%: Markah sifar akan diberikan. Assignments with 10 - 30 % overlap with others: 20% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with 31 - 50 % overlap with others: 40% deduction from the total marks scored. Assignments with more than 50% overlap with others: Zero mark would be given.
ASSIGNMENT QUESTION
PURPOSE The purpose of this assignment is to enhance leaners ability to evaluate companies efficiency in managing their assets and debts. REQUIREMENT Select any 2 listed companies of Bursa Malaysia from the Trading / Services sector and evaluate the companies asset management and leverage ratios using their financial statements for year 2011. _________________________________________________________________________
Weig ht
Low 0 No introduction was given. 1 Vague introduction of the companies that covers the companies names, year of establishment, company size, vision and mission of company and business activities. Able to identify some relevant ratios and provide correct formula but no explanation. Some relevant asset management ratios and leverage ratios for year 2011 were correctly computed but no workings were provided. No interpretation was given. Some relevant asset management ratios and leverage ratios for year 2011 were correctly computed but no workings were provided. No interpretation was given. Unable to identify the similarities and differences between
Fair 2 Clear but brief introduction of the companies that covers the companies names, year of establishment, company size, vision and mission of company and business activities. Able to identify some relevant ratios, provide correct formula but with brief explanation.
Above average 3 Clear and adequate introduction of the companies that covers the companies names, year of establishment, company size, vision and mission of company and business activities. Able to identify some relevant ratios, provide correct formula and adequate explanation.
Excellent 4 Clear and detailed introduction of the companies that covers the companies names, year of establishment, company size, vision and mission of company and business activities. Able to identify all relevant ratios, provide correct formula and detailed explanation.
Max Mark s
Explanation on Asset Management Ratio and Leverage Ratio. Compute and Interpret the Asset Management Ratio and Leverage Ratio for year 2011 (1st Company) Compute and Interpret the Asset Management Ratio and Leverage Ratio for year 2011 (2nd Company) Comparison of the companies asset
1.5
No identification of relevant ratios formula and explanation were given No calculation and interpretation were given.
Some relevant asset management ratios and leverage ratios for year 2011 were correctly computed and workings were provided. Poor interpretation and vague description were given. Some relevant asset management ratios and leverage ratios for year 2011 were correctly computed and workings were provided. Poor interpretation and vague description were given. Able to identify and explain clearly some of the similarities and differences
Most of the relevant asset management ratios and leverage ratios for year 2011 were correctly computed and workings were provided. Good interpretation and clear description were given. Most of the relevant asset management ratios and leverage ratios for year 2011 were correctly computed and workings were provided. Good interpretation and clear description were given. Able to identify and explain clearly some of the similarities and
All the relevant asset management ratios and leverage ratios for year 2011 were correctly computed and detailed workings were provided. Good and detailed interpretation and clear description were given. All the relevant asset management ratios and leverage ratios for year 2011 were correctly computed and detailed workings were provided. Good and detailed interpretation and clear description were given. Able to identify and explain clearly all the similarities and differences between the
2.5
10
the two companies in their asset management and debt financing. Unable to provide any relevant factors that influence the companies asset management efficiency and leverage. Irrelevant points were summarised.
between the two companies in their asset management and debt financing. Unable to provide relevant factors that influence the companies asset management efficiency and leverage. Some relevant key points were summarised but were incoherent.
differences between the two companies in their asset management and debt financing. Able to provide relevant factors that influence the companies asset management efficiency and leverage. Some relevant key points were clearly summarised, and written in a precise and coherent manner.
two companies in their asset management and debt financing. Able to provide relevant factors that influence the companies asset management efficiency and leverage.
Summary 1 Total 10
All relevant key points were clearly summarised and written in a precise and coherent manner.
4 40