Supernormal by Dean Radin
Supernormal by Dean Radin
Supernormal by Dean Radin
Published in the United States by Deepak Chopra Books, an imprint of the Crown
Publishing Group, a division of Random House, Inc., New York.
www.crownpublishing.com
DEEPAK CHOPRA BOOKS and colophon are trademarks of Random House, Inc.
ISBN 978-0-307-98690-0
eISBN 978-0-307-98691-7
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
First Edition
Foreword
The strange thing about the paranormal— or the supernatural, the mi-
raculous, and all other synonyms—is that no matter how often you
prove it, it remains unproven. There have been hundreds of studies
on clairvoyance and viewing at a distance, arising from age-old ex-
perience. Invariably, as Dean Radin patiently explains in this book,
the experiments indicate that the experience of reading someone else’s
thoughts, seeing a faraway event, or anticipating the future is real.
Ever since science demolished faith as a way of knowing reality, facts
are supposedly supreme, and when the same fact is repeatedly shown
to be true, that is enough to change accepted reality. So why, in this
case, have facts proved helpless?
The answer is complex, subtle, and yet as common as any in-
grained prejudice. Facts don’t change minds as often as they confirm
what the mind insists on believing. Therefore, the path from faith to
facts is much more fragile than we like to think, and along the way are
crouching adversaries—hidebound beliefs, stubborn biases, ad homi-
nem attackers, skeptics who know in advance that X cannot be true,
and the most elusive of adversaries, collective consciousness. Mass
opinion can stop an unwelcome fact in its tracks, which has happened
for centuries when miracles, wonders, magic, and the paranormal
have been too uncomfortable to confront. Behind the cliché that you
create your own reality there is a shadow: If you don’t create your own
reality, it will be created for you.
xi
generally realize, and some of those choices add greater power to the
mind, increase the potential for uncovering greater insight, and even-
tually turn the cliché of “You can create your own reality” into a living
experience. Radin doesn’t proselytize about which version of reality
anyone should choose, but in his evenhanded way he is also insistent
that some realities that seem outlandish to science, such as the reality
where a person can levitate, are not ridiculous, superstitious, or igno-
rant. Hundreds of observers have recorded in private diaries, public
statements, and sworn oaths that they saw Joseph of Cupertino levitate
(among the many levitating Catholic saints, this seventeenth-century
figure was alive almost fifty years after the death of Shakespeare), and
Radin makes note of it without apology or second-guessing.
Yet this book isn’t a wonder-working checklist from the past. It
goes beyond the worldview in which miracles are unquestioned and
the opposing worldview, in which miracles are preposterous, to fi nd
reconciliation. To some extent, the judgment of Solomon is involved—
both sides have something to say and something to learn from each
other. (Reconciliation was on Einstein’s mind when he made his fa-
mous comment, “Science without religion is lame, religion without
science is blind.”) Clearly that’s not good enough, because reality
stares us in the face, and we must relate to its actuality. Endless argu-
ments over how to model reality—for science and religion are merely
models—are digressions.
With that in mind, Radin doesn’t lose sight of the radical mystery
that reality poses, not just to mystics but to hard-nosed realists among
the quantum pioneers. In the book’s closing pages, two stark state-
ments of fact are quoted. The first comes from Max Planck, who origi-
nated the quantum revolution:
xiv
Planck felt that he was stating a fact that couldn’t be evaded (which
turned out to be a poor prediction of how powerful evasion can be).
Since Patanjali and all the Vedic seers espoused consciousness-based
reality, Radin has subtly turned the tables. It’s not yoga’s job to prove
that consciousness is the foundation of all experience; it’s science’s job
to prove that it isn’t. Such proof is far from forthcoming. But Radin
optimistically points out that a new generation of scientists, less liable
to grind their teeth, is steadily coming to terms with consciousness as
a factor that cannot be set aside, evaded, wished away, or treated with
contempt.
To support his optimism, Radin quotes another quantum pioneer,
Wolfgang Pauli: “It is my personal opinion that in the science of the
future reality will neither be ‘psychic’ nor ‘physical’ but somehow
both and somehow neither.” In other words, the issue is not either/
or, but both/and, a point that this book emphatically declares. To take
consciousness seriously is a step in the evolution of science, one that
extends the “spooky” nature of the quantum world. Spookiness isn’t
going away; neither are the world’s wisdom traditions. Two camps of
visionaries, from the distant past and the fringes of the present, are
advancing on us. Their message is about the conscious evolution of
humanity, and as this perceptive book shows, when the two camps of
visionaries merge, nothing will ever be the same.
xv
Introduction
Begin at the beginning and go on till you come to the end; then stop.
—Lewis Carroll
If it’s too touchy to ask such questions about religious icons, then
we may consider a more contemporary figure: The Dalai Lama regu-
larly hosts discussions between scientists and Buddhist monks. Do the
Western scientists who compete for a coveted slot at those meetings
secretly believe that he’s a backward country bumpkin, and they’re
just humoring him long enough to get their photo taken with a fa-
mous Nobel laureate so they can post it on their Facebook page?
Given the glowing praise about those meetings in books and ar-
ticles authored by no-nonsense science journalists, and a growing list
of collaborators hailing from Harvard University, Stanford University,
the University of Zürich, the Max Planck Institute for Human Cogni-
tive and Brain Sciences, and many others, it doesn’t seem so. But the
Dalai Lama takes reincarnation and the legendary yogic superpowers
(the siddhis) seriously. He’s claimed to see some of them in action, like
oracles who accurately divine future tendencies.6 What does he know
that most Western-trained scientists studiously ignore? Could the su-
perpowers actually be real? If so, why haven’t we read about them in
science magazines?
Such questions have been debated by scholars and by ordinary
people for millennia. In modern times, for the most part science has ig-
nored or denigrated the mere possibility of superpowers because such
abilities are not easily accommodated by Western scientific assump-
tions about the capacities of the human mind. It is also sidestepped
because any answer offered is guaranteed to seriously annoy someone.
If you say yes, “Buddha was just a nice guy,” then Buddhists will hurl
epithets at you. They may do this in a kind and compassionate way,
but you will still have to duck. If you say no, “Buddha was something
more,” then you will have to dodge objects thrown with equal gusto
by both scientists and devotees of other religions. As a result, for the
sake of safety the question is usually left unanswered.
There will always be some who are not satisfied with this soft
deflection. Cynics feel intense discomfort when questions are raised
about the possibility of “something more.” They shout accusations
of voodoo science, and they form posses to stop what they regard
as ominous tides of irrationality from heading our way.7 Their con-
cerns, bristling on the edge of hysteria, are not without justification.
The promise of something secretly powerful, beyond the mundane,
has been responsible for untold scams, conspiracies, and witch hunts
throughout history. Civilization embraces superstitions and ignores
rationality at its peril, so a legitimate case can be made that strenuous
protection of hard-won knowledge is necessary.
But here’s the rub: It is precisely because civilization must ad-
vance beyond superstition that we are obliged to carefully explore our
inquiry about the existence of supernormal abilities. The answer is
relevant to basic scientific assumptions about the nature of human po-
tential, to the relationships among science, religion, and society, and
without hyperbole, to the likelihood that humankind will continue to
survive.
In addition, all the nervous fussing one hears about the need to
combat superstition, the wringing of hands about looming threats to
rationality—such behavior positively drips with emotion, and that
presents its own cause for concern. As British psychiatrist Anthony
Storr wrote in Feet of Clay: A Study of Gurus, “Whether a belief is con-
sidered to be a delusion or not depends partly upon the intensity with
which it is defended, and partly upon the numbers of people subscrib-
ing to it”(p. 199).8 When it comes to the possibility of superpowers,
many are energetically engaged in either strident offenses or frenzied
defenses, adding precious little reason to the debate.
But something new can now be brought to the discussion: em-
pirical evidence. Laboratory data amassed over many decades suggest
that some of what the yogis, mystics, saints, and shamans have claimed
is probably right. And that means some of today’s scientific assump-
tions are probably wrong.
If you can’t stomach the thought that what you’ve learned in school
might not be completely correct (in spite of the fact that textbooks are
regularly revised), then rest assured: This does not mean that all the
Does science really know nothing about the more exotic claims of
yoga? By the end of this book we’ll have discovered that Broad didn’t
dig deep enough. We actually do know a few things.
Escape to Reality
Many ancient teachings tell us that we have the capacity to gain ex-
traordinary powers through grit or grace. Techniques used to achieve
these supernormal abilities, known as siddhis in the yoga tradition
(from the Sanskrit, meaning “perfection”2, 5), include meditation, ec-
6
Yoga Superpowers
Classic yoga texts, such as Patanjali’s Yoga Sutras, written about two
thousand years ago, tell us in matter-of-fact terms that if you sit qui-
etly, pay close attention to your mind, and practice this diligently, then
you will gain supernormal powers.15–19 These advanced capacities are
not regarded as magical; they’re ordinary capacities that everyone pos-
sesses. We’re just too distracted most of the time to be able to access
them reliably.
The sage Patanjali also tells us that these siddhis can be obtained
by ingesting certain drugs, through contemplation of sacred symbols,
repetition of mantras, ascetic practices, or through a fortuitous birth.
In the yogic tradition, powers gained through use of mantras, amulets,
or drugs are not regarded with as much respect, or considered to be
as permanent, as those earned through dedicated meditative practice.5
The promise of these superpowers has little to do with traditional
religious faith, divine intervention, or supernatural miracles. As Bud-
dhist scholar Alan Wallace says,
Who’s Right?
Who’s more likely to be correct about the siddhis—the world’s wis-
dom traditions or today’s scientific orthodoxy? We will explore this
question not by recitation of amazing stories, or by analysis of reli-
gious arguments, or by examination of case reports (although we will
look at a few). Rather, we’ll concentrate on controlled experimental
evidence published in peer-reviewed scientific journals.
We will fi nd that the scientific method is so powerful in discern-
ing fact from fiction that a strong argument can be made in favor of
some genuine siddhis. This is an example where scientific evidence
trumps previously held assumptions, and it’s also a demonstration of
the power of science to pull itself up by its bootstraps and to change
from within.
This is not to say that this evidence has been warmly embraced.
All organized holders of knowledge, whether in scientific or religious
contexts, strenuously resist change. We will explore this resistance as
well, as it will help us understand why we are only vaguely aware of
our true potentials.
What’s Ahead
Our approach to this topic is summarized in Figure 1. It shows two
basic epistemologies, or ways in which we can know the world—the
mystical and the scientific. The mystical includes intuitive and non-
rational ways of knowing, such as gut feelings, hunches, visions, and
dreams. The scientific involves rational knowing that manifests in
three primary forms: (1) empirical, including observation and mea-
surement; (2) theoretical, development of explanatory models; and
(3) debate, which includes the skeptical attitude and vigorous delibera-
tions that help maintain the vitality of scientific inquiry.
Figure 1 shows the mystical overlapping science because, like sci-
10
The gray spot in the center of Figure 1 is a place where all meth-
ods of knowing overlap. That’s the scintillating boundary between
the subjective and the objective, the mystical and the scientific. That’s
where we’re headed.
11