Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 103 views

    The Wisdom of Frédéric Bastiat

    Uploaded by

    Bob Weeks
    Bastiat discusses the proper role of government according to natural rights and outlines the dangers of "legal plunder", where the law takes property from some and gives it to others without their consent. He argues that through the law, government should only act to regularly provide for the common defense of individual rights to life, liberty, and property, and to prevent harm from others. However, when the law destroys people's liberty or property, or acts to benefit some citizens at the expense of others through "legal plunder", it oversteps its just powers and invites further injustice.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    The Wisdom of Frédéric Bastiat

    Uploaded by

    Bob Weeks
    103 views13 pages
    Bastiat discusses the proper role of government according to natural rights and outlines the dangers of "legal plunder", where the law takes property from some and gives it to others without their consent. He argues that through the law, government should only act to regularly provide for the common defense of individual rights to life, liberty, and property, and to prevent harm from others. However, when the law destroys people's liberty or property, or acts to benefit some citizens at the expense of others through "legal plunder", it oversteps its just powers and invites further injustice.

    Original Description:

    Presentation by Russell S. Sobel, Ph.D., Wichita, Kansas, July 11, 2013.

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Bastiat discusses the proper role of government according to natural rights and outlines the dangers of "legal plunder", where the law takes property from some and gives it to others without their consent. He argues that through the law, government should only act to regularly provide for the common defense of individual rights to life, liberty, and property, and to prevent harm from others. However, when the law destroys people's liberty or property, or acts to benefit some citizens at the expense of others through "legal plunder", it oversteps its just powers and invites further injustice.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    103 views13 pages

    The Wisdom of Frédéric Bastiat

    Uploaded by

    Bob Weeks
    Bastiat discusses the proper role of government according to natural rights and outlines the dangers of "legal plunder", where the law takes property from some and gives it to others without their consent. He argues that through the law, government should only act to regularly provide for the common defense of individual rights to life, liberty, and property, and to prevent harm from others. However, when the law destroys people's liberty or property, or acts to benefit some citizens at the expense of others through "legal plunder", it oversteps its just powers and invites further injustice.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    You are on page 1of 13

    The Wisdom of Frdric Bastiat

    Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else.

    (1801-1850)

    by Russell S. Sobel, Ph.D.

    Bastiat on Unintended Consequences: That Which is Seen, and That Which is Not Seen (1850)
    In the department of economy, an act, a habit, an institution, a law, gives birth not only to an effect, but to a series of effects. Of these effects, the first only is immediate; it manifests itself simultaneously with its cause - it is seen. The others unfold in succession - they are not seen: it is well for us, if they are foreseen. Between a good and a bad economist this constitutes the whole difference - the one takes account of the visible effect; the other takes account both of the effects which are seen, and also of those which it is necessary to foresee. Now this difference is enormous, for it almost always happens that when the immediate consequence is favourable, the ultimate consequences are fatal, and the converse. Hence it follows that the bad economist pursues a small present good, which will be followed by a great evil to come, while the true economist pursues a great good to come, - at the risk of a small present evil.

    Bastiat on Unintended Consequences: That Which is Seen, and That Which is Not Seen (1850)
    Good economists often hold policy positions that seem outrageous to some, but only because we see the unseen
    Examples Highlighting Unintended Consequences / Secondary Effects:
    Minimum Wages Environmental Regulations (Endangered Species Act) Drug War Airbags Obamacare Restrictions on Free Trade (Tariff and Quotas) example to come Government debt spending & monetary expansion

    Bastiat on Job Creation: The Broken Window Fallacy


    [Storyline: a shopkeeper, James B., has a window broken by his careless son] Suppose it cost six francs to repair the damage, and you say that the accident brings six francs to the glazier's trade - that it encourages that trade to the amount of six francs - I grant it; It is not seen that as our shopkeeper has spent six francs upon one thing, he cannot spend them upon another. It is not seen that if he had not had a window to replace, he would, perhaps, have replaced his old shoes, or added another book to his library...neither industry in general, nor the sum total of national labour, is affected, whether windows are broken or not. Now let us consider James B. himself. In the former supposition, that of the window being broken, he spends six francs, and has neither more nor less than he had before, the enjoyment of a window. In the second, where we suppose the window not to have been broken, he would have spent six francs on shoes, and would have had at the same time the enjoyment of a pair of shoes and of a window. Now, as James B. forms a part of society, we must come to the conclusion, that, taking it altogether, and making an estimate of its enjoyments and its labours, it has lost the value of the broken window.

    Bastiat on Job Creation: The Broken Window Fallacy


    Examples Highlighting Broken Window Fallacy:
    Cash for Clunkers Incentives for Economic Development Government Stimulus Spending

    Bastiat on Free Trade: The Candlemakers Petition (1845)


    A PETITION From the Manufacturers of Candles, Tapers, Lanterns, sticks, Street Lamps, Snuffers, and Extinguishers, and from Producers of Tallow, Oil, Resin, Alcohol, and Generally of Everything Connected with Lighting to the Honourable Members of the Chamber of Deputies. Gentlemen: We are suffering from the ruinous competition of a rival who apparently works under conditions so far superior to our own for the production of light that he is flooding the domestic market with it at an incredibly low price; for the moment he appears, our sales cease, all the consumers turn to him, and a branch of French industry whose ramifications are innumerable is all at once reduced to complete stagnation. This rival, which is none other than the sun, is waging war on us We ask you to be so good as to pass a law requiring the closing of all windows, dormers, skylights, inside and outside shutters, curtains, casements, bull's-eyes, deadlights, and blinds in short, all openings, holes, chinks, and fissures through which the light of the sun is wont to enter houses, to the detriment of the fair industries with which, we are proud to say, we have endowed the country, a country that cannot, without betraying ingratitude, abandon us today to so unequal a combat.

    Bastiat on Free Trade: The Candlemakers Petition (1845)


    My in Class Example (steel tariffs):
    Winners (those who gain) Candlemakers, etc. Losers (those who are harmed) Homeowners (consumers) Other job losses where money is now not spent (coffee shops, etc.) Windowmakers (port employees)

    Bastiat on Rights & The Role of Government: The Law


    1a) Natural Rights
    Life, faculties, productionin other words, individuality, liberty, propertythis is man. And in spite of the cunning of artful political leaders, these three gifts from God precede all human legislation, and are superior to it. Life, liberty, and property do not exist because men have made laws. On the contrary, it was the fact that life, liberty, and property existed beforehand that caused men to make laws in the first place. When law and force keep a man within the bounds of justice, they impose nothing upon him but a mere negation. They only oblige him to abstain from doing harm. They violate neither his personality, his liberty, nor his property. They only guard the personality, the liberty, the property of others. They hold themselves on the defensive; they defend the equal right of all. They fulfill a mission whose harmlessness is evident, whose utility is palpable, and whose legitimacy is not to be disputed.

    1b) Negative & Positive Rights

    But when the law, through the medium of its necessary agentforceimposes a form of labor, a method or a subject of instruction, a creed, or a worship, it is no longer negative; it acts positively upon men. It substitutes the will of the legislator for their own will, the initiative of the legislator for their own initiative.

    Bastiat on Rights & The Role of Government: The Law


    2) The Proper Role of Government
    If every man has the right of defending, even by force, his person, his liberty, and his property, a number of men have the right to combine together to extend, to organize a common force to provide regularly for this defense. Collective right, then, has its principle, its reason for existing, its lawfulness, in individual right; and the common force cannot rationally have any other end, or any other mission, than that of the isolated forces for which it is substituted. Thus, as the force of an individual cannot lawfully touch the person, the liberty, or the property of another individualfor the same reason, the common force cannot lawfully be used to destroy the person, the liberty, or the property of individuals or of classes. Nothing, therefore, can be more evident than this: The law is the organization of the natural right of lawful defense; it is the substitution of collective for individual forces, for the purpose of acting in the sphere in which they have a right to act, of doing what they have a right to do, to secure persons, liberties, and properties, and to maintain each in its right, so as to cause justice to reign over all.

    Bastiat on Rights & The Role of Government: The Law


    3) Legal Plunder
    But how is it to be distinguished? Very easily. See whether the law takes from some persons that which belongs to them, to give to others what does not belong to them. See whether the law performs, for the profit of one citizen, and, to the injury of others, an act that this citizen cannot perform without committing a crime. Abolish this law without delay; it is not merely an iniquityit is a fertile source of iniquities, for it invites reprisals; and if you do not take care, the exceptional case will extend, multiply, and become systematic. No doubt the party benefited will exclaim loudly; he will assert his acquired rights. He will say that the State is bound to protect and encourage his industry; he will plead that it is a good thing for the State to be enriched, that it may spend the more, and thus shower down salaries upon the poor workmen. Take care not to listen to this sophistry, for it is just by the systematizing of these arguments that legal plunder becomes systematized.

    Bastiat on Rights & The Role of Government: The Law


    3) Legal Plunder
    Man can only derive life and enjoyment from a perpetual search and appropriation; that is, from a perpetual application of his faculties to objects, or from labor. This is the origin of property. But also he may live and enjoy, by seizing and appropriating the productions of the faculties of his fellow men. This is the origin of plunder. Now, labor being in itself a pain, and man being naturally inclined to avoid pain, it follows, and history proves it, that wherever plunder is less burdensome than labor, it prevails; and neither religion nor morality can, in this case, prevent it from prevailing. When does plunder cease, then? When it becomes more burdensome and more dangerous than labor. When, therefore, plunder is organized by law, for the profit of those who perpetrate it, all the plundered classes tend, either by peaceful or revolutionary means, to enter in some way into the manufacturing of laws. These classes, according to the degree of enlightenment at which they have arrived, may propose to themselves two very different ends, when they thus attempt the attainment of their political rights; either they may wish to put an end to lawful plunder, or they may desire to take part in it.

    Bastiat on Rights & The Role of Government: The Law


    3) Legal Plunder
    It is absolutely necessary that this question of legal plunder should be determined, and there are only three solutions of it:
    1. When the few plunder the many. 2. When everybody plunders everybody else. 3. When nobody plunders anybody.

    Partial plunder, universal plunder, absence of plunder, amongst these we have to make our choice. The law can only produce one of these results. And this is what has taken place. The delusion of the day is to enrich all classes at the expense of each other; it is to generalize plunder under pretense of organizing it. Now, legal plunder may be exercised in an infinite multitude of ways. Hence come an infinite multitude of plans for organization; tariffs, protection, perquisites, gratuities, encouragements, progressive taxation, free public education, right to work, right to profit, right to wages, right to assistance, right to instruments of labor, gratuity of credit, etc., etc. And it is all these plans, taken as a whole, with what they have in common, legal plunder, that takes the name of socialism.

    The Wisdom of Frdric Bastiat

    by Russell S. Sobel, Ph.D.

    You might also like