No Load and Blocked Rotor Test
No Load and Blocked Rotor Test
No Load and Blocked Rotor Test
The slip of the induction motor at no-load is very low. Thus, the
value of the equivalent resistance
in the rotor branch of the equivalent circuit is very high. The no-load rotor
current is then negligible and the rotor branch of the equivalent circuit can
be neglected. The approximate equivalent circuit for the no-load test
becomes
Induction machine
equivalent circuit for
no-load test
Note that the series resistance in the no-load test equivalent circuit is not
simply the stator winding resistance. The no-load rotational losses
(windage, friction, and core losses) will also be seen in the no-load
measurement. This is why the additional measurement of the DC
resistance of the stator windings is required. Given that the rotor current
is negligible under no-load conditions, the rotor copper losses are also
negligible. Thus, the input power measured in the no-load test is equal to
the stator copper losses plus the rotational losses.
Note that the values of Xl1 and Xm1 are not uniquely determined by the no-
load test data alone (unlike the transformer no-load test). The value of the
stator leakage reactance can be determined from the blocked rotor test. The
value of the magnetizing reactance can then be determined.
The slip for the blocked rotor test is unity since the rotor is stationary.
The resulting speed-dependent equivalent resistance
goes to zero and the resistance of the rotor branch of the equivalent circuit
becomes very small. Thus, the rotor current is much larger than current in
the excitation branch of the circuit such that the excitation branch can be
neglected.
The resulting equivalent circuit for the blocked rotor test is shown in the
figure below.
Induction machine
equivalent circuit for
blocked rotor test
The ratio of the blocked rotor voltage and current equals the blocked rotor
impedance.
Note that this reactance is that for which the blocked rotor test is
performed. All reactances in the induction machine equivalent circuit are
those at the stator (line) frequency. Thus, all reactances computed based
on the blocked rotor test frequency must be scaled according to relative
frequencies (usually, a factor of 4 since TBR is usually 0.25TNL). The actual
distribution of the total leakage reactance between the stator and the rotor
is typically unknown but empirical equations for different classes of motors
(squirrel-cage motors) can be used to determine the values of Xl1 and Xl2N.
The following is a description of the four different classes of squirrel-cage
motors.
Class A Squirrel-Cage Induction Motor - characterized by normal
starting torque, high starting current, low operating slip, low rotor
impedance, good operating characteristics at the expense of high starting
current, common applications include fans, blowers, and pumps.
Using these empirical formulas, the values of Xl1 and Xl2N can be determined
from the calculation of XBR from the blocked rotor test data. Given the
value of Xl1, the magnetization reactance can be determined according to
Example (No-Load/Blocked Rotor Tests)
Determine (a.) the no-load rotational loss (b.) the parameters of the
approximate equivalent circuit.
(a.)
(b.) The voltage at the input terminals of the per-phase equivalent circuit,
given the wye connected stator windings, is
The equivalent circuit for the induction motor is shown below.
The Thevenin voltage (open-circuit voltage) for the stator portion of the
equivalent circuit (to the left of the air gap) is
The Thevenin impedance (impedance seen after shorting V1) is
From the equivalent circuit, the total real power per phase that crosses the
air gap (the air gap power = Pair gap) and is delivered to the rotor is
The portion of the air gap power that is dissipated in the form of ohmic loss
(copper loss) in the rotor conductors is
The total mechanical power (Pmech) developed internal to the motor is equal
to the air gap power minus the ohmic losses in the rotor which gives
or
According to the previous equations, of the total power crossing the air gap,
the portion s goes to ohmic losses while the portion (1!s) goes to
mechanical power. Thus, the induction machine is an efficient machine
when operating at a low value of slip. Conversely, the induction machine
is a very inefficient machine when operating at a high value of slip. The
overall mechanical power is equal to the power delivered to the shaft of the
machine plus losses (windage, friction).
The mechanical power (W) is equal to torque (N-m) times angular
velocity (rad/s). Thus, we may write
where T is the torque and T is the angular velocity of the motor in radians
per second given by
Inserting this result into the equation relating torque and power gives
Inserting this result into the torque per phase equation gives
The input power is found using the input voltage and current at the stator.
The output power is the mechanical power delivered to the rotor minus the
total rotational losses.
The internal efficiency (0int) of the induction machine is defined as the ratio
of the output power to the air gap power which gives
The rotational losses are 1700W. Determine (a.) the starting current when
starting direct on full voltage (b.) the starting torque (c.) the full-load slip
(d.) the full-load current (e.) the ratio of starting current to full-load current
(f.) the full-load power factor (g.) the full-load torque (h.) the air-gap power
(i) the machine efficiency (j) the slip at which maximum torque is
developed (k.) the maximum torque
(d.) The full load current is found using the full-load slip. The input
impedance at start-up is modified to include the slip-dependent term.
(e.) The ratio of starting current to full-load current is
(g.)
(h.)
(i)
(j.)
(k.)
INDUCTION MOTOR STARTING