Accident Investigation

Oregon OSHA
Accident Investigation
Presented by the Public Education Section Oregon OSHA Department of Consumer and Business Services
1207-05
Oregon OSHA Public Education Mission:

We provide knowledge and tools to advance self-sufficiency in workplace safety and health Consultative Services: Offers no-cost on-site assistance to help Oregon employers recognize and correct safety and health problems Enforcement: Inspects places of employment for occupational safety and health rule violations and investigates complaints and accidents Public Education and Conferences: Presents educational opportunities to employers and employees on a variety of safety and health topics throughout the state Standards and Technical Resources: Develops, interprets, and provides technical advice on safety and health standards Publishes booklets, pamphlets, and other materials to assist in the implementation of safety and health rules Field Offices: Portland Salem Eugene Medford Bend Pendleton 503-229-5910 503-378-3274 541-686-7562 541-776-6030 541-388-6066 541-276-2353
Questions? Call us
Salem Central Office: Toll Free number in English: 800-922-2689 Toll Free number in Spanish: 800-843-8086 Web site: www.orosha.org
This material is for training use only
Introduction
The three primary tasks of the accident investigator are to gather useful information, analyze the facts surrounding the accident, and write the accident report. The intent of this workshop is to help you gain the basic skills necessary to conduct an effective accident investigation at your workplace. Only experience will give you the expertise to fine-tune those skills. Most of the information about conducting an accident investigation will come directly from the class as we discuss issues, answer basic questions and complete group activities. If you have prior experience in accident investigation, we hope you will participate actively so others may benefit from your valuable input. Ultimately, we want you to leave this workshop knowing how to conduct an accident investigation and properly complete an accident investigation report with confidence using our systematic approach.
Objectives
After attending this workshop you should be able to: 1. Describe the primary reasons for conducting an accident investigation. 2. Discuss employer responsibilities related to workplace accident investigations. 3. Conduct the six step accident investigation procedure
Form investigation teams

Team Leader Member Member Member _________________________ _________________________ _________________________ _________________________
Please Note: This material, or any other material used to inform employers of compliance requirements of Oregon OSHA standards through simplification of the regulations should not be considered a substitute for any provisions of the Oregon Safe Employment Act or for any standards issued by Oregon OSHA.
The basics
Whats the difference between an incident and an accident? _____________________________________________________ What two key conditions must exist before an accident occurs? H_______________ and E_________________
What causes the most accidents? Unpreventable acts. Only ________ % of all workplace accidents are thought to be unpreventable. Heart attacks and other events that could not have been known by the employer are examples of unpreventable acts. Employers may try to place most of their injuries into this category. They justify these beliefs with such comments as: "He just lifted the box wrong and strained his back. What could we do?" Unfortunately, they are excuses for not looking into the "root cause" of the injury. System failure. Safety management system failures account for at least _________ % of all workplace accidents. System failures refer to inadequate design or performance of safety programs that provide training, resources, enforcement, and supervision.
What is the difference between accident investigation and accident analysis? No-Fault Accident Analysis
If someone deliberately sets out to produce loss or injury, that is called a crime, not an accident. Yet _______________________________________________________________ many accident investigations get confused with criminal investigations Whenever the investigative procedures are used to place blame, an adversarial relationship is inevitable. The investigator wants to _______________________________________________________________ find out what actually happened while those involved are trying to be sure they are not going to be punished for their actions. The result is an inadequate investigation. (Kingsley Hendrick, Ludwig Benner,
Investigating Accidents with STEP, p 42. Marcel Dekker, Inc. 1987.)
The six-step process
Accident investigation is fact-finding not fault-finding.
What are the basic steps for conducting an accident investigation?

Gather information
Step 1 - _________________________________________
Secure the accident scene
Collect facts about what happened Step 2 - _________________________________________ Develop the sequence of events Step 3 - _________________________________________ Analyze the facts Determine the causes Step 4 - _________________________________________ Recommend improvements Step 5 - _________________________________________ Implement Solutions Write the report Step 6 - _________________________________________
The first two steps in the procedure help you gather accurate information about the accident.
Step 1: Secure the accident scene

Your primary goal in this step is to gather accident information that can give critical clues into the causes associated with the accident. To do that you must first secure the accident scene.
When is it appropriate to begin the investigation? _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ What are effective methods to secure an accident scene? _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________
Step 2: Collect facts about what happened

In this step, you will use various tools and techniques to collect pertinent facts about the accident to determine the: Direct cause of injury. Hazardous conditions and unsafe employee/management behaviors (surface causes) that produced the accident. System weaknesses (root causes) that produced the surface causes for the accident.
List methods to document the accident scene and collect facts about what happened. _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ What documents will you be interested in reviewing? Why? _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________
Interviewing
When is it best to interview? Why? ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Who should we interview? Why? ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________ Where should we conduct the interview? ______________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________
Cooperate, dont intimidate

What are effective interviewing techniques?
What should we say? _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ What should we do? _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ What should we not say? _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ What should we not do? _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________ _________________________________________
Why? ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ Why? ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ Why? ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ Why? ________________________ ________________________ ________________________ ________________________
Team Exercise: Cooperation is the Key

Purpose. Gaining as much information as possible about an accident is extremely important. Interviewing witnesses is both a science and an art, and can make the difference between a failed or a successful accident investigation. This exercise will help you gain a greater awareness of those interviewing techniques that will help ensure your success as an investigator. Remember, you must communicate a message of cooperation, not intimidation. Instructions. Your instructor will describe an accident. Your team and the instructor are located at the scene of the accident and your job now is to ask follow-up questions to gather information about the accident. Use the space below for your notes. _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________ _____________________________________________________________________________
The next two steps help you organize and analyze the information gathered so that you may accurately determine the surface and root causes.
Step 3: Develop the sequence of events

An accident is the final event in an accident process
In this step, we take the information gathered in step 2 to determine the events prior to, during, and after the accident. Once the events are clearly understood, we can then continue to examine each event for hazardous conditions and/or unsafe behaviors. Accident investigations to place blame may not place adequate emphasis on this step. But, developing the sequence of events is critical in the accident analysis process to fix the system.
Each event in the unplanned accident process identifies one:

Actor - Individual or object An actor initiates a change by performing or failing to perform an action. An actor may participate in the process or merely observe the process.
Action Behavior the actor accomplishes Actions may or may not be observable. An action may describe something that is done or not done.
Circle the actor and action.

1. Beverly slipped on a banana. _____________________________________________________ 2. As Beverly lay on the floor, a brick fell on her head . _____________________________________________________ 3. Sam discovered Beverly unconscious on the floor and immediately began initial first aid procedures. _____________________________________________________
Team Exercise: What happened next?

Use the information gathered about the accident your instructor described in the interview exercise to construct a sequence of events.
Instructions. Identify the events leading up to and including the injury event. Be sure that you include only one actor and one action in each event. Decide where you want to start the sequence, then merely ask, "What happened next?" Event __ _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Event __ _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Event __ _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Event __ _______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ Event __ _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Event __ _______________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________________ Event __ _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Event __ _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________ Event __ _______________________________________________________________________ ___________________________________________________________________________________
Step 4: Determine the causes

W. H. Heinrich's Domino Theory
"The occurrence of an injury invariably results from a completed sequence of factors, the last one of these being the accident itself. The accident in turn is invariably caused or permitted directly by the unsafe act of a person and/or a mechanical or physical hazard." (W.H. Heinrich, Industrial Accident Prevention, 1931)
Do you agree with this theory? Why or why not?
Multiple Cause Theory

Behind every accident there are many contributing factors, causes, and subcauses. These factors combine in a random fashion causing accidents. We must find the fundamental root causes and remove them to prevent a recurrence. (Dan Petersen, Safety Management: A Human Approach, ASSE , p. 10-11) What may be the cause(s) of the accident according to the multiple causation theory? _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ What might be the solutions to prevent the accident from recurring? _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________ What are the strengths of this approach? _________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________ Weaknesses? _________________________________________________________________________________ _________________________________________________________________________________
Weed out the causes of injuries and illnesses
Burns Cuts
Strains
Direct Causes of Injury/Illness
Surface Causes of the Accident
Lack of time
Fails to enforce
Inadequate training
No discipline procedures
Discipline not administered
No policy to involve employees
No inspection process
Inspections not done
Root Causes of the Accident
10
Steps in cause analysis

1. Analyze the injury event to identify and describe the direct cause of injury. Examples: Laceration to right forearm resulting from contact with rotating saw blade. Contusion from head striking against/impacting concrete floor..
2. Analyze events occurring just prior to the injury event to identify those conditions and behaviors that caused the injury (primary surface causes) for the accident. Examples: Event x. Unguarded saw blade. (condition or behavior?) Event x. Working at elevation without proper fall protection. (condition or behavior?)
3. Analyze conditions and behaviors to determine other specific conditions and behaviors (contributing surface causes) that contributed to the accident. Examples: Supervisor not performing weekly area safety inspection. (condition or behavior?) Fall protection equipment missing. (condition or behavior?)
4. Analyze each contributing condition and behavior to determine if weaknesses in carrying out safety policies, programs, plan, processes, procedures and practices (inadequate implementation) exist. Examples: Safety inspections are being conducted inconsistently. Safety is not being adequately addressed during new employee orientation.
5. Determine implementation flaws to determine the underlying design weaknesses. Examples: Inspection policy does not clearly specify responsibility by name or position. No fall protection training plan or process in place.
11
Exercise: Digging up the roots

1. Enter the direct cause of injury within the top rectangle below. 2. List one hazardous condition and unsafe behavior from the sequence of events your group developed. 3. Determine contributing surface causes for the hazardous condition and unsafe behavior. 4. Determine implementation and design root causes for contributing surface causes.
Direct Cause of Injury ________________________________ ________________________________
Hazardous Condition __________________________________ Contributing conditions __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________
Unsafe Behavior _________________________________ Contributing behaviors _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________
Design root causes __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________ __________________________________
Implementation root causes _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________ _________________________________
12
The last two steps will help you develop and propose solutions that correct hazards and design long-lasting system improvements.
Step 5: Recommend corrective actions & Improvements

The Hierarchy of Controls
1. Engineering Controls - Remove or reduce the hazard
Eliminates or reduces the severity of the hazard itself through initial design and redesign, enclosure, substitution, replacement and other engineering changes. Major strengths: Eliminates the hazard itself. Does not rely solely on human behavior for effectiveness. Major weakness: May not be feasible if controls present long-term financial hardship.
2. Management Controls - Remove or reduce the exposure

Reduce the duration, frequency, and severity of exposure to hazards primarily through (1) changes and work procedures and practices, and (2) scheduling, job rotation, breaks. Major weakness: Relies on (1) appropriate design and implementation of controls and (2) appropriate employee behavior.
3. Personal protective equipment (PPE) - Put up a barrier

Equipment for personal use that presents a barrier between worker and hazard. Major weakness: Relies on (1) appropriate design and implementation of controls (2) appropriate employee behavior.
Team Exercise: Recommending Corrective actions

Purpose: In this exercise youll develop and recommend immediate actions to correct the surface causes of an accident. Instructions. Using the hierarchy of control strategies as a guide, determine corrective actions that will eliminate or reduce one of the hazardous conditions or unsafe behaviors identified on page 12. Write your recommendation(s) below. Recommendation: ____________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________ _______________________________________________________________________________
13
Improvement strategies to fix the system
Make improvements to policies, programs, plans, processes, and procedures in one or more of the following elements of the safety and health management system: 1. Management Commitment 4. Hazard Identification/Control 2. Accountability 5. Incident/Accident Analysis 7. Evaluation 3. Employee Involvement 6. Training
Making system improvements might include some of the following: Writing a comprehensive safety and health plan that include all of the above elements.. Improving a safety policy so that it clearly establishes responsibility and accountability. Changing a training plan so that the use of checklists are taught. Revising purchasing policy to include safety considerations as well as cost. Changing the safety inspection process to include all supervisors and employees.
Team Exercise: Fix the systemnot the blame

Purpose: In this exercise youll develop and recommend one improvement to make sure the case study accident does not recur. Instructions. Develop and write a recommendation to improve one or more policies, plans, programs, processes, procedures, and practices identified as design weaknesses. Recommendation: _______________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________ ______________________________________________________________________________
14
Step 6: Write the report

The primary reason accident investigations fail to help eliminate similar accidents is that some report forms unfortunately address only correcting surface causes. Root causes are often ignored. Let's take a look at one format for ensuring an effective report.
SAMPLE ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION REPORT

Number _________ Date _________ ____________________________
Prepared by ________________________ SECTION I. BACKGROUND WHO
Victim: _________________________________________
Witnesses (1) ___________ Address ________________ Phone (H) _________ (W) ____________ Job Title ______________ Length of Service ______ Witnesses (2) ___________ Address ________________ Phone (H) _________ (W) ____________ Job Title ______________ Length of Service ______ WHEN Date _____________ Time of day _____________ Work shift __________________ Date Accident Reported ____________ WHERE Department ________________ Location ____________________ Equipment _________
SECTION II. DESCRIPTION OF THE ACCIDENT PROCESS. (Describe the sequence of relevant events prior to, during, and immediately after the accident. Attach separate page if necessary) Events prior to: _____________________________________________________________________ Injury event: _____________________________________________________________________ Events after: _____________________________________________________________________ SECTION III. FINDINGS AND JUSTIFICATIONS. (Attach separate page if necessary) Surface Cause(s) (Unsafe conditions and/or behaviors at any level of the organization) ___________________________________________________________________________ Justification: (Describe evidence or proof that substantiates your finding.) ___________________________________________________________________________ Root Cause(s) (Missing/inadequate Programs, Plans, Policies, Processes, Procedures) ___________________________________________________________________________ Justification: (Describe evidence or proof that substantiates your finding.) ___________________________________________________________________________
15
SECTION IV. RECOMMENDATIONS AND RESULTS (Attach separate page if necessary) Corrective actions. (To eliminate or reduce the hazardous conditions/unsafe behaviors that directly caused the accident) ___________________________________________________________________________ Results. (Describe the intended results and positive impact of the change.) ___________________________________________________________________________ System improvements. (To revise and improve the programs, plans, policies, processes, and procedures that indirectly caused/allowed the hazardous conditions/unsafe behaviors.) ___________________________________________________________________________ Results. (Describe the intended results and positive impact of the change.) ___________________________________________________________________________ SECTION V: SUMMARY (Estimate costs of accident. Required investment and future benefits of corrective actions) ___________________________________________________________________________ SECTION VI: REVIEW AND FOLLOW-UP ACTIONS: (Describe equipment/machinery repaired, training conducted, etc. Describe system components developed/revised. Indicate persons responsible for monitoring quality of the change. Indicate review official.) Corrective Actions Taken: ______________________________ ______________________________ System improvements made: ______________________________ ______________________________ Responsible Individual: ______________________ ______________________ Responsible Individual: ______________________ ______________________ Date Closed: ____________ ____________ Date Closed: ____________ ____________
Person(s) monitoring status of follow-up actions: ________________________________ Reviewed by ___________________ Title __________________ Date ____________ Department ___________
SECTION VII: ATTACHMENTS: (Photos, sketches, interview notes, etc.)
The report is an open document until all actions are complete!

When the accident investigator completes the report, he or she will give it to someone who must do something with it. Thats the job of the decision-maker. For accident investigation to be effective, management must consider the findings and develop an action plan for taking corrective action and making system improvements. Finally, periodic evaluation of the quality of accident investigation and report is critical to maintaining an effective program.
16
Reference Materials
17
18
2007 Average Cost For Disabling Claims (Partial List)
Event or Exposure Leading to Injury (Partial list) 1. Overexertion 2. Bodily reaction 3. Fall on same level 4. Struck by an object 5. Repetitive Motion 6. Fall to lower level 7. Struck against an object 8. Caught in equipment 9. Highway accident 10. Assaults by person(s)
CLAIMS CLOSED 6015 3126 2755 2376 1856 1668 995 993 698 377
AVERAGE COST($) $19,130 $16,780 $17,740 $14,650 $22,190 $29,700 $11,150 $16,830 $22,410 $16,970
Ergonomic injuries (sprains, strains & tears) total 47.5% of all accepted disabling claims
19
Accident Investigation Checklist

Notification
_______ _______ _______ Time and date of accident Time and date of notification Time and date of arrival on site
Other Party
_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Instructions Experience in industry Experience in job Supervision Training Knowledge of rules Familiarity with equip
Documenting the Accident Scene

_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Observation notes Sketches/diagrams Measurements Photos/videotape Records/review
Worksite Equipment/Machinery
_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ General condition Make and model number Manufacturers information Maintenance information Suitability of equipment Layout of operation
Worker Identification
_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Name Age Home address and phone Occupation Experience Training in this job Familiarity with equipment How supervised PPE used Mental/physical disabilities Nature of injuries
Worksite Environment
_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ General condition Lighting Ventilation Wind Temperature Weather conditions Terrain Noise
Supervision
_______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ _______ Name Age Experience as supervisor Experience in job worker was doing Personal knowledge of worker Method of supervision Knowledge of rules How accident happened How accident could have been prevented Supervisors direction from management
Persons With Information

_______ _______ _______ _______ Name Work and residence address Recollection of accident Hearsay
Employer
_______ _______ Name and address of office Condition of company safety Program
First Aid
_______ _______ _______ Were services available? Was treatment given? Name of first aid attendent
20
SUMMARY OF RULES RELATED TO ACCIDENT INVESTIGATION

437-001-0052 Reporting an Occupational Fatality, Catastrophe, or Accident.
Employers shall inform the Administrator (or designee) of all fatalities or catastrophes within 8 hours, and accidents or injuries resulting in a hospital admission with medical treatment other than first aid within 24 hours after the employer receives notification.
437-001-0053 Preserving Physical Evidence at the Scene of an Accident.

(1) Employers, their representatives, or others shall not disturb the scene of a fatality or catastrophe other than to conduct the rescue of injured persons or mitigate an imminent danger until authorized by the Administrator (or designee), or directed by a recognized law enforcement agency. (2) In order to preserve physical evidence at the scene of a fatality or catastrophe, the Administrator is authorized to limit the number of employer representatives or employee representatives accompanying the compliance officer during the documentation of the scene. The employer representative and employee representative must be provided an opportunity to document the scene prior to disturbance or removal of physical evidence. (3) If an employer, their representative or others disturb the scene of a fatality or catastrophe other than to conduct the rescue of injured person(s) or mitigate an imminent danger before authorized by the Administrator or directed by a recognized law enforcement agency, a minimum penalty of $200 may be assessed.
437-001-0170 Determination of Penalty - Failure to Report an Occupational Fatality, Catastrophe, or Accident.

Failure to report an occupational fatality, catastrophe, or accident: a penalty of not less than $250, nor more than $7,000 shall be assessed.
OAR 437-001-0765 (8) Accident investigation.

The safety committee must evaluate all accident and incident investigations and make recommendations for ways to prevent similar events from occurring.
OAR 437-001-0760 (3) Investigations of Injuries.

Each employer shall investigate or cause to be investigated every lost time injury. The employer shall promptly install any safeguard or take any corrective measure indicated or found advisable. At the request of Oregon OSHA: Furnish all pertinent evidence and names of known witnesses to an accident. Give general assistance in producing complete information which might be used in preventing a recurrence of such accident. Preserve and mark for identification, materials, tools, or equipment necessary to the proper investigation of an accident.
21
At what point does the analysis stop?

Excerpt - CPL 2.113 - Fatality Inspection Procedures
H. FATALITY/CATASTROPHE INVESTIGATIONS 2. Fatalities and catastrophes shall be thoroughly investigated to attempt to determine the cause of the events, whether a violation of OSHA safety or health standards related to the accident has occurred and any effect the standard violation has had on the occurrence of the accident. J. POTENTIAL CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIONS 1. Section 17(e) of the Act provides criminal penalties for an employer who is convicted of having willfully violated an OSHA standard, rule or order when the violation caused the death of an employee. 2. Early in investigations the Area Director shall make an initial determination whether there is potential for a criminal violation, based on the following criteria. a. A fatality has occurred. b. There is evidence that an OSHA standard has been violated and that the violation contributed to the death. c. There is reason to believe that the employer was aware of the requirement of the standard and knew it was in violation of the standard. N. PRE-CITATION REVIEW 1. The Area Director or Assistant Area Director shall review all fatality/catastrophe investigation case files to ensure that the case has been properly developed in accordance with the Assistant Secretary's memo of March 24, 1995, "Enforcement Litigation Strategy", and in particular, Section III.B, titled "Case Selection and Development for Litigation."
__________________________________________________________________________________ OR-OSHA investigators found that the employer violated safety standards related to employee training and emergency evacuation procedures. Specifically:
Some maintenance electricians in the melting plant were not adequately trained in the proper safe adjustment procedures for the electronic flow sensors installed in the cooling water system. The employer had installed electronic flow sensors approximately 18 months earlier, to replace mechanical switches with a history of malfunctions. Ten of the plants 13 licensed electricians had received training on the new sensors, but the remaining three including the individual who happened to respond when the furnace shut down during the night of the explosion had not. Proposed penalty: $5,000.
Employees working in the melting department who are responsible for setting up or operating the remelt furnaces were not adequately trained for safe operation of the furnaces. While the employers own safety and health procedures require that all employees newly assigned to a department receive very detailed safety training relating to the department and their specific duties, none of the melting plant personnel at the time of the explosion had ever received the training. Proposed penalty: $5,000.
Exits were not maintained free of obstructions or impediments to full instant use in the event of an emergency. When the explosion occurred, employees used designated evacuation routes to leave the facility. A gate in a cyclone fence that blocked one of those routes was locked, so that two employees had to climb the fence. Proposed penalty: $1,500.
22
Fix The System Incident/Accident Analysis Plan

1.0 General Policy
____________________ considers employees to be our most valued asset and as such we will ensure that all incident and accidents are analyzed to correct the hazardous conditions, unsafe practices, and improve related system weaknesses that produced them. This incident/accident analysis plan has been developed to ensure our policy is effectively implemented. ____________________ will ensure this plan is communicated, maintained and updated as appropriate.
2.0 Incident/Accident Reporting

2.1 Background. We cant analyze incidents and accidents if they are not reported. A common reason that they go unreported is that the incident/accident analysis process is perceived to be a search for the guilty party rather than a search for the facts. We agree with current research that indicates most accidents are ultimately caused by missing or inadequate system weaknesses. Management will assume responsibility for improving these system weaknesses. When we handle incident/accident analysis as a search for facts, the all employees are more likely to work together to report incidents/accidents and to correct deficiencies, be they procedural, training, human error, managerial, or other. Consequently, our policy is to analyze accidents to primarily determine how we can fix the system. We will not investigate accidents to determine liability. A no-fault incident/accident analysis policy will help ensure we improve all aspects of our manufacturing process. 2.2 Policy. All employees will report immediately to their supervisor, any unusual or out of the ordinary condition or behavior at any level of the organization that has or could cause an injury or illness of any kind. Supervisors will recognize employees immediately when an employee reports an injury or a hazard that could cause serious physical harm or fatality, or could result in production downtime. (See recognition program procedures) 2.3 _____________________ will ensure effective reporting procedures are developed so that we can quickly eliminate or reduce hazardous conditions, unsafe practices, and system weaknesses.
3.0 Preplanning.
Effective incident/accident analysis starts before the event occurs by establishing a well thought-out incident/accident analysis process. Preplanning is crucial to ensure accurate information is obtained before it is lost over time following the incident/accident as a result of cleanup efforts or possible blurring of peoples recollections.
4.0 Incident/Accident Analysis.

4.1 All supervisors are assigned the responsibility for analyzing incidents in their departments. All supervisors will be familiar with this plan and properly trained in analysis procedures. 4.2 Each department supervisor will immediately analyze all incidents (near hits) that might have resulted in serious injury or fatality. Supervisors will analyze incidents that might have resulted in minor injury or property damage within 4 hours from notification. 4.3 The supervisor will complete and submit a written incident/minor injury report through management levels to the plant superintendent. If within the capability/authority of the supervisor, corrective actions will begin immediately to eliminate or reduce the hazardous condition or unsafe work practice the might result in injury or illness.
23
5.0 Management Responsibilities

5.1 When our company has an incident/accident such as a fire, release, or explosion emergency, management will: 1. Provide medical and other safety/health help to personnel; 2. Bring the incident under control, and 3. Investigate the incident effectively to preserve information and evidence. 5.2 To preserve relevant information the analyst will: 1. Secure or barricade the scene; 2. immediately collect transient information; 3. Interview personnel.
6.0 Incident/accident Analysis Team

6.1 Background. It is important to establish incident/accident analysis teams before an event occurs so that the team can quickly move into action if called on. The makeup of the team is another important factor affecting the quality of the analysis. We will appoint competent employees who are trained, and have the knowledge and skills necessary to conduct an effective analysis. Doing so will show managements commitment to the process. 6.2 Incident/Accident Analysis Team Makeup Although team membership may vary according to the type of incident, a typical team analyzing an incident/accident may include: 1. A third-line or higher supervisor from the section where the event occurred; 2. Personnel from an area not involved in the incident; 3. An engineering and/or maintenance supervisor; 4. The safety supervisor; 5. A first-line supervisor from the affected area; 6. Occupational health/environmental personnel; 7. Appropriate wage personnel (i.e., operators, mechanics, technicians); and, 8. Research and/or technical personnel.
Team member
Department
Shift ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
Phone _______________ _______________ _______________ _______________ _______________
_____________________________ ___________________________ _____________________________ ___________________________ _____________________________ ___________________________ _____________________________ ___________________________ _____________________________ ___________________________
24
6.3 The Incident/Accident Analysis Team Leader The incident/Accident Analysis team leader will: 1. Control the scope of team activities by identifying which lines of analysis should be pursued, referred to another group for study, or deferred; 2. Call and preside over meetings; 3. Assign tasks and establish timetables; 4. Ensure that no potentially useful data source is overlooked; and, 5. Keep site management advised of the progress of the analysis process.
7.0 Determining the Facts

A thorough search for the facts is an important step in incident/accident analysis. During the fact-finding phase of the process, team members will: 1. Visit the scene before the physical evidence is disturbed; 2. Sample unknown spills, vapors, residues, etc., noting conditions which may have affected the sample; (Be sure you sample using proper safety and health procedures) 3. Prepare visual aids, such as photographs, field sketches, missile maps, and other graphical representations with the objective of providing data for the analysis. 4. Obtain on-the-spot information from eyewitnesses, if possible. Interview with those directly involved and others whose input might be useful should be scheduled soon thereafter. The interviews should be conducted privately and individually; so that the comments of one witness will not influence the responses of others. 5. Observe key mechanical equipment as it is disassembled. Include as-built drawings, operating logs, recorder charts, previous reports, procedures, equipment manuals, oral instruction, change of design records, design data, records indicating the previous training and performance of the employees involved, computer simulations, laboratory tests, etc. 7. Determine which incident-related items should be preserved. When a preliminary analysis reveals that an item may have failed to operate correctly, was damaged, etc., arrangements should be made to either preserve the item or carefully document any subsequent repairs or modifications. 8. Carefully document the sources of information contained in the incident report. This will be valuable should it subsequently be determined that further study of the incident or potential incident is necessary.
8.0 Determining the Cause

It is critical to establish the root cause(s) of an incident/accident so that effective recommendations are made to correct the hazardous conditions and unsafe work practices, and make system improvements to prevent the incident from recurring. The incident/accident analysis team will use appropriate methods to sort out the facts, inferences, and judgments they assemble. Even when the cause of an incident appears obvious, the investigation team will still conduct a formal analysis to make sure any oversight, or a premature/erroneous judgment is not made. Below is one method to develop cause and effect relationships. 1. Develop the chronology (sequence) of events which occurred before, during, and after the incident. The focus of the chronology should be solely on what happened and what actions were taken. List alternatives when the status cannot be definitely established because of missing or contradictory information. 2. List conditions or circumstances which deviated from normal, no matter how insignificant they may seem. 3. List all hypotheses of the causes of the incident based on these deviations.
25
9.0 Recommending Corrective Actions and System Improvements

Usually, making recommendations for corrective actions and system improvements follow in a rather straightforward manner from the cause(s) that were determined. A recommendation for corrective action and system improvement will contain three parts: 1. The recommendation itself, which describes the actions and improvements to be taken to prevent a recurrence of the incident. 2. The name of the person(s) or position(s) responsible for accomplishing actions and improvements. 3. The correction date(s).
10.0 Follow-up System

To make sure follow-up and closure of open recommendations, ___________________ will develop and implement a system to track open recommendations and document actions taken to close out those recommendations. Such a system will include a periodic status report to site management.
11.0 Communicating Results

11.1 To prevent recurring incidents we will take two additional steps: 1. Document findings; and 2. Review the results of the analysis with appropriate personnel. 11.2 Incident documentation will address the following topics: 1. Description of the incident (date, time, location, etc.); 2. Facts determined during the analysis (including chronology as appropriate); 3. Statement of causes; and 4. Recommendations for corrective and preventive action (including who is responsible and correction date).
12.0 Review and approval.

Appropriate operating, maintenance and other personnel will review all incident/accident analysis reports. Personnel at other facilities will also review the report to preclude a similar occurrence of the incident.
Plan reviewed by __________________________________________ Date _______________________ __________________________________________ Date _______________________ __________________________________________ Date _______________________ Plan approved by __________________________________________ Date _______________________
26
Sample Incident/Accident Analysis Team Kit

Essential 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Helpful 1. Accident investigators checklist. 2. Magnifying Glass. 3. Sturdy gloves. 4. High visibility plastic tapes to mark off area. 5. First aid kit. 6. Cassette recorder and spare cassette tapes. 7. Identification tags. 8. Scotch tape. 9. Masking tape. 10. Specimen containers. 11. Compass. 12. Ten 4-inch spikes. 13. Hammer. 14. Paint stick (yellow/black). 15. Chalk (yellow/white) 16. Protractor. 17. Video camera with tape. 18. Investigators template. (Traffic Institute, PO Box 1409, Evanston IL 60204, Stock # 1000) 19. Tarp Camera, film, flash, fresh batteries. Tape measure - preferably 100 foot. Clipboard and writing pad. Graph paper. Straight-edge ruler. Can be used as a scale reference in Photos. Pens, pencils. Accident investigation forms. Flashlight, fresh batteries.
27
SKETCHING TECHNIQUES
1. Make sketches large; preferably 8" x 10". 2. Makes sketches clear. Include information pertinent to the investigation. 3. Include measurements. 4. Print legibly. All printing should be on the same plane. 5. Indicate directions, i.e. N,E,S,W. 6. Always tie measurements to a permanent point, e.g. telephone pole, building. 7. Use sketches when interviewing people. You can mark where they were standing. Also, it can be used to pinpoint where photos were taken.
28
FORMS OF ENERGY THAT DESCRIBE THE DIRECT CAUSE OF INJURY

1. MECHANICAL ENERGY - components that cut, crush, bend, shear, pinch, wrap, pull, and puncture as a result of rotating, transverse, or reciprocating motion. 2. ELECTRICAL ENERGY - low voltage electrical hazards (below 440 volts) and high voltage electrical hazards (above 440 volts). 3. CHEMICAL ENERGY - corrosive, toxic, flammable, or reactive (involving a release of energy ranging from "not violent" to "explosive" and "capable of detonation"). Toxics include poisonous plants, dangerous animals, biting insects and disease carrying bacteria, etc. 4. KINETIC (IMPACT) ENERGY - collision of objects in relative motion to each other including impact of a moving object against a stationary object, falling objects, flying objects, and flying particles. 5. POTENTIAL (STORED) ENERGY - sudden unexpected movement due to gravity, pressure, tension, or compression. 6. THERMAL ENERGY - extreme or excessive heat, extreme cold, sources of flame ignition, flame propagation, and heat related explosions. 7. ACOUSTIC ENERGY - excessive noise and vibration. 8. RADIANT ENERGY - relatively short wavelength energy forms within the electromagnetic spectrum including the potentially harmful characteristics of radar, infra-red, visible, microwave, ultra-violet, x-ray, and ionizing radiation. 9. ATMOSPHERIC/GEOLOGICAL/ OCEANOGRAPHIC ENERGY - atmospheric weather circumstances such as wind and storm conditions, geological structure characteristics such as underground pressure or the instability of the earth's surface, and oceanographic currents, wave action, etc.
Adapted from: Nelson & Associates, 3131 E. 29th Street, Suite E , Bryan, Texas 77802, Tel 409/774-7755, Fax 409/7740559 -- www.hazardcontrol.com Copyright 1997
29
ACCIDENT TYPES
STRUCK-BY. A person is forcefully struck by an object. The force of contact is provided by the object. Example -- a pedestrian is truck by a moving vehicle.
STRUCK-AGAINST. A person forcefully strikes an object. The person provides the force. Example -- a person strikes a leg on a protruding beam.
CONTACT-BY. Contact by a substance or material that by its very nature is harmful and causes injury. Example -- a person is contacted by steam escaping from a pipe.
CONTACT-WITH. A person comes in contact with a harmful material. The person initiates the contact. Example -- a person touches the hot surface of a boiler.
CAUGHT-ON. A person or part of his/her clothing or equipment is caught on an object that is either moving or stationary. This may cause the person to lose his/her balance and fall, be pulled into a machine, or suffer some other harm. Example -a person snags a sleeve on the end of a hand rail.
CAUGHT-IN. A person or part of him/her is trapped, stuck, or otherwise caught in an opening or enclosure. Example -- a persons foot is caught in a hole in the floor.
CAUGHT-BETWEEN. A person is crushed, pinched or otherwise caught between either a moving object and stationary object or between two moving objects. Example -- a persons finger is caught between a door and its casing.
FALL TO SURFACE. A person slips or trips and falls to the surface he/she is standing or walking on. Example -- a person trips on debris in the walkway and falls.
FALL-TO-BELOW. A person slips or trips and falls to a surface level below the one he/she was walking or standing on. Example -- a person trips on a stairway and falls to the floor below.
EXERTION. Someone over-exerts or strains him or herself while doing a job. Examples -- a person lifts a heavy object; repeatedly flexes the wrist to move materials, and; a person twists the torso to place materials on a table. Interaction with objects, materials, etc., is involved.
BODILY REACTION. Caused solely from stress imposed by free movement of the body or assumption of a strained or unnatural body position. A leading source of injury. Example - a person bends or twists to reach a valve and strains back.
EXPOSURE. Over a period of time, someone is exposed to harmful conditions. Example -- a person is exposed to levels of noise in excess of 90 dba for 8 hours.
30
CONTROLLING HAZARDS
Engineering Controls Hazard + Exposure = Accident
Engineering controls consist of substitution, isolation, ventilation, and equipment modification. These controls focus on the source of the hazard, unlike other types of controls that generally focus on the employee exposed to the hazard. The basic concept behind engineering controls is that, to the extent feasible, the work environment and the job itself should be designed to eliminate hazards or reduce exposure to hazards. Engineering controls are based on the following broad principles:
1. If feasible, design the facility, equipment, or process to remove the hazard and/or substitute something that is not hazardous or is less hazardous. Redesigning, changing, or substituting equipment to remove the source of excessive temperatures, noise, or pressure; Redesigning a process to use less toxic chemicals; Redesigning a work station to relieve physical stress and remove ergonomic hazards; or Designing general ventilation with sufficient fresh outdoor air to improve indoor air quality and generally to provide a safe, healthful atmosphere.
2. If removal is not feasible, enclose the hazard to prevent exposure in normal operations. Complete enclosure of moving parts of machinery; Complete containment of toxic liquids or gases; Glove box operations to enclose work with dangerous microorganisms, radioisotopes, or toxic substances; and Complete containment of noise, heat, or pressure-producing processes.
3. Where complete enclosure is not feasible, establish barriers or local ventilation to reduce exposure to the hazard in normal operations. Examples include: Ventilation hoods in laboratory work; Machine guarding, including electronic barriers; Isolation of a process in an area away from workers, except for maintenance work; Baffles used as noise-absorbing barriers; and
31
Management Controls Hazard + Exposure = Accident

Any procedure which significantly limits daily exposure by control or manipulation of the work schedule or manner in which work is performed is considered a means of management control. Management controls may result in a reduction of exposure through such methods as changing work habits, improving sanitation and hygiene practices, or making other changes in the way the employee performs the job. The use of personal protective equipment is not considered a means of management control.
1. Some of these general practices are very general in their applicability. They include housekeeping activities such as: Removal of tripping, blocking, and slipping hazards; Removal of accumulated toxic dust on surfaces; and Wetting down surfaces to keep toxic dust out of the air. 2. Other safe work practices apply to specific jobs in the workplace and involve specific procedures for accomplishing a job. To develop these procedures, you conduct a job hazard analysis. 3. Measures aimed at reducing employee exposure to hazard by changing work schedules. Such measures include: Lengthened rest breaks, Additional relief workers, Exercise breaks to vary body motions, and Rotation of workers through different jobs
Why are engineering controls considered superior to management controls?

________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________
32
Personal Protective Equipment (PPE)
Hazard + Exposure = Accident
When exposure to hazards cannot be engineered completely out of normal operations or maintenance work, and when safe work practices and administrative controls cannot provide sufficient additional protection from exposure, personal protective clothing and/or equipment may be required. PPE includes such items as: Face shields Knee guards Respirators Steel-toed shoes Safety glasses Leather aprons Ear muffs Mesh gloves Safety goggles Hard hats Life jackets Harness
Interim Measures
When a hazard is recognized, the preferred correction or control cannot always be accomplished immediately. However, in virtually all situations, interim measures can be taken to eliminate or reduce worker risk. These can range from taping down wires that pose a tripping hazard to actually shutting down an operation temporarily. The importance of taking these interim protective actions cannot be overemphasized. There is no way to predict when a hazard will cause serious harm, and no justification to continue exposing workers unnecessarily to risk.
What might be some of the drawbacks of reliance solely on PPE to protect workers?
________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________ ________________________________________________________________________________________
33
In Compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA), this publication is available in alternative formats by calling the Oregon OSHA Public Relations Manager at (503) 378-3272 (V/TTY)

Accident Investigation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Accident Investigation

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Accident Investigation

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Oregon OSHA

Oregon OSHA Public Education Mission:

This material is for training use only

Form investigation teams

This material is for training use only

This material is for training use only

The six-step process