Testimony On The 2013 Long-Term Budget Outlook
Testimony On The 2013 Long-Term Budget Outlook
Testimony On The 2013 Long-Term Budget Outlook
Douglas W. Elmendorf Director Before the Committee on the Budget U.S. House of Representatives September 26, 2013
This document is embargoed until it is delivered at 10:00 a.m. (EDT) on Thursday, September 26, 2013. The contents may not be published, transmitted, or otherwise communicated by any print, broadcast, or electronic media before that time.
Chairman Ryan, Congressman Van Hollen, and Members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me to testify on the Congressional Budget Offices (CBOs) most recent analysis of the long-term outlook for the budget and the economy. My statement summarizes the report The 2013 Long-Term Budget Outlook, which CBO released last week. Between 2009 and 2012, the federal government recorded the largest budget deficits relative to the size of the economy since 1946, causing federal debt to soar. Federal debt held by the public is now about 73 percent of the economys annual output, or gross domestic product (GDP). That percentage is higher than at any point in U.S. history except a brief period around World War II, and it is twice the percentage at the end of 2007. If current laws generally remained in place, federal debt held by the public would decline slightly relative to GDP over the next several years, CBO projects. After that, however, growing deficits would ultimately push debt back above its current high level. CBO projects that federal debt held by the public would reach 100 percent of GDP in 2038, 25 years from now, even without accounting for the harmful effects that growing debt would have on the economy (see Figure 1). Moreover, debt would be on an upward path relative to the size of the economy, a trend that could not be sustained indefinitely.
low levels, sharply raising the governments cost of borrowing. In addition, the pressures of an aging population, rising health care costs, and an expansion of federal subsidies for health insurance would cause spending for some of the largest federal programs to increase relative to GDP. By 2023, CBO projects, the budget deficit would grow to almost 3 percent of GDP under current law, and federal debt held by the public would equal 71 percent of GDP and would be on an upward trajectory.
CBO
SEPTEMBER 2013
Figure 1.
120
80
80
40
40
0 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 Total Spending and Revenues 30
Actual Spending Projected
30
20
20
Revenues
10
10
0 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038 Components of Total Spending 16
Other Noninterest Spending Actual Projected Federal Spending on a Major Health Care Programs
16 12
12
8
Social Security
4
Net Interest
0 0 2000 2002 2004 2006 2008 2010 2012 2014 2016 2018 2020 2022 2024 2026 2028 2030 2032 2034 2036 2038
Source: Congressional Budget Office. Notes: The extended baseline generally adheres closely to current law, following CBOs 10-year baseline budget projections through 2023 and then extending the baseline concept for the rest of the long-term projection period. These projections do not reflect the economic effects of the policies underlying the extended baseline. These data reflect recent revisions by the Bureau of Economic Analysis to estimates of GDP in past years and CBOs extrapolation of those revisions to projected future GDP . a. Spending on Medicare (net of offsetting receipts), Medicaid, the Childrens Health Insurance Program, and subsidies offered through new health insurance exchanges.
CBO
TESTIMONY
The federal governments net interest payments would grow to 5 percent of GDP, compared with an average of 2 percent over the past 40 years, mainly because federal debt would be much larger.
government to borrow money. Moreover, even before that point was reached, the high and rising amount of debt that CBO projects under the extended baseline would have significant negative consequences for both the economy and the federal budget:
Increased borrowing by the federal government would eventually reduce private investment in productive capital, because the portion of total savings used to buy government securities would not be available to finance private investment. The result would be a smaller stock of capital and lower output and income in the long run than would otherwise be the case. Despite those reductions, however, the continued growth of productivity would make real (inflationadjusted) output and income per person higher in the future than they are now. Federal spending on interest payments would rise, thus requiring larger changes in tax and spending policies to achieve any chosen targets for budget deficits and debt. The government would have less flexibility to use tax and spending policies to respond to unexpected challenges, such as economic downturns or wars. The risk of a fiscal crisisin which investors demanded very high interest rates to finance the governments borrowing needswould increase.
Federal revenues would equal 19 percent of GDP by 2038 under current law, CBO projects, compared with an average of 17 percent over the past four decades. Revenues are projected to rise from 15 percent of GDP last year to 17 percent in 2014, spurred by the ongoing economic recovery and changes in provisions of tax law (including the expiration of lower income tax rates for high-income people, the expiration of a temporary cut in the Social Security payroll tax, and the imposition of new taxes). After 2014, revenues would increase gradually relative to GDP, largely because growth in income beyond that attributable to inflation would push taxpayers into higher income tax brackets over time. The gap between federal spending and revenues would widen steadily after 2015 under the assumptions of the extended baseline, CBO projects. By 2038, the deficit would be 6 percent of GDP, larger than in any year between 1947 and 2008, and federal debt held by the public would reach 100 percent of GDP, more than in any year except 1945 and 1946. With such large deficits, federal debt would be growing faster than GDP, a path that would ultimately be unsustainable. Incorporating the economic effects of the federal policies that underlie the extended baseline worsens the long-term budget outlook. The increase in debt relative to the size of the economy, combined with an increase in marginal tax rates (the rates that would apply to an additional dollar of income), would reduce output and raise interest rates relative to the benchmark economic projections that CBO used in producing the extended baseline. Those economic differences would lead to lower federal revenues and higher interest payments. With those effects included, debt under the extended baseline would rise to 108 percent of GDP in 2038.
CBO
SEPTEMBER 2013
of current law that might be difficult to sustain for a long period would be modified. With those changes to current law, deficits (excluding the governments interest costs) would be a total of about $2 trillion higher over the next decade than in CBOs baseline; in subsequent years, such deficits would exceed those projected in the extended baseline by rapidly growing amounts. The harmful effects on the economy from the resulting increase in federal debt would be partly offset by lower marginal tax rates. Nevertheless, in the long run, output would be lower and interest rates would be higher under that set of policies than under the extended baseline. With those economic changes incorporated, federal debt held by the public would reach about 190 percent of GDP by 2038, CBO projects. In a different illustrative scenario, deficit reduction would be phased in such that deficits excluding interest costs would be a total of $2 trillion lower through 2023 than in the baseline, and the reduction in the deficit as a percentage of GDP in 2023 would be continued in later years. In that case, output would be higher and interest rates would be lower over the long run than in the extended baseline. Factoring in the effects of those economic changes on the budget, CBO projects that federal debt held by the public would be 67 percent of GDP in 2038, close to its percentage in 2012. Under a third scenario, with twice as much deficit reductiona $4 trillion reduction in deficits excluding interest costs through 2023CBO projects that federal debt held by the public would fall to 31 percent of GDP by 2038, slightly below its percentage of GDP in 2007 (35 percent) and its average percentage over the past 40 years (38 percent). Those different scenarios for fiscal policy would also have different effects on the economy in the short term. During the next several yearswhen the nations economic output will probably remain below its potential, or maximum sustainable, levelthe spending increases and tax reductions in the alternative fiscal scenario (relative to what would happen under current law) would increase the demand for goods and services and thereby raise output and employment. The reductions in deficits under the other illustrative scenarios, by contrast, would decrease the demand for goods and services and thereby reduce output and employment.
CBO
TESTIMONY
federal debt is already unusually high relative to GDP, further increases in debt could be especially harmful. To put the federal budget on a sustainable path for the long term, lawmakers would have to make significant changes to tax and spending policiesletting revenues rise more than they would under current law, reducing spending for large benefit programs below the projected levels, or adopting some combination of those approaches. The size of such changes would depend on the amount of federal debt that lawmakers considered appropriate. For example, bringing debt back down to 39 percent of GDP in 2038as it was at the end of 2008would require a combination of increases in revenues and cuts in noninterest spending (relative to current law) totaling 2 percent of GDP for the next 25 years. (In 2014, 2 percent of GDP would equal about $350 billion.) If those changes came entirely from revenues, they would represent an increase of 11 percent relative to the amount of revenues projected for the 20142038 period; if the changes came entirely from spending, they would represent a cut of 10 percent in noninterest spending from the amount projected for that period. In deciding how quickly to carry out policy changes to make the size of the federal debt more sustainable, lawmakers face other trade-offs. On the one hand, waiting to cut federal spending or raise taxes would lead to a greater accumulation of debt and would increase the size of the policy adjustments needed to put the budget on a
sustainable course. On the other hand, implementing spending cuts or tax increases quickly would weaken the economys current expansion and would give people little time to plan for and adjust to the policy changes. The negative short-term effects that deficit reduction has on output and employment would be especially large now, because output is so far below its potential level that the Federal Reserve is keeping short-term interest rates near zero and could not lower those rates further to offset the impact of changes in spending and tax policies.
This testimony reiterates the summary of The 2013 Long-Term Budget Outlook, which is one in a series of reports on the state of the budget and the economy that CBO issues each year. Prepared under the supervision of Joyce Manchester, the report represents the work of many people at CBO. In accordance with CBOs mandate to provide objective, impartial analysis, neither the report nor this testimony makes recommendations. Both are available on CBOs website, at www.cbo.gov/publication/44521 and www.cbo.gov/ publication/44602, respectively.
CBO