Classification of The Means
Classification of The Means
Classification of The Means
This Article has been reproduced with the permission of James Smith
In regards to strength training for sport; many comparisons and arguments have been
initiated in reference to the Olympic weight lifts and their derivatives and the power lifts
and their derivatives. Such debates are futile and often commenced by individuals who
lack a fundamental understanding of the transference of various types of exercise to
sports form.
First, all means (exercises) must be classified as general, general specific, or specific.
General means qualify as those which do not directly assist in perfecting or developing
sport skill; but rather, serve to develop general physical qualities such as general work
capacity, muscle cross-section, increased bone density, connective tissue strength,
flexibility/mobility, etc.
General Specific means qualify as those which match the energy system demands (speed
of muscle contraction, duration of effort, etc) of the sport skill and some or all of the
active musculature yet do not match the amplitude and direction of the sport skill.
Specific means qualify as those which exactly match the amplitude and direction of the
sport skill and, correspondingly, develop the special work capacity and have a direct
effect on the development of sport skill.
Following are some examples of various means and their classification relative to
different sporting disciplines:
• General- Olympic lifts, power lifts, any other lift performed with barbells,
dumbbells, kettlebells , etc
• General Specific- pushing a weighted implement (e.g. sled, tire, special training
apparatus, etc), performing intermittent contact/hitting drills, game simulation
wearing a weighted vest, etc for 4-10 second repetitions
• Specific- one on one contests against an opponent for 4-10 second repetitions
• General- Olympic lifts, power lifts, any other lift performed with barbells,
dumbbells, kettle bells, etc
• General Specific- double/single leg bounds, jumps, landings, depth jumps,
alternating bounds, sprints wearing a weighted belt or vest, sprints up a mild
grade, etc
• Specific- variable intensity sprints over different distances
• General- Power lifts, Olympic lifts, any other lift performed with barbells,
dumbbells, kettle bells, etc
• General Specific- any bounds, jumps, weighted jumps, depth jumps, etc other
then the competition exercise
• Specific- high jumps over various heights
Olympic Weightlifting
Powerlifting
In reference to the material listed above, one may conclude that the sport skill must
determine the classification of the means. Consequently, a general means for one sport
discipline may qualify as a general specific or specific means for another sport discipline.
Any arguments initiated over general means must, correspondingly, be initiated solely by
those individuals who have a grossly insufficient understanding of the training process; as
general means have little effect on the perfection of sport skill.
This fact is demonstrated in the physical preparation of American football players in the
National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA). Various Division 1 teams which have
a history of winning/competing in national championships (for their respective divisions)
all utilize widely varying means and methods of strength training in their weight rooms.
These same organizations; however, all have excellent recruiting capabilities and top
level coaching. Consequently, the process of deduction allows any intelligent individual
to realize that what is done in the weight room, no matter how optimal, orthopedically
sound, or absurd, has very little correlation with the success of the football teams who
have the luxury of being populated by the most gifted athletes and coaches. Here we see
the glaring lack of impact which General means have on the highly qualified athlete’s
perfection of sport skill.
A careful analysis of the physiology, biomechanics, etc of sport skill allows the coach to
understand what classifications of training means to employ at what volume/intensity
throughout the training year. Former Soviet and Eastern Bloc scientists, coaches, and
athletes have, for years, (at the Olympic level) demonstrated the significance of
programming various means and methods, ranging in transference to sports form,
throughout the yearly cycle.
Important to note is that spring ball is not accounted for in the loading of Table 1. If
spring ball were to be accounted for one would observe a spike in S means, up to
concentrated loading, midway through the sequence of training blocks followed by a
decay back down to an ancillary status until pre-comp.
To put this into a more meaningful context with respect to the sport (American Football);
we see that weight training initiates the off-season training at a concentrated capacity and
sequentially comprises less of the volume/intensity of the training load as the comp
season approaches. During the actual comp season the weight work does not comprise
any significant volume (relatively speaking) of the training load intensity; as the primary
function of the weight training during comp phase is to maintain the contractile strength
of muscle tissue developed in the prior training blocks. During the comp phase weight
training will also play a key role in prehabilitation and rehabilitation protocols. The GS
means serve a vital function for bridging the gap between G and S and are extremely
effective for developing the motor functions inherent to sport form. The ‘general’ aspect
of the GS means, however, introduce motor patterns distant enough from sport form so as
to avoid overuse injury which would be likely to occur as a result of cumulative/repetitive
stress effect if S was emphasized year round. As comp phase enters; however, the
training load volume of GS means are reduced, along with G means, as the S means
comprise the vast majority of the training load intensity.
In order to provide any useful insights we must introduce meaningful and specific
context. Accordingly, it is important to note that the Table 1 merely outlines one
particular plan for the acyclic sport discipline of American Football and that the planning
for one sport discipline must not be considered a universal template for other sport
disciplines; specifically when considering acyclic and cyclic activities.
The classification of the means is inherent to optimal programming and the regulation of
the intensive components of the training load. Debating over General means, this lift or
that lift is an elementary undertaking which serves no useful purpose in the training of
any athlete.
The training process is an organic whole. General, General Specific, and Specific means
must be accounted for in the overall plan regardless of which coaches regulate which
regimes of work. As a result, the athletes will be optimally primed for, and throughout,
the competitive phase.