Audit Sheet 1s

JISHU HOZEN AUDIT SHEET
'1 S' SEIRI: SORTING / SEGREGATION & REMOVAL DEPARTMENT:

AUDIT BY:
QUALIFYING SCORE
AREA:
CIRCLE NAME:
DEPARTMENT HEAD 85
CIRCLE LEADER:
TOP MANAGEMENT 80
SELF AUDIT [LEADER/OFFICER] 90
AUDIT DATE: MARKS SCORED PASS (YES/ NO) AUDITOR'S NAME & SIGNATURE
FULL MARKS
SCORE
BAD POOR FAIR GOOD EXCELL ENT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
TPM Circle's working and walking areas are clearly defined. No overlapping is there. Nothing is kept/ thrown in walking area No oil, coolant, chips, cotton waste, tag, components, wheels, trash, muck are kept/ thrown/ leakage directly on floor. No materials (Good, Rework & Scrap), accessories, spares, tools & fixtures, trays, prong standsare kept/ thrown directly on floor. No 'unneccessary' things (means not required or required at very less frequency*in that area) are kept/ thrown in that area (i.e. everything is sorted out on need base and then kept there on the stand) Sorting/ Segregation of material is done and only necessary materials are kept there (i.e. Good, Rework & Scrap materials are kept separately, No chance of mixup, Only one/ running symbol material is kept there). I) No unnecessary things kept/ thrown/ left on the machines (Dust, used wheels etc.) II) No obsolete & dirty papers on Display Boards
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Walking & a) 1 working area segregation b)
10 10
a) 2 Nothing on floor b)
10
10
a)
10
Sorting/ Segregation 3 and removal of unnecessary b) things
10
5 5
c)
FULL MARKS
SCORE
BAD POOR FAIR GOOD EXCELL ENT
ITEM
DESCRIPTION
The concept of 2S is understood & action Plan for Fixed location, one a) touch pickup & mistake proofing and demarcation of different areas, is made. a) Is the concept of 1S well understood by the members and responsibility defined
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
Concept & Action Plan for 1S
10
Circle 5 members b) Are all the circle members involvement involved and participating in the activity in their area. ITEM NO FULL MARKS CIRCLE SCORE
10
10
1 20
2 20
3 30
4 10
5 20
SCORE SHEET
HOW TO EVALUATE MARKS => ITEM 1 Shopfloor TO 4 EVALUATION LEVEL ITEM 5 Circle
BAD POOR FAIR GOOD
0.2
Hardly anything done
0.4
0.6
0.8
Visible/ Areas Most of the Major Maintained points are points only well maintained well All members Only Members Most of the are not Leader is are doing jobs are showing doing the easiest performed by interest portions members only
ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS:
RCLE LEADER:
TOP MANAGEMENT 80
REMARKS
REMARKS
TOTAL 100
EXCELLENT
1
Satisfactory progress and countermeas ure taken All members responsibilit y is clearly defined & strictly followed
Step 5 Diagnosis Sheet 7 2 9 - 12 Subsection Section TPM Autonomous Maintenance Step 5 Diagnosis date: __/__/__ Total points Pass 80 Department Autonomous Inspection Diagnosis Sheet Diagnosed by __/100 points Try again Target equipment: Diagnosis points Evaluation points (c)Are proper accuracy checks of equipment and tools for checking processes being carried out? 4 Well defined 3 Defined 2 Passably 1 Not defined (Comments) /12 Diagnosis points Evaluation points Are inspections being carried out in accordance with inspection standards, and are records being kept? 4 Thorough inspection and record keeping 3 Inspections and record keeping are being performed for the most part 2 Could do better 1 No record keeping Implementation status of inspections Are improvements being made for problem points identified as a result of inspections? 4 Thoroughly improved 3 Improved for the most part 2 Could do better 1 No im-provement
Are areas of deterioration being reliably identified and handled as a result of inspection cleaning? 4 Reliably identified 3 Identified for the most part 2 Could do better 1 Not yet started (Comments) /12 Diagnosis points Evaluation points Skill of inspection To devise means for raising the level of inspection skills, (a)Are the weak points of inspection skills understood? 4 Well understood 3 Understood for the most part 2 Understood vaguely 1 Not understood (b)Are there plans for that training and education? 4 Plans are clear 3 Drafting of plans in progress 2 Drafting of plans scheduled 1 Not yet started (Comments) /8 Diagnosis points Evaluation points Are the number of meetings, time and level of participation in TPM group activities satisfactory? 4 Satisfactory 3 Normal

Audit Sheet 1s

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Audit Sheet 1s

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Audit Sheet 1s

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

JISHU HOZEN AUDIT SHEET

'1 S' SEIRI: SORTING / SEGREGATION & REMOVAL DEPARTMENT:

SELF AUDIT [LEADER/OFFICER] 90

Walking & a) 1 working area segregation b)

Sorting/ Segregation 3 and removal of unnecessary b) things

Concept & Action Plan for 1S

ADDITIONAL COMMENTS / SUGGESTIONS:

You might also like